Bug#1091032: node-inwasm: FTBFS: wasm-ld-18: error: unknown argument: --no-growable-memory

2025-02-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: emscripten Followup-For: Bug #1091032 Control: tags -1 ftbfs Hi, I've successfully built emscripten and node-inwasm, for a start. For now I don't know if the tests are okay (many hours, need limit the amount of variations), but it works with binaryen 122 and llvm-19. Most troubles will

Processed: Re: node-inwasm: FTBFS: wasm-ld-18: error: unknown argument: --no-growable-memory

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1091032 [emscripten] node-inwasm: FTBFS: wasm-ld-18: error: unknown argument: --no-growable-memory Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1091032 to the same tags previously set -- 1091032: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10910

Bug#1095716: librenaissance-dev and renaissance-dev-tools have an undeclared file conflict

2025-02-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: librenaissance-dev,renaissance-dev-tools Version: 0.9.0-5 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + librenaissance0-dev librenaissance-dev and renaissance-dev-tools have an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error f

Bug#1083022: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Yves-Alexis Perez ) (Bug#1083022: fixed in tumbler 4.18.2-1)

2025-02-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:47:44AM +, mag...@autistici.org wrote: > On 2025-01-20 13:49, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On Sat, 2025-01-18 at 13:14 +, mag...@autistici.org wrote: > > > Could you apply the simple patch (unmark tumbler as m-a: same) > > > in stable/bookworm too, as tumbler stil

Processed: tinycbor-utils has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/json2cbor

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + node-cbor Bug #1095717 [tinycbor-utils] tinycbor-utils has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/json2cbor Added indication that 1095717 affects node-cbor -- 1095717: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095717 Debian Bug Tracking Syst

Bug#1095717: tinycbor-utils has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/json2cbor

2025-02-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: tinycbor-utils Version: 0.6.0-1+b1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + node-cbor tinycbor-utils has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error from dpkg. The file /usr/bin/json2cbor is contained in the packa

Processed: librenaissance-dev and renaissance-dev-tools have an undeclared file conflict

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + librenaissance0-dev Bug #1095716 [librenaissance-dev,renaissance-dev-tools] librenaissance-dev and renaissance-dev-tools have an undeclared file conflict Added indication that 1095716 affects librenaissance0-dev -- 1095716: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Processed: libdtkcore-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/features/dtk_install_dconfig.prf

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + libdtkcommon-dev Bug #1095715 [libdtkcore-dev] libdtkcore-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/features/dtk_install_dconfig.prf Added indication that 1095715 affects libdtkcommon-dev -- 1095715: https://bugs.deb

Bug#1095714: caveexpress FTBFS: SDLSoundEngine.cpp:34:23: error: cannot convert ‘_Mix_Music*’ to ‘Mix_Music*’

2025-02-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: caveexpress Version: 2.5.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs caveexpress fails to build from source in unstable on amd64. A non-parallel build log ends as follows: | [ 20%] Building CXX object src/modules/sound/CMakeFiles/sound.dir/SDLSoundEngine.cpp.o | cd /build/reproducible-path/caveex

Bug#1095715: libdtkcore-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/features/dtk_install_dconfig.prf

2025-02-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: libdtkcore-dev Version: 5.7.9-1~exp1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + libdtkcommon-dev libdtkcore-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error from dpkg. The file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspe

Bug#1093928: marked as done (ruby-roadie-rails: FTBFS: undefined method `ignored?' for an instance of Gem::Specification (NoMethodError))

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 05:19:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093928: fixed in ruby-roadie-rails 3.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093928, regarding ruby-roadie-rails: FTBFS: undefined method `ignored?' for an instance of Gem::Specification (NoMethodError) to b

Bug#1094713: marked as done (mdtraj: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:50:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094713: fixed in mdtraj 1.10.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094713, regarding mdtraj: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#1094944: marked as done (freedombox: not installable due to missing dnsutils)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:20:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094944: fixed in freedombox 25.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094944, regarding freedombox: not installable due to missing dnsutils to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1094562: marked as done (ruby-actionpack-xml-parser: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load suc

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:12:01 -0700 with message-id <2387973.ZkOooBPedc@soren-desktop> and subject line ruby-actionpack-xml-parser: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such file -- rack/session/abstract/id (LoadError) has caused the Debian Bug repor

Bug#1087058: lxqt-build-tools-qt5 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/lxqt-transupdate

2025-02-10 Thread Boyuan Yang
X-Debbugs-CC: czc...@debian.org ajq...@debian.org On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:38:38 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: Package: lxqt-build-tools-qt5 Version: 0.13.0-1~exp2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + lxqt-build-tools lxqt-build-tools-qt5 ha

Bug#1094808: marked as done (mdanalysis: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:51:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094808: fixed in mdanalysis 2.8.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094808, regarding mdanalysis: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1085142: Produces PPD files with invalid hash character in size names.

2025-02-10 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Agustin, thanks a lot for taking care of this1 @Marcin: did you try the patch from Agustin and does it help with your problem? Thorsten

Bug#1095643: marked as done (osmocom-dahdi-linux: -dkms only builds for the running kernel, -source unusable)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:22:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095643: fixed in osmocom-dahdi-linux 0.0~git20241003.b2ea348-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095643, regarding osmocom-dahdi-linux: -dkms only builds for the running kernel, -source unusable to be marke

Bug#1074839: marked as done (basemap: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:49:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1074839: fixed in basemap 1.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1074839, regarding basemap: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#1092778: marked as done (basemap: switch away from cython-legacy)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:49:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092778: fixed in basemap 1.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092778, regarding basemap: switch away from cython-legacy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#1095619: marked as done (courier-base and maildrop have an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/maildirkw)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:50:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095619: fixed in courier 1.3.13-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095619, regarding courier-base and maildrop have an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/maildirkw to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1076957: marked as done (basemap: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy.distutils')

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:49:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1076957: fixed in basemap 1.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1076957, regarding basemap: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy.distutils' to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1076957: marked as pending in basemap

2025-02-10 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1076957 in basemap reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/basemap/-/commit/708841eaff2f53ebe79

Processed: Bug#1076957 marked as pending in basemap

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1076957 [src:basemap] basemap: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy.distutils' Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1076957 to the same tags previously set -- 1076957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076957 De

Bug#1093363: marked as done (uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:49:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093363: fixed in uvloop 0.21.0+ds1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093363, regarding uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093363 Debian Bug Tra

Bug#1095700: xdebug-3-4 reject: Newer version of php8.4-xdebug already in unstable

2025-02-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: xdebug-3-4 Version: 3.4.0~beta1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bunk@coccia:~$ cat /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/reject/xdebug-3-4_3.4.0~beta1-1_arm64-buildd.changes.reason Version check failed: Your upload included the binary package php8.4-xdebug, version 3.4.0~beta1-1, for arm64,

Processed: [python-hug] RC Bug #1095372: forward to PR

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1095372 https://github.com/hugapi/hug/pull/927 Bug #1095372 [src:python-hug] python-hug: FTBFS: E AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'bool8'. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/hugapi/hug/pull/927'. >

Bug#1095619: marked as done (courier-base and maildrop have an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/maildirkw)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:33:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095619: fixed in maildrop 3.1.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095619, regarding courier-base and maildrop have an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/maildirkw to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1092611: marked as done (checksecurity: piuparts testing shows a regression (blocks testing migration))

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:26:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092611: fixed in checksecurity 2.0.18 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092611, regarding checksecurity: piuparts testing shows a regression (blocks testing migration) to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1095697: golang-1.24: FTBFS on arm64: FAIL

2025-02-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: golang-1.24 Version: 1.24~rc3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=golang-1.24&arch=arm64&ver=1.24%7Erc3-1&stamp=1738953789&raw=0 ok

Processed: forcibly merging 1087687 1087423

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1087687 1087423 Bug #1087687 [src:openjfx] mediathekview: Fatal error in Java Runtime Environment/SIGSEV Bug #1087423 [src:openjfx] libopenjfx-jni: mediathekview won't start with version 11.0.11+1-4 Severity set to 'grave' from 'norma

Processed: reassign 1087423 to src:openjfx, forcibly merging 1087687 1087687

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1087423 src:openjfx Bug #1087423 [libopenjfx-jni] libopenjfx-jni: mediathekview won't start with version 11.0.11+1-4 Bug reassigned from package 'libopenjfx-jni' to 'src:openjfx'. No longer marked as found in versions openjfx/11.0.11+1-4

Processed: src:elixir-makeup-erlang: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.0.2-1 Bug #1095696 [src:elixir-makeup-erlang] src:elixir-makeup-erlang: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions elixir-makeup-erlang/1.0.2-1. Bug #1095696 [src:elixir-makeup-erlang] src:elixir-makeup-erlang: fails to migrate

Bug#1095696: src:elixir-makeup-erlang: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: elixir-makeup-erlang Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.0.2-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1092439 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between te

Bug#1095695: src:lomiri-settings-components: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el

2025-02-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: lomiri-settings-components Version: 1.1.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.1.2-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org Usertags: mips64el Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages

Processed: src:lomiri-settings-components: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.1.2-1 Bug #1095695 [src:lomiri-settings-components] src:lomiri-settings-components: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Marked as fixed in versions lomiri-settings-components/1.1.2-1. Bug #1095695 [src:lomiri-settings-components] s

Processed: src:python-mashumaro: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 3.15-1 Bug #1095694 [src:python-mashumaro] src:python-mashumaro: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions python-mashumaro/3.15-1. Bug #1095694 [src:python-mashumaro] src:python-mashumaro: fails to migrate to testing for too lon

Bug#1095694: src:python-mashumaro: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-mashumaro Version: 3.13.1-4 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.15-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 da

Processed: marble: Unnecessary Build-Depends: libqt5webkit5-dev

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1094740 [src:marble] marble: Unnecessary Build-Depends: libqt5webkit5-dev Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > block 1069574 by -1 Bug #1069574 [libqt5webkit5] age-old and insecure webkit package 1069574 was blocked by: 929253 1074331 10

Processed: tagging 1074839

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1074839 + pending Bug #1074839 [src:basemap] basemap: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1074839: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074839

Processed: tagging 1076957

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1076957 + pending Bug #1076957 [src:basemap] basemap: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy.distutils' Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1076957: https://bugs

Processed: tagging 1092778

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1092778 + pending Bug #1092778 [src:basemap] basemap: switch away from cython-legacy Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1092778: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#1091577: seems to be a bug in autoconf

2025-02-10 Thread Paul Dreik
Hi, this failure seems to be due to a bug in autoconf: https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?110983 ...which was patched here: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/commit/?id=b71143738516017f0e0d347a4025301c06c40254 thanks github user jirislaby (Jiri Slaby) who tracked this down: https://

Processed: Re: liboobs FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t with gcc 14

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1086474 [src:liboobs] liboobs FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t with gcc 14 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1086474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086474 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Bug#1086474: liboobs FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t with gcc 14

2025-02-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important liboobs has been removed on armel & armhf so I am downgrading the severity of this issue. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1039731: marked as done (php-laravel-lumen-framework: FTBFS with symfony 6: unsatisfiable build-dependencies)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:28:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1039731: fixed in php-laravel-lumen-framework 10.0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1039731, regarding php-laravel-lumen-framework: FTBFS with symfony 6: unsatisfiable build-dependencies to be marked as d

Bug#1095502: marked as done (autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:23:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095502, regarding autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1095458: marked as done (autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:17:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095461: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095458, regarding autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1095491: marked as done (autopkgtest regression with ruby-sprockets 4)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:21:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095492: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095491, regarding autopkgtest regression with ruby-sprockets 4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1095481: marked as done (autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:20:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095483: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095481, regarding autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1095466: marked as done (autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:19:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095480: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095466, regarding autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1094840: marked as done (ruby-markdown-it-html5-embed: Expected to find a manifest file in `app/assets/config/manifest.js`)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:17:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095457: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094840, regarding ruby-markdown-it-html5-embed: Expected to find a manifest file in `app/assets/config/manifest.js` to be marked as

Bug#1094454: marked as done (ruby-rails-assets-jquery-colorbox: Bundler::GemNotFound: Could not find rails-assets-jquery-3.5.1.gem)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:11:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094456: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094454, regarding ruby-rails-assets-jquery-colorbox: Bundler::GemNotFound: Could not find rails-assets-jquery-3.5.1.gem to be marked

Bug#1094653: marked as done (gnome-devel-docs: unmaintained upstream; upstream repository is archived and read-only)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:13:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095185: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094653, regarding gnome-devel-docs: unmaintained upstream; upstream repository is archived and read-only to be marked as done. This

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 10. Feb. 2025 um 15:42 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber : > [...] > https://mentors.debian.net/package/stimfit/ Looks good, uploaded - you can track the package status and any further issues here: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/stimfit I don't see any major issues anymore, so this shou

Processed: Re: uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1093363 [src:uvloop] uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093363 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1093363: uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(

2025-02-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 patch On 2/10/25 7:16 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: Probably your cowbuilder chroot is similar to sbuild+unshare in that it disables network access, but this suggests the tests are trying to use the network (even if it's just DNS queries on "example.com"), which is forbidden. Let'

Bug#1093496: closing 1093496

2025-02-10 Thread Robin Gustafsson
close 1093496 thanks It's a dependency of Laravel 10 that's now in unstable and expected to be in Trixie.

Processed: closing 1093496

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1093496 Bug #1093496 [src:php-fruitcake-php-cors] php-fruitcake-php-cors: Useless in Trixie Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1093496: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#1093363: uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(

2025-02-10 Thread Santiago Vila
tags 1093363 - unreproducible thanks (I'm also a member of python team and I can reproduce it) On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:54:25 + Santiago Vila wrote: AssertionError: Lists differ: [( This suggests an IPv6 only host, as the package builds successfully in a plain sid cowbuilder chroot on my

Processed: Re: uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1093363 - unreproducible Bug #1093363 [src:uvloop] uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [( thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1093363: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093

Bug#1095683: impossible to install: depends on missing package librust-databake-0.2-dev

2025-02-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: librust-litemap-dev Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 librust-litemap-dev is impossible to install: depends on missing package librust-databake-0.2-dev. In future, please use the experimental suite for new packages, and only introduce into

Bug#1082570: libportal: FTBFS with segfault during TestInputCapture, reliably on AWS but rarely elsewhere

2025-02-10 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 15:53:23 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 9/2/25 a las 18:48, Simon McVittie escribió: > > On the VM that Santiago provided, I successfully built libportal from > > source twice in a row (by entering the sid schroot and building with > > dpkg-buildpackage), which seems incons

Bug#1093363: uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(

2025-02-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 unreproducible On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:54:25 + Santiago Vila wrote: AssertionError: Lists differ: [( This suggests an IPv6 only host, as the package builds successfully in a plain sid cowbuilder chroot on my system. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4A

Processed: Re: uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible Bug #1093363 [src:uvloop] uvloop: FTBFS: AssertionError: Lists differ: [(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093363 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1095678: marked as done (ruby-actionpack: Dependency change not corrected in Gemfile)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:06:50 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#1095678: ruby-actionpack: Dependency change not corrected in Gemfile has caused the Debian Bug report #1095678, regarding ruby-actionpack: Dependency change not corrected in Gemfile to be marke

Bug#1095678: ruby-actionpack: Dependency change not corrected in Gemfile

2025-02-10 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
Package: ruby-actionpack Version: 2:6.1.7.3+dfsg-11 Severity: serious Dear Lucas Nussbaum, the change of dependency on ruby-rack-session to "| ruby-rack (<< 3)" is not corrected in the Gemfile /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/specifications/actionpack-6.1.7.3.gemspec . Installation breaks the

Bug#1094951: marked as done (lynis: not installable due to missing dnsutils)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:06:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094951: fixed in lynis 3.1.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094951, regarding lynis: not installable due to missing dnsutils to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1095672: g10k :FTBFS:build failed ( -race is not supported on linux/*)

2025-02-10 Thread Yue Gui
Source: g10k Version: 0.9.9-2 Severity: serious Tags: FTBFS, patch Dear g10k maintainer, The package g10k build failed on most arch.The crucial buildd log below: ``` dh_auto_build -- -race -ldflags "-X main.buildversion=0.9.9 -X main.buildtime=1739129287" cd obj-riscv64-linux-gnu && go

Bug#1095281: marked as done (pycorrfit: missing dependency on numpy abi)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:22:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095281: fixed in pycorrfit 1.1.7+nopack-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095281, regarding pycorrfit: missing dependency on numpy abi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1094110: marked as done (vagrant-cachier: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libruby (< 1:3.2~) but 1:3.3~3.1 is to be installed)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:00:35 +0100 with message-id and subject line Closing since it was an effect of #1091664 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094110, regarding vagrant-cachier: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libruby (< 1:3.2~) but 1:3.3~3.1 is to be installed to be mar

Bug#1082570: libportal: FTBFS with segfault during TestInputCapture, reliably on AWS but rarely elsewhere

2025-02-10 Thread Santiago Vila
El 9/2/25 a las 18:48, Simon McVittie escribió: On the VM that Santiago provided, I successfully built libportal from source twice in a row (by entering the sid schroot and building with dpkg-buildpackage), which seems inconsistent with Santiago getting a less than 10% success rate. Running the

Bug#1095670: orange3: needs patches for numpy 2 compatibility

2025-02-10 Thread Stuart Prescott
Source: orange3 Version: 3.38.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS X-Debbugs-Cc: stu...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, The orange3 package needs patches for numpy 2 compatibility. I spotted this upstream patch which appears to be enough: https://github.com/biolab/orange3/commit/3517623b26322

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-10 Thread Christoph Schmidt-Hieber
> On 10 Feb 2025, at 14:28, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Am Mo., 10. Feb. 2025 um 07:43 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber > : >>> On 9 Feb 2025, at 20:31, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >>> >>> It looks like in order to get stimfit back into the next Debian >>> release, it will unfortunately also nee

Processed: RC Bug #1095096: forward to upstream fix

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1095096 https://github.com/mwaskom/seaborn/pull/3685 Bug #1095096 [src:seaborn] seaborn: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/mwaskom/seaborn/pull/3685'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 10. Feb. 2025 um 07:43 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber : > > On 9 Feb 2025, at 20:31, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > > > It looks like in order to get stimfit back into the next Debian > > release, it will unfortunately also need to be ported from sip4 to > > sip6, as sip4 does not work w

Bug#1092509: nml: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [Makefile:24: 001_action8] Error 1

2025-02-10 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
forwarded 1092509 https://github.com/OpenTTD/nml/issues/340 thanks Hi Lucas, Thanks for reporting this issue. Upstream has also identified this issue and fixed it upstream, see https://github.com/OpenTTD/nml/issues/340 and https://github.com/OpenTTD/nml/pull/341 It seems that some change in new

Bug#1095590: marked as done (python3-pytz has an undeclared file conflict)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:26:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095585: fixed in python-tz 2025.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095585, regarding python3-pytz has an undeclared file conflict to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1095585: marked as done (python3-pytz: Try to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pytz/__init__.py')

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:26:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095585: fixed in python-tz 2025.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095585, regarding python3-pytz: Try to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pytz/__init__.py' to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1083022: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Yves-Alexis Perez ) (Bug#1083022: fixed in tumbler 4.18.2-1)

2025-02-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 11:47 +, mag...@autistici.org wrote: > Hi Yves-Alexis, hi Helmut! > > @Helmut: I'm writing to you too because Yves-Alexis raised > the severity of the bug to serious and Yves-Alexis is asking > below if this does apply to s

Bug#1095405: marked as done (apparmor-notify: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cgitb')

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:19:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095405: fixed in apparmor 3.1.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095405, regarding apparmor-notify: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cgitb' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1094950: MR is prepared

2025-02-10 Thread Roland Clobus
Hello maintainers, I've prepared a MR for this: https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-tasks/-/merge_requests/8 With kind regards, Roland Clobus OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1093362: marked as done (thunderbird: FTBFS: According to "pip check", the current Python environment has package-compatibility issues.)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:01:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093362: fixed in thunderbird 1:135.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093362, regarding thunderbird: FTBFS: According to "pip check", the current Python environment has package-compatibility issues. to be

Processed: Re: Bug#1092509: nml: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [Makefile:24: 001_action8] Error 1

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1092509 https://github.com/OpenTTD/nml/issues/340 Bug #1092509 [src:nml] nml: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [Makefile:24: 001_action8] Error 1 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/OpenTTD/nml/issues/340'. > thanks Stopping processi

Processed: tagging 1095225, tagging 1095385, tagging 1095337, tagging 1094545, tagging 1094129, tagging 1094111 ...

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1095225 - sid experimental Bug #1095225 {Done: Jeremy Bícha } [src:mutter] mutter: cursor-tests failing with adwaita-icon-theme 48 Beta Removed tag(s) sid and experimental. > tags 1095385 + experimental Bug #1095385 [src:ruby-responders] rub

Bug#1094107: marked as done (pytrainer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-tox -i python{version} -p 3.13 returned exit code 13)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:08:01 +0100 with message-id <1491fded-3bdb-4238-91c6-bfc35113a...@debian.org> and subject line should be fixed in 11.1.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094040, regarding pytrainer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-tox -i python{version}

Bug#1094040: marked as done (pystray: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Command '['/usr/bin/python3.12', '-m', 'pip', '--disable-pip-version-check', 'wheel', '--no-deps', '-w', '/tmp/tmpx5sdn4zk

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:08:01 +0100 with message-id <1491fded-3bdb-4238-91c6-bfc35113a...@debian.org> and subject line should be fixed in 11.1.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094040, regarding pystray: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Command '['/usr/bin/python3.12', '

Bug#1095656: ruby-ammeter: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 136 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError)

2025-02-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-ammeter Version: 1.1.7-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, Broken with rails 7. Full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-ammeter/unstable/amd64/57495061/ -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy:

Bug#1083022: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Yves-Alexis Perez ) (Bug#1083022: fixed in tumbler 4.18.2-1)

2025-02-10 Thread magnus
Hi Yves-Alexis, hi Helmut! @Helmut: I'm writing to you too because Yves-Alexis raised the severity of the bug to serious and Yves-Alexis is asking below if this does apply to stable too. On 2025-01-20 13:49, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On Sat, 2025-01-18 at 13:14 +, mag...@autistici.org wrote

Processed: closing 1094092

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1094092 Bug #1094092 [src:mediastreamer2] mediastreamer2: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libmbedcrypto7t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedtls14t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedx509-1t64 (>= 2.28.0) Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing her

Processed: Re: osmocom-dahdi-linux: -dkms only builds for the running kernel, -source unusable

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1095643 [src:osmocom-dahdi-linux] osmocom-dahdi-linux: -dkms only builds for the running kernel, -source unusable Added tag(s) patch. -- 1095643: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095643 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@b

Bug#1095643: osmocom-dahdi-linux: -dkms only builds for the running kernel, -source unusable

2025-02-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1095643 Control: tag -1 patch Merge request: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-mobcom-team/osmocom-dahdi-linux/-/merge_requests/1 CI passes except for a Lintian error: E: osmocom-dahdi-linux source: debian-watch-file-pubkey-file-is-missing [debian/watch] The autopkgtests pass o

Bug#1095653: ruby-build: fails test build-ruby-openssl on unstable/armhf

2025-02-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: ruby-build Version: 20241225.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, See https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-build/unstable/armhf/ The error message in the build log is: cc -I. -Iinclude -Iapps/include -fPIC -pthread -march=armv7-a -Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -O3 -DOPENSSL_USE_NODELETE -DOPENSSL_PIC

Bug#1095651: ruby-devise-lastseenable: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16)

2025-02-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-devise-lastseenable Version: 0.0.6-1.1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, autopkgtest broken with rails 7. full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-devise- lastseenable/unstable/amd64/57495069/ -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/

Processed: limit source to apparmor, tagging 1094958, tagging 1084647, tagging 1095405

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source apparmor Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'apparmor' Limit currently set to 'source':'apparmor' > tags 1094958 + pending Bug #1094958 [apparmor] apparmor: Update/add debconf template translation [INTL:

Bug#1095650: oakleaf: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures

2025-02-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: oakleaf Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi, Your package failed to build on 32-bit architectures. From the armel and armhf build logs: | rfun_hampel_real128.f08:59:44: | |59 | elemental pure function pshampel_REAL128(x) result(pshampel) | |

Bug#1093862: marked as done (mame: FTBFS on mips64el: collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’)

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:30:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093862: fixed in mame 0.274+dfsg.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093862, regarding mame: FTBFS on mips64el: collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1094217: marked as done (kdenlive: Missing dependency on qml6-module-org-kde-desktop (segfault on startup))

2025-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:26:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094217: fixed in kdenlive 24.12.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094217, regarding kdenlive: Missing dependency on qml6-module-org-kde-desktop (segfault on startup) to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#1095648: ruby-js-routes: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16)

2025-02-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-js-routes Version: 1.4.9-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, autopkgtest broke with rails 7. Full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-js-routes/unstable/amd64/57495088/ -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstab

Bug#1095645: ruby-rails-timeago: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16) among 134 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError)

2025-02-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-rails-timeago Version: 2.19.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, Broken with rails 7 in experimental - this will be reuploaded to unstable soon. Full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-rails-timeago/unstable/amd64/57495100/ -- System I

  1   2   >