-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In the meantime, there is a xen-linux-system package in testing as well
in unstable!
Please let this package into testing...
Henning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.m
after more trying I found out, that when I give --debootstrap, the
command finished, seemingly successfully.
This is nowhere documented - every example on the web and in the manpage
is without that option, and I would assume that the scripts "knows"
itself when to use debootstrap and when to use r
Severity: important
>
> I'd suggest that you repeat the command with "--dist=sarge
> --debootstrap" as an initial step. If that fails, or if you
> wish to generate more output please add "--verbose" and
> send the log to this bug report.
Thanks for the fast feedback.
Actually, that helpe
I also tried the same with a loopback dislk image - no success.
I do exactlky what is documented, and have no idea how to investigate
the problem further.
Let me know what I can try to give more help on solving this bug.
Maybe the call to the external program should not be made in a way that
ana
Package: xen-tools
Version: 2.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
when running
xen-create-image --size=5Gb --swap=1024Mb --dhcp --lvm=virtualmachines
--hostname=fasel --kernel=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16-xen
--initrd=/boot/initrd-2.6.16-xen.img --force
it stops with the mess
Hi,
On 6/8/06, Thomas Pöhnitzsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
well the name of the bug actually describes exactly the problem I had. I
never said that building the nfsroot failed, as it did not for me.
Agreed, this is, as you say, what users look for. No discussion
necessary. I didn't want
BTW: I don't understand the name of this bug. Why is a bug which
creates problems in nfsroot building filed with the topic that fai
gives an error at install time: "nfs: RPC call returned error 101"
I am not sure because it's a while since I had that, is it possible
that make-fai-nfsroot doesn't
On 6/2/06, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
if fai becomes (mostly) unusable, it's grave:
No doubt. Grave is correct.
But Thomas was talking about "RC" - are they equivalent? RC isn't
mentioned in the posted docs, but the bug is actually on the RC list,
whatever the definition of
> Does the make-fai-nfsroot call fail or the installation
> itself?
The call to make-fai-nfsroot fails, no nfsroot can be built.
This problem also appeared in Ubuntu, but I didn't look into it because a lack
of time.
So this makes FAI completely unusable, but it doesn't imply a danger to any
o
tags: patch
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.2
My previous patch did not solve the Problem completely according to the
policy. We decided in irc therefore to remove the whole debconf support for
the fai package (only for the package at install time, not the debconf
features for client installation).
Just
tags: patch
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.2
The attached patch should correct the problem of incorrect postinst
behaviour when editing conffiles, which lead to user's manual changes where
overwritten.
With this patch applied, postinst will read the old value from the conffile,
no matter if it was cha
11 matches
Mail list logo
