* Andrew Lee <and...@linux.org.tw> [2009-06-14 12:57-0400]: > Hi Micah, > > Micah Anderson wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > I appreciate the help with the package, although typically a NMU is done > > after a patch is not being applied, so sending a patch and doing a 2-day > > NMU at the same time is a little aggressive. I'm also wondering how you > > can do this NMU because as far as I can tell you aren't yet a DD :) > > Sorry for the unclear message. I do not want aggressive. I just > reproduce other DD does for NMU. Please let me know the proper way if I > did this wrong. I guess you may smelled that I am in NM process so that > my AM would sponsor the upload. :)
No problem at all. The bug is a RC bug and I have not reacted to it in a timely manner. Doing the NMU with a 2-day delay is fine, for this bug. > > I have been working on a new version of util-vserver to upload, with a > > newer snapshot, so I was delaying this fix until that was > > finished. However I can upload this fix to resolve the RC bug. > > I see. My attention was to solve the RC bug for next point release. It > would be great if you accept this NMU for me. I've uploaded a new package with that fix, thanks for sending the patch! > > In any case, what would be even better than doing NMUs would be if you > > would join the Alioth team and help with the util-vserver packaging > > effort, its an open team, although nobody has helped on it so far and I > > would appreciate the help! > > Thanks for your invitation. I've sent the request on Alioth. Please > update me for the new version of util-vserver with a newer snapshot via > alioth. I have accepted your request on Alioth. micah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
