Bug#580856: jabsorb: which files?

2010-05-09 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Which files would these be? A quick grep -i didn't find any that aren't licensed either as Apache or BSD-ish. Or do you mean the clause in the BSD-ish license saying "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil"? Is there really debian-legal consensus that such a general statement is a real and v

Bug#521942: jabsorb: diff for NMU version 1.3-1.1

2009-09-17 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
David Paleino writes: > I've prepared an NMU for jabsorb (versioned as 1.3-1.1) and am going to > upload it to DELAYED/7 on Sep, 21 (you then have ~10days to do an upload > and cancel the NMU). Don't bother with the DELAYED, just do a zero-day NMU. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistingu

Bug#521448: gammu: Doesn't contain source for gnapplet.sis

2009-03-27 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Package: gammu Version: 1.23.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 It was brought to the ftpmasters' attention that gammu contains binaries without source. This requires one of the three alternatives: 1. Add source for gnapplet.sis 2. Move gammu to contrib 3. Remove gammu from archive

Bug#491176: jspwiki: Contains jars without the source

2008-07-17 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Package: jspwiki Version: 2.6.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Seems that binary jars slipped through when the package was moved to main from contrib. Will investigate on the best way of including the source code of those jars which are not yet packaged in Debian main. -- System In

Bug#443041: jspwiki: FTBFS problem possibly solved

2007-10-21 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried "new" as in "newer than a month ago". I built 2.2.33.ds1-2. Well, 2.5.139-1 is now available, please retest with that. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http:/

Bug#443041: jspwiki: FTBFS problem possibly solved

2007-10-21 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, then can you see what happens if you use the pbuilder in the same > system? The error message is caused by the Java compiler trying to Also, did you really try to build the new 2.5.139 package? I just tried to get the jspwiki source

Bug#443041: jspwiki: FTBFS problem possibly solved

2007-10-21 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, it still fails. OK, then can you see what happens if you use the pbuilder in the same system? The error message is caused by the Java compiler trying to compile Java 1.6 compatible source, although the JSPWiki build.xml forces the source and class c

Bug#443041: jspwiki: FTBFS problem possibly solved

2007-10-21 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
The new version, 2.5.139 in unstable, compiles fine in my pbuilder clean chroot. Could you check that the package compiles in your environment too, and then close this bug? -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http:/

Bug#439496: unmerge

2007-08-25 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > how is "unzip not found" (so a missing build-dep on unzip) related to > the Java errors in gjdoc? Hngh, sorry, got overzealous when correcting incorrectly filed mass bug reports (assumed the whole batch was for the same gjdoc problem instead of checking

Bug#413053: jta: orig.tar.gz not available

2007-03-01 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it only a bug in the maintainer's procedure or rather in the archive > maintaining software? I guess that depends on your point of view :) I ran into this problem with my jspwiki package, and IIRC the idea is to fix the archive to handle this at some

Bug#386831: User tomcat5 problem after removing tomcat5 but keeping tomcat5.5

2006-09-13 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Ruben Puettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes this would be the best way. Cause so it is posible that tomcat5 and > tomcat5.5 runs on the same Server with different users. But if you do > you must keep the people in mind that already has installed the package. I think the better way would be t

Bug#386394: tomcat5: Fails to start: doesn't detect sun-java5-bin JVM

2006-09-07 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adding /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun to the JDK dirs tomcat starts up > without errors. Here is the patch: Umh, how have you installed the Sun 1.5 JDK? make-jpkg should put it into /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun, not under lib/jvm. -- * Sufficiently advanced

Bug#341691: libpam-mount: Fails with mount: unknown file system type 'local'

2005-12-05 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
severity 341691 minor retitle 341691 Please document that local file system type is no longer supported Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > please try to replace 'local' in pam_mount.conf with the actual > filesystem type you are using (eg. 'ext3') and see if that works. > Y

Bug#341691: libpam-mount: Fails with mount: unknown file system type 'local'

2005-12-02 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Package: libpam-mount Version: 0.10.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The following /etc/security/pam_mount.conf directive fails with the latest version (worked fine previously). Mounting the encrypted partition with mount works fine. volume killer local - /dev/hda6 - -

Bug#312665: Only /usr/share/doc/ssh directory in the package

2005-06-09 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Package: ssh Version: 1:4.1p1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I guess this dpkg -L snippet tells everything: kaylee ~/src % dpkg -L ssh /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/ssh /usr/share/doc/ssh/copyright /usr/share/doc/ssh/NEWS.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/ssh/