Bug#1098953: fails to install due to conflicts with bash-completion

2025-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:43:13 -0500 Eric Dorland wrote: Package: kmod Version: 34-2 Severity: serious Seeing failures install 34-2 due to conflicting files in the bash-completion package: Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 157324 files and directories currently installed.) Prepa

Bug#1093489: Useless in Debian

2025-02-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi David, Am Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:16:16AM +0100 schrieb David Prévot: > Hi Andreas, > > On 27/02/2025 16:41, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Ping? > > > > Am Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 07:29:27PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > > Hi David, > > > > > > I appreciate your attempt to clean up the set of PHP

Bug#1093489: Useless in Debian

2025-02-27 Thread David Prévot
Hi Andreas, On 27/02/2025 16:41, Andreas Tille wrote: Ping? Am Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 07:29:27PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: Hi David, I appreciate your attempt to clean up the set of PHP packages. I just wonder in this specific case whether the new version released less than one year ago:

Bug#1099085: apparmor: FTBFS on riscv64: subprocess.TimeoutExpired

2025-02-27 Thread Bo YU
Package: apparmor Version: 4.1.0~beta5-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv64 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, Now apparmor has one FTBFS issue on riscv64 due to timeout on test case: ``` ... ERROR: test_allow_all (

Bug#1098736: marked as done (ibus 1.5.32~beta2-2 breaks + on US intl layout)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 06:05:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098736: fixed in ibus 1.5.32~rc1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098736, regarding ibus 1.5.32~beta2-2 breaks + on US intl layout to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#1098792: marked as done (ibus: Dead keys on french keyboard no longer accept spaces)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 06:05:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098736: fixed in ibus 1.5.32~rc1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098736, regarding ibus: Dead keys on french keyboard no longer accept spaces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1095382: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-wordpress: FTBFS: Failure/Error: require 'multi_json')

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:34:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095382: fixed in ruby-omniauth-wordpress 0.2.2-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095382, regarding ruby-omniauth-wordpress: FTBFS: Failure/Error: require 'multi_json' to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#1095378: marked as done (ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS: failing tests)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:05:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095378: fixed in ruby-ahoy-email 1.1.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095378, regarding ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1096232: marked as done (invidtui: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:14: binary] Error 25)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:36:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1096232: fixed in invidtui 0.4.6-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096232, regarding invidtui: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:14: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1099080: libbelr1 shlibs generated dependencies it does not fulfill

2025-02-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: libbelr1 Version: 5.3.105-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: Bastian Germann This cannot be fulfilled by version 5.3.105-1: https://sources.debian.org/src/belr/5.3.105-1/debian/libbelr1.shlibs/ Additionally, the package in experimental has: * libbelr2: Soname bump due to ABI break.

Bug#1099013: emacs: hangs the system regularly

2025-02-27 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 27 Feb 2025 at 01:52pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote: > Let me try emacs from sid for some time and if that doesn't hang anymore, > let's assume the issue got fixed. If not, I pursue these routes. Please be > aware that I only used gdb before with explicit instructions on what to do, > I'm

Bug#1098736: ibus 1.5.32~beta2-2 breaks + on US intl layout

2025-02-27 Thread Yannick Le Pennec
I've validated that upstream 1.5.32-rc1 fixes this. Thanks to наб for kindly building the packages :)

Bug#1096037: mutter: 48's autopkgtests are failing

2025-02-27 Thread Daniel van Vugt
That needs a new bug. One test failing is very different to all tests timing out.

Processed: severity of 1099079 is serious

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1099079 serious Bug #1099079 [mediastreamer2-plugin-openh264] mediastreamer2-plugin-openh264: Plugin built as static library Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Processed: tagging 1099079

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1099079 + patch Bug #1099079 [mediastreamer2-plugin-openh264] mediastreamer2-plugin-openh264: Plugin built as static library Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1099079: https

Bug#1095090: marked as done (python-pbcore: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:27:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095090: fixed in python-pbcore 2.1.2+dfsg-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095090, regarding python-pbcore: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1098706: linux: building out-of-tree modules fails with pahole: not found

2025-02-27 Thread Денис Кошечкин
The problem also affects the broadcom-sta-dkms package.

Bug#1096048: gnome-shell-extension-hamster: needs update for GNOME Shell 48

2025-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I updated the metadata.json and debian/control for this extension locally and tried to use the extension. But I got errors and I don't have the time now to investigate further. This extension will likely be removed from Testing when we start the GNOME Shell 48 transition within a few days. April 15

Bug#1095595: marked as done (libquotient FTBFS with nocheck build profile: rm: cannot remove 'debian/tmp/usr/bin/quotest': No such file or directory)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:04:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095595: fixed in libquotient 0.8.2-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095595, regarding libquotient FTBFS with nocheck build profile: rm: cannot remove 'debian/tmp/usr/bin/quotest': No such file or direct

Bug#1098953: fails to install due to conflicts with bash-completion

2025-02-27 Thread Tom Overlund
> You need to upgrade bash-completion. > I will add a Breaks+Replaces in the next upload, but I want to wait > a few days for more issues to surface. Different user here. I just did a # apt-get dist-upgrade on unstable, and ran into the same error, causing the upgrade to fail. I don't think you

Processed: Bug#1095090 marked as pending in python-pbcore

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095090 [src:python-pbcore] python-pbcore: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095090 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1095090: marked as pending in python-pbcore

2025-02-27 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095090 in python-pbcore reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-pbcore/-/commit/25bde02cc980cb44a0d

Bug#1098974: marked as done (python3-orange3: missing dependency on numpy abi)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:10:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098974: fixed in orange3 3.38.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098974, regarding python3-orange3: missing dependency on numpy abi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1095670: marked as done (orange3: needs patches for numpy 2 compatibility)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:10:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095670: fixed in orange3 3.38.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095670, regarding orange3: needs patches for numpy 2 compatibility to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1093478: marked as done (python3-orange3: python3-qtconsole dropping dependency on PyQt5; Depends possibly needs updating (but probably not))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:10:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093478: fixed in orange3 3.38.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093478, regarding python3-orange3: python3-qtconsole dropping dependency on PyQt5; Depends possibly needs updating (but probably not) to

Bug#1095595: marked as done (libquotient FTBFS with nocheck build profile: rm: cannot remove 'debian/tmp/usr/bin/quotest': No such file or directory)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:06:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095595: fixed in libquotient 0.8.2-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095595, regarding libquotient FTBFS with nocheck build profile: rm: cannot remove 'debian/tmp/usr/bin/quotest': No such file or direct

Processed: Re: mutter: 48's autopkgtests are failing

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1096037 {Done: Jeremy Bícha } [src:mutter] mutter: 48's autopkgtests are failing 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marke

Bug#1099069: src:r-cran-dendextend: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: r-cran-dendextend Version: 1.18.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.19.0+dfsg-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for mo

Processed: src:rust-serde-json: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.0.134-1 Bug #1099070 [src:rust-serde-json] src:rust-serde-json: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions rust-serde-json/1.0.134-1. Bug #1099070 [src:rust-serde-json] src:rust-serde-json: fails to migrate to testing for too lo

Processed: src:r-cran-dendextend: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.19.0+dfsg-1 Bug #1099069 [src:r-cran-dendextend] src:r-cran-dendextend: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions r-cran-dendextend/1.19.0+dfsg-1. Bug #1099069 [src:r-cran-dendextend] src:r-cran-dendextend: fails to migrate to

Bug#1096037: mutter: 48's autopkgtests are failing

2025-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: reopen -1 monitor-dbus.test is still failing with mutter 48~beta-5 so I'm reopening this bug. https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/mutter/unstable/amd64/ Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1099070: src:rust-serde-json: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rust-serde-json Version: 1.0.133-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.0.134-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30

Bug#1094892: marked as done (bcnc: Unable to run due to NameError)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:55:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094892: fixed in bcnc 0.9.14.318+ds-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094892, regarding bcnc: Unable to run due to NameError to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#1096256: marked as done (asyncpg: FTBFS: ValueError: Invalid IPv6 URL)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:55:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1096256: fixed in asyncpg 0.30.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096256, regarding asyncpg: FTBFS: ValueError: Invalid IPv6 URL to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1099048: src:libxmp: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: rst2pdf

2025-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: libxmp Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be removed from

Processed: affects 1098706

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1098706 + broadcom-sta-dkms package Bug #1098706 [src:linux] linux: building out-of-tree modules fails with pahole: not found Bug #1098737 [src:linux] virtualbox-dmks: possible missing dependency on pahole Bug #1098739 [src:linux] vhba-dk

Bug#1097135: cssc: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2025-02-27 Thread Santiago Vila
Simon Quigley wrote: Hi Lucas, [ Note: I doubt Lucas is subscribed to the bug. Please note that the BTS does not forward messages sent to n...@bugs.debian.org to the bug submitter ]. I am unable to reproduce this build failure with an i386 chroot on amd64. I have attached a build log. The r

Processed: src:bfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 4.0.5-2 Bug #1099064 [src:bfs] src:bfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Marked as fixed in versions bfs/4.0.5-2. Bug #1099064 [src:bfs] src:bfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Marked Bug as done --

Bug#1099066: impossible to install: depends on missing package librust-actix-server-2+io-uring-dev

2025-02-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: librust-actix-web-dev Version: 4.9.0-1 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Attempting to install librust-actix-web-dev fails like this: The following packages have unmet dependencies: librust-actix-web-dev : Depends: librust-actix-server-2+io-uring-dev but i

Processed: Re: blupimania: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1096237 [src:blupimania] blupimania: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1096237 to the same tags previously set -- 1096237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#1096237: blupimania: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2

2025-02-27 Thread Patrice Duroux
Package: blupimania Version: 1.6.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #1096237 Control: tags -1 ftbfs Sorry, it's MR!2 (Salsa played a trick on me!) -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'

Bug#1087556: marked as done (singularity-container: FTBFS: undefined: errdefs.ToGRPC)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:54:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1087556: fixed in singularity-container 4.1.5+ds4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1087556, regarding singularity-container: FTBFS: undefined: errdefs.ToGRPC to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: Re: blupimania: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1096237 [src:blupimania] blupimania: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1096237 to the same tags previously set -- 1096237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#1096237: blupimania: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2

2025-02-27 Thread Patrice Duroux
Package: blupimania Version: 1.6.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #1096237 Control: tags -1 ftbfs Hi, Finally, I have set a MR!1 that should solve this. Best, Patrice -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,

Bug#1099064: src:bfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el

2025-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: bfs Version: 4.0.4-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 4.0.5-2 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-m...@lists.debian.org Usertags: mips64el Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team consi

Bug#1098266: marked as done (snapper-gui: Missing dependency to python3-pkg-resources)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:24:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098266: fixed in snapper-gui 0git.960a94834f-6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098266, regarding snapper-gui: Missing dependency to python3-pkg-resources to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1094123: marked as done (ruby-mongo: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:135:in `load_gemspec': E: cannot load gemspec mongo.gemspec (RuntimeError))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:24:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094123: fixed in ruby-mongo 2.5.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094123, regarding ruby-mongo: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:135:in `load_gemspec': E: cannot load gemspec mongo.g

Bug#1096210: lincity-ng: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2

2025-02-27 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi there, Am Mittwoch, dem 26.02.2025 um 21:14 +0100 schrieb Fabio Pedretti: > Adding in CC Fabian, who recently uploaded some update fluidsynth > packages: do you maybe have any hints? I have also seen this when preparing the packages for dsda-doom and woof-doom. The CMake rule for libfluidsynth

Bug#1094123: nmu to fix FTBFS

2025-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, I have just uploaded ruby-mongo to fix the FTBFS since Ruby 3.3 is the default. Somehow I missed that when I uploaded my previous NMU. I did make a mistake in the versioning, the runes that I used to create the changelog entry didn't recognize this was an NMU instead of a maintainer uplo

Bug#1075436: marked as done (raspell: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:37:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095552: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1075436, regarding raspell: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1093753: marked as done (cantor: FTBFS with analitza 24.12.1: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:00:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093753: fixed in cantor 4:24.12.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093753, regarding cantor: FTBFS with analitza 24.12.1: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1098246: sympy: autopkgtest failures

2025-02-27 Thread Santiago Vila
Sorry, there is a build failure. Working on it right now.

Bug#1098246: marked as done (sympy: autopkgtest failures)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:20:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098246: fixed in sympy 1.13.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098246, regarding sympy: autopkgtest failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#1067375: marked as done (amp: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'meson')

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:51:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098703: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1067375, regarding amp: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'meson' to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1094565: marked as done (ruby-ammeter: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: cannot load such file -- rack/session/abstract/id)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:54:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095657: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094565, regarding ruby-ammeter: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: cannot load such file -- rack/session/abstract/id to be marke

Processed: Bug#1099053 marked as pending in autopkgtest

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1099053 [autopkgtest] Cannot build sid qemu VM Added tag(s) pending. -- 1099053: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099053 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1096212: marked as done (dbus: FTBFS: ../../bus/selinux.c:928:49: error: ‘struct security_id’ has no member named ‘refcnt’)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:10:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1096212: fixed in dbus 1.16.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096212, regarding dbus: FTBFS: ../../bus/selinux.c:928:49: error: ‘struct security_id’ has no member named ‘refcnt’ to be marked as done. Thi

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: extractpdfmark: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1091268 [src:extractpdfmark] extractpdfmark: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > user debian-...@lists.debian.org U

Bug#1070295: marked as done (cgroupfs-mount: Fails to upgrade or remove if elogind is running: "umount: /sys/fs/cgroup/elogind: target is busy.")

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:04:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1099039: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1070295, regarding cgroupfs-mount: Fails to upgrade or remove if elogind is running: "umount: /sys/fs/cgroup/elogind: target is busy.

Bug#1098246: sympy: autopkgtest failures

2025-02-27 Thread Santiago Vila
El 27/2/25 a las 2:30, Santiago Vila escribió: Can I make a team upload with these two patches to see if they fix the autopkgtests? Note: Since this is a RC issue and I did the 1.13.3-3 upload which introduced the problem in the first place, I went ahead and did the upload for 1.13.3-4. I belie

Bug#1091268: extractpdfmark: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2025-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important Control: user debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: usertags -1 armel armhf I had extractpdfmark removed from Unstable on armel & armhf to allow extractpdfmark to migrate to Testing. Since this is no longer blocking migrating to Testing etc, I'm demoting the severity.

Bug#1098583: marked as done (ocaml-theora: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit")

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:50:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098659: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1098583, regarding ocaml-theora: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit" to be marked as done. This m

Bug#1097128: Subject: Re: Bug#1097128: halide: FTBFS on i386: clang++-19: error: unable to execute command: Aborted

2025-02-27 Thread Roman Lebedev
Hi. Could you please check if this issue has been sufficiently addressed in the newest package: 19.0.0-6 ? Roman.

Bug#1086577: marked as done (amp FTBFS with python >= 3.12: No module named 'numpy.distutils')

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:51:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098703: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1086577, regarding amp FTBFS with python >= 3.12: No module named 'numpy.distutils' to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1000067: marked as done (haskell-regex-pcre: depends on obsolete pcre3 library)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:57:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098899: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #167, regarding haskell-regex-pcre: depends on obsolete pcre3 library to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#1098584: marked as done (ocaml-vorbis: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit")

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:50:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098660: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1098584, regarding ocaml-vorbis: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit" to be marked as done. This m

Bug#1098581: marked as done (ocaml-opus: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit")

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:49:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098657: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1098581, regarding ocaml-opus: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit" to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#1096246: marked as done (deepin-menu: FTBFS: src/ddockmenu.cpp:76:21: error: incomplete type ‘QTimer’ used in nested name specifier)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:35:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098214: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1096246, regarding deepin-menu: FTBFS: src/ddockmenu.cpp:76:21: error: incomplete type ‘QTimer’ used in nested name specifier to be m

Bug#1031468: marked as done (ruby-rubydns: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find '

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:55:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098819: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1031468, regarding ruby-rubydns: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `re

Bug#1096249: marked as done (rust-ntp-os-clock: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: librust-rustls-native-certs-0.7+default-dev, librust-rustls-pemfile-2+default-dev)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:55:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098823: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1096249, regarding rust-ntp-os-clock: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: librust-rustls-native-certs-0.7+default-dev, librust-

Bug#1092364: marked as done (cluster3: needs rebuild for Python 3.13 as default)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:52:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098772: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1092364, regarding cluster3: needs rebuild for Python 3.13 as default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1018305: marked as done (amp: build-depends on python3-nose or uses it for autopkgtest)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:51:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098703: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1018305, regarding amp: build-depends on python3-nose or uses it for autopkgtest to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1098580: marked as done (ocaml-flac: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit")

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:47:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098655: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1098580, regarding ocaml-flac: FTBFS: Error: The value "restart" has type "Ogg.Stream.stream -> unit" to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#1074964: marked as done (francine: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:39:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098363: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1074964, regarding francine: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1099053: marked as pending in autopkgtest

2025-02-27 Thread Paride Legovini
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1099053 in autopkgtest reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/commit/b69b55c35ddae68a4c1a8a95

Processed: [bts-link] source package ibus

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package ibus > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting us

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:netavark

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:netavark > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Se

Bug#1091232: marked as done (RM: khtml -- RoQA; Obsolete)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:36:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098239: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1091232, regarding RM: khtml -- RoQA; Obsolete to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1052110: marked as done (gnome-shell-extension-vertical-overview: needs update for GNOME Shell 46)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:33:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1096068: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1052110, regarding gnome-shell-extension-vertical-overview: needs update for GNOME Shell 46 to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#1094032: marked as done (belcard: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libmbedcrypto7t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedtls14t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedx509-1t64 (>= 2.28.0))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:34:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094032: fixed in belcard 5.3.105-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094032, regarding belcard: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libmbedcrypto7t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedtls14t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedx50

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:python-pyo

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:python-pyo > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Bug#1075228: marked as done (lisaac: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:32:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1096030: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1075228, regarding lisaac: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1089418: marked as done (restartd: Supporting rootless builds by default)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:31:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1096026: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1089418, regarding restartd: Supporting rootless builds by default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#1065708: marked as done (Useless in Debian nowadays)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:30:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095947: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1065708, regarding Useless in Debian nowadays to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1095762: marked as done (ruby-rails-deprecated-sanitizer: undefined method `debug=' for class ActiveSupport::Deprecation)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:17:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095763: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095762, regarding ruby-rails-deprecated-sanitizer: undefined method `debug=' for class ActiveSupport::Deprecation to be marked as do

Bug#1094522: marked as done (ruby-pry-rails: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: LoadError: cannot load such file -- rack/session/abstract/id (LoadError))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:19:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095803: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094522, regarding ruby-pry-rails: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: LoadError: cannot load such file -- rack/session/abstract/id

Bug#1093487: marked as done (php-console-table: Abandoned upstream)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:48:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095614: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1093487, regarding php-console-table: Abandoned upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#1094559: marked as done (ruby-haml-rails: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such file -- r

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:10:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095735: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094559, regarding ruby-haml-rails: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such file -- rack/session/ab

Bug#1099032: Flickering on BananaPI CM4 with Arm Mali-G52

2025-02-27 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Dear maintainer(s), dear Johannes, dear everyone. Potentially related – happens with mesa 25.0.0-1 on Devuan Ceres (which uses Debian unstable packages for most of the installed packages including mesa) with KDE Plasma 6.3 desktop on Qt 6.7.2: Flickering and various graphics related glitches with

Bug#1094190: mesa-va-drivers: VAAPI fails to initialize

2025-02-27 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi! On ThinkPad T14 AMD Gen 5 with AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U w/ Radeon 780M Graphics. KDE Plasma 6.3 desktop on Qt 6.7.2 with X11. Did not see a failure to initialize VAAPI with previous 24.x mesa. However with current mesa 25.0.0-1 VLC crashes start with auto detection of video output: % LANG=C v

Bug#1095731: marked as done (ruby-js-image-paths: Could not find 'rails' (< 7.0, >= 4.0))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:56:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095732: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095731, regarding ruby-js-image-paths: Could not find 'rails' (< 7.0, >= 4.0) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1095656: marked as done (ruby-ammeter: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 136 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:54:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095657: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095656, regarding ruby-ammeter: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 136 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError) to be marked as

Bug#1095879: marked as done (ruby-ammeter: autopkgtest failure with rails 7: Failure/Error: expect('/some/file/path').to exist)

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:54:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095657: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095879, regarding ruby-ammeter: autopkgtest failure with rails 7: Failure/Error: expect('/some/file/path').to exist to be marked as

Bug#1095648: marked as done (ruby-js-routes: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:50:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095649: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095648, regarding ruby-js-routes: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1095727: marked as done (ruby-asset-sync: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:47:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095571: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095727, regarding ruby-asset-sync: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#1095877: marked as done (ruby-activerecord-import: autopkgtest failure with rails 7: `block in assert_valid_keys': Unknown key: :unique. Valid keys are: :limit, :precision, :scale, :default, :null

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:45:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095565: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095877, regarding ruby-activerecord-import: autopkgtest failure with rails 7: `block in assert_valid_keys': Unknown key: :unique. Va

Processed: limit source to linux, tagging 1095745, tagging 1098661, tagging 1098354, tagging 1098250

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source linux Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux' Limit currently set to 'source':'linux' > tags 1095745 + pending Bug #1095745 [src:linux] rockchip: NVMe unavailable on rk3568 platform Bug #1098250 [src:l

Bug#1095651: marked as done (ruby-devise-lastseenable: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:45:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095566: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095651, regarding ruby-devise-lastseenable: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1095645: marked as done (ruby-rails-timeago: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 134 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:43:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095562: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095645, regarding ruby-rails-timeago: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 134 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError) to be mark

Bug#1095641: marked as done (ruby-mobile-fu: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 150 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError))

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:41:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095561: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095641, regarding ruby-mobile-fu: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 150 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError) to be marked a

  1   2   >