2008/11/9 Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 00:25 +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
[...]
>
> This makes sense, but I'm _sure_ that dpkg --search told me that the
> files were owned by neko, not libapache2-mod-neko. Is it possible that
> they used to be owned by neko, but transitioned to the other package at
> some point, and that didn't work properly?
>
> Of course, now the files are gone, I can't reproduce the bug. But if I
> look at my dpkg status file, there is no mention of libapache2-mod-neko;
> that is, dpkg has _never_ seen it in an installed state on this machine:
>
OK, so when the apache module was separated out into its own package
(around June 2007), I must have made a mistake in the upgrade process.
But I am not sure what to do about it now...
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
