Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 06:36:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103226: fixed in chromium 135.0.7049.95-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103226,
regarding chromium: FTBFS:
gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:138:7: error: fallthrough
annotation does
Hi,
Looks like
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/18662/commits/da8fce3830baa2fd4d70050a3f7677d6e8bd5ad4
by Mark is fixing the issue.
But it's still waiting to be merged.
Thanks,
Pranav
Package: src:r-bioc-affxparser
Version: 1.78.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
Hi, I'm summitting a patch for fixing this FTBFS problem while building with
r-base-dev=4.5.0-1 on Debian sid,trixie.
My patch Fix-FTBFS.patch replace Calloc() and Free() with R_Calloc()
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 22:55:49 -0700 Roger Shimizu wrote:
> control: fixed -1 20250314+ds-4
>
> is this the same as #1102321?
> looks very similar.
> -Roger
>
>
i think you ment 0~20250314+ds-4 i could be wrong that's why i didn't fix it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1103210 python-levenshtein 0.27.1-1
Bug #1103210 [src:textdistance] textdistance: FTBFS: RuntimeError: cannot
import Levenshtein.distance
Bug reassigned from package 'src:textdistance' to 'python-levenshtein'.
No longer marked as found i
reassign 1103210 python-levenshtein 0.27.1-1
affects 1103210 textdistance
close 1103210 0.27.1-2
thanks
--
python-levenshtein 0.27.1-1 did not include the Levenshtein module;
this is fixed in 0.27.1-2.
From: Matheus Polkorny
To: 1102...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: passenger: missing licenses
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 1102390 + patch + bsp-2025-04-brazil
thanks
Hi,
I have updated the d/copyright file according to the latest
upstream version available on Debian.
More deta
Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 04:19:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102379: fixed in hyperkitty 1.3.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102379,
regarding hyperkitty: FTBFS: FAIL: test_header
(hyperkitty.tests.test_templatetags.TestDecorate.test_header)
to be marked as don
Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 03:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078617: fixed in golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient
1.12.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078617,
regarding golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient: will FTBFS during trixie
support period
to be marked
On 2025-04-16 05:50, Peter Green wrote:
On 15/04/2025 16:07, Jing Luo wrote:
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-am...@lists.debian.org,
debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-powe...@lists.debian.org,
debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
I understand CC'ing the porters when you have an issue that is specific
to the
Source: hwloc-contrib
Version: 2.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
while rebuilding all packages build-depending on nvidia-cuda-toolkit,
hwloc-contrib did FTBFS with a failing test:
FAIL: hwloc_type_sscanf
===
Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 01:49:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103146: fixed in jsonpickle 4.0.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103146,
regarding jsonpickle: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild
--test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.13 re
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103146 in jsonpickle reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/jsonpickle/-/commit/6587920555c2b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1103146 [src:jsonpickle] jsonpickle: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test:
error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.13 returned exit
code 13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1103146: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1103146 https://github.com/jsonpickle/jsonpickle/pull/560
Bug #1103146 [src:jsonpickle] jsonpickle: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test:
error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.13 returned exit
code 13
Set Bug forwa
Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 01:04:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101500: fixed in upx-ucl 4.2.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101500,
regarding upx-ucl: CVE-2025-2849
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/ which does include the
> new Terms of Use.
I don't see a link on that page to the new ToU. (It does link to some
ToU's of chatbots.)
> It is also linked to in Help > About Firefox.
Indeed it is! While this is a ways from "mak
Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:55:08 +0900
with message-id
and subject line r-cran-multitaper is now in Debian.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101591,
regarding r-cran-waveslim: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
r-cran-multitaper
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1102516 + ftbfs
Bug #1102516 [src:yubikey-manager] yubikey-manager_5.6.1-1_all-buildd.changes
REJECTED
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1102516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 6:59 PM Mike Hommey wrote:
> Actually, we don't, because ESR 128 doesn't have the code that shows the
> Terms of Use.
I thought that at first. Opening Firefox ESR 128.9.0esr-2 in Debian
Testing opens two tabs, one is about:welcome and can be ignored here.
The other, becaus
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 firefox
Bug #1099130 [firefox-esr] Are the Firefox Terms of Use suitable for Debian?
Bug reassigned from package 'firefox-esr' to 'firefox'.
No longer marked as found in versions firefox-esr/128.7.0esr-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1
Control: reassign -1 firefox
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 05:37:24PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 Are the Firefox Terms of Use suitable for Debian?
>
> > As described in Mozilla’s communication, due to changes in laws in
> > various places where Mozilla operates (particularly Calif
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1103152 [getty-run] Starts 2nd getty on hvc0, making console login
(almost) impossible
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1103152 to the same tags previously set
--
1103152: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103152
Debian
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andras,
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:28:36 +0200
Andras Korn wrote:
> Package: getty-run
> Version: 2.2.0-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: makes console logins all but impossible, thus arguably
> breaking the entire system
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a VPS that
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1103152 [getty-run] Starts 2nd getty on hvc0, making console login
(almost) impossible
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1103152: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103152
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:11:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103044: fixed in mat2 0.13.5-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103044,
regarding mat2: unsatisfiable dependency on python2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1103256 0.20.0-5
Bug #1103256 {Done: Jérémy Lal }
[golang-github-smallstep-certificates] golang-github-smallstep-crypto: FTBFS
during tests when built with nebula >= 1.9.3
There is no source info for the package 'golang-github-smallstep-ce
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1103256 golang-github-smallstep-certificates
Bug #1103256 {Done: Jérémy Lal }
[src:golang-github-smallstep-crypto] golang-github-smallstep-crypto: FTBFS
during tests when built with nebula >= 1.9.3
Bug reassigned from package 'src:golan
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Are the Firefox Terms of Use suitable for Debian?
Bug #1099130 [firefox-esr] firefox-esr: Please package a fork that respects
users privacy
Changed Bug title to 'Are the Firefox Terms of Use suitable for Debian?' from
'firefox-esr: Please package a fork
Control: retitle -1 Are the Firefox Terms of Use suitable for Debian?
> As described in Mozilla’s communication, due to changes in laws in
> various places where Mozilla operates (particularly California and the
> EU), having a clear Terms of Use in the product became a necessity (all
> other majo
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:07:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103208: fixed in supysonic 0.7.9+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103208,
regarding supysonic: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:06:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100320: fixed in qt6-webengine 6.8.2+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100320,
regarding skanpage: FTBFS in testing/arm64: make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary]
Error 2
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:06:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100320: fixed in qt6-webengine 6.8.2+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100320,
regarding qt6-pdf-dev: missing Qt6Pdf files (which are in qt6-webengine-dev
instead) break cmake-based builds w/o qt6-web
Processing control commands:
> tags 1101258 patch
Bug #1101258 [src:uvloop] uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: None != 'mytask!'
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1101258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 15/04/2025 16:07, Jing Luo wrote:
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-am...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org,
debian-powe...@lists.debian.org, debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
I understand CC'ing the porters when you have an issue that is specific to the
port, but
if it's failing on every damn
Control: tags 1101258 patch
This is actually caused by a test that makes assumsations about the
builtin python asyncio event loops that no longer hold.
python upstream commit
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/38a99568763604ccec5d5027f0658100ad76876f
semi-silently moved the responsibity fo
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 20:42:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102970: fixed in guile-git 0.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102970,
regarding guile-git: FTBFS in testing: dh_auto_test: error: cd
debian/build/guile-3.0 && make -j1 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j1 --verb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1103275
> https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs/issues/1074
Bug #1103275 [src:rust-sudo-rs] rust-sudo-rs: Autopkgtests fail on 32-bit
architectures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation
Source: rust-sudo-rs
Version: 0.2.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
The autopkgtests for rust-sudo-rs are failing on 32-bit architectures.
This is preventing the latest update from migrating to Testing.
I'm filing an upstream bug for this.
Autopkgtest log excerpt
==
error[
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1103208 [src:supysonic] supysonic: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing
files, aborting
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1103208: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103208
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103208 in supysonic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/supysonic/-/commit/75d143b9dc5f3fe
Le 15/04/2025 à 20:24, Patrick Winnertz a écrit :
Hey,
There is a partial fix upstream available however they lock the version to
<2.2.2 which won't help us within debian right now. So - sadly no fix available
upstream yet.
For yubikey-manager ignore the change for pyproject.toml that locks p
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:41:22AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Given that different variants of libvulkan_*.so are located in separate
> search paths, is there any scenario other than a system misconfiguration
> which would result in an attempt to load the wrong one?
I fear the answer to this
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 01:47:54PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I think a regression for amd64/i386 co-installation would have a
> considerably larger practical negative impact on Debian users than
> ABI conflicts between less-commonly-used architecture pairs like
> armel/armhf, and a
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 19:49:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103194: fixed in pcs 0.12.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103194,
regarding pcs: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
'/<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/*.dist-info/COPYING':
No such file or directory
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 23:10:19 -0300 Matheus Polkorny wrote:
> The attached debdiff fixes a policy violation in xrt where a
> compiler flag was conditionally applied only in unstable.
I've just uploaded it to the DELAYED/2 queue. If you prefer I postpone
or cancel the nmu, let me know.
Also,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1067709 important
Bug #1067709 [src:dante] FTBFS in armel/armhf: some symbols disappeared
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1067709: https://bugs.d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1102612 https://github.com/pmodels/mpich/issues/7064
Bug #1102612 [mpich] mpich 4.3 not initialising multiple processes
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/pmodels/mpich/issues/7064'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1102889
> https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/z_6sh7byddqdk...@eldamar.lan/T/#u
Bug #1102889 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-33-amd64: KVM GPU passthrough broken
Bug #1102914 [src:linux] VMs don't start up when being passed through a PCI
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1103039 - pending
Bug #1103039 [src:yubikey-manager] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'smartcard.pcsc.PCSCContext' since 2.2.1-2 to 2.2.2-1 upgrade
Bug #1103211 [src:yubikey-manager] yubikey-manager: FTBFS: E
ModuleNotFoundError: No m
Hi
[Apologies if this has been reported already but I have not found an
already filled corresponding report]
After updating from the 6.1.129 based version to 6.1.133, various
users have reported that their VMs do not boot anymore up (both KVM
and under Xen) if pci-passthrough is involved. The rep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1103039 src:yubikey-manager
Bug #1103039 [yubikey-manager] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'smartcard.pcsc.PCSCContext' since 2.2.1-2 to 2.2.2-1 upgrade
Bug reassigned from package 'yubikey-manager' to 'src:yubikey-manager'.
Ignorin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1103039 + pending
Bug #1103039 [src:yubikey-manager] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'smartcard.pcsc.PCSCContext' since 2.2.1-2 to 2.2.2-1 upgrade
Bug #1103211 [src:yubikey-manager] yubikey-manager: FTBFS: E
ModuleNotFoundError: No m
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1103129 [src:libbioparser-dev] libbioparser-dev: FTBFS in testing/i386:
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1103129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103129
Debian B
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Greetings,
Making the find_package(biosoup) more verbose, I see the
following warning when trying to build libbioparser-dev on i386:
CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:25 (find_package):
Could not find a configuration file for package "biosoup" that is
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 19:35:27 +0100
with message-id
and subject line re: feature trace is unusable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102275,
regarding feature trace is unusable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hello Santiago, thanks for the report.
I could reproduce the issue on my box.
I will try to fix this during the next week-end.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36
forcemerge 1103211 1103039
thanks
Hey,
There is a partial fix upstream available however they lock the version
to <2.2.2 which won't help us within debian right now. So - sadly no fix
available upstream yet.
With the patch currently in salsa the build still fails like this:
I: pybuild base:3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1103211 1103039
Bug #1103211 [src:yubikey-manager] yubikey-manager: FTBFS: E
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'smartcard.pcsc.PCSCContext'
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1103039 is 'yubikey-manager' not 'src:yubikey-ma
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1103187 [src:dssi] dssi: FTBFS: /usr/include/alsa/seq_event.h:30:2: error:
#warning "use #include , should not be
used directly" [-Werror=cpp]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1103187: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103187
Debian
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103187 in dssi reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/dssi/-/commit/498e0fbff74eb804d0932af34f1ecf
tags 1102516 + pending
thanks
I've repacked the source with find -type f -exec touch {} \; in order
to give every file a valid timestamp.
The wrong timestamps are according to the upstream bug report a "feature".
A new upload is however depending on a solution for the
ModuleNotFoundError du
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1102516 + pending
Bug #1102516 [src:yubikey-manager] yubikey-manager_5.6.1-1_all-buildd.changes
REJECTED
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1102516: https://bugs.debian.org
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:22:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102068: fixed in mpich 4.3.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102068,
regarding libfabric: FTBFS on 32-bit arches: ofi_cma.h: error: passing argument
2 of 'ofi_consume_iov' from incompatible pointer type
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:19:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103229: fixed in ltt-control 2.13.15-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103229,
regarding ltt-control:FTBFS:build failed(error: 'health_state' undeclared)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:19:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103256: fixed in golang-github-smallstep-certificates
0.20.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103256,
regarding golang-github-smallstep-crypto: FTBFS during tests when built with
nebula >= 1.9.3
to be ma
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:17:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100828: fixed in debian-archive-keyring 2023.3+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100828,
regarding debian-archive-keyring: trixie archive signing keys
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:17:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100829: fixed in debian-archive-keyring 2023.3+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100829,
regarding debian-archive-keyring: trixie SRM key
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:17:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099223: fixed in debian-archive-keyring 2023.3+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1099223,
regarding debian-archive-keyring: FTBFS: gpg: Can't check signature: No public
key
to be marked as done.
This
Control: severity -1 normal
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 07:33:09PM +0200, наб wrote:
> Package: ruby-railties
> Version: 2:6.1.7.10+dfsg-1~deb12u1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 11.4
> File: /usr/bin/rails
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I just got
> $ rails credentials:edit
> No $EDITOR t
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1103255 [ruby-railties] /usr/bin/rails: No $EDITOR to open file in. Assign
one like this: EDITOR="mate --wait" bin/rails credentials:edit
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
1103255: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
pprof was at some point needed for the gix stack, if they have moved
away from using it then I agree that it's not needed in trixie.
Will this bug be enought to block it, or do we need to do anything more?
Den tis 15 apr. 2025 kl 17:57 skrev Peter Green :
>
> Package: rust-pprof
> Version: 0.13.0
Source: golang-github-smallstep-crypto
Version: 0.57.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
This is
https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/golang-github-smallstep-certificates/testing/amd64/59900165/
143s # github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/provisioner
[github.com/smallstep/certificates/authorit
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:18:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103239: fixed in all-knowing-dns 1.7-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103239,
regarding all-knowing-dns: service doesn't start at all (Net::DNS
incompatibility)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:44:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102689: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101712,
regarding ruby-mail-room: FTBFS: Failure/Error: @server.start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:43:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102667: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082382,
regarding ruby-devise-two-factor: CVE-2024-8796
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:41:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102636: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100967,
regarding golang-step-crypto-dev and golang-github-smallstep-crypto-dev have
undeclared file conflicts
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:44:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102688: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095881,
regarding ruby-devise: autopkgtest failure with rails 7:
/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/railties-7.2.2.1/lib/rails
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:43:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102667: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084360,
regarding ruby-devise-two-factor: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Source: node-prop-types
Version: 15.8.1+~15.7.9+~cs1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (ho
Package: src:libssh
Version: 0.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
[ 47%] Building C object examples/CMa
On 2025-04-15 Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:gpgme1.0
> Version: 1.24.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
> Dear maintainer:
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +help
Bug #1102967 [src:python-booleanoperations] python-booleanoperations: FTBFS in
testing: BooleanTests
Added tag(s) help.
--
1102967: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102967
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Source: r-cran-themis
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:40:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102530: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089267,
regarding memkind: FTBFS with make 4.4.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:39:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102510: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078314,
regarding qtorganizer-eds: FTBFS: The following tests FAILED: 5 -
recurrence-test (Failed)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:36:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102506: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091960,
regarding xfce4-sntray-plugin: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat
'/<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/xfce4': No such file or directory
to be marked
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:36:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102506: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086771,
regarding vala-sntray-plugin: Wrong placement of the library file prevents
detection of the plugin by vala-panel
to be marke
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:36:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101718: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053625,
regarding rust-extprim: Remove from Debian?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:34:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100144: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089185,
regarding liboqs: CVE-2024-54137
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:34:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100144: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073250,
regarding liboqs: CVE-2024-36405
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:33:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099982: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064714,
regarding codraft: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'update_dataset' from
'guidata.dataset' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-pac
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:35:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101522: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068502,
regarding Dead upstream and broken, remove or switch to a fork?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:34:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100144: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065802,
regarding liboqs: FTBFS: Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:33:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099981: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027825,
regarding bind-dyndb-ldap: FTBFS in bullseye (‘dns_dyndbctx_t’ has no member
named ‘refvar’)
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:34:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099985: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012893,
regarding anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:33:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099981: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064294,
regarding bind-dyndb-ldap: FTBFS: error: Install BIND9 development files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:34:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099985: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061888,
regarding anfo: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:33:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099983: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060107,
regarding urweb: FTBFS: http.c:119:32: error: pointer ‘buf’ may be used after
‘realloc’
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099979: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008980,
regarding adabrowse: depends on unavailable asis
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
