Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-04-14 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Chris, It's a bit moot as the bug is already solved On 13-04-2025 23:06, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > I think you are implying a finer detail that is lost on me. Let me try again. The other bug is about valgrind Recommends a package that doesn't exist. That's clearly RC, it can be fixed

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-04-13 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Hi Paul, * Paul Gevers [250413 20:25]: On 13-04-2025 11:23, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Do you agree with the submitter of this bug that the lack of debug symbols available via Recommends is a release critical bug? I'm not an experienced valgrind user, but with my Release Team member hat on, thi

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-04-13 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi zeha, On 13-04-2025 11:23, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Do you agree with the submitter of this bug that the lack of debug symbols available via Recommends is a release critical bug? I'm not an experienced valgrind user, but with my Release Team member hat on, this looks a bit exaggerated. (I

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-04-13 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 at 11:23, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 07:21:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > On Wed, 06 Dec 2023 02:05:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > For the usual case where debug symbols are only used > > > when debugging in a debugger this is no problem, > >

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-04-13 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 07:21:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On Wed, 06 Dec 2023 02:05:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > For the usual case where debug symbols are only used > > when debugging in a debugger this is no problem, > > but valgrind-dbg is (like libc6-dbg) an exception: > > > > Package

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-04-10 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - Please beware a possible naming confusion: "valgrind-gdb" vs "valgrind-dbg". The former is a relatively recently added subpackage for gdb interfacing support, and has nothing to do with valgrind's own debuginfo. - FChE

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-04-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear maintainer, On Wed, 06 Dec 2023 02:05:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: For the usual case where debug symbols are only used when debugging in a debugger this is no problem, but valgrind-dbg is (like libc6-dbg) an exception: Package: valgrind Recommends: valgrind-dbg, gdb https://sources.debia

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-02-11 Thread Antoine
Hi, On 2/11/25 12:41, Vincent Lefevre wrote: I'm also wondering about the current status of this bug. After more than one year, there haven't been any comments. Sorry for not being of great help on this, but just for information, it has been also one year since I'm holding it's upgrade: ##

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-02-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, On 2023-12-06 02:05:07 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: valgrind > Version: 1:3.20.0-1 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-Cc: Adam Borowski > > -dbgsym packages are not part of the normal archive, > and they can therefore not be expected to be pulled in > by normal dependencies. > > For th

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2023-12-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: valgrind Version: 1:3.20.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: Adam Borowski -dbgsym packages are not part of the normal archive, and they can therefore not be expected to be pulled in by normal dependencies. For the usual case where debug symbols are only used when debugging in a debugge