On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 01:40:01PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 11, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But ... makedev is Priority: required, even in sid. And Policy says
> > that removing a package marked as required "may cause your system to
> > become totally broken and you
On Jul 11, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But ... makedev is Priority: required, even in sid. And Policy says
> that removing a package marked as required "may cause your system to
> become totally broken and you may not even be able to use dpkg to put
> things back, so only do so if
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:31:04AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 11, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't know why Marco changed the location of MAKEDEV; it was right
> > before:
> Because if makedev is not installed but udev is, /sbin/MAKEDEV will not
> exist. Most other
On Jul 11, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know why Marco changed the location of MAKEDEV; it was right
> before:
Because if makedev is not installed but udev is, /sbin/MAKEDEV will not
exist. Most other packages use /dev/MAKEDEV, but probably ppp is the
only one which pbuilder
# This is actually a bad bug to be reopening, there's two bugs mixed in
# together; the second reporter confused the symptoms.
# However, Matt and Bob are already looking at this bug, so there's some
# benefit.
reopen 325650
reassign 325650 ppp
thanks
Looks like a bug in ppp's postinst to me:
O
5 matches
Mail list logo
