Bug#1020580: marked as done (FTBFS: ruby3.1 needs network/DNS during tests)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095937: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1020580, regarding FTBFS: ruby3.1 needs network/DNS during tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1065705: marked as done (Useless in Debian nowadays)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:50:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1101962: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1065705, regarding Useless in Debian nowadays to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1094422: marked as done (rust-serde-yml - serious concerns about these forks.)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:39:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1104040: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094422, regarding rust-serde-yml - serious concerns about these forks. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1078642: marked as done (ruby3.1: will FTBFS during trixie support period)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095937: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1078642, regarding ruby3.1: will FTBFS during trixie support period to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1069966: marked as done (ruby3.1: CVE-2024-27280: Buffer overread vulnerability in StringIO)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095937: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1069966, regarding ruby3.1: CVE-2024-27280: Buffer overread vulnerability in StringIO to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1055352: marked as done (ruby3.1: circular dependency between libruby3.1 and ruby-sdbm)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095937: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1055352, regarding ruby3.1: circular dependency between libruby3.1 and ruby-sdbm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1077617: marked as done (will not be maintained in trixie: please migrate to ahash v0.8)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:44:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094918: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1077617, regarding will not be maintained in trixie: please migrate to ahash v0.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1094419: marked as done (rust-serde-yml - serious concerns about these forks.)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:40:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1104041: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094419, regarding rust-serde-yml - serious concerns about these forks. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1084364: marked as done (ruby-redis-activesupport: FTBFS: failing tests)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:38:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103971: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1084364, regarding ruby-redis-activesupport: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#1102690: A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required

2025-04-24 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Control: tag -1 + patch Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2025-04-13 23:28:32) > It seems that, if flash-kernel gets upgraded together with the kernel, then > flash-kernel is not run at the end of the installation and thus, the old > kernel stays referenced in /boot/boot.scr. Steps to repr

Bug#1103777: marked as done (ruby-csv: breaks ruby-roo autopkgtests)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 07:59:25 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: ruby-csv: breaks ruby-roo autopkgtests has caused the Debian Bug report #1103777, regarding ruby-csv: breaks ruby-roo autopkgtests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Re: Bug#1102690: A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #1102690 [flash-kernel] A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required Added tag(s) patch. -- 1102690: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102690 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro

Bug#1103579: marked as done (coot: autopkgtest regression: ImportError)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 07:52:53 +0200 with message-id <810091b3-34ed-4faf-a772-32e398fa8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1103579: coot: autopkgtest regression: ImportError has caused the Debian Bug report #1103579, regarding coot: autopkgtest regression: ImportError to be marke

Bug#1103833: rust-protobuf: CVE-2024-7254

2025-04-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-04-25 03:02:57) > - scaphandre (leaf, no rdeps) Scaphande is now (pending upload) patched to no longer build-depend on the protobuf crate. Turns out it was optional and already unused for other reasons (will file a bug about that upstream). Thanks! - Jonas -- * Jonas

Processed: affects 1076350

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1076350 src:node-prop-types src:node-glob src:node-browserify > src:simulate-event.js src:node-chai Bug #1076350 [nodejs] Segfault with shared libuv on x86 Bug #1103061 [nodejs] node-prop-types: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/r

Processed: forcibly merging 1076350 1103069

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1076350 1103069 Bug #1076350 [nodejs] Segfault with shared libuv on x86 Bug #1103069 [nodejs] node-chai: FTBFS in testing/i386: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://git

Processed: reassign 1103133 to nodejs, affects 1103133, forcibly merging 1103133 1103069

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1103133 nodejs Bug #1103133 [node-browserify] browserify segfaults building i386/simulate-event.js Bug reassigned from package 'node-browserify' to 'nodejs'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1103133 to the same values pr

Processed: reassign 1103064 to nodejs, affects 1103064, forcibly merging 1103064 1103069

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1103064 nodejs Bug #1103064 [src:node-glob] node-glob: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1 Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-glob' to 'nodejs'. No longer marked as fou

Processed: reassign 1103061 to nodejs, affects 1103061, forcibly merging 1103061 1103069

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1103061 nodejs Bug #1103061 [src:node-prop-types] node-prop-types: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:5: binary] Error 25 Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-prop-types' to 'nodejs'. No longer marked as found in versions no

Processed: Re: rust-protobuf: CVE-2024-7254

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/issues/763 Bug #1103833 [src:rust-protobuf] rust-protobuf: CVE-2024-7254 Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/issues/763' from 'https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-p

Bug#1103833: rust-protobuf: CVE-2024-7254

2025-04-24 Thread NoisyCoil
Source: rust-protobuf Followup-For: Bug #1103833 X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, jel...@debian.org, infini...@debian.org, d...@jones.dk Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/issues/763 I looked into this, I will try to summarize the situation to the best of my kn

Bug#1104049: bash-completion: bashism in /etc/profile.d/ snippet

2025-04-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: bash-completion Version: 1:2.11-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.4 Tags: bookworm trixie sid Control: found -1 1:2.16.0-7 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de /etc/profile.d/bash_completion.sh has: if [ "x${BASH_VERSION-}" != x -a "x${PS1-}" != x -a "x${BASH_COMPLETION_VERSINFO-}" =

Processed: bash-completion: bashism in /etc/profile.d/ snippet

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1:2.16.0-7 Bug #1104049 [bash-completion] bash-completion: bashism in /etc/profile.d/ snippet Marked as found in versions bash-completion/1:2.16.0-7. -- 1104049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104049 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1103218: marked as done (ruby-roo: FTBFS: Failure/Error: expect(subject.instance_variables).to_not include(:@memoized_data))

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:19:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103218: fixed in ruby-roo 2.10.0-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103218, regarding ruby-roo: FTBFS: Failure/Error: expect(subject.instance_variables).to_not include(:@memoized_data) to be marked as don

Bug#1103138: marked as done (r-cran-recipes: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:04:41 +0900 with message-id and subject line Giving up on i386 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103138, regarding r-cran-recipes: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1103134: marked as done (r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS in testing/i386: make[1]: *** [/usr/lib/R/etc/Makeconf:202: stan_files/bernoulli.o] Error 1)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:04:41 +0900 with message-id and subject line Giving up on i386 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103134, regarding r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS in testing/i386: make[1]: *** [/usr/lib/R/etc/Makeconf:202: stan_files/bernoulli.o] Error 1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#1103110: marked as done (r-cran-tidyverse: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:04:41 +0900 with message-id and subject line Giving up on i386 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103110, regarding r-cran-tidyverse: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1103111: marked as done (r-cran-dbitest: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:04:41 +0900 with message-id and subject line Giving up on i386 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103111, regarding r-cran-dbitest: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1103082: marked as done (r-cran-epir: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:04:41 +0900 with message-id and subject line Giving up on i386 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103082, regarding r-cran-epir: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1103063: marked as done (r-cran-themis: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:04:41 +0900 with message-id and subject line Giving up on i386 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103063, regarding r-cran-themis: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1103118: marked as done (r-cran-caret: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:58:24 +0900 with message-id and subject line Re: r-cran-caret: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103118, regarding r-cran-caret: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] E

Bug#1104047: dovecot-ldap: uninstallable due to missing ucf input file

2025-04-24 Thread Noah Meyerhans
Package: dovecot-ldap Version: 1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1 Severity: grave Tags: pending Justification: renders package unusable dovecot-ldap fails to configure with: Setting up dovecot-ldap (1:2.4.1+dfsg1-1) ... Error: The new file /usr/share/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext does not exist! dpkg: error p

Bug#1104045: Acknowledgement (ipython3: ipython3 crashes on startup)

2025-04-24 Thread Dima Kogan
I just tried to revert from builds at https://snapshot.debian.org/package/ipython/ 8.29.0-1 is broken, but 8.20.0-1 works.

Bug#1094557: marked as done (ruby-ethon: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'rack/handler/webrick')

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 21:19:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094557: fixed in ruby-ethon 0.16.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094557, regarding ruby-ethon: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'rack/handler/webrick' to be marked a

Bug#1104046: python-crytography - overly strict build-dependency.

2025-04-24 Thread Peter Green
Package: python-cryptography Version: 43.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch, ftbfs python-cryptography cannot be built in sid (and soon trixie) due to an overly strict Debian build-dependency for the cc crate (the upstream cargo dependency is fine). A debdiff fixing this is attached.diff -Nru p

Bug#1103218: ruby-roo: FTBFS: Failure/Error: expect(subject.instance_variables).to_not include(:@memoized_data)

2025-04-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
For some reason, this is triggered by ruby-csv. On a pure trixie system as of today, all tests pass. If I upgrade ruby-csv to the version in unstable, then that one test fails: 8<8<8<- $ rspec

Bug#1104045: ipython3: ipython3 crashes on startup

2025-04-24 Thread Dima Kogan
Package: ipython3 Version: 8.30.0-2 Severity: grave Hi. I use ipython3 regularly. After a recent update it does not work anymore: dima@fatty:~$ ipython3 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/ipython3", line 5, in from IPython import start_ipython File "/usr/lib/pyth

Bug#1103239: marked as done (all-knowing-dns: service doesn't start at all (Net::DNS incompatibility))

2025-04-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:57:08 +0200, Manawyrm wrote: sorry to bother again. Sadly the bugfix wasn't entirely OK. Oh :/ all-knowing-dns will terminate after 10 minutes because of a hardcoded (and unchangeable) timeout. This was work-arounded in https://github.com/all-knowing-dns/all-knowing-d

Bug#1104044: orthanc-wsi: Plugin OrthancWSI fails to start on arm64, ppc64el, riscv64 and s390x

2025-04-24 Thread Étienne Mollier
Package: orthanc-wsi Version: 3.2+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Justification: autopkgtest failure X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-powe...@lists.debian.org, debian-ri...@lists.debian.org, debian-s...@lists.debian.org User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org Usertags: s390x User: debian-...@

Bug#1091947: python-click-option-group: FTBFS: FAILED tests/test_click_option_group.py::test_missing_group_decl_first_api

2025-04-24 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 03:15:23PM -0400, Gabriel Filion wrote: The new release does not change much to the code semantically and pretty much only releases some maintenance to the code and upstream CI. 35 files changed, 1071 insertions(+), 669 deletions(-) I don't think this is acceptable du

Bug#1102967: python-booleanoperations: FTBFS in testing: KeyError: 'setuptools_scm'

2025-04-24 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 02:25:17PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: E First differing element 14: E ((250.0, 100.0), 'curve', True, None) E ((249.97, 100.0), 'curve', True, None) Well, it uses assertEqual on almost equal, but not exactly equal, floats. Not sure how go

Bug#1075473: marked as done (ruby-prometheus-client-mmap: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:46:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075473: fixed in ruby-prometheus-client-mmap 1.2.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075473, regarding ruby-prometheus-client-mmap: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Processed: reassign 1103069 to nodejs, affects 1103069

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1103069 nodejs Bug #1103069 [src:node-chai] node-chai: FTBFS in testing/i386: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2 Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-chai' to 'nodejs'. No longer marked as found in versions n

Bug#1104010: redis: CVE-2025-21605

2025-04-24 Thread Chris Lamb
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > CVE-2025-21605[0]: > | Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. > | In versions starting at 2.6 and prior to 7.4.3, An unauthenticated > | client can cause unlimited growth of output buffers, until the > | server runs out of memory or is kill

Bug#1104036: marked as done (ruby-shoulda-context: autopkgtest failure: cannot load such file -- /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.1_v7v5ha/downtmp/build.yEW/src/lib/shoulda/context)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:56:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1104036: fixed in ruby-shoulda-context 2.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1104036, regarding ruby-shoulda-context: autopkgtest failure: cannot load such file -- /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.1_v7v5ha/downtmp/bui

Bug#1104036: marked as pending in ruby-shoulda-context

2025-04-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1104036 in ruby-shoulda-context reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-shoulda-context/-/commit/e00a

Processed: Bug#1104036 marked as pending in ruby-shoulda-context

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1104036 [src:ruby-shoulda-context] ruby-shoulda-context: autopkgtest failure: cannot load such file -- /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.1_v7v5ha/downtmp/build.yEW/src/lib/shoulda/context Added tag(s) pending. -- 1104036: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Processed: Re: Bug#1104033: Acknowledgement (dovecot-antispam: incompatible with dovecot 2.4)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1104033 [src:dovecot-antispam] dovecot-antispam: incompatible with dovecot 2.4 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1104033: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104033 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Processed: Bug#1103200 marked as pending in r-bioc-rtracklayer

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103200 [src:r-bioc-rtracklayer] r-bioc-rtracklayer: FTBFS: ucsc/common.c:249:9: error: too many arguments to function 'free' Bug #1097765 [src:r-bioc-rtracklayer] r-bioc-rtracklayer: ftbfs with GCC-15 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #11032

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:ansible-core

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:ansible-core > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.or

Bug#1103217: marked as done (r-bioc-affxparser: FTBFS: R_affx_cel_parser.cpp:37:33: error: expected primary-expression before 'char')

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:37:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103217: fixed in r-bioc-affxparser 1.78.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103217, regarding r-bioc-affxparser: FTBFS: R_affx_cel_parser.cpp:37:33: error: expected primary-expression before 'char' to be m

Processed: tagging 980148

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 980148 + pending Bug #980148 [mesa-vulkan-drivers] mesa-vulkan-drivers: file content conflict in Multi-Arch:same package Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 980148: https://

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:dxvk

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:dxvk > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Settin

Processed: [bts-link] source package nodejs

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package nodejs > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:cadabra2

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:cadabra2 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Se

Bug#1103128: marked as done (valijson: FTBFS in testing/i386: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28: override_dh_auto_test] Error 2)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:19:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103128: fixed in valijson 1.0.3+repack-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103128, regarding valijson: FTBFS in testing/i386: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28: override_dh_auto_test] Error 2 to be marked as don

Bug#1070644: gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one?

2025-04-24 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I'm replying to reset the autoremoval timer since we definitely want gnome-remote-desktop in Trixie. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1102954: libimage-imlib2-perl: FTBFS in testing: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255

2025-04-24 Thread Nicolas Schodet
Control: reassign -1 libimlib2 1.12.4-1 Control: affects -1 src:libimage-imlib2-perl Thanks Hi, * Andreas Tille [250424 12:48]: > [...] > Thus I investigated a bit and found out the problem is caused by the > Upgrade from imlib 1.12.3 to 1.12.4. Thanks, I used this information as a starting poi

Bug#1101469: marked as done (squareness: BSD-3-clause variants are misrepresented in d/copyright)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:36:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1101469: fixed in squareness 2.3.0-7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1101469, regarding squareness: BSD-3-clause variants are misrepresented in d/copyright to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1102618: [DRE-maint] ruby-pry-byebug: Does not install in unstable

2025-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 24-04-2025 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once ruby-shoulda-context migrates

Bug#1071811: python-sparse: FTBFS: INTERNALERROR> pluggy._manager.PluginValidationError: unknown hook 'pytest_cmdline_preparse' in plugin >/.pybuild/cpyth

2025-04-24 Thread Santiago Vila
severity 1071811 important thanks This is buildable today. I suspect of a build-dependency but don't know which one. Thanks.

Processed: python-sparse: FTBFS: INTERNALERROR> pluggy._manager.PluginValidationError: unknown hook 'pytest_cmdline_preparse' in plugin >/.pybuild/cpython

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1071811 important Bug #1071811 [src:python-sparse] python-sparse: FTBFS: INTERNALERROR> pluggy._manager.PluginValidationError: unknown hook 'pytest_cmdline_preparse' in plugin >/.pybuild/cpython3_3.12_sparse/build/tests/conftest.py'> Se

Bug#1102618: [DRE-maint] ruby-pry-byebug: Does not install in unstable

2025-04-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 24/04/25 at 17:11 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 24-04-2025 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on > > > > r

Bug#1104036: ruby-shoulda-context: autopkgtest failure: cannot load such file -- /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.1_v7v5ha/downtmp/build.yEW/src/lib/shoulda/context

2025-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: ruby-shoulda-context Version: 2.0.0-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), [As aligned in bug 1102618, I'll make this bug non-blocking for migration to testing.] With a recent upload of ruby-shoulda-context the autopkgtest of rub

Bug#1051511: marked as done (lua-http: CVE-2023-4540)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:13:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1051511: fixed in lua-http 0.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1051511, regarding lua-http: CVE-2023-4540 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#1101469: NMU: squareness: BSD-3-clause variants are misrepresented in d/copyright

2025-04-24 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU containing the previously sent copyright file. Please find the debdiff attached. diff -Nru squareness-2.3.0/debian/changelog squareness-2.3.0/debian/changelog --- squareness-2.3.0/debian/changelog 2018-03-07 12:04:41.0 +0100 +++ squareness-2.3.0/debian/changelog 202

Bug#1104031: installation fails with KeyError: 'iterKeys'

2025-04-24 Thread Markus Demleitner
Dear Marcin, On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 03:34:19PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > Apr 24 12:51:56 in-target: return locals()["iterKeys"] > Apr 24 12:51:56 in-target: This problem is due to PEP 667 and is fixed upstream. I've prepared a patch for the DaCHS version

Bug#1102390: NMU: passenger: missing licenses

2025-04-24 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. The debdiff is attached. diff -Nru passenger-6.0.26+ds/debian/changelog passenger-6.0.26+ds/debian/changelog --- passenger-6.0.26+ds/debian/changelog2025-03-23 08:47:11.0 +0100 +++ passenger-6.0.26+ds/debian/changelog2025-04-16 06:01:51.00

Bug#1087443: marked as done (x2gobroker: please remove extraneous dependency on to-be-removed python3-wsgilog)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:34:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1087443: fixed in x2gobroker 0.0.4.3-4.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1087443, regarding x2gobroker: please remove extraneous dependency on to-be-removed python3-wsgilog to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1102618: [DRE-maint] ruby-pry-byebug: Does not install in unstable

2025-04-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on > > ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once > > ruby-shoulda-context migrates). > > > ruby-shoulda-context fa

Bug#1104031: installation fails with KeyError: 'iterKeys'

2025-04-24 Thread Marcin Owsiany
Package: gavodachs2-server Version: 2.11+dfsg-1 Severity: grave When installing Debian 13 I selected the "Astronomy" pure blend. This among other packages pulled in this package, but its installation failed, preventing the package installation stage from succeeding. Install log follows Apr 24 1

Processed: Re: Bug#1102954: libimage-imlib2-perl: FTBFS in testing: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libimlib2 1.12.4-1 Bug #1102954 [src:libimage-imlib2-perl] libimage-imlib2-perl: FTBFS in testing: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255 Bug reassigned from package 'src:libimage-imlib2-perl' to 'libimlib2'. No

Processed: fixed 1103648 in 2.19.0~beta2-1

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1103648 2.19.0~beta2-1 Bug #1103648 [src:ansible-core] ansible-core removed ansible.parsing.utils.jsonify (impacting ansible-mitogen) The source 'ansible-core' and version '2.19.0~beta2-1' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked

Processed: Bug#1102956 marked as pending in r-cran-sparr

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1102956 [src:r-cran-sparr] r-cran-sparr: FTBFS in testing: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1102956 to the same tags previously set -- 1102956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=

Bug#1087443: x2gobroker: please remove extraneous dependency on to-be-removed python3-wsgilog

2025-04-24 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. The debdiff is attached. diff -Nru x2gobroker-0.0.4.3/debian/changelog x2gobroker-0.0.4.3/debian/changelog --- x2gobroker-0.0.4.3/debian/changelog 2025-02-19 12:45:09.0 +0100 +++ x2gobroker-0.0.4.3/debian/changelog 2025-04-24 13:07:31.0 +0200 @@ -1

Bug#1103199: marked as done (r-bioc-oligo: FTBFS: ParserGzXYS.c:62:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'Calloc'; did you mean 'calloc'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration])

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:07:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103199: fixed in r-bioc-oligo 1.70.0+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103199, regarding r-bioc-oligo: FTBFS: ParserGzXYS.c:62:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'Calloc'; did you mean 'calloc'

Processed: Bug#1103199 marked as pending in r-bioc-oligo

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103199 [src:r-bioc-oligo] r-bioc-oligo: FTBFS: ParserGzXYS.c:62:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'Calloc'; did you mean 'calloc'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1103199 to the same tags previ

Processed: Bug#1103704 marked as pending in thunarx-python

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103704 [src:thunarx-python] thunarx-python: fails to discover SONAME of libpython, tries to load /usr/lib/MULTIARCH/lib.so.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103704: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103704 Debian Bug Tracking Syst

Bug#1102956: marked as done (r-cran-sparr: FTBFS in testing: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:49:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102956: fixed in r-cran-sparr 2.3-16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102956, regarding r-cran-sparr: FTBFS in testing: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1103228: marked as done (r-cran-sdmtools: FTBFS: pointinpolygon.c:11:20: error: 'PI' undeclared here (not in a function))

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:49:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103228: fixed in r-cran-sdmtools 1.1-221.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103228, regarding r-cran-sdmtools: FTBFS: pointinpolygon.c:11:20: error: 'PI' undeclared here (not in a function) to be marked a

Bug#1103202: marked as done (rapache: FTBFS: mod_R.c:1241:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'Calloc')

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:49:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103202: fixed in rapache 1.2.10-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103202, regarding rapache: FTBFS: mod_R.c:1241:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'Calloc' to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1102956: marked as pending in r-cran-sparr

2025-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1102956 in r-cran-sparr reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-sparr/-/commit/609494f22c73abe63af

Bug#1102956: marked as pending in r-cran-sparr

2025-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1102956 in r-cran-sparr reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-sparr/-/commit/a438ebc75d2de7d2b74

Bug#1103199: marked as pending in r-bioc-oligo

2025-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103199 in r-bioc-oligo reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-oligo/-/commit/fa781c8b787638b0e3d

Bug#1103198: marked as done (r-bioc-cner: FTBFS: ucsc/common.c:360:9: error: too many arguments to function 'free')

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:37:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103198: fixed in r-bioc-cner 1.42.0+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103198, regarding r-bioc-cner: FTBFS: ucsc/common.c:360:9: error: too many arguments to function 'free' to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1097762: marked as done (r-bioc-cner: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:37:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103198: fixed in r-bioc-cner 1.42.0+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103198, regarding r-bioc-cner: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#1102618: [DRE-maint] ruby-pry-byebug: Does not install in unstable

2025-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once ruby-shoulda-context migrates). ruby-shoulda-context fails its own autopkgtest everywhere. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc D

Bug#1103199: marked as pending in r-bioc-oligo

2025-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103199 in r-bioc-oligo reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-oligo/-/commit/cbc1883ccf20e7b291a

Processed: Bug#1103199 marked as pending in r-bioc-oligo

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103199 [src:r-bioc-oligo] r-bioc-oligo: FTBFS: ParserGzXYS.c:62:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'Calloc'; did you mean 'calloc'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1103199 to the same tags previ

Processed: Bug#1102956 marked as pending in r-cran-sparr

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1102956 [src:r-cran-sparr] r-cran-sparr: FTBFS in testing: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1102956 to the same tags previously set -- 1102956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=

Bug#1103704: marked as done (thunarx-python: fails to discover SONAME of libpython, tries to load /usr/lib/MULTIARCH/lib.so.1.0)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:38:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103704: fixed in thunarx-python 0.5.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103704, regarding thunarx-python: fails to discover SONAME of libpython, tries to load /usr/lib/MULTIARCH/lib.so.1.0 to be marked as

Bug#1103200: marked as done (r-bioc-rtracklayer: FTBFS: ucsc/common.c:249:9: error: too many arguments to function 'free')

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:19:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103200: fixed in r-bioc-rtracklayer 1.66.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103200, regarding r-bioc-rtracklayer: FTBFS: ucsc/common.c:249:9: error: too many arguments to function 'free' to be marked as d

Processed: unarchiving 1055136, fixed 1055136 in 545.29.06-1, unarchiving 1064983, unarchiving 1072792

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 1055136 Bug #1055136 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: CVE-2023-31022 Unarchived Bug 1055136 > fixed 1055136 545.29.06-1 Bug #1055136 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers

Bug#1099927: r-cran-testthat does not actually break other packages

2025-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:23:10 +0100 "Rebecca N. Palmer" wrote: Anything that involves partial removals also needs permission to ignore some arch:all packages (i.e. their reverse dependencies) becoming uninstallable on 32-bit architectures. (By default, arch:all packages are expected to b

Processed: Bug#1103202 marked as pending in rapache

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103202 [src:rapache] rapache: FTBFS: mod_R.c:1241:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'Calloc' Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1103202 to the same tags previously set -- 1103202: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#1103906: qemu-efi-aarch64: Secure Boot regression for some arm64 VMs

2025-04-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:01:36PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, 17:41 Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > > control: retitle -1 qemu-efi-aarch64: Secure Boot regression for some > > arm64 VMs > > control: reassign -1 qemu-efi-aarch64 2025.02-7 > > control: severity -1 serious > > con

Bug#1103202: marked as pending in rapache

2025-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103202 in rapache reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/rapache/-/commit/8a6c952076735670bb69995a01a01

Bug#1103348: jcal: Change the souce code repo

2025-04-24 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:17, Matthias Geiger wrote: On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:48:44 +0330 Danial Behzadi wrote: Package: jcal Version: 0.4.1-2.2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream l10n Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: dani.be...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, The package jcal is curr

Bug#1097765: marked as done (r-bioc-rtracklayer: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:19:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103200: fixed in r-bioc-rtracklayer 1.66.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103200, regarding r-bioc-rtracklayer: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#1103704: marked as pending in thunarx-python

2025-04-24 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103704 in thunarx-python reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/thunarx-python/-/commit/9e83b

  1   2   >