Hello,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:23:01AM -0600, Serge
Hallyn wrote:
> As mdeslaur has pointed out in irc, one solution
> would be to have interactive su use a new pty
> for the session. Not trivial,
and not very portable too. The best pty handling
is done by Expect (Tcl/Expect) IMHO, but its co
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:15:59PM +0200, Thibault Manlay wrote:
> On 21/06/10 01:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> If you are able again to produce an image with libc6 crashing (I mean
>> already crashing, not that will crash after an upgrade), that's probably
>> something we can already study.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:18:28PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> had the same situation several days ago, libc
> became corrupt (no process could be started,
> including /sbin/init).
here's excerpt from dpkg.log:
2010-06-20 02:14:41 upgrade libc6 2.10.2-9 2.11.1-3
2010-06-20 0
Hello,
had the same situation several days ago, libc
became corrupt (no process could be started,
including /sbin/init).
I had no busybox-static on this system, only
sash, but it wasn't very helpful -- no
tar/gzip/lvm2 tools available from sash on this
broken system anyway.
I booted off a USB fl
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:50:46AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Gattin (xr...@yandex.ru):
> > P.S. Christian, what's your opinion on the issue?
>
> I should have one? :-)
It would be nice if you do :). Maybe you faced
similar discussions in the
Hello again,
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:19:09PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> you absolutely don't get it. I give the two most used
> configurations
(i.e. pdnsd-recurse.conf and pdnsd-resolvconf.conf)
> for free, namely:
> * local cache, slave to your ISP or dhcp servers, through the
>
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:03:17PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> It's not, many packages do the same,
?
> In the next upload I'll make it very clear in
> the /usr files that those are not meant to be
> edited by the user, and will be overwritten by
> an upgrade
"a large billboard that says in
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:19:09PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Oh boy, you absolutely don't get it.
of course I do,
> I give the two most used configurations for free
yes, and while it's perfectly OK regarding your
intentions, the manner in which it's implemented
isn't.
> If you're not in t
I do not understand why did you introduce the
AUTO_MODE at all? Probably, you wanted to help
users configuring pdnsd by making it
accomplishable through dpkg-reconfigure pdnsd?
If so, then amount of behavoiur which is exposed
to dpkg-reconfigure pdnsd is obviously
insufficient (server_ip? proxy_on
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > you have totally screwed up the Policy's
> > definitions and intentions: regardless of
> > whether it's a conffile or Conf
Hello, Pierre,
you have totally screwed up the Policy's definitions and intentions:
regardless of whether it's a conffile or Config File, local changes
must be preserved during a package upgrade.
--
WBR,
xrgtn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:06:06AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> Could you please try upgrading to latest bochs sid packages just to test that
> this is not a duplicate of #417416
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417416)
I checked with latest bochsbios and this
reall
Package: qemu
Version: 0.9.0-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
after upgrading qemu and libc:
1.
the WinXP image stoped booting. I can see only
BIOS logo during boot, then qemu hangs showing
no signs of boot progress. (this behaviour
regardless of -no-kqemu & rmmod kqemu).
When downgraded to 0.8.2-4, the
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:03:57AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> The main problem is that you are calling '/usr/bin/env'.
As Nicolas has discovered yesterday, -p is ignored
_only_ when su starts a _shell_. Bug itself was in
shell() function.
--
WBR,
xrgtn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Hi!
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:22:58PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Methinks we will need to evaluate what needs to be fixed, and how
> difficult the fix is, and then proceed further.
Maybe, there is smth. wrong with .*rc of target user's shell?
For example, I see that environment is preserved
retitle 328440 NIS broken with bash, ksh, tcsh and sash
thanks
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:51:58PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> If I have "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" entry in /etc/passwd, tilde expansion
> crashes bash:
I need to rephrase -- it's rather "tilde completi
Hi!
I'm having the same problem with new Debian's libc6,
but due to different usage symptoms are different (I
didn't tried to login to NIS accounts, I can expose
problem without it).
For the test, I have "zhinis" NIS user, which is member
of "pwr" netgroup.
If I have "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" entry in
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:11:17PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:02:34PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > merge 330526 330247
> > thanks
> >
> > IMHO it's better to have all these grave conflicts
> > wi
merge 330526 330247
thanks
IMHO it's better to have all these grave conflicts
with manpages-XX merged in single place.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> clone 330247 -1
> reassign -1 manpages-ru
> retitle -1 Please stop providing outdated manpages
> thanks
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:13:58AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Jan Brüninghaus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: login
> > Version: 1:4.0.3-39
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags:
20 matches
Mail list logo
