Bug#1103863: openstack-meta-packages: Depends on unavailable ntp

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Source: openstack-meta-packages Version: 0.37 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:ntpsec X-Debbugs-CC: ntp...@packages.debian.org Per tracker.d.o: 5 binary packages have unsatisfiable dependencies: The dependencies of openstack-toaster=0.37 cannot be satisfied in unstable on amd64 because

Processed: openstack-meta-packages: Depends on unavailable ntp

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:ntpsec Bug #1103863 [src:openstack-meta-packages] openstack-meta-packages: Depends on unavailable ntp Added indication that 1103863 affects src:ntpsec -- 1103863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103863 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Processed: bts

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1103769 https://github.com/DNS-OARC/dnscap/issues/324 Bug #1103769 [src:dnscap] dnscap: FTBFS on armel, armhf: test failures Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/DNS-OARC/dnscap/issues/324'. > thanks Stopping processing he

Bug#1103862: firmware-nvidia-gsp: Can't insall nvidia-kernel-dkms or nvidia-driver due to broken dependendencies

2025-04-21 Thread david
Package: firmware-nvidia-gsp Version: 535.216.01-1~deb12u1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: john01...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? When I turned my

Bug#1102690: A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required

2025-04-21 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
On 2025-04-22 05:29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2025-04-12, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2025-04-12, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: Luckily, running flash-kernel manually fixed the issue. But had I not noticed that /boot/boot.scr still contained a version of a kernel that I had just

Bug#1103768: marked as done (awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Apr 2025 04:39:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103768: fixed in prompt-toolkit 3.0.51-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103768, regarding awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit to be marked as done. Thi

Processed: Bug#1103768 marked as pending in prompt-toolkit

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103768 [python3-prompt-toolkit] awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103768: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103768 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Bug#1103768: marked as pending in prompt-toolkit

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103768 in prompt-toolkit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/prompt-toolkit/-/commit/6c66a

Bug#1102690: A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required

2025-04-21 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2025-04-12, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2025-04-12, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: >> Luckily, running flash-kernel manually fixed the issue. But had I not noticed >> that /boot/boot.scr still contained a version of a kernel that I had just >> removed, my system would've become unboot

Bug#1100748: marked as done (segfault when using get_text() on arm64)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1100748: fixed in mupdf 1.25.1+ds1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1100748, regarding segfault when using get_text() on arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1103857: Acknowledgement (remmina-plugin-rdp links against unavailable library versions, cannot use)

2025-04-21 Thread Brian Arnold
Please disregard, it appears I had some rogue version of libfreerdp3-3 and libwinpr3-3 sitting in /usr/local/lib causing a conflict. After removing them and rerunning ldconfig, the issue appears to be resolved. - Brian C. Arnold Senior Software Engineer 256-652-6754 - conn...@brian-arnold.dev __

Bug#1103857: remmina-plugin-rdp links against unavailable library versions, cannot use

2025-04-21 Thread Brian Arnold
Package: remmina-plugin-rdp Version: 1.4.39+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: conn...@brian-arnold.dev Dear Maintainer, * Updated to currently available version of remmina-plugin-rdp, 1.4.39+dfsg-1 amd64 * Current version links against: * lib

Bug#1103659: vcsh: autopkgtest regression on all archs

2025-04-21 Thread David Bremner
Dave Hibberd writes: > > Spent an hour or so trying to do some autotools magic to get compilation to a > stage where it won't compile as `ronn` is required. the previous version did not use autotools, so that is at least part of the mystery solved. The autopkgtests were not updated when the ups

Processed: update bug metadata

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # reassign from binary to source > reassign 1103250 src:yasm Bug #1103250 [yasm] yasm: FTBFS on amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el, ppc64, powerpc, riscv64 Bug reassigned from package 'yasm' to 'src:yasm'. No longer marked as found in vers

Bug#1103652: broken by ansible 12

2025-04-21 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 21, stefa...@debian.org wrote: Can you provide a minimal trival playbook that triggers this? # ansible.cfg [defaults] inventory = hosts.txt strategy = mitogen_linear # hosts.txt [servers] server1.example.com ansible_user=root # server1.yaml - hosts: server1.example.com gather_facts:

Bug#1103004: skimage test failures

2025-04-21 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi Rebecca, Yes, we have been trying to resolve this issue, but unfortunately it is related to internal Fortran state inside of SciPy's ARPACK implementation. The problem is annoying: it means that successive normalized cut segmentations do not give results that are bit-for-bit the same. Howeve

Bug#1093924: marked as done (ruby-puma-worker-killer: FTBFS: Could not find 'puma' (>= 2.7) among 109 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError))

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:44:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093924: fixed in ruby-puma-worker-killer 0.3.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093924, regarding ruby-puma-worker-killer: FTBFS: Could not find 'puma' (>= 2.7) among 109 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecErr

Bug#1103140: python-momepy test failures

2025-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Those all look like rounding errors (probably due to x87 excess precision, since they only happen on i386). This suggests that the appropriate response is either to ignore these tests on i386, or possibly (the graph object output by gdf_to_nx has (x: float, y: float) node keys, so rounding iss

Bug#1103004: skimage test failures

2025-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This has failed twice on reproducible-builds, and started failing between 2025-02-23 and 2025-04-20: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/arm64/skimage.html No other architectures have been tried since 2025-03-26, so we don't actually know whether it's arm64-specific. T

Bug#1102590: r-cran-fansi fails to migrate to testing

2025-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This passes its tests in unstable but still fails them in testing. I don't know whether this is caused by R 4.5.0 vs 4.4.3 or by some other package. As far as I know, nothing is actually wrong with the old (testing) version other than that it's old, so just accepting that the new version won

Bug#1100748: Acknowledgement (segfault when using get_text() on arm64)

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Echeverri
Hello Josch! El lun, 21 abr 2025 a la(s) 12:15 p.m., Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues ( jo...@debian.org) escribió: > Control: reassign -1 mupdf 1.25.1+ds1-5 > Control: tag -1 + patch > > Hello mupdf and pymupdf maintainers, > > my package plakativ is not in testing because of an RC bug in pymupd

Processed: Re: Bug#1100958: sopv-gpgv: Does not consider RIPEMD160 and SHA-1 as weak digests

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign 1100958 gpgv Bug #1100958 [sopv-gpgv] sopv-gpgv: Does not consider RIPEMD160 and SHA-1 as weak digests Bug reassigned from package 'sopv-gpgv' to 'gpgv'. No longer marked as found in versions sopv-gpgv/0.1.2-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bu

Bug#1100958: sopv-gpgv: Does not consider RIPEMD160 and SHA-1 as weak digests

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: reassign 1100958 gpgv Control: retitle 1100958 gpgv does not consider RIPEMD160 and SHA-1 as weak digests Control: found 1100958 2.4.7-15 Control: found 1100958 2.2.46-6 Control: found 1100958 2.2.40-1.1 Hi Guillem-- On Fri 2025-03-21 01:28:40 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On a minimal

Processed: Re: Bug#1103804: xserver-xorg-video-trident FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outw'; did you mean 'putw'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1103804 [src:xserver-xorg-video-trident] xserver-xorg-video-trident FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outw'; did you mean 'putw'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -

Bug#1103804: xserver-xorg-video-trident FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outw'; did you mean 'putw'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Control: severity -1 normal * Helmut Grohne [250421 19:12]: Source: xserver-xorg-video-trident xserver-xorg-video-trident fails to build from source on arm architectures. #1087037 removed the binaries from arm64 armel armhf mips64el ppc64el, so this is not r-c on these archs. Chris

Processed: Re: Bug#1103805: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outb'; did you mean 'moutb'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1103805 [src:xserver-xorg-video-tdfx] xserver-xorg-video-tdfx FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outb'; did you mean 'moutb'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 11

Bug#1103805: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outb'; did you mean 'moutb'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Control: severity -1 normal * Helmut Grohne [250421 19:12]: Source: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx xserver-xorg-video-tdfx fails to build from source on arm architectures. #1087036 removed the previously built binaries from arm64 armel armhf mips64el ppc64el, so this is not r-c on these archs. C

Processed: Re: Bug#1100748: Acknowledgement (segfault when using get_text() on arm64)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 mupdf 1.25.1+ds1-5 Bug #1100748 [python3-pymupdf] segfault when using get_text() on arm64 Bug reassigned from package 'python3-pymupdf' to 'mupdf'. No longer marked as found in versions pymupdf/1.25.0+ds1-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug

Bug#1100748: Acknowledgement (segfault when using get_text() on arm64)

2025-04-21 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Control: reassign -1 mupdf 1.25.1+ds1-5 Control: tag -1 + patch Hello mupdf and pymupdf maintainers, my package plakativ is not in testing because of an RC bug in pymupdf. It turns out that to fix #1100748, src:mupdf has to be changed like this: --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -36,7

Bug#1103652: broken by ansible 12

2025-04-21 Thread stefanor
Hi Marco (2025.04.20_22:42:38_+) Still broken, now a trivial playbook fails with: I can see why the code is broken, but without reproducing it, I don't know if I've fixed it. Can you provide a minimal trival playbook that triggers this? Stefano -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org

Bug#1103804: xserver-xorg-video-trident FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outw'; did you mean 'putw'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2025-04-21 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: xserver-xorg-video-trident Version: 1:1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm xserver-xorg-video-trident fails to build from source on arm architectures. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb

Bug#1103805: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx FTBFS on arm architectures: error: implicit declaration of function 'outb'; did you mean 'moutb'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2025-04-21 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx Version: 1:1.5.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm xserver-xorg-video-tdfx fails to build from source on arm architectures. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/u

Bug#1103802: austin: does not work with Python >3.8

2025-04-21 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: austin Version: 1.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: fixed-upstream Hi, thanks for maintaining austin. Unfortunately, it doesn't quite just work anymore. It needs code for each specific Python interpreter version and since it wasn't uploaded in a while, the latest supported version in Debian

Bug#1103135: marked as done (golang-github-hashicorp-go-sockaddr: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-i686-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/hashicorp/go-sockaddr github.

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:06:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103135: fixed in golang-github-hashicorp-go-sockaddr 1.0.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103135, regarding golang-github-hashicorp-go-sockaddr: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-i686-

Bug#1103720: ssh-askpass-gnome prompts for confirmation, but the connection is always allowed

2025-04-21 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:57:34AM +0200, erebion wrote: Using: - ssh-askpass (GNOME version) - KeePassXC - GNOME Keyring as the SSH Agent - setting /run/user/1000/gcr/ssh as SSH_AUTH_SOCK in the KeepassXC settings Askpass asks to allow using the SSH key. Upon clicking "no", a connection is st

Bug#1103787: gpgme1.0: Testsuite error on 32bit archs with 64bit time (FAIL with gnupg 2.4, SKIP with 2.2)

2025-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: gpgme1.0 Version: 1.24.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, ametz...@bebt.de User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: armel armhf Hello, upgrading gpg from 2.2 to 2.4

Bug#1103661: marked as done (synthv1: autopkgtest regression on all archs)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103661: fixed in synthv1 1.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103661, regarding synthv1: autopkgtest regression on all archs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1103660: marked as done (drumkv1: autopkgtest regression on all archs)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:05:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103660: fixed in drumkv1 1.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103660, regarding drumkv1: autopkgtest regression on all archs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1103717: marked as done (python3-grpc-tools: grpc_tools.protoc: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources')

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:06:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103717: fixed in python-grpc-tools 1.14.1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103717, regarding python3-grpc-tools: grpc_tools.protoc: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources' to be marked as don

Bug#1103667: marked as done (KDE system settings got installed in lxqt)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:11:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103667: fixed in lxqt-metapackages 33.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103667, regarding KDE system settings got installed in lxqt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 21-04-2025 13:15, Daniel Baumann wrote: I though filling the RC bug against harlequin right after it left NEW would be enough to never let harlequin-* migrate, seems not. Sorry about the confusion it caused. harlequin-* in testing don't depend on harlequin, so blocking harlequin didn'

Bug#1103120: marked as done (golang-google-api: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:37:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103120: fixed in golang-google-api 0.61.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103120, regarding golang-google-api: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1103661: marked as pending in synthv1

2025-04-21 Thread Dennis Braun
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103661 in synthv1 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/synthv1/-/commit/5e3c65f5f2582959d6359ac3

Processed: Bug#1103661 marked as pending in synthv1

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103661 [src:synthv1] synthv1: autopkgtest regression on all archs Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103661: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103661 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1103660 marked as pending in drumkv1

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103660 [src:drumkv1] drumkv1: autopkgtest regression on all archs Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103660: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103660 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1103551: shortwave: Additional info re dependencies

2025-04-21 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:27 AM Oliver M. Schode wrote: > Thanks! While the original issue was quickly fixed, I got stuck a few > more times and it turned out this time indeed due to missing > dependencies. Just for completeness and on the off chance it may be of > help to someone, here's how I g

Bug#1103660: marked as pending in drumkv1

2025-04-21 Thread Dennis Braun
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103660 in drumkv1 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/drumkv1/-/commit/8d4701037e7040e1b7629352

Bug#1103551: shortwave: Additional info re dependencies

2025-04-21 Thread Oliver M. Schode
Package: shortwave Followup-For: Bug #1103551 Thanks! While the original issue was quickly fixed, I got stuck a few more times and it turned out this time indeed due to missing dependencies. Just for completeness and on the off chance it may be of help to someone, here's how I got it working. For

Processed: Bug#1103717 marked as pending in python-grpc-tools

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103717 [python3-grpc-tools] python3-grpc-tools: grpc_tools.protoc: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103717: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103717 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Bug#1103717: marked as pending in python-grpc-tools

2025-04-21 Thread Ananthu C V
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103717 in python-grpc-tools reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-grpc-tools/-/commit

Bug#1103667: KDE system settings got installed in lxqt

2025-04-21 Thread 李健秋
Source: lxqt-metapackages Followup-For: Bug #1103667 X-Debbugs-Cc: ajq...@debian.org, czc...@debian.org After investigate that ark and quassel pulls KDE related depends such as kio and kwallet6 and systemsettings package also got pulled in as the default installation installs packages from recomm

Processed: ruby-csv: breaks ruby-roo autopkgtests

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:ruby-roo Bug #1103777 [src:ruby-csv] ruby-csv: breaks ruby-roo autopkgtests Added indication that 1103777 affects src:ruby-roo -- 1103777: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103777 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Bug#1103777: ruby-csv: breaks ruby-roo autopkgtests

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Source: ruby-csv Version: 3.3.4-1 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:ruby-roo X-Debbugs-CC: ruby-...@packages.debian.org Hi, ruby-csv 3.3.4-1 apparently causes ruby-roo's autopkgtests to fail, on multiple architectures. ruby-csv's migration excuses thus are: Issues preventing migrati

Bug#1103717: python3-grpc-tools: grpc_tools.protoc: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources'

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Petter Reinholdtsen [250421 15:15]: So I guess what you are saying is that this patch is needed? diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 4c55185..402543a 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${python3:Depends}, ${shlibs:Dep

Bug#1027451: libunwind-14-dev: spurious "Provides: libunwind-dev"

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Hi Sylvestre et al, On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 12:53:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > Control: tags -1 ftbfs > Control: reassign -1 libunwind-17-dev > Control: retitle -1 libunwind-17-dev: Please remove Provides: libunwind-dev > Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4 > Control: rea

Bug#1103717: python3-grpc-tools: grpc_tools.protoc: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources'

2025-04-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
So I guess what you are saying is that this patch is needed? diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 4c55185..402543a 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${python3:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, + python3-pkg-resources, Descr

Bug#1103765: gourmand: not installable in sid

2025-04-21 Thread Christian Marillat
On 21 avril 2025 13:47, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: gourmand > Version: 1.1.0+really1.1.0-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > gourmand is not installable in sid since it depends on > python3-sqlalchemy (<< 2.0) (hardcoded in debian/control). > However, the version of python3-alchemy currently in

Bug#1103252: rust-pprof - soundness issue RUSTSEC-2024-0408

2025-04-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Peter Michael Green (2025-04-21 14:12:22) > > On 21/04/2025 12:47, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Am Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 07:52:49PM +0200 schrieb Alexander Kjäll: > >> pprof was at some point needed for the gix stack, if they have moved > >> away from using it then I agree that it's not nee

Bug#1103768: awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit

2025-04-21 Thread Noah Meyerhans
Control: reassign -1 python3-prompt-toolkit On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:01:22PM +0200, Andre Naujoks wrote: > The 'aws' command no longer functions in any way. Just running 'aws' without > arguments gives me an exception. Adding arguments does not change this. This > seems to be very early in initi

Processed: Re: Bug#1103768: awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 python3-prompt-toolkit Bug #1103768 [awscli] awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit Bug reassigned from package 'awscli' to 'python3-prompt-toolkit'. No longer marked as found in versions awscli/2.23.6-1.

Bug#1103768: awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit

2025-04-21 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:01:22PM +0200, Andre Naujoks wrote: > The 'aws' command no longer functions in any way. Just running 'aws' without > arguments gives me an exception. Adding arguments does not change this. This > seems to be very early in initialization. > > $ aws > Traceback (most recen

Bug#1103252: rust-pprof - soundness issue RUSTSEC-2024-0408

2025-04-21 Thread Peter Michael Green
On 21/04/2025 12:47, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Am Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 07:52:49PM +0200 schrieb Alexander Kjäll: pprof was at some point needed for the gix stack, if they have moved away from using it then I agree that it's not needed in trixie. Will this bug be enought to block it, or do we n

Bug#1103769: dnscap: FTBFS on armel, armhf: test failures

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Source: dnscap Version: 2.3.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs dnscap previously built on armel, armhf, but 2.3.0-1 fails to do so. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dnscap&arch=armel&ver=2.3.0-1&stamp=1745228515&raw=0 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dnscap&arch=armhf&

Bug#1103768: awscli: aws command quits with python exception PackageNotFoundError for prompt_toolkit

2025-04-21 Thread Andre Naujoks
Package: awscli Version: 2.23.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, The 'aws' command no longer functions in any way. Just running 'aws' without arguments gives me an exception. Adding arguments does not change this. This seems to be very early in initializa

Bug#1103765: gourmand: not installable in sid

2025-04-21 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: gourmand Version: 1.1.0+really1.1.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, gourmand is not installable in sid since it depends on python3-sqlalchemy (<< 2.0) (hardcoded in debian/control). However, the version of python3-alchemy currently in sid and testing is 2.0.40+ds1-1. -Ralf.

Bug#1103252: rust-pprof - soundness issue RUSTSEC-2024-0408

2025-04-21 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Am Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 07:52:49PM +0200 schrieb Alexander Kjäll: > pprof was at some point needed for the gix stack, if they have moved > away from using it then I agree that it's not needed in trixie. > > Will this bug be enought to block it, or do we need to do anything more? If it's entirely

Bug#1103764: libghc-hindent-doc: not installable in sid

2025-04-21 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: libghc-hindent-doc Version: 5.3.4-1 Severity: serious Hi, libghc-hindent-doc is not installable in sid since it depends on haddock-interface-38. However, the version of haddock-interface provided by the current ghc in sid is haddock-interface-42. -Ralf.

Processed: severity of 1033111 is grave

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1033111 grave Bug #1033111 [src:python-cmarkgfm] python-cmarkgfm: CVE-2023-22483 CVE-2023-22484 CVE-2023-22485 CVE-2023-22486 Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: reassign 1040332 to src:hyperspy

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1040332 src:hyperspy 1.7.3-1 Bug #1040332 [hyperspy] hyperspy - build-depends on removed package. Bug reassigned from package 'hyperspy' to 'src:hyperspy'. No longer marked as found in versions 1.7.3-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed ver

Bug#1103442: marked as done (erlang: CVE-2025-32433)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103442: fixed in erlang 1:25.2.3+dfsg-1+deb12u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103442, regarding erlang: CVE-2025-32433 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 4/21/25 12:13, Paul Gevers wrote: So they should have never made it to testing. yes. I though filling the RC bug against harlequin right after it left NEW would be enough to never let harlequin-* migrate, seems not. Sorry about the confusion it caused. Regards, Daniel

Bug#1103018: ruby-rmagick fails to coinstall

2025-04-21 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le lundi 21 avril 2025, 12:03:52 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Chris Hofstaedtler a écrit : > On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 10:50:03PM +0200, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > > Le dimanche 13 avril 2025, 22:47:54 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Chris > > > > Hofstaedtler a écrit : > > > * Bastien Roucaries [2

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 21-04-2025 11:58, Daniel Baumann wrote: harlequin-* are the database connection plugins and useless without harelquin itself. So they should have never made it to testing. The autoremoval is correct (which was my intention with their depends to harlequin, so that they in turn also do

Bug#1103018: ruby-rmagick fails to coinstall

2025-04-21 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 10:50:03PM +0200, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > Le dimanche 13 avril 2025, 22:47:54 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Chris > Hofstaedtler a écrit : > > * Bastien Roucaries [250413 22:09]: > > >Le dimanche 13 avril 2025, 20:55:07 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Helmut > > > > > >Gr

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 4/21/25 10:36, Paul Gevers wrote: From src:harlequin point of view, this is fine I guess. But from src:harlequin-odbc there is a problem, see bug #1102694. harlequin-* are the database connection plugins and useless without harelquin itself. The autoremoval is correct (which was my inten

Bug#1103721: libreoffice-dev-common: IDL files not in package

2025-04-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 21.04.25 um 10:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [...] * The SDK no longer ships an idl/ sub-directory containing the udkap and offapi    .idl files (as, unlike idlc, unoidl-write does not need them).    odk/config/cfgWin.js had to be adapted to look (somewhat arbitrarily) for an

Bug#1076350: nodejs i386 affects node-glob

2025-04-21 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le lundi 21 avril 2025, 10:10:26 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Bastien Roucaries a écrit : > Le lundi 21 avril 2025, 02:06:51 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Jérémy Lal a > > écrit : > > Le lun. 21 avr. 2025 à 02:04, Jérémy Lal a écrit : > > > Le lun. 21 avr. 2025 à 02:02, Bastien Roucaries a > >

Bug#1103757: FTBFS on ppc64el

2025-04-21 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Source: octave-video Version: 2.1.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el octave-video currently FTBFS on ppc64el (tried 3 times). See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-video&arch=p

Bug#1099927: Ping bug to reset testing removal timer

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 07:29:29 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote: If r-cran-testthat would be removed a lot of tests of R packages become broken. I assume you're working on fixing the issues and that bugs have been filed against the packages that need to adapt. It is probably worth it to block this bu

Processed: Re: Bug#1103704: thunarx-python: fails to discover SONAME of libpython, tries to load /usr/lib/MULTIARCH/lib.so.1.0

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:thunarx-python 0.5.2-2 Bug #1103704 [rabbitvcs-thunar] rabbitvcs-thunar: Installation of rabbitvcs-thunar breaks start of Thunar because of PyExc_NotImplementedError Bug reassigned from package 'rabbitvcs-thunar' to 'src:thunarx-python'. No longer ma

Bug#1102936: qt6-style-kvantum has an undeclared file conflict

2025-04-21 Thread 李健秋
Package: kvantum Followup-For: Bug #1102936 X-Debbugs-Cc: ajq...@debian.org, czc...@debian.org The qt5-style-kvantum will be removal for Trixie release as the request on #1103756. And kvantum package already has versioned conflicts and replaces on qt5-style-kvantum that allows users to upgrade f

Bug#1102612: mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 16:45:34 +0200 Drew Parsons wrote: Package: mpich Version: 4.3.0-5 Followup-For: Bug #1102612 Control: found -1 4.3.0-5 Control: fixed -1 4.3.0-6 Updating tags (the fixed version is in experimental, the version in unstable is not yet updated). https://qa.debian.org/e

Bug#1103721: libreoffice-dev-common: IDL files not in package

2025-04-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 21.04.25 um 10:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Indeed: commit a8485d558fab53291e2530fd9a1be581c1628deb Author: Stephan Bergmann Date:   Tue Sep 14 17:26:17 2021 +0200     [API CHANGE] Remove deprecated idlc and regmerge from the SDK     * Client code must replace uses of idlc and

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Daniel, On 21-04-2025 10:09, Daniel Baumann wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:22:02 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Do you mean it depends on it, but it doesn't Depends on it? yes - harlequin depends on the python parts of apache arrow which is not packaged for Debian yet. I didn't add a non-exi

Bug#1103721: marked as done (libreoffice-dev-common: IDL files not in package)

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:28:36 +0200 with message-id <4fea7e75-9d1b-4216-ad45-61b4270c5...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1103721: libreoffice-dev-common: IDL files not in package has caused the Debian Bug report #1103721, regarding libreoffice-dev-common: IDL files not in pack

Bug#1078608: apt update silently leaves old index data

2025-04-21 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 18/04/25 à 11:31, Laurent Bigonville a écrit : Le 18/04/25 à 09:43, Julian Andres Klode a écrit : On April 16, 2025 11:23:03 AM GMT+02:00, Laurent Bigonville wrote: [...] So it seems that the InRelease file was downloaded, but not the rest If I delete the InRelease file, the other files a

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:22:02 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Do you mean it depends on it, but it doesn't Depends on it? yes - harlequin depends on the python parts of apache arrow which is not packaged for Debian yet. I didn't add a non-existing package name to Depends but instead chose to immed

Processed: block 1101054 with 1098466

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1101054 with 1098466 Bug #1101054 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:tworld] src:tworld: fails to migrate to testing for too long 1101054 was not blocked by any bugs. 1101054 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1101054: 1098466 > tha

Processed: block 1101052 with 1102930

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1101052 with 1102930 Bug #1101052 {Done: Joost van Baal-Ilić } [src:systraq] src:systraq: fails to migrate to testing for too long 1101052 was not blocked by any bugs. 1101052 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1101052: 110

Processed: Re: grpc_tools.protoc: undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf8internal22Release_CompareAndSwapEPVlll

2025-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1103718 [python3-grpc-tools] grpc_tools.protoc: undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf8internal22Release_CompareAndSwapEPVlll Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1103718: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103718

Bug#1103718: grpc_tools.protoc: undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf8internal22Release_CompareAndSwapEPVlll

2025-04-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: severity -1 important This has already been reported as https://bugs.debian.org/1030311 >, and given that the package never built on riscv64 and other architectures where the symbol is missing, it is not really release critical. I suggest closing this as a duplicate of #1030311. -- Happ