Package: librem-ec-acpi-dkms
Version: 0.9.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #1038001
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@bostoncoop.net
There's a patch for this upstream:
https://source.puri.sm/nicole.faerber/librem-ec-acpi-dkms/-/commit/cec8c0e8bf1532c9c605f60bb02a2ef0f98e5d77
--Dylan Thurston
-- System Inform
skencil 0.6.17-11 still contains /usr/share/man/man1/sketch.1.gz,
which is a file conflict and presumably a mistake.
Peace,
Dylan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Just an update here: the bug does not seem to be in evince itself,
this was just a handy way to trigger it. Something broke after my
upgrade yesterday, and I'm currently trying to isolate which package
is responsible by selective downgrades.
Peace,
Dylan Thurston
-
Package: evince
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
If you start evince with the attached file placed in
~/.gnome2/evince/ev-metadata.xml by calling "evince file.pdf" for any
PDF file[1], X will effectively freeze: the keyboard and mouse clicks no
longer ha
Subject: apt-listbugs: Bug is now reappearing
Followup-For: Bug #437020
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.82
This bug is now (Sept. 7) occurring again.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'experimental')
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30/08/2007):
> According to the changelog, not accurate:
> | + Add Conflicts/Replaces: network-manager-gnome (<< 0.6.5-1) as [...]
>
> Not doing so would be a grave bug (file conflict between packages).
Do you have a reference for why "Replaces" is necessary?
oftware.
What makes this something other than a wrapper package? What kind of
package are you looking for here:
> Any idea if a similar package exists in main/contrib?
?
Peace,
Dylan Thurston
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: linux-wlan-ng-firmware
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2
As I understand it, the sole purpose of this package is to download
non-free firmware. This fits into 'contrib', not 'main', since it
depends on non-free software for its ultimate operation. Packages
like this are given
reopen 296087
severity 296087 minor
thanks
So if the Microsoft EULA doesn't apply to anything included in the
package, why is it included with the other licenses without any
indication that the corresponding components are not present in this
version?
Peace,
Dylan
signature.asc
Descript
9 matches
Mail list logo