Bug#985336: #985336 not fixed (anymore)

2021-05-10 Thread Jan Wagner
reopen 985336 thx As 0.7.15.0+debian does not incorporate the changes done by 0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu1 and 0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu2 (where are the changelogs?) this bug is present in 0.7.15.0+debian again! Cheers, Jan. -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- V

Bug#986286: diaspora-installer: fails to install: Your bundle is locked to mimemagic (0.3.5), but that version could not be found

2021-04-25 Thread Jan Wagner
CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M+ V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h r+++ y --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- commit 0e50f2ba851d216c801029a27c7fda9e6ff15160 Author: Jan Wagner Date: Sun Apr 25 23:53:28 2021

Bug#976218: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#976218: nagios-plugins-contrib: diff for NMU version 27.20200511+1+nmu1

2020-12-07 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Christoph, Am 07.12.20 um 22:05 schrieb Christoph Biedl: > Okay, I've removed the upload from the queue as I really like to avoid > disrupting the maintainers' workflow by doing a NMU. However, I'd > appreciate if you could deal with this pretty soon as it is delaying the > testing migration of

Bug#976218: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#976218: nagios-plugins-contrib: diff for NMU version 27.20200511+1+nmu1 (was: Bug#976218: file breaks nagios-plugins-contrib autopkgtest: SSL_CERT UNKNOWN www.debian

2020-12-07 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Chirstoph, thanks for taking care. Am 07.12.20 um 08:09 schrieb Christoph Biedl: > to resolve this issue, I've prepared a NMU for nagios-plugins-contrib > (versioned as 27.20200511+1+nmu1), and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please > feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. 1.124.0 is alr

Bug#925919: (no subject)

2019-03-30 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi, we've seen this with the following errors on several VMWare systems: Mar 28 13:58:13 mail kernel: [26002.992114] general protection fault: [#1] SMP Mar 28 07:03:46 sigten kernel: [ 1251.757467] BUG: Bad page map in process apache2 pte:2c303a2236706f70 pmd:7afb5067 Mar 28 07:03:46 sigte

Bug#919375: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#919375: monitoring-plugins: FTBFS with mariadb-10.3: check_mysql.c:61:24: error: 'MYSQL_PORT' undeclared

2019-01-17 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, Am 15.01.19 um 12:17 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > i686-linux-gnu-gcc -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. > -I.. -I../lib -I../gl -I../intl -I/usr/include/ldap > -I/usr/include/postgresql -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/mariadb > -I/usr/include/ma > riadb/mysql -Wd

Bug#878966: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#878966: nagios-plugins-contrib FTBFS with libvarnishapi-dev 5.2.0-1

2017-12-13 Thread Jan Wagner
Am 18.10.17 um 08:20 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > ... > check_varnish.c: In function 'check_stats_cb': > check_varnish.c:193:33: error: 'const struct VSC_point' has no member named > 'section' > assert(sizeof(tmp) > (strlen(pt->section->fantom->type) + 1 + > ^ > check_

Bug#867256: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#867256: monitoring-plugins-basic: fails to install: Error: The new file apt.cfg does not exist!

2017-07-10 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Andreas, Am 10.07.2017 um 20:52 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > Looking at my logs, the problem was only reproducible in sid at the time > I filed the bug, but now it also happens in buster. Unfortunately this wasn't obvious from your bugreport and I tested with stretch. > OK, let me debug a bit

Bug#867256: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#867256: monitoring-plugins-basic: fails to install: Error: The new file apt.cfg does not exist!

2017-07-10 Thread Jan Wagner
tags 867256 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hi Andreas, thanks for bringing this to our attention. Am 05.07.2017 um 10:42 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As > per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy fo

Bug#847612: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#847612: monitoring-plugins-basic lost OpenSSL support

2016-12-14 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Sebastian, Am 13.12.16 um 21:54 schrieb Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > Could someone please enlighten me what is wrong here? The dep in -2 is > libssl-dev | libssl1.0-dev > which makes no sense becuase it should be either the one or the other. > So the -2 build took libssl-dev and built aga

Bug#847612: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#847612: monitoring-plugins-basic lost OpenSSL support

2016-12-11 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Adrian, Am 09.12.16 um 22:10 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > configure: WARNING: OpenSSL or GnuTLS libs could not be found or were disabled thanks for notifying. Seems that there was a change in depencies in unstable (and testing) for some of the packages we were depending on. A package with explicit d

Bug#822337: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#822337: upgrade from libfreeradius-client to radcli

2016-11-14 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear radcli maintainers, Am 05.11.2016 um 20:42 schrieb Jan Wagner: > Am 03.11.2016 um 00:51 schrieb Jan Wagner: >> monitoring-plugins configure tries to detect the radius library >> which can't be detected, with libradcli

Bug#822337: upgrade from libfreeradius-client to radcli

2016-11-05 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 03.11.2016 um 00:51 schrieb Jan Wagner: > monitoring-plugins configure tries to detect the radius library > which can't be detected, with libradcli-dev (and libradcli4) > installed: > > configure: WARNING: Skipping rad

Bug#822337: upgrade from libfreeradius-client to radcli

2016-11-02 Thread Jan Wagner
Am 02.11.16 um 23:38 schrieb Jan Wagner: > it's my understanding that it's a drop in for freeradius-client > and radiusclient-ng. So simply adding 'libradcli-dev' as the first build > dependency alternaive should do the trick? monitoring-plugins configure tries to de

Bug#822337: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#822337: upgrade from libfreeradius-client to radcli

2016-11-02 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Daniel, Am 23.04.16 um 17:43 schrieb Daniel Pocock: > Please check the preinst for radcli to see if you are satisfied with it, > it has to copy /etc/radiusclient/* to /etc/radcli sorry, but the migration of configurations done by users or radiusclient/radcli maintainers is nothing we will deal

Bug#822337: upgrade from libfreeradius-client to radcli

2016-11-02 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Sandro, Am 02.11.16 um 23:16 schrieb Sandro Tosi: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 17:43:05 +0200 Daniel Pocock wrote: >> > monitoring-plugins-standard depends on libfreeradius-client >> > >> > libfreeradius-client has been deprecated in favor of radcli[1] >> > >> > Please update the build dependency to

Bug#779838: nagios-plugins-contrib: FTBFS when patching

2015-03-05 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: nagios-plugins-contrib Version: 14.20141104 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: FTBFS Hi, the packages doesn`t build anymore on sid since the patches doesn`t apply anymore when the target has a symlink in it`s path. Applying patch

Bug#778995: forked-daapd: Does not work with iTunes 12.1

2015-02-23 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 22.02.15 um 21:14 schrieb Bálint Réczey: > Package: forked-daapd Version: 0.22.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: > upstream fixed-upstream Control: forwarded -1 > https://github.com/ejurgensen/forked-daapd/issues/100 > > Latest iTunes can't work with f

Bug#711502: Bug in quotatool, need to update package

2014-12-14 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Bas, Am 12.12.2014 um 20:42 schrieb Bas Zoetekouw: > On 12-12-2014 17:44 , Jan Wagner wrote: >> The version in unstable will never hit jessie. Nobody asked for >> an unblock jet. Even, I asked short in #debian-release and this &g

Bug#711502: Bug#773063: pre-approval unblock: quotatool/1.4.12-1.1

2014-12-14 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Bas, Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: >> Could you please state if you would approve to update the >> quotatool package via testing-proposed-updates

Bug#711502: Bug in quotatool, need to update package

2014-12-12 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 12.12.14 16:41, schrieb Bas Zoetekouw: > Thanks for the patch. Unfortunately, quotatool is no longer > included in Jessie, and Unstable has a new upstream version, which > also includes this patch. The version in unstable will never hit jessie.

Bug#711502: Bug in quotatool, need to update package

2014-12-12 Thread Jan Wagner
014-12-12 15:44:26.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +quotatool (1.4.12-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Adding debian/patches/ignore_initramfs.diff takes from upstream +(Closes: #711502) + + -- Jan Wagner Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:27:17 +0100 + quotatool (1.4.12-1) unstable; urgency=low * New u

Bug#721621: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#721621: dependency change s/libradiusclient-ng2/libfreeradius-client2

2014-05-21 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Daniel, Am 26.02.14 08:46, schrieb Jan Wagner: > Am 02.02.14 22:18, schrieb Daniel Pocock: >> Looks like argument 1 and 6 are new. They may or may not be >> needed, if we are lucky you can just insert 0 for missing >>

Bug#747298: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#747298: Recent request-tracker4 version

2014-05-16 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Am 16.05.14 00:00, schrieb Dominic Hargreaves: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 09:11:14PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: >> Am 15.05.2014 19:47, schrieb Dominic Hargreaves: >>> My plan for wheezy-backports was to first solve the issue

Bug#747298: Recent request-tracker4 version

2014-05-15 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Dominic, Am 15.05.2014 19:47, schrieb Dominic Hargreaves: > My plan for wheezy-backports was to first solve the issue of > people who want to stay with 4.0.x, which might involve setting up > an unofficial repository. I already uploaded a load of

Bug#721621: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#721621: dependency change s/libradiusclient-ng2/libfreeradius-client2

2014-02-25 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, Am 02.02.14 22:18, schrieb Daniel Pocock: > Looks like argument 1 and 6 are new. They may or may not be > needed, if we are lucky you can just insert 0 for missing arguments > and it will emulate the old behavior but that is not something

Bug#701744: fixed in linux 3.2.46-1+deb7u1

2013-09-03 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 03.09.2013 16:57, schrieb dann frazier: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:04:25AM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: >> as we are facing this also massively on squeeze, is there a >> chance to get that also fixed there, even when this

Bug#701744: fixed in linux 3.2.46-1+deb7u1

2013-09-03 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, Am 01.09.13 23:47, schrieb dann frazier: > Source: linux Source-Version: 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version > of linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. as we are

Bug#701406: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#701406: nagios-plugins: diff for NMU version 1.4.16-1.1

2013-07-09 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Gregor, many thanks for having a look into this. Am 09.07.13 19:21, schrieb gregor herrmann: > I've prepared an NMU for nagios-plugins (versioned as 1.4.16-1.1) > and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it

Bug#699413: [nagios-snmp-plugins] not compatible with recent libnet-snmp-perl package

2013-01-31 Thread Jan Wagner
Am 31.01.2013 09:10, schrieb Jan Wagner: > Tags: patch now the correct patch against latest package in testing/unstable. diff -u nagios-snmp-plugins-1.1.1/debian/changelog nagios-snmp-plugins-1.1.1/debian/changelog --- nagios-snmp-plugins-1.1.1/debian/changelog +++ nagios-snmp-plugins-1.

Bug#692613: [php-maint] Bug#692613: Bug#692613: php5: non-free files in upstream tarball ("The Software shall be used for, Good, not Evil")

2012-11-19 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ondřej, On 11/16/2012 10:12 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > please, keep the trolling out of this list. Your comment was > neither constructive nor helpful. maybe I was reading to much threads of communication between Stefan Esser and php-internals, sorr

Bug#692613: [php-maint] Bug#692613: php5: non-free files in upstream tarball ("The Software shall be used for, Good, not Evil")

2012-11-16 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/15/2012 07:00 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > They seem to think it's a self-made, Debian-only problem. Isn't it a common attitude of this upstream team to get other people responsible for issues? Just my 2 cents, Jan. - -- Never write mail to , yo

Bug#658228: Possible solution

2012-04-14 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 658228 + moreinfo thanks Hi Ludvig, Am 14.04.2012 18:49, schrieb Stefan Esser: > Try using > > suhosin.stealth=Off > > in your php.ini > > Xcache and Suhosin both register themself as internal zend > extensions when loaded as normal PHP exten

Bug#656486: not fixed

2012-04-10 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 656486 - fixed-upstream thanks Upstream closed the bug without providing a fix - -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V-

Bug#667865: php-suhosin: FTBFS struct _php_core_globals has no member named magic_quotes_gpc

2012-04-07 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Adam, Am 07.04.2012 19:01, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 18:41 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: >> block 657077 with 656486 > > #657077 is the release.d.o transition bug for php 5.4, which has > been closed for

Bug#667865: php-suhosin: FTBFS struct _php_core_globals has no member named magic_quotes_gpc

2012-04-07 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 block 657077 with 656486 block 663954 with 656486 block 667865 with 656486 thanks Am 07.04.2012 15:10, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: > found 667865 0.9.33-1 tags 667865 + sid wheezy thanks > > On 04/07/2012 10:04 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: >> Package: php-suhosin

Bug#603427: probable fix for rc bug #603427

2010-12-09 Thread Jan Wagner
ax.dpatch to fix broken default config * Only call postinst and config if we install the package or on dpkg-reconfigure * Copy template of local_conf.php to /etc/ipplan/ via postinst if there isn't one yet * Remove /etc/ipplan/local_conf.php on purge -- Jan Wagner Thu, 09 Dec 20

Bug#603427: probable fix for rc bug #603427

2010-11-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Dear Release Team, On Sunday, 21. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Saturday, 20. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > > i did work on a fix for rc bug #603427[1], but before uploading i would > > like to get some feedback from you, if that would be sufficient, as it > &

Bug#603427: probable fix for rc bug #603427

2010-11-21 Thread Jan Wagner
hi again, On Saturday, 20. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > i did work on a fix for rc bug #603427[1], but before uploading i would > like to get some feedback from you, if that would be sufficient, as it > isn't a small fix. i was going through your hints and did modify the

Bug#603427: probable fix for rc bug #603427

2010-11-20 Thread Jan Wagner
nfig_syntax.dpatch to fix broken default config * Only call postinst and config if we install the package or on dpkg-reconfigure -- Jan Wagner Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:00:25 +0100 diffstat: README.Debian | 15 +++--- changelog | 2

Bug#603427: ipplan: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2010-11-15 Thread Jan Wagner
tags 603427 + pending patch thanks On Sunday, 14. November 2010, you wrote: > Package: ipplan > Version: 4.92a-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade t

Bug#526878: Bug#471801: Bug#526878: Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2010-09-29 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Lars, On Monday, 3. May 2010, Lars Volker wrote: > I've uploaded the new packages to m-d-n and I'd be glad, if one of you > could have a look at them. Especially I'm looking forward to hear from > Peter again. even if it would be too late for squeeze, is there any progress on the packaging? I

Bug#521198: nulls mysql update parameters and allows update to continue

2010-06-03 Thread Jan Wagner
severity 521198 important tags 521198 + wontfix thanks On Friday 07 May 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > Suhosin is now installed and enabled by default. So "1. if anybody > installes a php security module, the documentation should be read" no > longer applies. php5-suhosin is actually installed

Bug#504283: Bug#471801: Bug#526878: Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2010-04-14 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Lars, On Wednesday 14 April 2010 14:45:02 Lars Volker wrote: > after building Debian packages for the EPL version of egroupware for the > last year, I also started building packages on opensuse's buildserver. > They can be downloaded at > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/eGroup

Bug#526878: Bug#471801: Bug#526878: Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2010-04-13 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Lars, hi Peter, hi Martin, On Tuesday 09 March 2010 10:32:29 Jan Wagner wrote: > On Saturday, 22. August 2009, Ralf Becker wrote: > > Independent of how EGroupware is maintained in Debian in future, I'm > > happy to work closer together with Debian Security Team, to get ear

Bug#573147: [gallery2] no informations available how to create repackaged orig tarball

2010-03-09 Thread Jan Wagner
Package: gallery2 Version: 2.3.1.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Hi Michael, you fixed #528115 anyhow. But I can't find any informations about how to generate the orig.tar.gz (via README.source [1]) nor can I find any inforamtion how you modified the following files: gallery2-2.3.1.dfsg/MANIFEST ga

Bug#526878: Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2010-03-09 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Ralf, On Saturday, 22. August 2009, Ralf Becker wrote: > Independent of how EGroupware is maintained in Debian in future, I'm > happy to work closer together with Debian Security Team, to get earlier > information about exploits in embedded code and coordinate security fixes. > > If I'm going

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2010-02-01 Thread Jan Wagner
On Monday 01 February 2010 10:39:50 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Saturday 30 January 2010 14:47:34 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >> Certainly, not users. And, let's make that clear: it's not "in my eyes". > >> Ask other DDs or DMs abo

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2010-02-01 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Mehdi, On Saturday 30 January 2010 14:47:34 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > Who should do backports in your eyes? Debian Developers? Maintainers? > > Nobody? > > Certainly, not users. And, let's make that clear: it's not "in my eyes". > Ask other DDs or DMs about this particular question if you want to

Bug#542500: libcapsinetwork: Broken maintainer address

2010-01-25 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Daniel, On Thursday 20 August 2009, you wrote: > Your maintainer address is broken, please fix: > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > schep...@debian.org > SMTP error from rem

Bug#566683: trying to overwrite '/etc/bash_completion.d/xm', which is also in package xen-tools 0:4.1-1

2010-01-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Goswin, On Sunday 24 January 2010, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Either bash-completion or xen-tools is missing a Replaces and then > other should drop the file. maybe you have noticed, that xen-tools was removed from testing and sid and even the bug was also reported, before it was marked fi

Bug#542500: libcapsinetwork: Broken maintainer address

2010-01-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Daniel, On Thursday 20 August 2009, you wrote: > Your maintainer address is broken, please fix: > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > schep...@debian.org > SMTP error from rem

Bug#542500: libcapsinetwork: Broken maintainer address

2010-01-24 Thread Jan Wagner
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > just guessing you are reading (hopefully). Are > you able to fix that? okay .. just for the records: : host mx.berkeley.edu[169.229.218.141] said: 550 unknown user (in reply to RCPT TO command) With kind regards, Jan. -- Never write m

Bug#552011: marked as done (console-tools: Virtual consoles from tty2 onwards depend on utf-8)

2010-01-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Alastair, On Sunday 03 January 2010, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >* Patch from kbd by Martin Shutte sets default_utf8 > > in consoles. Closes: #552011. > > I'm still seeing this with 1:0.2.3dbs-67, after a reboot. > > Looking at /sys/module/vt/paramters/default_utf8 it does > contain 0 now,

Bug#562554: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2010-01-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Andreas, On Sunday 24 January 2010, Andreas Tille wrote: > But yould you please be more verbose why you > think that > > blend-update-usermenus > > is regenerating /etc/blends/science/science.conf ? This is not > the case but perhaps I might overlook something I was just running "sh -x /

Bug#562554: Bug#562552: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2010-01-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Andreas, On Sunday 24 January 2010, you wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:52:03PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > looks like #562552 and #562554 are related was there a change in > > blends- common which affected both packages or is this just a copy&paste > > er

Bug#552690: mknod-in-maintainer-script postinst:39

2010-01-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Simon, On Sunday 24 January 2010, Simon Horman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 07:42:47PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > what about the suggested change? Is anything blocking this fix? :) > > The suggested change seems entirely reasonable to me. > I'm reluctant to uplo

Bug#547336: closed by Free Ekanayaka (Fixed in 1.2-3)

2010-01-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Free, On Sunday 15 November 2009, Neil Wilson wrote: > That doesn't fix it I'm afraid. The headers on the madfuload.c haven't > been sorted for AMD64 and the udev selectors won't work as they stand. > > You need to grab the version of the package from my PPA. The vanilla > Ubuntu one is still b

Bug#562554: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2010-01-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Friday 25 December 2009, you wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then > prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But > this is not the real

Bug#552690: mknod-in-maintainer-script postinst:39

2010-01-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Thursday 29 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > You may use mkfifo instead of mknod, since there is no policy > prohibition on mkfifo (and it can't be used to make special > files). Perhaps we can add a footnote to policy mentioning mkfifo where > the mknod prohibition

Bug#481072: dk-filter reliably crashes upon connection from postfix

2010-01-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Friday 17 April 2009, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > I hope someone can resolve this for me, thanks. any progress here? As this is an RC bug and looking on the popcon usage, you risk to get the package removed from squeeze, as we freeze in the near future. Thanks and with kind regards, J

Bug#550233: arpwatch 2.1a15 NMU

2010-01-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 at 08:18:00 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > and i'll change the version number to 2.15a-0.2 > > Too late, that version number is less than the one you uploaded, so it'd be > rejected at upload; 2.15a-1.1 would b

Bug#418642: smart bug #418642

2010-01-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Thursday 30 July 2009, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > you were working on smart the other day, so I wondered whether you'd > have time to look into (and either close or fix) #418642, a fairly old > RC bug that smart has. any special reason for the slow process here and on #560953? You shou

Bug#562554: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2010-01-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Friday 25 December 2009, Holger wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then > prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But > this is not the re

Bug#562555: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2010-01-22 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Marco, On Friday 25 December 2009, you wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then > prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But > this is not the real

Bug#565153: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2010-01-22 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Wednesday 13 January 2010, you wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then > prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But > this is not the rea

Bug#528115: gallery2: contains non-free material

2010-01-21 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Michael, On Saturday, 24. October 2009, Michael Schultheiss wrote: > Luk Claes wrote: > > What's the status of this RC bug report? > > I've done the equivalent fix for gallery - I need to do a similar fix > for gallery2 as well. any progress here? Thanks and with kind regards, Jan. -- Neve

Bug#562946: fails to install -- update

2010-01-21 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Deepak, On Monday, 4. January 2010, Deepak Tripathi wrote: > I have installed in my system, Yes this package need to be build-dep on > libtre4 . After installing libtre4, i am able to install package > successfully. > > debian:~/Debian_project/ruby/libterm# dpkg -l | grep "libtre4" > ii libtr

Bug#526491: fixed in radiusclient 0.3.2-12

2009-10-15 Thread Jan Wagner
reopen 526491 thanks Hi Barry, On Friday 09 October 2009 18:39:14 Barry deFreese wrote: >* Add Conflicts for radiusclient-ng packages. (Closes: #526491). you added "Conflicts: libradiusclient-ng-dev, libradiusclient-ng2", which is wrong! The conflicting packages are "libradiusclient-ng-dev"

Bug#548303: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#548303: missrepresented license information

2009-10-14 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Millan, On Friday, 25. September 2009, Robert Millan wrote: > debian/copyright claims there's FSF-copyrighted code in this package > whose license is: > >[...] GNU General Public License as published by >the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991. > > but there's no file

Bug#526878: Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-08-22 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Ralf, On Thursday 20 August 2009, Ralf Becker wrote: > I'm one of the admins and the main developer of EGroupware project. > > Naturally I'm very interested that EGroupware stays in Debian. > > I'm building the projects own rpm packages and since a while also Debian > packages for a professiona

Bug#504283: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-08-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Peter, On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin Meredith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:11:29PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:39:48 Martin Meredith wrote: > > > I've suggested that I adopt this, however, the current maintainer seems &

Bug#526878: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-08-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Martin, On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:39:48 Martin Meredith wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:02:18AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > Hi everyone (formerly) interested in egroupware, > > > > egroupware seems to be in need for attention > > > > #526878 > > [egroupware-wiki] egroupware-

Bug#526878: Bug#471801: egroupware adoption or removal?

2009-07-29 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno mer, 29/07/2009 alle 09.39 +0100, Martin Meredith ha scritto: > [...] > > > I've suggested that I adopt this, however, the current maintainer seems > > to want to stay as maintainer, and just do everything through "accessible >

Bug#538487: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#538487: Please rebuild against libmysqlclient16 from MySQL-5.1

2009-07-25 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Christian, On Saturday 25 July 2009, Christian Hammers wrote: > MySQL 5.1 has just been uploaded and will replace the existing MySQL 5.0. > Once you see libmysqlclient-dev (5.1.36-3) in unstable, please replace > the build dependencies to libmysqlclient15-dev to libmysqlclient-dev and > upload

Bug#521198: php5-suhosin nulls mysql update parameters and allows update to continue

2009-07-24 Thread Jan Wagner
tags 521198 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Hi David, On Wednesday 25 March 2009, David wrote: > Suhosin nulls the parameters of a very large mysql update resulting in > null values being submitted to the database, where data was expected. that depends on your suhosin settings. I expect people

Bug#521198: [php-maint] Fwd: Bug#521198: php5-suhosin nulls mysql update parameters and allows update to continue

2009-07-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Sean, On Tuesday 07 April 2009, sean finney wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:48:38PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: > > Guessing from the bugreport, I think the cause for the "dataloss" was, > > that suhosin blocked the execution of the script, cause the values are to >

Bug#521198: Fwd: Bug#521198: php5-suhosin nulls mysql update parameters and allows update to continue

2009-07-24 Thread Jan Wagner
Hey guys, any idea how to respond on this "bugreport"? I personally think: 1. if anybody installes a php security module, the documentation should be read 2. if the documentation was read, the users are able to set appropriate settings 3. if anybody don't like to act suhosin and use the simula

Bug#530271: CVE-2009-1732, CVE-2009-1733

2009-05-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Giuseppe, On Saturday 23 May 2009, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Hi, > the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were > published for ipplan. > > CVE-2009-1732[0]: > | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/usermanager in IPlan > | 4.91a allows remote attackers to injec

Bug#513872: Need to depend on nagios-plugins-basic

2009-02-01 Thread Jan Wagner
Package: nagios-snmp-plugins Version: 1.1.1-5 Severity: serious While looking at the ubuntu bugs for the package just for fun, I noticed[1] that I use /usr/share/nagios-plugins/dpkg/functions (which is shiped with nagios-plugins-basic) in postinst of nagios-snmp-plugins. If nagios-plugins-basic is

Bug#503401: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#503401: try to start command via irc:// handler

2008-10-26 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Mark, On Sunday 26 October 2008 00:27, Mark Purcell wrote: > Are you referring to this old report, or is this a new exploit? > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvirc/+bug/123037 Maybe ... I didn't have a deeper look into the issue, I just saw popping up the issue on the kvirc maili

Bug#503401: try to start command via irc:// handler

2008-10-25 Thread Jan Wagner
Package: kvirc Version: 3.4.0 Severity: serious Tags: security --- Please enter the report below this line. --- There is an exploit outside which trys to start commands via irc handler. Dunno if there older versions which are also vuln. Maybe you will also adjust the severity. http://www.milw0

Bug#499408: Gallery 2.2.6 Security Fix Release available

2008-09-18 Thread Jan Wagner
Package: gallery2 Severity: grave Tags: security A new version has been released which fixes the following bugs: * Arbitrary file disclosure through archive upload module - Users with "add item" permission could retrieve any file on the server that is owned by the web server account. The prob

Bug#498621: [php-maint] Bug#498621: PHP5 - ext/standard/rand.c is not dfsg conform

2008-09-11 Thread Jan Wagner
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Author homepage: http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/emt.html > > Current license of the code > http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/MT2002/elicense.html > > So looks like documentation bug. Okay ... but how to process here

Bug#498621: PHP5 - ext/standard/rand.c is not dfsg conform

2008-09-11 Thread Jan Wagner
Package: php5 Version: 5.2.0-8 Severity: serious Please have a look into line 144-148 of ext/standard/rand.c: "When you use this, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with an appropriate reference to your work. It would be nice to CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#471160: removed smarty

2008-07-11 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Michael, On Saturday 19 April 2008 17:39, Michael Schultheiss wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > tags 471160 + patch > > > > hi there, > > > > what about the attached patch. shouldn't do it the trick? on my test > > installation it works all well >

Bug#488822: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#488822: nagios-plugins: overwrites configuration on upgrade

2008-07-01 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Andreas, On Tuesday 01 July 2008 16:36, Andreas Unterkircher wrote: > [UPGRADE] nagios-plugins 1.4.11-2 -> 1.4.12-1 > [UPGRADE] nagios-plugins-basic 1.4.11-2 -> 1.4.12-1 > [UPGRADE] nagios-plugins-standard 1.4.11-2 -> 1.4.12-1 > > For me it seems it has overwritten all files in > /etc/nagios-pl

Bug#488822: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#488822: nagios-plugins: overwrites configuration on upgrade

2008-07-01 Thread Jan Wagner
tags 488822 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Tuesday 01 July 2008 15:58, Jan Wagner wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Tuesday 01 July 2008 15:17, Andreas Unterkircher wrote: > > During upgrade, nagios-plugins has replaced all config files in > > /etc/nagios-plugins/config with t

Bug#488822: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#488822: nagios-plugins: overwrites configuration on upgrade

2008-07-01 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Andreas, On Tuesday 01 July 2008 15:17, Andreas Unterkircher wrote: > During upgrade, nagios-plugins has replaced all config files in > /etc/nagios-plugins/config with that files provided in the dist package. > The upgrade sequence did not asked me to keep my local changes which I > made to the

Bug#479916: asused: FTBFS: Can't call method "getIn" on an undefined value at test.pl line 27, line 38.

2008-05-07 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Lucas, On Wednesday 07 May 2008 10:57, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > i386. [...] > Relevant part: > > make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/asused-3.72/Net/RIPEWhois/in' > > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-I../../../blib/

Bug#452128: Is there a need to run the upgrade script?

2008-04-25 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Shawn, On Friday 25 April 2008 16:04, Shawn Willden wrote: > zsh 11 % ls -la /var/lib/gallery2/ > total 1 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 80 2007-04-01 22:06 . > drwxr-xr-x 47 root root 1208 2008-04-12 02:17 .. > drwxrwxrwx 3 www-data www-data 72 2006-09-09 16:24 g2data.bak look

Bug#452128: Is there a need to run the upgrade script?

2008-04-19 Thread Jan Wagner
On Friday 18 April 2008 22:43, Shawn Willden wrote: > drwxr-xr-x 2 www-data www-data 4096 Nov 7 04:42 /var/lib/gallery2/g2data > > I notice that this directory is empty, though. My actual data is > in /usr/share/gallery2/g2data. ls -ald on this directory gives > > drwxr-xr-x 8 www-data www-data

Bug#452128: Is there a need to run the upgrade script?

2008-04-18 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Shawn, On Monday 17 March 2008 17:18, Shawn Willden wrote: > On Monday 17 March 2008 10:01:57 am Michael Schultheiss wrote: > > Shawn Willden wrote: > > I just tested this on 2008-03-14 and was not forced to run the web-based > > upgrader when moving from the original etch package to the securi

Bug#471160: removed smarty

2008-04-05 Thread Jan Wagner
m via symlink + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:05:32 +0200 + gallery2 (2.2.4-2) unstable; urgency=high * Urgency high due to release critical bug diff -Nru /tmp/FAwFfSgYAZ/gallery2-2.2.4/debian/control /tmp/3kZ6Kihe9t/gallery2-2.2.4/debian/control --- gallery2-2

Bug#470291: Intend to NMU

2008-03-21 Thread Jan Wagner
/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +php-codesniffer (1.0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * depend on php-pear (Closes: #470291). + * remove some trailing whitespaces from debian/* + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:29:33 +0100 + php

Bug#431523: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#431523: Bug#431523: nagios: diff for NMU version 2:1.4-3.2

2008-01-13 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Sunday 13 January 2008 08:22, sean finney wrote: > actually, i think it's about time that we consider having nagios (1.x) > removed from testing/unstable any objections from other folks on > pkg-nagios? since 3.0 is coming around and handling 3 branches of nagios will be not res

Bug#399892: nepenthes_0.2.0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to use static library compiled without -fPIC

2007-07-17 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Luciano, On Wednesday 20 June 2007 19:15, Luciano Bello wrote: > I need your opinion and comments about: http://bugs.debian.org/399892 > Nepenthes has a module (modulehoneytrap.so) linked with libipq (IPQ > library for userspace), which is part of iptables-dev. Libipq looks like it

Bug#429193: Uploaded ipplan

2007-06-18 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Thijs, On Sunday 17 June 2007 22:26, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Since I'm interested in getting those copies of phpmailer out of the > archive as soon as possible, I've uploaded your fix now. Thanks for your > work! this upload happened faster as expected. :) Thanks and with kind regards, Jan.

Bug#429343: Needs to use libphp-phpmailer

2007-06-17 Thread Jan Wagner
severity 429343 grave merge 429193 429343 On Sunday 17 June 2007 12:43, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: ipplan > Severity: serious > > Your package includes a copy of PHPMailer, which also is packaged as > libphp-phpmailer in the archive. You need to fix your package > to use the system-wide

Bug#428446: [Pkg-ltsp-devel] Bug#428446: /usr/lib/ltsp/update-kernels wipes modified /opt/ltsp/i386/boot/pxelinux.cfg/default

2007-06-12 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Oliver, On Tuesday 12 June 2007 13:21, Oliver Grawert wrote: > nfsroot isnt needed for anyone else on debian or ubuntu, why did you > need it seems your dhcp setup is broken or you run two dhcp servers in > the same network segment or so. I've one dhcp server, but making addition options avail

  1   2   >