On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 07:25:47PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> So this is not a bug, but a local misconfiguration. In order to fix
> your system, I think the best way is to do the following:
>
> - copy /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf to a safe place
>
> - Add a file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/99local.cnf which
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So this is not a bug, but a local misconfiguration. In order to fix
> your system, I think the best way is to do the following:
Did that work, and do you agree that we can close the bug?
On the other hand, we (the maintainer team) should collect all tho
Sebastien Helleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % kpsewhich --show-path map
> .:/root/texmf/fontname:/usr/local/share/texmf/fontname:/usr/local/lib/texmf/fontname:!!/var/lib/texmf/fontname:!!/var/lib/texmf/fontname:!!/usr/share/texmf/fontname
This is bad, (Ralf, you were right), and this
> % grep
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:14:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> The answer to the first question - why is the wrong file found - is
> unclear to me. Sebastien, what is the output of the following commands:
>
> kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map
> kpsewhere --format=map dvips35.map
> kpsewhere
Sebastien Helleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
>>
>> # mv 00updmap.cfg.dpkg-dist 00updmap.cfg
>> # mv 20tetex-extra.cfg.dpkg-new 20tetex-extra.cfg
>> # dpkg --configure -a
>>
>> --
>> Florent
>
> Done, still same prob
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
>
> Ah, that can probably explain everything. You probably didn't accept the
> updates for 00updmap.cfg and 20tetex-extra.cfg (the former with ucf, I
> think; the latter is a conffile). Please:
>
> 1. Backup your old files if you cu
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> used. This could cause a wrong search path for mapfiles. What I am
> wondering is why this problem didn't occur during the original 2.0.2 ->
> 3.0 update. Also, why are dvips35.map and pdftex35.map still available
> in /etx/texmf/dvips? I thought these fil
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 14:17 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Good. Presumably, the problem was located (only) in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/
> as suspected by Ralf.
Actually, I suspect that there is a similar situation in
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/, ie, some configuration files from teTeX 2 are still
used. This
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:45 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
>
> I think from 3.0-10.
Where there any problems with version 3.0-10?
> > What is
> > the output of 'ls /e
Sebastien Helleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ ls -l /usr/share/texmf/dvips/
> total 52
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 antp
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 antt
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-23 02:13 base
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 bl
Sebastien Helleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
>
> I think from 3.0-10.
You can confirm by looking at /var/log/dpkg.log.
>> Interesting, current tetex has 'true' for the last two options. What is
>> the output of 'ls /etc/texmf/updmap.d/'
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:37:13PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sebastien Helleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Output of apt:
> >
> > Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ...
>
> What does 'dpkg -l tetex-base' say?
>
> > Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ...
>
> [...]
>
> >
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:33 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
> > Package: tetex-bin
> > Version: 3.0-10.1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
I
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:33 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-10.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
> download standard fonts (dvips): `false'
> download standard fonts (pdf
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does 'dpkg -l tetex-base' say?
Well, that one was at the end of the report (if it was done from the
right machine), sorry:
ii tetex-base3.0-10 Basic library files of teTeX
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Hi,
Sebastien Helleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Output of apt:
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ...
What does 'dpkg -l tetex-base' say?
> Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ...
[...]
> !!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been
> changed for this release and the m
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Output of apt:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ...
updmap failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/tetex.u
17 matches
Mail list logo
