Hi all! I cannot actually check something since I am in Georgia and far away from any of my computers, kut I have some questions/comments:
..... Original Message ....... On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Looks like the 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-new is there because jadetex cannot jet >be configured and so the old version of the config file is still used. Yes, this is true, it seems to be like this. BUT: Why is the snippet at all included in the fmtutil.cnf file??? The new update-* code ??? added (who was it?) should make sure that the snippets with a .dpkg-new file are *not* included. So could it be that tetex-* doesnt call update-fmtutil at the beginning of the postinst script? this would explain why this happened, at least this is my semi-qualified opinion from the crystal-ball ... Bye bye, I am back on Monday for checking stuff. Ahh yes Ralf: I assume that the original bug report did go to the maintainer. What I dont understand is why the NMU is numbered -7? Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di Siena Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
