Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:54:04AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> However, I have not re-uploaded jlgui just yet. We ran into a problem
> with the audio part.
>
> When starting jlgui with openjdk it defaulted to use pulseaudio (which
> was not even installed) and failed to play any sound.
Version: 1.6.4-4
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:34:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: groovy
> Version: 1.6.4-4
> Severity: serious
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic
>
> There are a lot of files licensed under the Apache-2.0 license; the
> debian/copyrig
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:17:41PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> But, first, I would like to understand the reasoning behind this change in
> version mapping. Michael could you please describe your process ?
The process was very simple. I tried to update doxia and related packages.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 25/10/09 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Source: libgnucrypto-java
> > > Version: 2.1.0-3
> > >
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libgnucrypto-java
> Version: 2.1.0-3
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pa
tags 549838 - unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:24:45PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> tags 549838 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> excalibur-logkit has alternate build dependency on libjboss-j2ee-java.
> So it should not fail to build.
> This bug is not reproducible in pbuilder chroot
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 05:04:58PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > --
> > 3208. ERROR in ../java/lang/Float.java (at line 76)
> > public static final float MIN_VALUE = 1.4e-45f;
> >
> > The literal 1.4e-45f of type float is out o
Version: 1.6.4.dfsg1-1
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 08:23:37PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Package: libceguiogre-dev,libogre-dev
> Version: libceguiogre-dev/1.6.3.dfsg1-1
> Version: libogre-dev/1.6.3.dfsg1-1
> Severity: serious
> User: trei...@debian.org
> Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
>
> Date: 200
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:57:37PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Package: pdfsam
> Version: 1.1.3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> when invoking pdfsam-console regularly, I just get no error but unreadable
> files.
> When following the instructions from pdfsam-console -h, I get the followi
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:26:07AM +0200, Jakub Skoczen wrote:
> On my machine all jars under /usr/share/maven-repo/javax are real
> files and not symlinks. That includes Servlet, JSP and Expression
> Language APIs so stuff definitely loaded by tomcat:
>
> |-- javax
> | |-- el
> | | `-- el-a
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:35:17AM +0200, Jakub Skoczen wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> I don't see the new packages being available in testing yet, at least
> not on danish mirrors. I'll upgrade and test them as soon as they are.
It will not be in testing for at least the next 10 days as we just upload
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:15:47PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
>
> Yes, this version should fix this bug. It works for me, Jakub, can you
> confirm that the fix works for you as well?
I have made some small changes and uploaded to the archive.
Thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To U
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:29:11PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
> This was a temporary issue with the way I installed jars both to
> /usr/share/java and /usr/share/maven-repo. In an old version of
> maven-repo-helper, the script mh_installjar was copying the jars to
> /usr/share/maven-repo
reassign 547735 bootchart
thanks
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:01:17AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: libcommons-compress-java
> Version: 1.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: breaks unrelated packages
Well the package is not unrelated, bootchart depends on
libcommons-compress-java.
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:12:22PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Do you have any specific showstopper for filing a removal request RoM
> > > right ahead?
> >
> > The only showstopper I can
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:47:08PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:28:43PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Many thanks in advance,
>
> BTW, I forgot to mention, it is of course totally up to you to decide
> whether let my delayed NMU flow in or not. I doubt it wi
Hello zack,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:25:00PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for kaffe (versioned as 2:1.1.8-5.3) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/2, as allowed by devref §5.11.1. The patch generalize the
> build-dep which was on gcj-4.2 to plain gcj.
The current plan is to
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:43:57PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
> > And what about people who have the old package already installed?
> > A Replaces helps them and is needed in this case afaik.
>
> A Replaces won't
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Shouldn't the libjgrapht0.6 then have the "Replaces" entry in the
> > control file?
>
> No, the old package should get removed. Steffen filed the removal
> request #546040
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:26:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Package: pj
> > Severity: serious
> > Version: 0.0~20080628-1
>
> no reverse (build) deps, low popcon, outdated upstream version, last
> upload > 14 months, nobody cared to mov
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:19:01PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libnoise
> Version: 1.0.0
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> libtool --mode=link g++ -shared -Wl,-soname=libnoise.so.0 -o libnoise.so.0.3
> ../src/latlon.lo ../src/noisegen.lo ../src/model/cyl
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:44:25PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> tag 540737 + confirmed
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > | Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ...
> > | * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into
Version: 0.9.1.2-3
Hello,
the package builds fine now. I'm unsure if this was a temporary
breakage in another package or what.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 540737 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> | Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ...
> | * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono
> | E: installing Assembly /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll failed
> | E: Installation of
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:47:38AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: classpath
> Version: 2:0.98-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Start Time: 20090729-0552
>
> [...]
>
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), ecj [!alpha !arm !hpp
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:29:24PM +0100, Al Riddoch wrote:
> Subject: cyphesis-cpp packages since at least version 0.5.15 are missing key
> files
> Package: cyphesis-cpp
> Version: 0.5.15-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> *** Please type your report below this lin
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:47:11PM -0400, Matthias Klose wrote:
> reassign 537290 classpath-common
> thanks
>
> No, there's nothing wrong with gcj-jdk. It defines a conflict with
> the current classpath-common. What needs to be done: update
> classpath to 0.98, build cacao using the new c
Hello Steve,
sorry for the long delay.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:03:15PM +0100, Steve Cotton wrote:
> > There's a year-old ITP for Ember: #437516
>
> > Sear is currently the only user of four libary packages:
> > liberis-1.3-14 libmd3-1 libsage2 libwfut-0.2-1
>
> Erick (Ember's ITP'r) reques
tag 487036 pending
thanks
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:04:22PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: dom4j
> Version: 1.6.1+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080619 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in s
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:49:31PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29
> > #
> > # eclipse (3.2.2-7) UNRELEASED; ur
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:09:10AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: cacao
> Version: 0.99~rc5-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> your package failed to build from source.
>
> The reason seems to be that configure tries to compile an executable
> with -m64 which fails since gcc-multilib
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 09:07:12PM +0200, Philippe Coval wrote:
> Tags: patch
>> It seems that the jar file is badly linked :
> I think this can be easly fixed using wildcards in debian/rules
> check this patch attached or online at :
>
> http://rzr.online.fr/docs/contribs/patches/eclipse_3.2.2-6.0
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:36:43PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: libjdic-java
> Version: 0.0.20060613-8
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of libjdic-java_0.0.20060613-8 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> > Build star
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:10:00PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: eclipse-cdt
> Version: 3.1.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of eclipse-cdt_3.1.2-2 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> > Build started at 20080501-
tag 479226 unreproducible help
thanks
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:17:22PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
> No, it doesn't.
> What does indeed work is starting with a fresh workbench -- i.e. rm
> workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.ui.workbench/workbench.xml
>
> I tried isolating the offendin
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:27:12AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:34PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
> > Package: eclipse
> > Version: 3.2.2-5
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > ***
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:34PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.2-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> Eclipse invariably starts up properly, displays the UI for a short
> moment, then
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: cacao
> Version: 0.99~rc3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> your package failed to build from source.
>
> | Automatic build of cacao_0.99~rc3-1 on signy by sbuild/mips 98-farm
> | Build started at 20080505-0116
> |
>
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
#
# classpath (2:0.97.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends on ecj and gcj not on alpha, arm, hppa and hurd-i386.
#Closes: #477852
#
package classpath-common-unzipped classpath-qtpeer classpath-doc gcjwebplugin
c
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
#
# eclipse (3.2.2-6) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends on default-jdk-builddep. Closes: #477858
package eclipse-efj eclipse-jdt eclipse-platform libswt3.2-gtk-jni eclipse-sdk
eclipse-rcp eclipse-source eclipse-rcp-g
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:20:25AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> tags 478503 +patch
> thanks
>
> to fix this bug add
>
> chmod 755 src/native/unix/configure
>
> to the beggining of the configure-stamp target in debian/rules.
No, thats the wrong solution. Problem is that configure script was not
d
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Hello Matthias,
>
> Le vendredi 25 avril 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > gij/gcj and java-gcj-compat are not available (anymore) on the following
> > architectures: alpha, arm, hppa and hurd-i386.
> >
> > This pack
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Andreas Kirschbaum wrote:
> gcc-4.2 and gcc-4.3 differ in the representation of char values: gcc-4.2
> represents a char as a 32 bit value (bits 0..7 is the char value; bits
> 8..31 are always set to zero); gcc-4.3 uses only the lower 8 bits,
> ignoring bit
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:33:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: cdk
> Version: 1:1.0.2-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
...
> > [javac] Compiling 125 source files to /build/user/cdk-1.0.2/build
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.21
#
# sear (0.6.3+cvs20080127-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Added patch to be able to build with GCC 4.3. Closes: #474866
#
package sear
tags 474866 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: java-access-bridge
> Version: 1.22.0-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package f
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> reopen 459281
> thanks
>
> Sorry, this problem still occur as of now, on AMD64 machines at
> least. With the following commands on one of my boxes (amd64, gij
> version 4.3.0-2):
I tested on amd64 with gij-4.3 4.3.0-2.
Cheers
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:13:15PM +0200, Andreas Kirschbaum wrote:
> I cannot reproduce this issue: all of jdk1.5.0_02, cacao, kaffe, and gij
> produce charts on both AMD x32 and x64 machines.
>
> The only remaining issues are:
>
> - The charts produced by caco/kaffe/gij are about twice as large
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.21
#
# kaffe (2:1.1.8-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Make Build-Depends on libasound2-dev only used on linux archs.
#Closes: #397782, #462329
# * Added patch to build against alsa 1.0.16 and up. Closes: #470341
#
package kaf
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.21
#
# tomcat5.5 (5.5.26-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * New upstream release.
#- CVE-2007-5333: unauthorized disclosure of information. Closes: #465645
#- CVS-2007-6286: handling of empty requests.
#
package tomcat5.5-adm
forwarded 451494 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44738
thanks
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0900, SASAJIMA,Toshihiro wrote:
> This is a bug of JkOptions handling.
>
> I made a patch for this:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44738
Thanks for the upst
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:22:55PM +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hello Petter, Hi Java Team,
>
> Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb am Sat 29. Mar, 19:02 (+0100):
> > [Trent W. Buck]
> > > I don't really know about Java, but I suspect this is failing
> > > because bootchart-view doesn't work with sablevm (
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:56:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: libtritonus-java
> Version: 20070428-5
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package f
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 06:06:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: kaffe
> Version: 2:1.1.8-3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bui
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> And what was the reason? I need to know.
>>
>> !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
>> !M
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE Application error
!STACK 1
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin
at
org.eclipse.osgi.framework.inte
re it no longer compiles:
> > > * java-gcj-compat 1.0.76-4 sets gcj-4.2 as the default gcj version
> > > * gcj-4.2, gij-4.2 and libgcj8-* are at version 4.2.1-3
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:12:44PM +0100, Michael Koch replied:
> > I have just tried this with SUN JDK
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: jfreereport
> Version: 0.9.0-05-4
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080225 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:35:36PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libxpp3-java
> Version: 1.1.3.4.O-3
> Severity: serious
>
> >From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> cd . && /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java -classpath
> /usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/an
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:23:42PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libcommons-codec-java
> Version: 1.3-4
> Severity: serious
>
> >From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> cd . && /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java -classpath
> /usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:33:30PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libxpp2-java
> Version: 2.1.10-4
> Severity: serious
>
> >From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
Nice pbuilder output.
To be serious. I can't reproduce this her in a clean pbuilder. Do you
did something special to your pbu
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:54:16AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> This happens because the existing version is "bigger than the new one".
>
> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.2.5-2etch1 gt 1.2.5-2+b1 &&
>
> echo bigger || echo smaller
> smaller
BTW: I sent an update to the secur
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
> >> Runtime.exit()?
> >
> >
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
> Runtime.exit()?
I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called
with code 13.
> I'm betting it's a bogus version check.
What kind of vers
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:21:54PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Package: tomcat5.5
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for tomcat5.5.
>
> CVE-2007-5333[0]:
> | Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25
severity 459281 important
forwarded 459281 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35168
thanks
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:18:06PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:42:41PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Michael Koch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:42:41PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> >> For information, libjfreechart-java still does not work with gcj
> >> 4.3-20
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> For information, libjfreechart-java still does not work with gcj
> 4.3-20080202-1.
I have tested 4.3-20080116-1 and 4.3-20080202-1 locally and both worked.
The generated image is slightly different to the one generated by SUN
bu
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> reassign 432541 gcj-4.2
> retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins
> merge 432539 432541
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using
> snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed a
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:49:39AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > antlr/WildcardElement.java:30: error: String cannot be resolved to a type
> >public void setLabel(String label_) {
> > ^^
> > antlr/WildcardElement.java:34: error: String cannot be resol
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:07:30PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> sudo apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev java-gcj-compat
>
> $ eclipse
> searching for compatible vm...
> testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
> $
>
> Apparently works. How can I see for sure, whether it uses gcj?
It did alread
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 12:16 PM, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CP
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+
> > > COMMAND
> > > 4588 arie 23 0 930m 754m 60m D 81 64.7 0:28.48 java
> >
> > Hmm, no I have a much leaner memory usage here. Is the package
> > eclipse-
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:43:50AM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried executing /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse?
> >
>
> When I start /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse, it complains on out-of-memory
>
> # /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse
> GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL!
>
> In separate wind
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:21:55PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> I have the same problem.
> If I launch the command line manually (not using eclipse shell script), then
> eclipse starts properly:
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -
> Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:21:55PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> I have the same problem.
> If I launch the command line manually (not using eclipse shell script), then
> eclipse starts properly:
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -
> Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 04:22:52AM +0100, Rene Wunderlich wrote:
>
> 1. ubuntu users have the same problem
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/109583
>
> 2. i found this bug fix from Arnold Daniels and it work for me
> http://blog.adaniels.nl/?p=14
>
>
>
> $sudo apt-get --
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:48:31PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > It blocked during the testcases. I have no idea why. The last testcases
> > to be executed were:
> > [junit] Testcase: setOpenCallCountTwice took 0.045 sec
> >
tag 460364 pending
thanks
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > [javac] 2. ERROR in
> /build/user/eclipse-3.2.2/source-tree/plugins/org.eclipse.team.cvs.ssh2/src/org/eclipse/team/internal/ccvs/ssh2/CVSSSH2PreferencePage.java
> (at line 877)
> > [javac]
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Deller, Helge wrote:
> This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
I think both are issues in GCJ. Ant itself is only bytecode. So no
native calls (except when ant-gcj and ant-optional-gcj are installed but
I think these are empty on hppa anyway
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:29:47AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Package: libjfreechart-java
> Version: 1.0.9-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> Unfortunately, unlike what is said in the changelog,
> libjfreechart-java does not work with free JVM available. As I proof,
> I joined a test
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: jaxme
> version: 0.5.2+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
severity 458606 normal
thanks
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:03:49AM +0800, Jivan Amara wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.1-6
> Severity: grave
> File: /usr/bin/eclipse
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This bug started for me after installing and removing two UML editors
> that in
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:07:44AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 at 00:53:28 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother
> >
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:48:00PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:55:26AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> >> http://people.alioth.debian.org/~smcv-guest/gnash-0.81~rc070818-2.1-r
Hello Simon,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother
> asking for a sponsored-NMU of a known-broken package in the hope that it's
> xmms2's fault, should I add the Recommends, should I file a separate
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > (I'm a new maintainer doing RC bug squashing; Michael Koch, Cc'd, is my AM.)
> >
> > I attach a proposed NMU interdiff for this bug, and for a FTBFS with recent
> > dpkg-shlibdeps which I dis
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:15:55PM +0800, darren wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l |grep libc6
> ii libc62.7-3GNU C
> Library: Shared libraries
> ii libc6-dev2.7-3GNU C
> Library: Devel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:23:50AM +0800, darren wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.2-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Can please retry with libc6 2.7-3?
With which options if your /home parition mounted?
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Hello Nicolas,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:38:27PM +0100, Nicolas Maitre wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.2-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Hi,
> I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the "java" process
> was using up to 80% of the mem
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:49:09PM +0100, NoX wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.2-4
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
> I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the "java" process
> was using up to 80% of the memory.
Please update to glibc 2.7-3 and retry and report back if its better
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 05:58:02PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: flutejava
> Version: 1.3-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> your package failed to build from source. The failure seems to appear on
> every architecture.
>
> | Automatic build of flutejava_1.3-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:13:55AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Please retry with current java-gcj-compat installed. This should use
> much less memory.
Bastian requeued bouncycastle and it build this time (with newer
java-gcj-compat).
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 07:55:28AM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct, 2007 at 11:38:29AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > This is cause by a bug in dak (e.g. #232730). A possible workaround is
> > to do a complete update with a new orig tarb
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 10:45:34PM +0200, Rene Wunderlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i tink it is an amd64 bug
>
> i have a 32bit and a 64bit system and the bug is only on the 64bit system
> (sid)
>
> the init on a clean homedir fail and eclipse crashes ;/
Hmm, I develop the package on x86_64 and it wor
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/javahelp_nbproject/build.xml:119:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
> /build/user/javahelp2-2.0.05/build-tree/javahelp2-2.0.05/JSearchIndexer_
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:19:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: bouncycastle
> Version: 1.37-2
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of bouncycastle_1.37-2 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
> > sbuild/s390 98
> [...]
> >
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:20:22PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: entagged
> version: 0.31-3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bui
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 at 07:36:30 -0600, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-15 11:30]:
> > > A patch is attached. It makes the following changes to fix the FTBFS:
>
> Um, oops. Patch *re
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
