On 2024-07-18 14:29:54, Clément Hermann wrote:
> Hi Micah,
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 11 juillet 2024 13:06:48 UTC, micah anderson a écrit :
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>In April you had said that you were going to try and upload a new
>>version of torsocks, which
Hello,
In April you had said that you were going to try and upload a new
version of torsocks, which fixes the FTBFS, but you were trying to fix a
few lintian issues first.
Do you have any update on that? It looks like it is going to be removed
from testing soon if it is not fixed.
Thanks!
Mic
These issues are fixed upstream in main, but there is not a release.
The fix is in commit 1171bf2fd4e7a0cab02cf5fca59090b65af9cd29.
Clément would you pull that fix into the package to resolve this FTBFS?
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:57:06AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: src:u1db
>> Version: 13.10-6.4
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: sid bullseye
>> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: py2removal
>>
>> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian
Hello Sergio,
I'm reviewing bugs that are currently release critical at our local bug
squashing party, and I stumbled on yours.
I'm not disputing this bug exists, I'm just trying to determine why it
is you set the severity to "Serious". As you are probably aware, this
severity indicates that th
Hello Marc,
I'm checking up on RC bugs, because we are working on a Bug Squashing
Party here.
Back in November, you were saying you were going to combine this fix
with a bump of upstream's version:
> I was planning to combine this with an update from upstream.
I'm wondering if you are plannin
That fix works, I've done a NMU fixed package and uploaded it to
DELAYED-3.
Micah
I've confirmed this bug, as reported:
I installed lighttpd:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
lighttpd spawn-fcgi
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 326 not upgraded.
Need to get 299 kB of archives.
After this operation, 1,019 kB of additional disk space will be used.
D
Hello,
intrigeri writes:
> Hi Micah,
>
> Adrian Bunk:
>> Can you anyway NMU this package?
>
>> The alternative is that it will get removed from stretch soon.
>
> Well, it's not a goal of mine to include as many packages in Stretch
> as possible. So I really don't want to be the one who decides
Antonio Terceiro writes:
>> Relevant part (hopefully):
>> > Failure/Error: response = http.request(request)
>> >
>> > OpenSSL::SSL::SSLError:
>> >SSL_connect returned=1 errno=0 state=unknown state: sslv3 alert
>> > unsupported certificate
Hmm, I built the reverse depends on r
hangelog 2014-07-10 00:49:54.0 -0400
+++ network-manager-0.9.10.0/debian/changelog 2014-08-11 12:37:33.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+network-manager (0.9.10.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Pull patch from upstream to fix checks for default
+routes
+
+ -- Mic
to /bin/dash
Versions of packages bird depends on:
ii adduser 3.113+nmu3
ii libc6 2.19-7
ii libreadline6 6.3-8
ii libtinfo5 5.9+20140712-2
bird recommends no packages.
Versions of packages bird suggests:
ii bird-doc 1.4.4-1
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelo
Package: horde3
Version: 3.3.8+debian0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: security issue
Hello,
As detailed on the debian security tracker[0] and reported on oss-sec[1] and
assigned CVE 2014-1691, there is a remote code execution bug in horde affecting
all versions from at least
close 716909
thanks
I believe that I've resolved this, the following addresses are allowed
to send, if there is an additional ftp master email that needs to be
allowed, please let me know and I will add that:
d...@ftp-master.debian.org, debb...@bugs.debian.org,
debb...@busoni.debian.org, debian-b
Package: python-virtualenv
Version: 1.7.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: security
Hello,
It seems as if python-virtualenv embeds a copy of pip[0], and there is
a security issue with python-pip noted as CVE-2013-1629 which affects
squeeze and wheezy (it appears fixed in sid an
Package: python-pip
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: security
Hello,
It appears as if python-pip in Debian (all versions supported) suffers
from CVE-2013-1629. This CVE appears to still be "reserved", but is
clearly described in a few places on the internet[0],[1].
Russ Allbery writes:
> Anton Gladky writes:
>
>> Ok, I canceled the upload.
>
>> We cannot postpone Wheezy-release, waiting for every upstream's
>> decision. If the solution works, why should not it be applied?
>> Otherwise the package should be removed from testing.
The solution may work, but
Anton Gladky writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have rescheduled an upload for 15-days. Or you want me to cancel it
> completely?
>
> Anton
>
> On 03/01/2013 12:45 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>>
>> That patch was marked as "Code Insufficient" in the upstream bug tracker
>> two weeks ago at http://project
Marco Nenciarini writes:
> Il giorno 12/feb/2013, alle ore 17:16, Jaldhar H. Vyas ha scritto:
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the patch but if the diagnosis is correct it seems it will not be
>> needed as -7 took out the perl code. So backporting that should solve the
>> problem. Unfortunately I am ra
Dane Elwell writes:
> This bug seems to still exist in CouchDB 1.2.0-3 update that was pushed out
> recently in Wheezy.
>
>
> Setting up couchdb (1.2.0-3) ...
> Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/couchdb ...
> Installing new version of config file /etc/logrotate.d/couchdb ...
> [.
severity 681549 serious
thanks
I'm marking this bug as serious (accidentally made it grave a minute
ago), bucause I believe that it makes the package unsuitable for
release, and the fix is trivial, so it should be able to be brought into
wheezy without issue.
The this issue renders the package un
Hi Lucas,
* Lucas Nussbaum [2012-09-30 03:43-0400]:
> On 08/09/12 at 23:03 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > Control: tags 680235 + unreproducible moreinfo
> >
> > Hi Lucas--
> >
> > On 07/04/2012 10:40 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > I generate a wheezy 'minimal' image using debirf (runnin
Holger Levsen writes:
> severity 678072 serious
> thanks
>
> On Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012, John Eikenberry wrote:
>> Running puppet-lint fails every time, with or without any arguments. This
>> coincided with a recent change of ruby to default to 1.9.1 instead of 1.8.
>> The puppet-common package,
Is the situation that all users that are at 1.2.3-348 and older can
speak to each other and all users that are at 1.2.3-349 and greater can
speak to each other, but >=349 cannot speak to <=348 users?
If so, is the intended plan for everyone to bump up to >=349?
If that is true, at the very least
Arno Töll writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 24.05.2012 19:12, micah anderson wrote:
>>> Do you have a way of testing this? I've set up something that I believe
>>> should let the messages through based on the X-Loop header, but need to
>>> test that it is working.
&g
micah anderson writes:
> Arno Töll writes:
>> Hello,
>>
>> reopening the bug as the problem still persists.
>
> Do you have a way of testing this? I've set up something that I believe
> should let the messages through based on the X-Loop header, but need to
&g
Arno Töll writes:
> Hello,
>
> reopening the bug as the problem still persists.
Do you have a way of testing this? I've set up something that I believe
should let the messages through based on the X-Loop header, but need to
test that it is working.
micah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
Stefan Fritsch writes:
> Hi,
>
> I think the problem is that you can't match on the Sender or From
> headers, because those remain unmodified for BTS mail. But BTS mail
> seems to have
>
> X-Loop: ow...@bugs.debian.org
>
> and
>
> X-Debian-PR-Source: name-of-source-package
>
> Maybe you can mat
Package: sympa
Version: 6.0.1+dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
It is possible to open the archive management ("arc_manage") page
for any list, even those set to only be available to members,
giving anyone the option to download the archive, or delete th
On Sun, 06 May 2012 12:17:04 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi Micah,
>
> On 06.05.2012 06:13, micah anderson wrote:
> > What address is not working? I looked around for a canonical list of
> > role addresses that should accept emails, but I couldn't find one, so I
> >
On Sat, 05 May 2012 19:04:06 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> reopening the bug as the problem still persists.
What address is not working? I looked around for a canonical list of
role addresses that should accept emails, but I couldn't find one, so I
gathered as many as I could and added th
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:21:08 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from micah anderson's message of Sun Apr 08 10:13:40 -0700 2012:
> > severity 660206 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > This is actually a regression, the only way to get things to work again
> > is to downgrade package like such:
> >
> >
> The maintainer address you added to your package does not accept mail
> from role accounts, including but not limited to the bug tracking
> system. This is a policy violation as of §3.3: "The email address given
> in the Maintainer control field must accept mail from those role
> accounts in De
> The maintainer address you added to your package does not accept mail
> from role accounts, including but not limited to the bug tracking
> system. This is a policy violation as of §3.3: "The email address given
> in the Maintainer control field must accept mail from those role
> accounts in De
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:57:55 -0500, micah wrote:
>
> Attached is a debdiff against the squeeze version to fix imp4.
I forgot to mention that I've built a package off of this diff and
tested it and it seems to work fine (I have no way of testing that the
XSS issue is fixed).
mich
--
To UNSU
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:22:29 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> CVE-2012-0791 has a simple changeset:
Sorry, I switched these CVE issues, this one is actually CVE-2012-0909
> https://github.com/horde/horde/commit/208eae43c95136a67104f760027a8892a22b6e25
>
> it touches two files:
>
I've been trying to figure out if this issue affects stable.
The issues point to this openwall post:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/22/2
which has actual git commits for things.
CVE-2012-0791 has a simple changeset:
https://github.com/horde/horde/commit/208eae43c95136a67104
Package: frei0r-plugins
Version: 1.1.22git20091109-1.1
Severity: serious
Its impossible to install this package.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
frei0r-plugins : Depends: libcvaux2.1 but it is not installable
Depends: libhighgui2.1 but it is not installable
--
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:40:20 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Severity: serious
>
> util-vserver hasn't seen an upload since 1.5 years and vserver support
> has been dropped from the Debian kernels post-Squeeze.
>
> Should util-vserver be removed as well?
I'm not sure.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:33:50 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 10:43 PM, Gregory Holt wrote:
> > Yes, the rename did happen: st -> swift
> >
> > I'm not sure who/how the Debian packaging for OpenStack Swift is
> > handled, but I expect they're listed on this bug so probably got emailed
Hi,
It was written:
> We're also tossing around changing the OpenStack 'st' to
> 'swiftly'. Whatever it becomes, it'll likely happen in our n
Hi folks,
This security issue really needs to be dealt with, I'm concerned that we
are getting close to one month from when the bug was first reported to
the BTS, we are already over one month from when the bug was reported
upstream.
I'm looking for any feedback on the work I did...
micah
--
Hi,
I decided to help a little bit moving these issues forward. I did what I
could, but now the more experienced debian rails people need to act. In
particular, there is a decision that needs to be made for CVE-2011-0446,
and a review of the fix I did for CVE-2011-0447. I am happy to help
facili
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson"
wrote:
> What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have
> http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff
> applied? IIRC this was one way that problem exhibited itself.
Actually, I li
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson"
wrote:
> What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have
> http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff
> applied? IIRC this was one way that problem exhibited itself.
Looking at the
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:18:56 +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Sorry for delay; i was on vacation to India (Raj).
>
> Yes actually popcon is very low for libcompass-ruby but i will still discuss
> with Micah Anderson who is the primary maintainer for
> this m
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:15:58 +0200 (CEST), Jan Kontze
wrote:
>
> Hi Micah,
>
>
> I Wrote:
>
> > Hi Micah!
> > > Hi, I just posted a follow-up to the Debian bug you reported about the
> > > squirrelmail security regression. I neglected to CC you, so you probably
> > > didn't know about it. But
I've uploaded a package that includes my fix, it seems to be working
well for me. If other people on this bug report can try it to see if it
works for them, that would be helpful.
you can get the package here:
http://people.debian.org/~micah/squirrelmail_1.4.15-4+lenny4_all.deb
note: source pac
I tried the fixed package too, and I got the same error as reported by
Jan Kontze. I'm running courier imapd from Lenny, and perdition.
I looked at the fix some more on the SM websvn, and I think I found a
missing hunk that was applied at the same time the security fix was, but
is *not* in the d
I looked at the SM upstream source for their SM-1_4-STABLE branch, and
found that they added this function Mon Jul 27, 2009, as evidenced here:
http://squirrelmail.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/squirrelmail/branches/SM-1_4-STABLE/squirrelmail/functions/imap_general.php?r1=13733&r2=13789
Considering
r...@nuthatch:~# /etc/init.d/ipsec stop
Stopping strongSwan IPsec failed: starter is not running
/etc/init.d/ipsec: line 96: return: : numeric argument required
micah
pgpcnkLasa1kc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: perdition
Version: 1.17.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
I tried to install my backport of perdition onto my lenny box and got this:
(Reading database ... 36581 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace perdition 1.17.1-2 (using
perdition_1.19~rc3-1
tag 587913 +moreinfo
tag 587913 +unreproducible
severity 587913 normal
thanks
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:00:30 +0200, Christophe Moille
wrote:
> Package could not be installed.
>
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Can you provide more information about how your apt pre
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:23:25 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > install -Dp -m0644 -o puppet -g puppet ext/rack/files/config.ru \
> > >
> > > /build/user-puppet_0.25.4-3-amd64-zxBvTe/puppet-0.25.4/debian/puppetmaster/usr/
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:06:51 -0400, "Aaron M. Ucko" wrote:
> Package: libffi-ruby
> Version: 0.6.2debian-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Hi, Micah!
>
> libffi-ruby fails to build because it tries to run ruby1.9.1 but
> build-depends instead on the old ruby1
> Packaging updated, see changelog:
>
>
Hi maks!
* maximilian attems [2010-01-31 04:44-0500]:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:41:14AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: klibc
> > Version: 1.5.15-1
...
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
> >
> > Relevant part:
> > > gcc -Wp,-MD
As part of the BSP party here in NYC, I'm NMU'ing this, uploading to the
3-day DELAYED queue with this patch (with only a minor change in the
changelog to include the Closes line for this bug).
thanks!
micah
pgpo3jN21Nved.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:32:01 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 07:23:35PM -0500, micah wrote:
> > As part of the fun at the NYC BSP, I decided to try and fix this issue.
> >
> > I built this package, with the patch that Simon McVittie submitted. I
> > then asked some
* Steffen Joeris [2010-01-30 17:13-0500]:
> Hi Adam
>
> These issues have been assigned CVE ids, see below:
>
> CVE-2009-4214[0]:
> | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the strip_tags function in
> | Ruby on Rails before 2.2.s, and 2.3.x before 2.3.5, allows remote
> | attackers to inje
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:56:47 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > The version of libgpgme-ruby1.8 currently in Debian is not compatible with
> > the
> > version of libgpgme actually in Debian.
> > […]
> > This problem breaks schleuder in
* Christoph Siess [2009-09-02 14:57-0400]:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
> Version: 2.6.26-17lenny2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
>
>
> Hi,
>
> according to http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1862 this Version of the
> 2.6.26-2 Kernel shou
I just upgraded to awesome 3.3.1-1 and because it seemed like this was
fixed, I decided to try a dbus restart, and was sad to find out it
actually wasn't. So this is a me too.
micah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Aníbal!
* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [2009-07-09 21:20-0400]:
> util-vserver build-depends on libbeecrypt6-dev which will be removed
> from unstable in the near future.
Ok, thanks for the warning!
> The current beecrypt in unstable ships libbeecrypt-dev instead of
> libbeecrypt6-dev.
Hasn't h
* Andrew Lee [2009-06-14 12:57-0400]:
> Hi Micah,
>
> Micah Anderson wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > I appreciate the help with the package, although typically a NMU is done
> > after a patch is not being applied, so sending a patch and doing a 2-day
> > NMU at the
Hi Andrew,
* Andrew Lee [2009-06-13 02:40-0400]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> tags 527065 +patch
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for util-vserver (versioned as 0.30.216~r2772-6.1).
> And it will be uploaded to DELAYED/02. Please free to tell me
Package: clamav-milter
Version: 0.95.1+dfsg-0volatile2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
New rewrite of clamav-milter fails to hurl, instead of starting, dry heaves.
First all previous command-line options seem to have mysteriously
disappeared and no documentation about wher
* Magnus Holmgren [2009-03-05 14:49-0500]:
> On onsdagen den 4 mars 2009, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > The list of missing package dependencies is actually:
> >
> > libdigest-sha-perl, libarchive-tar-perl and liblinux-inotify2-perl
>
> I never got around to looking
The list of missing package dependencies is actually:
libdigest-sha-perl, libarchive-tar-perl and liblinux-inotify2-perl
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: debpool
Version: 0.5.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Missing dependencies on: libarchive-tar-perl and liblinux-inotify2-perl
micah
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architectu
* Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-11 04:30-0500]:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:11:14PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > As it turns out dietlibc-0.31 doesn't properly define the umount2
> > symbols on two architectures: alpha and ia64. This sadly results in a
>
Package: dietlibc
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
As it turns out dietlibc-0.31 doesn't properly define the umount2
symbols on two architectures: alpha and ia64. This sadly results in a
build regression for util-vserver, which used to build
What kernel version and arch are you running? It looks like i686 from
your bug report, but please verify.
I'm on i686 with 2.6.26, and I am not able to replicate this.
Micah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Florian Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-26 05:35-0500]:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.216~r2772-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> After updating to version 0.30.216~r2772-4 services like openssh
* Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-06 04:45-0400]:
> Le lundi 06 octobre 2008 à 12:17 +0200, Olivier Salaün a écrit :
> > Micah Anderson a écrit :
> > >
> > > After installation of sympa, it tries to start the daemons, and the
> > > follow
> Micah Anderson a écrit :
>> Package: sympa
>> Version: 5.3.4-5.2
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>> After installation of sympa, it tries to start the daemons, and the
>> following errors are printed out for each of t
tag 501605 + unreproducible
thanks
I've just attempted to do an install of -6 myself and I did not get this
error:
Setting up sympa (5.3.4-6) ...
Configuration file read, default log level 0
Sympa 5.3.4 started
Conf::checkfiles() creating spool /var/spool/sympa/automatic
Conf::checkfiles() creat
This isn't a bug at all, all the reasons cited aren't actually bugs.
> (1) It seems abandoned upstream — the last update is Feb 2003 according
> to CPAN.
Thats not a bug, and doesn't make this package RC.
> (2) bug 443629 (CDATA handling) makes it useles for a large number of
> feeds, and wor
I've taken David's patch and removed the extraneous bits (substitutions
done because of the build process, etc.), and attached the adjusted diff
to this bug.
Micah
diff -u sympa-5.3.4/src/sympa.pl sympa-5.3.4/src/sympa.pl
--- sympa-5.3.4/src/sympa.pl
+++ sympa-5.3.4/src/sympa.pl
@@ -159,7 +159,7
The patch wasn't attached to the bug, as I previously said it was. I'm
attaching it to this email instead.
This patch also contains a fix for #498144 (attached to that bug report
as well).
The upload has been sent to the 5-day delayed queue.
Micah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
ebian/changelog
+++ sympa-5.3.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,13 +1,3 @@
-sympa (5.3.4-5.3) unstable; urgency=low
-
- * Non-maintainer upload.
- * Fix insecure use of /tmp in sympa scripts by applying upstream
-patch to tools.pl (Closes: #496520)
- * Add the sympa.pl --upgrade procedure to the debian/
Package: sympa
Version: 5.3.4-5.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installation of sympa, it tries to start the daemons, and the
following errors are printed out for each of the daemons:
Setting up sympa (5.3.4-5.2) ...
Starting Sympa mailing list manager: sympaProtot
tags 496520 +patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is a patch to fix this insecure tempfile usage in the code. I
did not make the POD change, as I think that this doesn't qualify as an
RC-exception (this doesn't mean it should not be fixed, just that
justifying this change for a freeze-exception doesn't seem
* Victor NOEL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-26 07:22-0400]:
> > > It looks like the ionice binary is needed by the configure script.
> > > It is included in the schedutils package which is not a dependency of
> > > util-vserver.
> >
> > There is no such package called 'schedutils', ionice is includ
Hi,
* kaouete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-26 01:40-0400]:
> Justification: no longer builds from source
Can you provide a build log showing this?
> It looks like the ionice binary is needed by the configure script.
> It is included in the schedutils package which is not a dependency of
> util
* Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-04 11:09-0400]:
> Hi
>
> Dne Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:39:25 -0400
> Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>
> > I've applied a patch from upstream that I hope will solve this. Can
> > you try this
* Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-04 13:08-0400]:
> The util-vserver trunk can build against the newer headers, so maybe we
> can pull from there to resolve this.
Hi,
I've applied a patch from upstream that I hope will solve this. Can
you try this on your machine an
Hi,
Thanks for your bug report.
> some upgrade of util-vserver made all attempts to start vserver fail
> with:
>
> # vserver pmademo start
> capget(): Invalid argument
> capabilities are not enabled in kernel-setup
>
> Downgrading backt to 0.30.214-6 the problem is gone (this is lat
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Doing an apt-get dist-upgrade today gave me this:
Unpacking replacement cupsys ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cupsys_1.3.7-4_i386.deb
(--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/cups/daemon/cups-lpd', which is also
in package c
Hi,
* intrigeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-08 03:09-0400]:
> When I upgraded a lenny system from 0.30.214-6 to 0.30.215-2, all my
> VServers were restarted without any warning.
Yes, this is because of the postrm in 0.30.214-6 stopping the
vservers. This actually has been fixed, but if you had
tag 456996 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I'm trying to track down how this happened for you, can you please
provide the following:
1. the contents of your /etc/default/util-vserver
2. the debconf value for util-vserver/prerm_stop_running_vservers
3. the debconf vaue for util-vserver/start_on_boot
I hav
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-17 16:51-0400]:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:41:38PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > tag 456996 +moreinfo
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to track down how this happened for you, can you ple
Due to the security nature of this fix (resolves 3 CVEs), I am going to
upload this to the archive for you. I've changed the severity to high
and will upload the package immediately, please use severity 'high' on
all future security uploads.
In the future its probably best if there is a security
I have added NEWS.Debian information about this change to the svn
repository for the package.
In order to fix this, please migrate to static context IDs, to do this
simply stop your guest, echo an unique number to
/etc/vservers//context and then start your guest.
Micah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
>The postinst script unconditionally removes /etc/vserver{,s}.conf on
>every configuration. Since the configuration is apparently preserved
>by sourcing the files and creating a symlink in place of their
>content, this is okay. However the package both includes and removes
>the conffile vservers
I haven't been able to install hpijs for over two weeks now (this bug is
18 days old alone), which is making printing really difficult :)
Usually a binNMU doesn't take this long, is there another issue holding
things up?
Micah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070822 02:57]:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.213-1
> Followup-For: Bug #432410
>
> This bug is marked as pending. Can you upload it?
Unfortunately, I cannot because I am getting some build errors with the
newer build suite in sid. Once these are wo
Ola,
The modutils package has been removed from sid and lenny as it is a
package that supports 2.4 kernels, which are no longer a part of any
Debian release (including Etch).
Modutils functionality is now provided by module-init-tools, however I
am not sure why it is needed for util-vserver, do
Remi Vanicat wrote:
> 2006/12/19, Cameron Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 12/18/06, Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > $ DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer dpkg --configure --pending
>> > Setting up torrentflux (2.1-7) ...
>> > debconf (developer): frontend started
>> > debconf (developer): fronte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Joel Fuster wrote:
> Package: backupninja
> Version: 0.9.4-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
>
> The mysql backup handler happily overwrites your existing sql.gz files with
> empty tarballs even in situations suc
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
