Hey guys,
>> My motivation to work on this package is very limited, maybe we
>> should remove it from the distribution?
> I suspect that would be best. Let's leave this bug open for two
> weeks. If nobody shows up, I'd suggest you request the removal of the
> package.
Well, the bug's been ope
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> I fully agree with you. I suggest to put bsmtpd itself in the
> bitbucket. The code is quite old, hard to read and every time I look
> deeper into it, I find some problems in the code like above.
Ok. I am going to revert to my shell scripts, which
Hi Henrique!
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Package: bsmtpd
> Version: 2.3pl8b-16
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> sbsmtp will gladly ignore any error-exit status codes from UUX, and proceed
> to act as if mail was corretly delivered.
>
Package: bsmtpd
Version: 2.3pl8b-16
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
sbsmtp will gladly ignore any error-exit status codes from UUX, and proceed
to act as if mail was corretly delivered.
If backups are enabled, that means the batch ends up in the bak dir for a
while, if
4 matches
Mail list logo
