Hi Graham,
Am Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 09:15:06AM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 17:57, M. Zhou <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> > The previous segfault on armel becomes Bus Error on armel and armhf.
> > I can build it on Power9, but it seems that the test fails on power8 (our
> > buildd).
>
> In #1003165, one of the arm porters wrote they are happy to look at
> the bus errors, but the baseline issue should be fixed first.
... this was five months ago and silence since then. We've lost lots of
packages in testing and I see no progress here. It seems upstream is not
actually keen on working on this as well. Meanwhile they stepped forward
with new releases and I simply refreshed the issues for the new version
(which are the same and not solved).
Currently we have bus errors on arm 32 bit architectures and a baseline
violation on power. If there is no solution at the horizon I'd vote for
excluding these three architectures instead of sit and wait (which is all
I can personally do in this topic).
> > I have skimmed over the build logs and one of the main issues is the use of
> > -march flags to enforce a certain baseline [1]:
> >
> > powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option
> > ‘-march=native’; did you mean ‘-mcpu=native’?
>
> This may be the cause of the test failures on power8.
Could someone give this a try? I know I could use a porter box to do
so but my time is to limited to do it in a sensible time frame.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
