Thank you so much for explaining! Going down this path looks like it
involves more work than fixing the real upstream problem. Even a
"solution" to add some ugly patch that hides the problem on armel+armhf
feels attractive now. It feels a bit weird that removing things from
Debian has that prope
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 10:29:47PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Chris Hofstaedtler writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 02:32:20PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >> I am in the process of uploading a new upstream version into unstable
> >> that disables armel+armhf builds.
> >
> > You don't nee
severity -1 important
thanks
Chris Hofstaedtler writes:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 02:32:20PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I am in the process of uploading a new upstream version into unstable
>> that disables armel+armhf builds.
>
> You don't need to explicitly disable the architecutres, if
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 02:32:20PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I am in the process of uploading a new upstream version into unstable
> that disables armel+armhf builds.
You don't need to explicitly disable the architecutres, if your
package won't successfully build on them.
Just have the exist
I am in the process of uploading a new upstream version into unstable
that disables armel+armhf builds.
While the bug has been discussed upstream, I didn't find a proper bug
report, so I filed this one:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15720
If anyone has time to debug or look into a f
Luca Boccassi writes:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:03:22 +1200 Andrew Bartlett
> wrote:
>> Just a warning that trying to brute force a fix for this is likely to
>> end badly. A lot of developer time was spent to get to this current
>> delicate situation, which relied on the narrow behaviour that is
Just a warning that trying to brute force a fix for this is likely to
end badly. A lot of developer time was spent to get to this current
delicate situation, which relied on the narrow behaviour that is now
eliminated by the Debian time_t 64 transition rules.
Socket-wrapper starts with:
/*
* M
7 matches
Mail list logo
