Bug#722660: libgraphviz-dev and blt-dev: error when trying to install together

2013-09-17 Thread David Claughton
reassign 722660 blt thanks Hi, I'm reassigning this to blt as it looks like this might be a regression. The changelog for version 2.4z-3 says the following: "Moved the man pages and HTML docs for the BLT commands from the blt-dev package to the blt package, where they really belong. Left just t

Bug#707502: graphviz: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/graphviz/python26': No such file or directory

2013-05-20 Thread David Claughton
tags 707502 + pending thanks On 19/05/13 10:18, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > the attached patch fixes the build error. There might be issues left for > a complete python transition, though. > > Roland Thanks Roland, I've applied this fix to the git archive. Cheers, David. -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#676098: graphviz: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/graphviz/ruby/libgv_ruby.so': No such file or directory

2012-06-20 Thread David Claughton
tags 676098 + pending thanks Hi Lucas, Thanks for your efforts - looks like the package was broken by the recent change to use ruby 1.9 by default. I've pushed changes to the git repo that fixes the build, just needs a little testing before I get it uploaded... Cheers, David. On 04/06

Bug#674150: libgvc5 install fails

2012-05-23 Thread David Claughton
Hi Sylvestre, I'm afraid I'm having trouble reproducing your problem. Although I don't use cowbuilder, I've successfully installed the package both directly and on an sbuild schroot. Could be a corrupt package download - can you re-download and try again, maybe from a different mirror? Cheers,

Bug#639288: graphviz: FTBFS: Cannot install gv.3python

2011-09-02 Thread David Claughton
tags 639288 - patch thanks On 28/08/11 20:51, David Claughton wrote: > On 26/08/11 03:49, Daniel Schepler wrote: >> On Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:36:13 PM David Claughton wrote: >>> On 25/08/11 17:58, Daniel Schepler wrote: >> [...] and tcl-dev and tk-dev aren't

Bug#639288: graphviz: FTBFS: Cannot install gv.3python

2011-08-28 Thread David Claughton
tags 639288 + patch pending thanks On 26/08/11 03:49, Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:36:13 PM David Claughton wrote: >> On 25/08/11 17:58, Daniel Schepler wrote: > When I tried removing gv.3python from debian/libgv-python.install to get the > packages bu

Bug#639288: graphviz: FTBFS: Cannot install gv.3python

2011-08-25 Thread David Claughton
On 25/08/11 17:58, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > An interesting line from earlier in the log: > > /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 gv.3guile gv.3lua gv.3ocaml gv.3perl gv.3php > gv.3ruby '/tmp/buildd/graphviz-2.26.3/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man3' > > I'm not sure why gv.3python is missing in that line.

Bug#623165: Updated graphviz to fix FTBFS caused by python 2.7

2011-04-24 Thread David Claughton
On 24/04/11 23:45, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 04/25/2011 12:17 AM, David Claughton wrote: >> >> OK, I've applied the patch to the git repo - looks good. Thanks >> again to you both. >> > > Thanks. > > However, you might want to revert the other patch th

Bug#623165: Updated graphviz to fix FTBFS caused by python 2.7

2011-04-24 Thread David Claughton
On 23/04/11 23:32, David Claughton wrote: > On 22/04/11 21:10, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> I've been able to build the package using Barry's patch, and >> successfully tested the python binary package produced. So, ok >> upstream's Graphviz doesn't

Bug#623165: Updated graphviz to fix FTBFS caused by python 2.7

2011-04-23 Thread David Claughton
On 22/04/11 21:10, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > I'm sorry but 65883762c382d200cc5001433d060474045c7e30 looks wrong. > If python 2.7 is set as default python interpreter, libgv-python will be > useless, unless you install python2.6. I realise that this will probably happen at some point, but I didn't t

Bug#623165: Updated graphviz to fix FTBFS caused by python 2.7

2011-04-21 Thread David Claughton
Hi Christoph, Hope you're having a happy Easter (you too Seb). I've just pushed some changes to the git repo to fix the recent FTBFS which was caused by the introduction of python 2.7 to the archive. I've thrown in a couple of other things including a patch for Hurd which was submitted - just so

Bug#623165: src:graphviz: FTBFS with Python 2.7 enabled

2011-04-18 Thread David Claughton
> It seems that all supported Python versions are explicit in the > configure script, and Python 2.7 is missing. > Hi Stéphane, Thanks for the report. It looks like the current graphviz doesn't offer support for python 2.7. Upstream have advised that version 2.28 is due to be released "any day

Bug#539187: Patch is broken - packaging is too

2009-12-03 Thread David Claughton
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Furthermore, it is not the role of dh_pysupport to fix broken symbolic > links. Hi Josselin, I think maybe I wasn't clear enough about the problem - I'm not suggesting dh_pysupport should fix a broken symlink - I'm suggesting it breaks a symlink that wasn't broken befor

Bug#539187: (no subject)

2009-12-02 Thread David Claughton
reassign 539187 python-support retitle 539187 Moving symlink fails where linkdest is also moved affects 539187 libgv-python tags 539187 patch thanks Hi, I've tracked this problem down to the 'rename_subtle' function in 'movemodules'. This function is designed to modify relative symlinks that are

Bug#479200: [exim4-base] E: /var/cache/apt/archives/exim4-base_4.69-5+b1_i386.deb: subprocess new post-removal script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)

2008-05-03 Thread David Claughton
Marc Haber wrote: On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 04:24:55PM +0100, David Claughton wrote: > When updating from 4.69-5 to 4.69-5+b1 the install fails with the > following output... > > Unpacking replacement exim4-base ... > Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at >

Bug#479200: [exim4-base] E: /var/cache/apt/archives/exim4-base_4.69-5+b1_i386.deb: subprocess new post-removal script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)

2008-05-03 Thread David Claughton
Package: exim4-base Version: 4.69-5+b1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- When updating from 4.69-5 to 4.69-5+b1 the install fails with the following output... Unpacking replacement exim4-base ... Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /usr/lib/perl/5.

Bug#414746: Possible fix upstream.

2007-04-24 Thread David Claughton
Hi, I looks to me like this bug matches upstream bug RT #24145, which has been marked as resolved. Although it's not 100% clear it looks as if XML::Twig v3.29 includes this fix. Rgrds, Dave. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E