On Mit, 20 Sep 2006, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Yes, this is true, it seems to be like this. BUT: Why is the snippet at all
> > included in the fmtutil.cnf file??? The new update-* code ??? added (who
> > was it?) should make sure that the snippets with a .dpkg-new file are *not*
> > included.
>
Hi all!
On Don, 21 Sep 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> the case that tetex-base.postinst does not call update-fmtutil before
> caling fmtutil-sys, which is probably wrong.
Good. So I hold my interpretation that the missing call created the
problem. Calling update-fmtutil would have recreated a fmtuti
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 23:46 +0400, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Looks like the 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-new is there because jadetex cannot jet
> >be configured and so the old version of the config file is still used.
>
> Yes,
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:46:33PM +0400, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I cannot actually check something since I am in Georgia and far away from any
> of my computers, kut I have some questions/comments:
>
> . Original Message ...
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 "Frans Pop
Hi all!
I cannot actually check something since I am in Georgia and far away from any
of my computers, kut I have some questions/comments:
. Original Message ...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Looks like the 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-new is there bec
hey ralf,
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 11:56 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> However, Frans and Sean, please answer these questions:
>
> > The other errors just seems to be subsequent.
> > 1. Which version of jadetex package do you use?
> > 2. What gives you "ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d"?
> > 3. Please send u
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:56:05AM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> >
> > Relevant log message seems to be:
> >
> > (/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
> > ! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
> > l.78
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:00, you wrote:
> 1. Which version of jadetex package do you use?
iU jadetex 3.13-7
Previously installed version is: 3.13-6
> 2. What gives you "ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d"?
$ ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d
total 28
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1364 Oct 31 2005 00tex.c
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>
> Relevant log message seems to be:
>
> (/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
> ! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
> l.78 ... using an initex with no format preloaded}
This happens after fmtutil ca
Hi
I experience the same problem on amd64. To answer your question:
> The other errors just seems to be subsequent.
> 1. Which version of jadetex package do you use?
iU jadetex3.13-7
> 2. What gives you "ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d"?
# ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d
i
On 19.09.06 Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> I'm seeing the same errors on my sparc64 (log file looks the same
> too).
>
Relevant log message seems to be:
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
l.78 ... using an
I'm seeing the same errors on my sparc64 (log file looks the same too).
Cheers,
FJP
pgptNFeTOYX2A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
