Thanks for your bug report. However, I am no longer a Debian developer.
Cheers,
/JP
(Sent from my phone)
On 17/07/2012, at 22.00, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> Package: sml-mode
> Version: 4.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I tried installing sml-mode. Installation failed while it wa
Hi, I am no longer a Debian Developer, so it would be great if someone
else could take over or just upload the fix.
Cheers,
/JP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
New version with bug fixes:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4213259/deb/trac-mercurial_0.12.0.27%2Br10693-0.2.debian.tar.gz
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
,
--
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2011-04-30 10:57, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> I removed it because it wasn't ready when we needed to migrate OCaml.
> Now OCaml migrated, haxe will migrate again as soon as it's fixed
> everywhere (e.g. on kfeeebsd-*).
>
> Besides, I don't see any reason to exclude haxe from kfeebsd-*, it
> should be
buildd problems before with the exact same error
message.
So, I cannot do anything about it. Does this mean that I have to
exclude the haxe package from kfreebsd? Please advice.
Cheers,
- --
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of
problems before with the exact same error
message.
So, I cannot do anything about it. Does this mean that I have to
exclude the haxe package from kfreebsd? Please advice.
- --
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why
Hi Wei Dai, have gotten access to the armel machines?
Cheers,
/JP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wei Dai, can I get you to sign and send me an RSA SSH key? Then it
should be possible for me to sponsor [1] an account for you on an armel
machine [2].
Cheers,
/JP
[1] http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account
[2] http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?hos
This seems to be the same problem as Bug #557290, so I think the problem
is in the buildd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
to be the name of the profile: i.e.,
> silent-ssh-single-sign-on.
Ahh, sorry about that. I will fix it.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical
pam-ssh uses pam-auth-update (from libpam-runtime) in postinst and
prerm, as advocated in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg3.html, so I guess
piuparts is flawed.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E
bound to arise now and then, aren't they?
I do not see how.
Anyways, I will upload a new version of pamssh with proper prefixed
names to avoid conflicts.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsec
I am working on prefixing all generic names with the prefix pamssh_ to
avoid name conflicts with other PAM modules.
--
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> And the problem is specifically that Dovecot also has buffer_free() function.
Can you elaborate on this?
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
Please reschedule AMD64 build for mercurial-buildpackage: the new
version of package neko should fix #569806.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical
On 20 February 2010 08:53, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
>
> http://hg.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/neko/file/tip/debian/patches/kfreebsd-compile-fix.diff
> http://hg.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/neko/file/tip/debian/patches/kfreebsd-executable-path.diff
>
> and in addition I have the f
neko-1.8.1-5 seems to have fixed the spurious stack overflows etc.
which means that mercurial-buildpackage should build fine now. So if
someone could reschedule AMD64 build for mercurial-buildpackage, it
would be great.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter
I think the loop is the result of this gas bug:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856
Matthias, is there a plan for your fix to be included in Debian?
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63
$realfile, then it makes no sense to copy the non-existent
$realfile_esc. I will go for the solution of rejecting weird file
names.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Becaus
f = (@diff, "Non-sane: '$realfile'\n");
next;
}
for outright rejecting weird filenames. Can you come up with other
problematic characters in filenames?
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD
,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
s
with debugging symbols included which makes it easier to follow what
is going on.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discuss
imple.h:17
No locals.
#5 0xb7c62495 in IteratedHashWithStaticTransform (this=0xbfd200e0) at
iterhash.h:88
No locals.
#6 0xb7c62525 in SHA256 (this=0xbfd200e0) at sha.h:21
No locals.
Am I right in thinking that SecBlock(size=16) looks odd considering that
everything else in the trace use sizes of 32
I am in the process of making new versions of the haxe and neko
packages and putting them under hg.debian.org.
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical
2008/11/9 Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 00:25 +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
[...]
>
> This makes sense, but I'm _sure_ that dpkg --search told me that the
> files were owned by neko, not libapache2-mod-neko. Is it possible that
> they use
-over from some manual install
of neko?
Can you confirm or unconfirm the above observations?
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of dis
uld you please rename /usr/bin/sgen to something else?
> Like siggen.sgen maybe?
When I get back home next week, I will rename it signalgen.
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because
amlp4.
De Rauglaudre maintains a separate backwards-compatible version, which
has been renamed Camlp5."
I have not found a good way to deal with this yet.
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
The problem is that apparently the neko compiler is broken on HPPA. I
have verified the problem on paer.debian.org. Working on a solution.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A
uploaded it. If my patch do not work out
on 64-bit, I will revert and use yours. And I will pass it upstream
anyways.
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_
A. Because it breaks the logical
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: prevents install
Downloaded the daily etch netinst ISO image from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Booted fine on a ThinkPad T42, detected CD drive and built-in
Hmm, yes, it seems that installing emacs and lua-mode together breaks,
whereas first installing emacs, then intalling lua-mode works.
Investigating...
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_
A
are CC'ed.
Regards,
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to do is to change the lines 24 and 25 of install.ml
to:
let bytecode = true
let native = false
on architectures where /usr/bin/ocamlopt cannot be found.
Thanks, I will try that out when I get access to one of those machines.
--
Jens Peter Secher
ing into such Debian machines after the breakin. When
things settle down I will try to investigate myself.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_
A. Because it breaks the logical seque
I am trying to build a new version of libcrypto++ on paer right now,
using GCC 3.4.
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:55:43AM +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
>> libcrypto++5.2.1c2-6 is in needs-build state, but I am pretty sure it
>> won't build cleanly, since it didn't on other architectures using GCC
>&
use 5.5 hours [1] on each of those hard-pressed
architectures...
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_
[1] Build needed 05:23:28, 155252k disk space
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
.
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am working on fixing the "' is/uses anonymous type"
problems. Please do not upload without coordinating with me; I have a
bunch of other pacthes that should go in.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E
41 matches
Mail list logo
