Hello,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:47:11PM -0400, Matthias Klose wrote: > reassign 537290 classpath-common > thanks > > No, there's nothing wrong with gcj-jdk. It defines a conflict with > the current classpath-common. What needs to be done: update > classpath to 0.98, build cacao using the new classpath, then decide > what to do with the tools which are both built by gcj-jdk and > classpath, if we want to avoid the conflict. classpath/cacao should > at least provide something like /usr/lib/jvm/<something> and provide > alternatives as other JVM's do. > > Maybe it is a help to provide a new cacao-source source package just > building the cacao-source binary package, which then is then used by > classpath and openjdk-6 to build the cacao runtime. > > If nobody is interested in classpath, then we maybe should remove it. I will take care of this. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
