Bug#693839: debian-installer fails on linkstation mini because of missing u-boot-tools

2013-07-24 Thread Benjamin Cama
Coucou Cyril, Le jeudi 25 juillet 2013 à 02:20 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Benjamin Cama (2013-07-25): > > Could this patch be backported to wheezy? As wheezy uses version 3.3, it > > basically renders it uninstallable on _all_ those armel platforms > > (which, if I

Bug#693839: debian-installer fails on linkstation mini because of missing u-boot-tools

2013-07-24 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, Could this patch be backported to wheezy? As wheezy uses version 3.3, it basically renders it uninstallable on _all_ those armel platforms (which, if I understand well, all require u-boot-tools). I just tested the very nice installer on a new Linkstation Mini, and I had to apt-get install u-b

Bug#704613: cdebootstrap: signature verification bypass with manipulated InRelease file

2013-04-08 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, Same thing happened with debootstrap recently, see #703146 InRelease support was disabled because we can't get a proper cleartext out of this file, and modifying gpgv to get it is too much work. Regards, -- Benjamin Cama -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#703146: Better debootstrap InRelease handling fix

2013-03-27 Thread Benjamin Cama
Le mercredi 27 mars 2013 à 13:32 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > Le mercredi, 27 mars 2013 12.59:15, Benjamin Cama a écrit : > > attached version fix both problems (and is based on latest master, after > > Julien disabled InRelease support). Please not that it wi

Bug#703146: Better debootstrap InRelease handling fix

2013-03-27 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, Le mercredi 27 mars 2013 à 00:53 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit : > * Benjamin Cama [130326 18:33]: > > index 1dc0f87..f44 100644 > > --- a/functions > > +++ b/functions > > @@ -530,8 +530,13 @@ download_release_sig () { > > warning KEYRIN

Bug#703146: Better debootstrap InRelease handling fix

2013-03-26 Thread Benjamin Cama
lease. Regards, -- Benjamin Cama >From 169cffe3c20f36947a1604a6e1151d0f31e18de2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Cama Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:08:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove dependency on gnupg, extract Release with sed Get back gnupg to Recommends, as it is only used to extract the

Bug#612985: Partially bad workaround

2011-02-17 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, Modifying ~/.local/share/applications/defaults.list doesn't work here (and I don't see any other place where it could be overridden). But changing /etc/gnome/defaults.list works; even if I find it not optimal as I would like to only change the default browser for me, not system-wide. Regards,

Bug#613381: Workaround

2011-02-17 Thread Benjamin Cama
Ok, actually, the workaround is here : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612985#31 Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#613381: Workaround ?

2011-02-17 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, Could we _at least_ have a workaround for that? As it seems the change is not going to happen soon. Chromium fucked-up my default browser choice, and now I've no easy way to change that, and I don't even know where to look to fix that by hand. What's the workaround ? Regards, Benjamin --

Bug#589701: ofpath is not compatible with non-builtin disk controllers

2010-09-28 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi Rick, Le vendredi 24 septembre 2010 à 15:53 -0400, Rick Thomas a écrit : > First, let me apologize for the confusing non-specificity of my bug > reports to you and everyone else who is following this (and related) > bug(s). The only excuse I can offer is that at the time I was > submitti

Bug#589701: ofpath is not compatible with non-builtin disk controllers

2010-09-24 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi Rick, I am a bit disappointed about how this is ending, but I just realized you are using an addon Promise card as disk controller. This is not supported by ofpath, which just handle IDE controllers using the old ATA stack or true SCSI controllers. In short, it is hardwired for a list of disk c

Bug#587290: [Debootloaders-yaboot] Bug#587290: How does linux-base modify /etc/yaboot.conf ?

2010-09-19 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi Ben, Le samedi 18 septembre 2010 à 22:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > The value of the kernel (or rather initramfs) root parameter generally > does need to include an '=' character and linux-base.postinst is correct > to use it. It must then double-quote the value in yaboot.conf so that >

Bug#587290: How does linux-base modify /etc/yaboot.conf ?

2010-09-16 Thread Benjamin Cama
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 15:12 +0200, Benjamin Cama a écrit : > You mentioned that linux-base may modify /etc/yaboot.conf. I think it > might be the culprit for this bug, but I would first like to know how > and why it does that ? OK, I was right, thanks to your hint:

Bug#587290: How does linux-base modify /etc/yaboot.conf ?

2010-09-16 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, I'm trying to solve #587290, i.e. yaboot.conf being generated with strange values. You advised that yabootconfig be fixed, but actually I discovered that it's not its fault : it correctly handles labels/uuids, see my last answer at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580455 You m

Bug#575137: /usr/bin/aptitude missing

2010-04-03 Thread Benjamin Cama
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 18:02 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit : > On 2010-04-03 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote: > > > Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit : > >> I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin-NMU >

Bug#575137: /usr/bin/aptitude missing

2010-04-03 Thread Benjamin Cama
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit : > I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin-NMU > of the lenny aptitude, you can reproduce it by downloading that > aptitude's source and building it. Well, I happen not to find any source for it too ... The hg

Bug#575137: /usr/bin/aptitude missing

2010-04-03 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, First, thanks for caring about this bug. Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:54 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit : > On 2010-04-03 06:34 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > So, I haven't had time to do actual work on this bug yet, but I've > > mulled it over a bit. Here's what I think we know for sure

Bug#575137: Info received (Bug#575137: /usr/bin/aptitude missing)

2010-03-26 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, > I just upgraded my system and did *not* see that behaviour. > > I use the testing repositories and today's upgrade installed 0.6.1.5-3, > replacing 0.4.11.11-1+b2. /usr/bin/aptitude exists and points to > /etc/alternatives/aptitude, which in turn points to > /usr/bin/aptitude-curses. Thank

Bug#575137: /usr/bin/aptitude missing

2010-03-26 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi Daniel, Le jeudi 25 mars 2010 à 07:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Benjamin Cama was > heard to say: > > I just updated from aptitude 0.4.11.11-1+b2 to version 0.6.1.5-3 and > > lost the 'aptitude' command. It i

Bug#572869: Information request for #572869

2010-03-24 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi, I would like investigating this bug, even if for now I don't have this problem. But I need some more details on this : - first, on a up-to-date squeeze with 2.6.32, but still using the old ata stack (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_PMAC=y), I don't have any problem with ofpath even if /proc/scsi/scsi is m

Bug#575137: /usr/bin/aptitude missing

2010-03-23 Thread Benjamin Cama
Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.1.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just updated from aptitude 0.4.11.11-1+b2 to version 0.6.1.5-3 and lost the 'aptitude' command. It is no more listed in 'dpkg -L aptitude' too. Apparently, the alternative for aptitude has been lost. I

Bug#537843: tftpd-hpa: Initscript broken because inetd already bound UDP port

2009-07-23 Thread Benjamin Cama
Package: tftpd-hpa Version: 5.0-3 Severity: normal Hi, The postinst script fails because tftpd won't start. This is because UDP port 69 is already bound by inetd, which is the way I chose tftpd to run. Something should be done to detect that, or continue the postinst script even if tftpd doesn