On 8/13/22 13:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
The drawback of this solution is that we will not get any warning for
new *potentially more important* issues since all test failures will be
ignored now. For me this is outweighted by the advantage that we can
present upstream a full log of all issues in c
Hi again,
Am Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:25:42PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Am Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:09:26AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Before we fall into another "do nothing" period: I will upload
> scikit-learn restricted to those architectures only which have all tests
> passing and wil
Hi again,
Am Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:09:26AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> I just like to repeat my point: If the package is to slow on release
> architectures, that we will not manage to fix it, it is in the interest
> of our users to not support the problematic architectures in favour of
> pro
Am Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 08:15:45PM -0700 schrieb M. Zhou:
> I have a long-term power 9 VM (not QEMU) as testbed.
> I'm trying to investigate the issues for release architectures,
> but this package is too slow to build with QEMU (multiple hours).
> (abel.debian.org is also extremely slow for scikit
I have a long-term power 9 VM (not QEMU) as testbed.
I'm trying to investigate the issues for release architectures,
but this package is too slow to build with QEMU (multiple hours).
(abel.debian.org is also extremely slow for scikit-learn)
I've not yet given up, but the build speed means I cannot
Hi Graham,
Am Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 09:15:06AM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 17:57, M. Zhou wrote:
> > The previous segfault on armel becomes Bus Error on armel and armhf.
> > I can build it on Power9, but it seems that the test fails on power8 (our
> > buildd).
>
Hi Nilesh,
Am Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 06:21:19PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On 7/20/22 4:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Before we stop progress in Debian for many other architectures since we
> > cant't solve this on our own or otherwise are burning patience of
> > upstream I'd alternatively cons
On 7/20/22 4:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 05:58:33PM +0200 schrieb julien.pu...@gmail.com:
[1]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scikit-learn&arch=armel&ver=1.1.1-1&stamp=1653343638&raw=0
I would open a bug report to upstream pointing to that log, and
Hi,
Am Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 05:58:33PM +0200 schrieb julien.pu...@gmail.com:
> > [1]:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scikit-learn&arch=armel&ver=1.1.1-1&stamp=1653343638&raw=0
>
> I would open a bug report to upstream pointing to that log, and if the
> log isn't enough to pinp
9 matches
Mail list logo
