severity 985632 important
tags 985632 moreinfo
stop
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 09:59:45AM +0900, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote:
> Package: firmware-brcm80211
> Version: 20210208-4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid bullseye
> Justification: renders package unusable
please provide info on the affected hardware
severity 982757 critical
stop
> Version: 20201218-3
> Severity: normal
thank you for the report, oh boy this one is opens a can of trouble.
It seems I was blissfully unaware that the Debian packaging did not
take into account the symlinks of upstream linux-firmware WHENCE file.
So this means we a
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:29:43PM +, B.R. Oake wrote:
> Source: linux
> Version: 3.19-1~exp1
> Justification: fails to build from source
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> The two patches:
>
> features/arm/dts-sun7i-Add-spi0_pins_a-pinctrl-setting.patch
> features/arm/dts-sun7i-Add-uart3_pi
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:30:34 +0100, Janusz S. Bien wrote:
>
> > Quote/Cytat - Julien Cristau (sob, 15 lis 2014,
> > 10:48:51):
> >
> > >On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 23:42:37 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > >
> > >>I think the prob
severity 757982 important
stop
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:37:03AM +0200, repron wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
> Version: 1:7.4.0-2
> Severity: grave
and no a single failure is not grave.
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> With installed packages:
> xserver-xorg-video-radeon
> xserver-xor
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 03:38:57PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 28 juin 2014 15:02 +0200, maximilian attems :
>
> >> OK, I understood only later that the bug was reported against an unknown
> >> package. I suppose that the original submitter did try to install kerne
Having to plot thingies, this is my workaround for the moment:
+import matplotlib
+matplotlib.use('GTK')
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 05:33:21PM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > "VC" == Vincent Cheng writes:
> VC> Section "Device"
> VC> Identifier "Intel Graphics"
> VC> Driver "intel"
> VC> Option "AccelMethod" "uxa"
> VC> EndSection
> Indeed, that fixes it.
>
Newer snapsha
tags 707040 pending
stop
On Wed, 08 May 2013, Ben Love wrote:
> Two potential solutions:
>
> 1) Change the -x test to a -e test. I don't know if sh.shared would
> ever legitimately exist, yet should not be used as /bin/sh.
ack, done.
> 2) Create a final, unconditional block that does "someth
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:09:05AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> Package: libklibc
> Version: 2.0.2-1
> Severity: serious
> File: klibc
>
> new build failure on mips*:
>
> In file included from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/klibc/../include/sys/md.h:30:0,
>
Package: libklibc
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
File: klibc
new build failure on mips*:
In file included from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/klibc/../include/sys/md.h:30:0,
from usr/kinit/do_mounts_md.c:19:
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/linux/include/linux/raid/md_p.h:159:2: error: #error unspecified
severity 707789 important
tags 707789 moreinfo
stop
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:19:15PM +0200, Frank Denissen wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.109.1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
A single boot failure as bad it is for the single box != critical.
>
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:43:17AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> tags 692951 + patch
> thanks
>
> Andreas Beckmann dixit:
>
> >After the upgrade /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/ is just an empty directory.
>
> Hey, I know that. Patch attached, can NMU if you want, maks.
I'm happy if you deal with thi
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> OK, thanks. I think one of the ARM guys or jak can do
> a test-boot with an initrd made from the fixed klibc
> and without busybox, and rebuilding mksh on armhf with
> it would also show success (in fact, once you uploaded,
> I’ll ask for a binNMU o
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I’ve submitted upstream a number of commits that fix this, plus one for
> the Debian packaging:
>
> • fix http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2012-September/003366.html
> • fix http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2012-September/003368.html
> • pkg h
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:13:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:59:34PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> * There's a real bug in the ARM assembly version of longjmp in
> >>usr/
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> More debugging results:
>
> * If I replace -Os with -O0 to disable optimisation, the crash goes
>away too. Suggests (maybe) a compiler bug here...
nasty. :|
> * There's a real bug in the ARM assembly version of longjmp in
>usr/klibc/arc
Sorry for the time it took.
According to your bug report klibc dash on ia64 has a working echo,
so it's basic functionality should be good.
It is not clear to me why the initramfs won't boot without busybox?
It does here very well on x86 platforms.
could you please list all the hooks that are sh
Package: libklibc
Version: 2.0~rc4-1
Severity: serious
due to newer stricter signal handing fails on build,
on archs with unknown sig, will be corrected soonish.
--
maks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System dixit:
>
> >> # klibc's broken klcc is at fault
> >> reassign 645738 libklibc-dev
> >Bug #645738 [rootskel] rootskel: FTBFS on multiple architectures
>
> Partial multiarch issue? (Just a guess. This error message
> sounds l
severity 643741 important
stop
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:50:57AM +0100, Volodymyr M. Shcherbyna wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32-35squeeze2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
no at max important, maybe breaks *one* box.
>
> Hello,
>
>
ernel memory: 1024kB freed
> Loading, please wait...
>
> And then, nothing.
>
> Regression has been bisected to commit
> 8f8299d9ba017d2a5af853a52be37ee50c89fac2 (mkinitramfs: copy over on
> build instead of using symlink tree) from maximilian attems,
> 2011-02-21 (initramfs-t
severity 627869 important
tags tags moreinfo
stop
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:34:17AM -0300, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.38-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Since upgrade from 2.6.32 to 2.6.38 my wireless network card becam
tags 618616 pending
stop
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I've fixed this in Ubuntu with the attached patch, but didn't find
> where to upstream it; since you're a klibc upstream developer and since
> it probably already affects Debian, I figured it was probably best to
> send it her
severity 619711 important
stop
default is KEYMAP=n.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I had no idea that initramfs-tools does this. I think this was wrong
> even with old version of console-setup because in some situations
> cached.kmap.gz will not correspond to the actual configur
severity 606017 important
tags 606017 unreproducible moreinfo
stop
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> st...@riemann{~}sudo nvram-wakeup
> nvram-wakeup: Your mainboard is currently not supported.
> nvram-wakeup: Please try determining the addresses and sending the following
> nvram-wa
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:19:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:30:58PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > I am hereby asking the tech-ctte to decide how the kernel ABI should
> > be managed.
>
> Hi Julien, from the bug log it's pretty clear that there was no
> possib
tags 607090 pending patch
stop
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Carsten Hey wrote:
>
> Please adapt the severity if you think this is RC.
indeed, thank you for reporting.
Thought it was only an issue of partial upgrades but indeed Lenny
cryptsetup had one of the two errors that got later corrected for
pre
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:41:22PM +0100, Volker D. Pallas wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.36-1~experimental.1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: breaks the whole system
come on get real this is an exp package and even in unstable
important would be enough.
> U
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:16:46PM +0100, Emmanuel wrote:
>
> I've been building my own kernels since 0.9x versions... and I like
> stability.
nice, but irrelevant 0.9 pointer.
2.6.32 is the stable branch.
2.6.30 is long fucked, please wake up.
the ide stack is dead, switch to libata
or bette
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:54:48PM +0100, epierre wrote:
>
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.10 (PREEMPT)
why are you using that homewgrown unsupported linux-2.6?
Seriously dude this is ridiculous, reproduce on up to date
standard linux-2.6 debian image and then maybe one could
start talking about the s
severity 594125 important
stop
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:28:31PM +0200, Florian Kriener wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64
> Version: 1~experimental.2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
important is enough.
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> There is a bug in the l
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 12:05 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > thanks for the info, currently waiting on an upstream pull request.
> > http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2010-July/002667.html
> > will upload ab
[ adding relevant cc's ]
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a second patch for ipconfig, which further improves (actually,
> restores) ipconfig's behaviour on busy LANs with UDP noise.
>
> Commit 4efbcf90f60e27febe883ef052454d8cfded5c15 really is the root
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Michael Prokop wrote:
> maks, you can easily reproduce this issue with kvm, a live system
> (latest Grml release works fine) and two virtual NICs.
> If you need any further information I'm happy to provide it,
> debugging klibc-utils 1.5.12-2->1.5.18-1 is PITA with all its hea
tags 591473 moreinfo
stop
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 01:37:22PM +0100, FRLinux wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-15
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
no only if *lots* of boxes would be affected,
also prove posted.
>
> We use this server as a bridging fir
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:10:57AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-07-15 08:49 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > Hmm, regarding that: debian/rules uses debhelper and passes --link-doc
> > to dh_installdocs. Thus a symlink is created to the libklibc binary
> > package, which contains th
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:45:33PM -0400, crop...@acm.org wrote:
> Sirs and Dames:
>
> The system that has the problem discussed under bug #'s 582177 and 582342
> will
> be deactivated the second week of August 2010. It will not be reactivated
> until October 2010; it might be cannibalized.
>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 28/06/2010 14:58, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hmm checking the root mail account, I see lots of mails telling me to:
> > evolution --force-shutdown
> > why can't that be done by hand,
>
>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 02:59:28PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 28/06/2010 14:25, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Preparing to replace evolution 2.22.3.1-1 (using
> > .../evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb) ...
> > Evolution is still running, aborting...
> > dpkg:
Package: evolution
Version: 2.22.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace evolution 2.22.3.1-1 (using
.../evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb) ...
Evolution is still running, aborting...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb
(--unpack): subprocess new pr
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> So far, Ben has only agreed to reinstate the historic function of
>
>do_bootloader = yes
>
> in /etc/kernel-img.conf for Lenny kernel maintainer scripts.
> It hasn't actually happened yet, but
> he has agreed to restore its
tags 583310 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 06:34:11PM -0400, Patrick Naylor wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-13
> Severity: critical
> Tags: sid
> Justification: breaks the whole system
no breaking "one" box is not RC.
> I get a kernel panic when booting kernel 2.6.32-686 an
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:33:15PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Oops! I accidentally sent the e-mail prematurely. Allow me to continue ...
>
> and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows:
>
>Device Device
>Name Driver
>-- --
severity 582002 important
stop
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> I run Debian testing (Squeeze) on the s390 architecture. I just performed
> an "aptitude update" and "aptitude full-upgrade" sequence, and among the
> updates was a new version of initramfs-tools:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 07:54:35PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-12
> Severity: serious
>
> Because of the IDE -> ATA transition for Squeeze the pata_cmd64x driver should
> be enabled instead of the (old) cmd64x driver. AFAIK the pata_cmd64x has been
> tested and i
hello jonas,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:51:48AM +, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
> On 05/04/2010 maximilian attems wrote:
> > initramfs-tools 0.94 will break cryptsetup cryptroot boot script.
> > The Ubuntu feature of pre-cached order got merged,
> > will add a versio
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:14:29AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.94
>
> Upgrade failed with
>
> Setting up initramfs-tools (0.94) ...
> Installing new version of config file /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools ...
> Installing new version of config file /
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:01:29AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > .: 4: Can't open /scripts/functions
> >
>
> mdadm initramfs/script.local-top assumes to be only run in
> initramfs which is wrong, by a quick look at it you just need
>
>
> --- a/debian/in
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:55:13PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: serious
>
> Kernel Panic - no init found.
> Tried init=/sbin/init. No help.
please post output of
update-initramfs -u -k 2.6.32-3-686
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94
Severity: serious
breaks cryptsetup for now thus should stay in sid,
until fixed cryptestup available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:21:14PM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: renders package unusable
not at most important, as only local breakage, works fine for thousand
others and we need more i
Package: src:klibc
Version: 1.5.17-2
Severity: serious
KLIBCLD usr/klibc/libc.so
ld: s390:31-bit architecture of input file
`/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4.3/libgcc.a(_clzdi2.o)' is incompatible with
s390:64-bit output
ld: s390:31-bit architecture of input file
`/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.
Package: klibc
Version: 1.5.17-1
Severity: serious
make all INSTALLROOT=debian/tmp KBUILD_VERBOSE=1
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-klibc_1.5.17-1-s390-2QwYDl/klibc-1.5.17'
make -f
/build/buildd-klibc_1.5.17-1-s390-2QwYDl/klibc-1.5.17/scripts/Kbuild.klibc
obj=klcc
GEN klcc/klibc.
forcemerge 573926 574699
stop
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:04:57PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
known, fixed upstream and about to upload fixes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
severity 574553 important
tags 574553 moreinfo unreproducible
stop
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:07:39PM +0100, Jes???gel wrote:
>
> r...@gollum:~# dpkg --configure -a
> Configurando initramfs-tools (0.93.4) ...
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
> Procesando disparadores para
issue got fixed in 2.6.32.9.
is stable affected?
Ben wanted to review it before stable upload as rh/fedora fix went
throug several iterations. although they seem to have settled now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
severity 574031 normal
tags 574031 moreinfo unreproducible
stop
you mocking with postinst doesn't help anyone.
please post failure, as until now you haven't shown us the
failure that affects you.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Version: 2.6.32-10
failure seeems quite similar:
CC kernel/trace/trace_clock.o
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-10-alpha-POBShR/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_alpha_none/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c:
In function 'trace_clock_local':
/build/buildd-linux-2
Package: klibc
Version: 1.5.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
latest klibc failed on sparc and i386.
issue is on the way to be investigated, thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experime
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > known, have a local patch for that, need to push upstream
> > to also get a reall release of latest git, thanks.
>
> Just poking you on this... your last email was from October, any
> progress on this RC bug?
yes small progres we are working upstrea
tags 570252 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:38:07AM -0500, LeJacq, Jean Pierre wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-8
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
that would be the case if it would affect many aka X > 100 boxes.
anyway important is enough.
>
severity 568223 important
stop
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:22:03AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: critical
wrong at several level,
first critical is only ok if it would crash a huge nr of boxes.
also 2.6.32-5 is outdated test against 2.6.32-6
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, irb250 irb250 wrote:
> Jan 5 22:49:01 localhost kernel: [17744.647218] [ cut here
> ]
> Jan 5 22:49:01 localhost kernel: [17744.647230] WARNING: at lib/kref.c:43
> kref_get+0x17/0x1c()
> Jan 5 22:49:01 localhost kernel: [17744.647233] Modules linke
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:22:37PM +0100, Lars Mucha wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
> Version: 2.6.26-19lenny2
> Followup-For: Bug #550977
>
>
> There is one bug in ATI SATA PMP of SB600 and SB700 old revision, which leads
> to soft reset failure. This patch can fix the bug.
>
> You
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 07:39:23AM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> On November 10, 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Nov 10, Gordon Haverland
> wrote:
> > > I don't know, is an initialization error the same as a
> > > creation error? Trying to upgrade udev an hour or so ago, I
> > > get:
> > > se
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.31-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> There is no /etc/kernel-img.con on a fresh debootstrap sid. Installing a
> kernel leads to:
>
thanks perfect analysis and patch, applied.
nuked that templated whe
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:41:14AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: klibc
> Version: 1.5.15-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package faile
severity 552088 normal
stop
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:30:26AM +0200, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.26+17+lenny1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
not even remotely.
> I have a:
> [ 256.620087] ath5k phy1: Atheros AR5213A chip found
severity 551728 important
stop
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Adam Schmalhofer wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
no that would be true if it would break a huge number of boxes.
> After upgrading to initra
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.20+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
please nuke this entry
egrep "blacklist snd-pcsp" /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base-blacklist.conf
blacklist snd-pcsp
this one needs to be enough.
egrep snd-pcsp /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf
# Keep snd-pcsp from beeing loaded as first soundc
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Dr. Jürgen Pfennig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a working upstream bug-fix for this (kernel 2.6.30.2 ???), but not
> yet in debian's 2.6.30-2 (kernel 2.6.30.1).
>
> Please feel free to close this bug.
>
> Thanks.
is it fixed in latest 2.6.30-3? 2.6.30.1 had one cifs fix afai
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.9-12
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.31~rc1-1~experimental.1~snapshot.13865_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/include/scsi/scsi.h', which is also in package
libc6-dev
-- System Information:
Debi
reassign 530880 libmtp8
stop
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 06:26:28PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> reassign 530880 initramfs-tools 0.93.2
> retitle 530880 update-initramfs broken probably due to bad symlink
> libmtp8.rules
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2009, Stefano Costa wrote:
> > Il giorno gio, 2
reassign 527493 libmtp8
stop wasting others time
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:50:23PM -0500, Ken Bloom wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: breaks kernel upgrades
>
> update-initramfs tries to access libmtp.rules, but fails because it
> doesn't ex
reassign 527360 libmtp8
stop
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 09:44:43AM +0100, Ben Whyte wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> While updating initramfs-tools today I recieved an error from dpkg informing
> me that installat
severity 526102 important
tags 526102 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
do *not* inflate, aboves is not true as it boots on X boxes.
where X >= 50.000
> initra
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:37:51PM +0200, Beat Bolli wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-486
> Version: 2.6.26-15
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> During installation of the latest 2.6 kernel I get the following:
>
> Setting up linux-image-2.6.26-2-486 (2.6.26-15
n/changelog (working copy)
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -linux-2.6 (2.6.29-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> +linux-2.6 (2.6.29.dfsg.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
>[ Martin Michlmayr ]
>* [arm/ixp4xx] Build in LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER (closes: #521141).
> @@ -6,8 +6,12 @@
>[ maximilian
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:32:44PM +0300, Nikolay Panov wrote:
> Have I understood you correctly: your say that broken package issue
> made no sense already?
>
it is normal that package relations are out of sync for a bit.
yes it is called *unstable*
learn how to fix it or run lenny.
over and o
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:49:40PM +0300, Nikolay Panov wrote:
> > right thus please stop reopening new bugs on same issue.
>
> Well, this is same issue, but not the same bug. This bug is about
> another package (linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64, not
> linux-headers-2.6.28-1-amd64) which cannot be ins
[ adding jcm and lkml to Cc: ]
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:40:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Hmmm. I wonder if it is the old m-i-t's modprobe that is the problem when
> you do:
> modprobe --set-version=2.6.26.3 --ignore-install --show-depends
>
> Looks like that's it:
> # modprobe -V
> mod
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 06:43:27PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> f...@thorin:~$ grep ": .\+" /tmp/lib/modules/2.6.26.3/modules.dep | head -n3
> kernel/fs/cramfs/cramfs.ko: kernel/lib/zlib_inflate/zlib_inflate.ko
> kernel/fs/hfs/hfs.ko: kernel/fs/nls/nls_base.ko
> kernel/fs/nfs_common/nfs_acl.ko: kernel
thanks for quick feedback.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:15:06PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> You have to build a kernel from source while having the new m-i-t installed.
> And then install that kernel *without* running depmod (which is currently
> also not done by i-t).
well linux-2.6 images postin
> Recently kernels I built from upstream kernel source failed to boot
> after unpacking them because no modules got included in the initramfs
> initrd (and thus no root file system).
> This problem was solved after downgrading to m-i-t 3.4.1.
how can i reproduce this?
upgraded to latest m-i-t 3.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:01:49PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[snipp]
>
> It is true that yaird silently ignore some of the newer initramfs-tools
> extensions to the mkinitrd interface, but not the -t option which is now
> expected by linux-2.6 (see bug#518315).
right so it is time to add i
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:24:24PM +0100, Pol Bettinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can confirm this bug.
>
> 2.6.28-1-amd64
>
> hangs just after "Booting the kernel." with a blinking cursor as does a
> compiled 2.6.28 with mith my .config even with a very minimalistic
> config it does hang at the s
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:14:42PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please reopen this bug.
>
> Debian Policy 3.5 mandates correct package dependencies.
>
> Debian Policy also applies to Debian unstable too.
>
> The "unstable" refer to the collection of packages - each individual
> package rele
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:03:13AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > - dsp56k: use request_firmware and firmware nuked (closes: #494010)
>
> Thank you.
>
> Will you be building dsp56k firmware from source and includi
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:25:39PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > Package: et131x-source
> > Version: 1.2.3-2-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: code duplication
> >
> > 2.6.28 added et131x to staging thus linux-2.6 builds
&g
Package: et131x-source
Version: 1.2.3-2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: code duplication
2.6.28 added et131x to staging thus linux-2.6 builds
that module in tree. there is no more need for another source
package.
so that package should be kept out of testing.
(2.6.28 is currently in NEW but wi
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-486
> Version: 2.6.26+17
> Severity: Grave
> Justification: Makes package unusable
>
> Installing lenny on a 486 is not possible, because the installer kernel
> cannot boot. Upgrading from Etch will work, but o
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# uups
reassign 514808 grub-pc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# harmless message showing up on boot *after* init
reassign 514808 linux-2.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
# overflated severity
severity 512742 important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The issue he is specifically referring to above was cloned as
> bug#457463. It was closed with the upload of yaird 0.0.13-1 5 months
> ago.
any initramfs generator has to add relevant firmware to the initramfs out
of the box without user interventi
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Do the release team still consider yaird too buggy for release with
> Lenny?
there has been no progress nor any new release since last evaluation.
the worst failure is still the lack of firmware loading in initramfs.
happy vacations.
--
maks
not open to NMU.
patch applied in latest git repo, will be uploaded soonest.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: transmission
Version: 1.40-1
Severity: serious
Justification: doesn't install
Processing triggers for menu ...
Setting up transmission-common (1.40-1) ...
Setting up transmission-daemon (1.40-1) ...
Adding system user `debian-transmission' (UID 119) ...
Adding new user `debian-transmissio
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:54:01PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Well...
>
> I did another dist-upgrade tonite, and the problem went away. Go
> figure...
>
> Some one of the following list of upgrades (extracted from /var/log/
> dpkg.log) fixed it.
>
> 2008-09-17 22:57:42 upgrade initramfs-too
1 - 100 of 363 matches
Mail list logo
