This bug is grave (I've adjusted its severity accordingly). It breaks
unrelated packages entirely.
I have this problem too. The failure mode is quite cryptic. Killing
udisks-daemon is the only way to fix it, though I have not tried the patch
attached to #592719.
Since this is grave, I suggest
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.8.0-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This has now been true for months.
Please stop producing the lirc-modules-source package if you cannot make it
compile properly.
This bug IS grave. I'm sorry.
-- System Information:
Debian R
Package: lirc-modules-source
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package is pretty much completely worthless on etch. If I follow the
instructions from dpkg-reconfigure-source, or the instructions in the README,
it builds some modules (with the wrong extension -- .o inst
close 392964 0.99.33-1.3
thanks
Luckily this bug was fixed in an NMU.
This package could use a maintainer upload to wrap up all those fixed bugs
though
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Package: libooc-vo
Severity: serious
Justification: All of it
This package has been unbuildable for over a year and uninstallable for some
time
as well. It also hasn't been updated since 2003.
Users would be better served at this point to go directly upstream for sources.
If and when you prepa
o the kernel or something)
to
deal with the remaining issue?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It's just a goddamned piece of paper."
-- President Bush, referring to the US Constitution
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
--
To UNSUBSCR
irm
>that this fix is satisfactory?
Yes, this is most satisfactory. With this documentation in place, I would have
been able to implement the workaround in no time flat. :-)
Thank you!
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
;
As root, create a file /etc/hal/fdi/policy/dont-wake-drive.fdi containing the
following text (replacing the string "HL-DT-STDVD-ROM GDR8162B" with the one
for
your drive):
Then, as root, restart hal as follows:
/etc/dbus-1/event.d/20hal force-reload
Package: utf8-migration-tool
Version: 0.5.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
command-line launch:
---
File "/usr/bin/utf8migrationtool", line 85
w['Login'].newLocale .= match.group(3)
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
-
Launch from KDE
OK, in the interests of space saving, I gzipped the logfile; it's at
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/hal.logfile.gz
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek,
http://li
rade it, sorry.
The best alternative if you can't fix the actual bug would be to provide an
*easy*
mechanism to *permanently* disable hald-addon-storage. If there was such a
mechanism
documented, then you could downgrade the bug.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theocracy
32212 was hald-addon-storage, I think.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have gotten no relevant response from GTRC. Accordingly, I think this bug
really is "serious". Perhaps someone else could try asking them the Three
Questions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
riginal
function of
trademarks are generally not DFSG-free, but are also unnecessary for trademark
defense.
This is just an FYI matter, as it is really quite off the main topic of the bug.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Li
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: copyright
OK. So the e100 microcode situation isn't as bad as we expected -- thanks
entirely
to OpenBSD.
I'm opening this bug to track this issue because I expect it will be resolved
relatively
quickly, and because the 'big bug' is getting to
FYI, the involved files are:
SGI Free Software License B:
glcore.h
glxmd.h
glxproto.h
glxtokens.h
GLX Public License:
glxint.h
Those five header files are the only ones in x11proto-gl which
have the problem licenses.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Henning, Nathanael,
>
> I'm working on an NMU of mesa this weekend, and was going to take care of
> bug #368562 ("debian/copyright does not contain all licenses") even though I
> obviously can't take care of bug #368560 conc
/
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ually likely to be sued over: the
company clearly didn't authorize this use.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nightmare!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
ing a lawyer.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theocracy, fascism, or absolute monarchy -- I don't care which it is, I don't
like it.
pgptGfdIOdQ5u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
or directory
This third failure mode can be worked around by creating the
appropriate device nodes. That is obviously extremely suboptimal,
so I wouldn't close the bug just yet.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud o
severity 379518 critical
thanks
Now even the ignore-table option doesn't work. This makes it
*impossible* to run lilo.
Raising to critical. Since I have already upgraded the kernel, I
cannot reboot the system until you fix this bug. (Well, actually,
I can install the lilo from sarge, but you k
Here's the new failure mode. Which is obviously NONSENSE.
Warning: '/proc/partitions' does not match '/dev' directory structure.
Name change: '/dev/sda4' -> '/dev/sda4'
part_nowrite check:: No such file or directory
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
ing. If upstream
screwed up once, they're likely to have screwed up repeatedly in the
same way. (This seems to be the case with legal issues, anyway.)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Read it and weep.
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Text_of_Gore_speech_0116.html
pgpaQ0WqnymTv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: mmx-emu
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy
Simple enough to fix, but I think nobody really cares about this package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ghc6&ver=6.4.2-2&arch=alpha&stamp=1151843053&file=log&as=raw
Not that I care personally, but it's keeping most haskell packages
from updating in etch, so you might
reassign 380520 hald
thanks
I believe that acpid has the prior claim on
/proc/acpi/events.
Furthermore, if acpid starts first, hald runs.
But if hald starts first, acpid doesn't run. This
means that *hal* is breaking *acpid*, not vice
versa. So, hal's bug.
--
Nathanael Nerod
Package: lilo
Version: 1:22.6.1-7+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: breaks all kernel upgrades
On upgrade, I find that running lilo gives me this:
Fatal: '/dev/sdb' is not a whole disk device
If I remove the "disk=/dev/sdb inaccessible" line from my lilo.conf
and rerun lilo, I instead get:
Can
]: 21:11:23.621 [I] hald_dbus.c:3183:
unregistered
And sometime shortly *after* that, the drive spins down.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nightmar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:45:36PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:23:02PM +02
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:23:02PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:29:55PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>>> I can confirm that this happens on my laptop as well; when a CD is in the
>>> drive, I can h
nse.
Hopefully the authors of these can be found and will be happy
to license the files.
That's it; every other file has been mentioned previously by either
Bdale or Andres.
(4) There are some substantial updates needed to debian/copyright.
I'd be happy to do this once (1), (2),
Why are
these clarifications not sufficient when we regularly accept clarifications
of this nature from other copyright holders?
Such clarifications should be placed in the debian/copyright file.
Preferably a copy of the email containing the clarifications, at least
including the identity of
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This damages hardware. Hence the 'grave' severity.
The only fix I have found for this is to uninstall HAL.
su-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, '
Package: mesa-utils
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Looking at the actual files, they are mostly
Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Brian Paul All Rights Reserved.
(Some have fewer years; that's the union of the years.)
One of these (opencloseopen.c) is additionally
* (C) Copyright IBM Cor
Package: xorg-server
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Do a search for "/FreeB". The source package contains a bunch of code under
this
license, but the license is not in the debian/copyright file. (Indeed, it's not
even in the package -- the license header points to a URL, and you ha
Package: mesa
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The copyright file mentions that certain parts of the package are under the
"FreeB" license. Checking, indeed certain files are.
It does not mention that one file is under the "GLX Public License".
Neither license is in the copyright fil
Package: x11proto-gl-dev
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The copyright file contains a copy of the license notices from the top of the
header files. So far so good. HOWEVER, those notices do not contain the actual
licenses. They merely refer to them by reference:
http://oss.sgi.com
As discussed in this bug, mhash's maintainer appears to be MIA or out to lunch.
Is it OK if we forcibly orphan the package now?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It's just a goddamned piece of paper."
-- President Bush, referring to the US Constitution
http
, but I'll do it if that's the only
way. I also suspect that most of the files have gone to a small number of
packages, and that a fair number of them may have disappeared (the
Imakefiles).
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theocracy, fascism, or absolute monarchy -- I d
.
So just go do that, OK?
Words fail me sometimes. I ask some upstream maintainers to fix a
serious licensing mistake, and they fix it. I ask most upstream
maintainers to fix a licensing mistake, and they respond "I don't see a
problem, and I'm not going to look into the topic, let al
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:39:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>>Hi Dan,
>>
>>On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:48:58AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:26:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>&g
> Shall we make a truce, a peace even, and move on?
Yes, totally, of course, thanks, and sorry.
> --
> Jérôme Marant
There has been absolutely no progress. It's March. The manual still contains
invariant sections upstream and in Debian. Documentation with invariant
sections was reaffirmed as non-free in the most recent GR.
Time to remove the manual.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
please explain what broke to this bug trail and someone will explain how
to fix it. :-)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Read it and weep.
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Text_of_Gore_speech_0116.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
reopen 321551
reopen 320876
retitle 320876 uninstallable due to aalib transition
severity 320876 grave
thanks
The package FTBFS (see 348529, and possibly also 320992), so these can't
be fixed by binNMUs. :-P
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote her
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>Jérôme Marant wrote:
>>
>>>Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
>>>leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
&g
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
> leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
> us to the right path, that is getting rid of fundamentalists.
If Debian goes down your "we don't give a damn about freedom" path,
Package: wmufo
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is to keep the package out of testing until the ftpmasters process
the removal bug (reassigned from the WNPP bug).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Package: wmsetimon
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
wmsetimon can only monitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classic processes, and the [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
classic project is now officially dead. So it's unusable.
Wmsetimon should probably be removed from Debian. Alter
Romain Francoise wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
>
>
> Don't:
>
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001>
>
That's not directly relevant, since it's
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>>And for whatever it's worth, as long as I'm maintaining the packages,
>>>these files will almost certainly not be removed unless there's some
>>>overwhelmingly con
ncy
>from libmagick6-dev to libmagick9-dev
--
Nathanael Nerode
Doom! Doom!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You said you might be able to upload harbour 0.45 in October. Any chance it's
going to happen soon, or should harbour be removed from 'etch' for now?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI, this affects *all* architectures.
It's probably caused by bug 320992.
Unfortunately, solving it is somewhat beyond me at the moment.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The repeatedly-confirmed GRs, the current Social Contract, debian-legal
consensus, and the stated opinion of the etch release team, are that
everything in 'main', with the special exception of license texts which
constitute the licenses to works in 'main', has to satisfy the DFSG. The
DFSG re
Is a new upload of antlr coming soon? It's been "pending" for two months.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>the boilerplate stuff?
>
>Paolo
(The answer was that I couldn't find one, but I suggested some boilerplate
to him.)
(Ken Pizzini)
>> You're still willing to license them under the GPL too though?
>
>Yes.
>
> --Ken Pizzini
So, one RC bug nearly done.
close 346028
thanks
I retested this (a tedious process to say the least) and 2.6.15-1 appears to
purge cleanly now. I'm using lilo, so I haven't tested it with hook scripts
present. Closing this.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"(Instead, we front-load the fla
Frank Litchenheld wrote:
> the reference manual license is stated as for the generated material
> only and is by the maintainer himself. I would suggest to just declare
> GPL instead like the source code (I don't know if re-licensing the
> generated material under GFDL is even legal, but tha
Matthias Klose wrote:
>anyway, I'll wait until Debian's position on the GFDL is documented
>somewhere and then address all these together.
It's pretty well documented by now. So is it time? :-P
I'm sorry I haven't had the time or mental focus to write replacement
manpages, but the {cpp, gcc, g++
Hello! This is one of 5 RC bugs, apparently with no maintainer response.
Apparently the list which is listed as the maintainer is rejecting messages
(336752), which probably contributes to the problem. Hence the Cc: to
debian-devel.
This bug is trivial to fix, and because it prevents mesa fr
> However the following packages replace it:
> xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev
Change the Build-Deps to:
xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev
If you actually need libglu (I doubt it, but you can test in pbuilder),
then change them to
xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-xorg-dev | libglu-dev
You don'
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.36-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Log is at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=clisp&ver=1%3A2.36-2&arch=ia64&stamp=1136422835&file=log&as=raw
...
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/clisp-2.36/debian/build/callback'
make[1]
n it should), and it would be nice if we could keep the
sed docs in Debian main.
Sincerely,
Nathanael Nerode
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, could you please give us the output of ls -lR /etc/kernel
"No such file or directory".
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This space intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Nothing forces a maintainer to provide a _pic.a library, original
> upstream says that this is not what the library is intended for.
Checked djb's website; he says absolutely nothing about _pic.a libraries.
There is no claim there that "that is not what the library is intended
Please reply to the bug trail.
If you're not maintaining xalan, I'll be happy to orphan it for you.
If you are, this bug *needs* to be addressed, because it will render xalan
uninstallable very soon.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
This is a library package, so it needs a rename.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but it can and will break packages outside Debian.
It would be best to use the same package name used by Ubuntu, which is
libsp-gxmlcpp1c2a
The Ubuntu patch is linked from http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sp-gxmlcpp.html
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It's just a god
put device; if you then
try to do output directly through 'alsa', it will complain that the audio
output device is busy.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It's just a goddamned piece of paper."
-- President Bush, referring to the US Constitution
http://www.c
This is a very old bug, and it applies to a version in experimental which has
been superseded by the version in unstable, and the version in unstable build
just fine.
So why is this bug open?
Reply to bug trail please.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quot
Can this bug be closed?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It's just a goddamned piece of paper."
-- President Bush, referring to the US Constitution
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
You said in Dec. 2004 that you would apply the patch to a Debian-only release.
Ready to do so yet?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a very old bug report which appears to be very easy to fix. Do you
need an NMU?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This space intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: Won't uninstall cleanly
It hangs on this line of the postrm script:
my $ret = purge();
I can get it to work by deleting this line. Perhaps this is because a
debconf routine is being called after "stop" has been called? I don't know,
but anyw
Could you fast-track this one? It's at the base of a number of
progression-to-testing delays, including the KDE mess.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This space intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Package: xjig
Version: 2.4-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS
We're post-sarge, so no /usr/doc symlink please.
This can usually be solved by rebuilding with a new debhelper.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: rolldice
Version: 1.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS
We're post-sarge, so no symlinks in /usr/doc please.
You can usually fix this by updating debhelper and rebuilding.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Doing some late-night QA work, and noticed that you were planning to upload
this in September. It does need an upload badly. Alternatively, you could
orphan it or ask for it to be removed (your choice). It's already been
kicked out of 'testing' so it won't be in the next release of Debian un
Package: readline5
Severity: serious
>From the buildd logs:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
The common factor in the three logs is that it dies in the "build64" part
of the build, which isn't present for the other archi
Package: xnecview
Version: 1.34-7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS
This ships its manpage in /usr/man ; should be /usr/share/man, of course.
This transition is essentially finished; only this package and am-utils
are shipping files in /usr/man.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS
This package violates the FHS by shipping a file in /usr/man.
This should be /usr/share/man, of course.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ksetisaver
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is a reminder to myself. :-P As of December 15, old [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
dead.
This package needs to be adapted to use BOINC, or replaced by a similar
package which uses BOINC. It shouldn't go in
to be MIA,
reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C++ package which never underwent the c102 transition, let alone
the c2 transition.
Please remove from unstable.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: gtkmm2.0
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
This is almost certainly not your fault, but maybe you'll know
what package to report this bug in (glibc? binutils?).
The log is at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gtkmm2.0&ver=2.2.12-2&arch=hppa&stamp=113339
Package: debbugs
Severity: grave
Justification: breaks tracking of open vs. closed bugs!
Examine http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=glibc
and look for bug #333766. It is listed under "resolved bugs" and
looks like this:
#333766: libc6: SIGBUS in libm on hppa breaks qt-x11-free
Pac
Package: libapt-front
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Not your fault, setting blocking bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All build-deps are built everywhere, so it's safe to upload a mercator
transitioned to c2a.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All its dependencies are built with the needed ABIs everywhere that matters
(m68k currently doesn't matter because it's so far behind that its
uninstallability count is allowed to increase).
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandr
Package: usrp
Version: 0.8-6
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Long, involved failure at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=usrp&ver=0.8-5&arch=ia64&stamp=1133933801&file=log&as=raw
Appears to be due to poor use of Linux kernel headers,
since errors are spewing f
Package: dar
Version: 2.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
See the logs at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=dar&ver=2.2.4-2&arch=mips&stamp=1133597852&file=log&as=raw
and
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=dar&ver=2.2.4-2&arch=mipsel&stamp=1133613457&fil
You appear to have uploaded since I filed this grave -- but trivial to fix --
bug, without fixing it. So I wondered what was going on.
The fix is to change the debian/control entry for libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg, so it
depends on libgfcui-2.0-0c2a rather than on libgfcui-2.0-0c2.
--
Nathanael
Do you need help? Is there some problem with the build?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: openc++
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Log at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=openc%2B%2B&ver=2.8-8&arch=hppa&stamp=1133557227&file=log&as=raw
Odd stuff going on here, might not be your fault.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Package: sear
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Mostly it's depending on obsolete library packages; most of this would
be fixed by a rebuild, but not all since some transitions are involved.
Here are the Build-Dep changes which I think are needed:
* xlibmesa-dev | libgl-dev
Package: anjuta
Severity: grave
Please note that anjuta is one of the packages with an apparently
spurious dependency on libfreetype6. This should probably be
fixed at the same time as #339146.
You should be able to lose quite a lot of dependencies actually, as this looks
like it's suffering rat
Package: cppunit
Version: 1.10.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Build log is at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=cppunit&ver=1.10.2-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1132795524&file=log&as=raw
The relevant bit is:
cd src/qttestrunner && qmake qttestrunner.pro
/usr/bin/make
reopen 339277
thanks
You've misrenamed this package. Please read the announcement at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html ;
you should be using c2a, not c2.
This causes, among other things, gratuitous differences from Ubuntu.
--
Nathanael Nerode &l
Package: libcal3d11-dev
Version: 0.10.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Depends: libcal3d11 (= 0.10.0-3)
But that doesn't exist, only libcal3d11c2 exists.
Should be Depends: libcal3d11c2 (= 0.10.0-3), of course.
Also, you *actually* should have used 'libcal3d11c2a', sin
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
