Hello Stuart,
Nuitka supports 3.12 for a while now, and will support 3.13 at release
time. We will be able to keep it this way. I think I messed up with my
sponsor such that currently the stable package didn't make it through my
automatic checks, but I think it should be good to go I will check t
The later versions of Nuitka with less problems didn't make it to unstable
yet, they would only give an error. However, I
expect to make an upload in the next 2 weeks that will then close this bug.
Yours,
Kay
Hello Lucas,
I have seen this on my side as well, but it was inconsequential, probably
because I still have Python2 installed, but of course, that is bad. The
relevant code should be this:
BUILD_ONLY_PYTHON3 := $(shell [ `lsb_release -r -s | sed -e s/unstable/11/
-e s/testing/11/ -e s/buildd-// -
Hello Adrian,
thanks for your effort. As you probably know, my interest is to provide
Debian packages for old distributions too. However, I think I will follow
this, and remove the burden from Debian folk, and work in the future with
an approach, where I will generate the control file based on the
Hello,
I am readying said release right now. Future releases will be faster
though, promised. I got blocked as an upstream by a push to make Nuitka do
real optimization, but will release more often again. Sorry for the delays.
But in my defence, Nuitka uploads were blocked for months due to broken
Hello,
this is not explained in the FAQ, but the way I have done it is like this
(in build-depends, removed irrelevant parts):
python (>= 2.6.6-2) | base-files (>= 11),
python-all-dbg (>= 2.6.6-2) | base-files (>= 11),
python-all-dev (>= 2.6.6-2) | bas
Hello,
Nuitka is very much ported to Python3 for a long time. I have done the
changes to the packaging, which remove Python2 dependencies for Bullseye
and Sid, but I wanted to keep the packaging working for Wheezy and higher,
so this took more time.
Nuitka has been not building due to rst2pdf fai
Hello Adrian,
> +simpleFunction21: FAILED 125836 125872 leaked 36
The reference counting in 3.7.0 was broken, as reported in
https://bugs.python.org/issue34042 which is reported fixed.
For current releases, I have had disabled it for 3.7.0 therefore, and
couldn't see what 3.7.1 will be. These no
Hello,
I tried 2.7.8 and it does not happen, and I tried hg branch 2.7 and it
does, obviously that is an issue of Nuitka, that Nuitka will face more
widespread, once 2.7.9 gets released.
However, check out this:
[> /opt/python27_hg/bin/python
Python 2.7.8+ (2.7:e6c7a5a94a1d, Sep 16 2014, 08:49:1
Hello,
this is about a behaviour change of Python:
> -Exec with None as tuple args did update locals: 1
> > +Exec with None as tuple args did update locals: 0
>
Normally, "exec" only used to copy back to locals, if it was given no
argument, and using "locals()" in a read only fashion, when it's
new version of Nuitka to be released soon will address the issue by
treating ">=2.7.6" the same as "2.7.5+".
Best regards,
Kay Hayen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello Jakub,
what I didn't know is that only the "g++" package provides the "g++"
binary, and that the "g++-4.6" doesn't. I wonder why my minimal Debian
chroot used for building has it.
What I noticed is this "apt-get remove g++" wants to remove
"build-essential" package. So a adding depend
Hello Lucas,
Am 23.03.2012 10:27, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
So it's much easier to fix that problem in your package, for example by
build-depending on B | A.
I totally agree and prepare an upload with this for my sponsor Yaroslav
Halchenko at the next opportunity.
Yours,
Kay Hayen
Hello Lucas,
As to deterministic, are you implying that the choice is not made in
a deterministic way? It probably is just that somebody or something
hates it when not all choices are valid.
If you use alternative build-deps, two builds of the same package at
the same time might produce diffe
u implying that the choice is not made in a
deterministic way? It probably is just that somebody or something hates
it when not all choices are valid.
Best regards,
Kay Hayen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-dbg (>= 2.6.6-2), python-all-dev (>= 2.6.6-2),
rst2pdf (>= 0.14-2), scons (>= 2.0.0), base-files (<< 6.0) |
python3-all-dev (>= 3.2), base-files (<< 6.0) | python3-all-dbg (>= 3.2)
I am assuming a bug in an underlying package and ask to reassign this bug.
Yours,
Kay Hayen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
this is just to confirm that ftp.debian.org is also affected. I didn't yet
find a workaround that makes apt-get ignore signatures. Is there one?
Yours,
Kay Hayen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
17 matches
Mail list logo
