Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-09-04 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 04:57:54PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.04.1622 +0200]: > > It already does that, it first tries the proc interface, then the socket. > > The > > problem is that afaik /var/run might be empty on boot, so checking for

Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-09-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.04.1622 +0200]: > It already does that, it first tries the proc interface, then the socket. The > problem is that afaik /var/run might be empty on boot, so checking for > /var/run/acpid.socket then doesn't really help. It should first try the

Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-09-04 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
Am Montag 04 September 2006 15:36 schrieb Sjoerd Simons: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:54:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > It's clear that hald has the means to work whether acpid is started in > > advance or not, but that acpid has no such mechanism to cope with hald > > blocking its access to

Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-09-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.04.1536 +0200]: > I don't want hal depending on acpid. I will patch the hal acpi addon to not > directly use the proc interface iff /usr/sbin/acpid exists. Doesn't acpid provide access to the data through /var/run/acpid.socket ? I'd say hal s

Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-09-04 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 04:07:59PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.04.1536 +0200]: > > I don't want hal depending on acpid. I will patch the hal acpi addon to not > > directly use the proc interface iff /usr/sbin/acpid exists. > > Doesn't acpi

Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-09-04 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:54:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > It's clear that hald has the means to work whether acpid is started in > advance or not, but that acpid has no such mechanism to cope with hald > blocking its access to /proc/acpi/event. Nor should it, AFAICT. > > If we want reliab

Processed: Re: Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 380520 hal,acpid Bug#380520: acpid and hald conflict Bug reassigned from package `acpid' to `hal,acpid'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-08-22 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 380520 hal,acpid quit On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:51:14PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > reassign 380520 acpid > thanks > >But hald is started by udev, so it's hard to control that order sensibly. > ^^ dbus > It's not so hard. By default it wor

Bug#380520: Reassign

2006-08-22 Thread Filipus Klutiero
reassign 380520 acpid thanks But hald is started by udev, so it's hard to control that order sensibly. ^^ dbus It's not so hard. By default it works fine after reboot. This means that *hal* is breaking *acpid*, not vice versa. Right, so acpid is "b

Bug#380520: Reassign this to hald

2006-08-22 Thread Nathanael Nerode
reassign 380520 hald thanks I believe that acpid has the prior claim on /proc/acpi/events. Furthermore, if acpid starts first, hald runs. But if hald starts first, acpid doesn't run. This means that *hal* is breaking *acpid*, not vice versa. So, hal's bug. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTEC