Hi!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 09:09:05PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19-09-2024 18:49, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Ah! That would work. But I've now found the source of the problem,
> > and have a suggestion for how to fix it. Shall I commit directly to
> > the emscripten salsa repo?
>
Hello,
I am one of the upstream developers of cod-tools. Thanks a lot everyone
for tracking down the issue and coming up with a patch.
On 2024-09-29 22:52, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 29/9/24 a las 20:21, Aurelien Jarno escribió:
1) Defining the rule with an absolute path:
I would have gone wi
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 19:51:16 +0200 Antonio Valentino
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:50:02 + Stefano Rivera
wrote:
> FWIW: I think these bugs were all caused by setuptools v72 dropping
> support for the "test" command, so dh-python has fallen back to
> distutils / other test plugins.
>
> If
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 tumbler
Bug #1083022 [crossgrader] crossgrader: dpkg error "trying to overwrite shared
'/usr/lib/systemd/user/tumblerd.service', which is different from other
instances of package tumbler:amd64"
Bug reassigned from package 'crossgrader' to 'tumbler'.
No
Processing control commands:
> severity 1079965 normal
Bug #1079965 [src:golang-github-coreos-go-tspi] Should
golang-github-coreos-go-tspi be removed from unstable?
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle 1079965 RM: golang-github-coreos-go-tspi -- RoQA; rc-buggy
Bug #1079965 [src:golan
Processing control commands:
> severity 1079847 normal
Bug #1079847 [src:jodd] Should jodd be removed from unstable?
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle 1079847 RM: jodd -- RoQA; rc-buggy
Bug #1079847 [src:jodd] Should jodd be removed from unstable?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: jodd --
Control: severity 1079965 normal
Control: retitle 1079965 RM: golang-github-coreos-go-tspi -- RoQA; rc-buggy
Control: reassign 1079965 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects 1079965 + src:golang-github-coreos-go-tspi
Dear golang-github-coreos-go-tspi maintainer and ftp team,
a month has passed since fil
Processing control commands:
> severity 1079843 normal
Bug #1079843 [src:php-webimpress-safe-writer] Should php-webimpress-safe-writer
be removed from unstable?
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle 1079843 RM: php-webimpress-safe-writer -- RoQA; rc-buggy
Bug #1079843 [src:php-webimpr
Control: severity 1079847 normal
Control: retitle 1079847 RM: jodd -- RoQA; rc-buggy
Control: reassign 1079847 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects 1079847 + src:jodd
Dear jodd maintainer and ftp team,
a month has passed since filing a suggestion to remove jodd
from Debian. It was suggested for remova
Control: severity 1079843 normal
Control: retitle 1079843 RM: php-webimpress-safe-writer -- RoQA; rc-buggy
Control: reassign 1079843 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects 1079843 + src:php-webimpress-safe-writer
Dear php-webimpress-safe-writer maintainer and ftp team,
a month has passed since filing a
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libjmagick6-jni
Bug #1083021 [libjmagick7-jni] libjmagick7-jni has an undeclared file conflict
on /usr/lib/jni/libJMagick.so
Added indication that 1083021 affects libjmagick6-jni
--
1083021: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1083021
De
Package: libjmagick7-jni
Version: 6.7.8-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libjmagick6-jni
libjmagick7-jni has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an
unpack error from dpkg.
The file /usr/lib/jni/libJMagick.so is contained
Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2024 03:34:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077678: fixed in xtrx-dkms 0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077678,
regarding xtrx-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.10: error: 'struct
uart_state' has no member named 'x
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1082907 [src:chromium] chromium: FTBFS with reverted libxml2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1082907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 pending
On 9/28/24 02:48, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Source: chromium
Version: 129.0.6668.70-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
libxml2 has been reverted to the 2.9.x s
Package: nautilus
Version: 47.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrade to version 47.0-1, nautilus fails to start with:
$ nautilus
** Message: 19:38:42.449: Connecting to
org.freedesktop.Tracker3.Miner.Files
MESA-INTEL: warning: ../src/intel/vulk
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:22:36 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: lomiri-online-accounts: FTBFS: 18 - tst_qmlplugin (Failed)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080114,
regarding lomiri-online-accounts: FTBFS: 18 - tst_qmlplugin (Failed)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Confirmation: The upstream PR fixes the compilation issue, after removing the
duplicate lines.
I combined it into a single patch and pushed it to the repo.
@hyperair: Feel free to release a new Debian version when you can.
Thanks!
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:03:46 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > I wonder what still was compiled against libxml2 2.12 … One guess is libxslt
> > which hasn't seen any upload or binNMU since July.
>
> Um, seems to me that libxml-libxslt-perl itself needs a rebuild (and
> possibly tighter dependencies) ag
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 21:50:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076352: fixed in procps 2:4.0.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076352,
regarding procps: leftover conffiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 21:50:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072533: fixed in procps 2:4.0.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072533,
regarding procps: flaky autopkgtest:
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
This issue was fixed upstream a long time ago:
https://github.com/slic3r/Slic3r/pull/4974
Fedora had the same issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259590
They added a quick&dirty fix to their build files:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/12#request_diff
I'
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:35:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082747: fixed in cod-tools 3.10.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082747,
regarding cod-tools: FTBFS on riscv64, with disorderfs or with make --shuffle
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074858: fixed in bup 0.33.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074858,
regarding bup: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
El 29/9/24 a las 20:21, Aurelien Jarno escribió:
1) Defining the rule with an absolute path:
Great! This one looks good enough for me.
I'm going to make a team upload including that fix.
(I've tested and it fixes the ftbfs problem when using
make --shuffle, so hopefully it will also work for
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 19:49:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082612: fixed in lintian 2.119.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082612,
regarding lintian: stumbles over new $YAML::XS::VERSION: "v0.902.0" is not
numeric
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 19:49:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082612: fixed in lintian 2.119.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082612,
regarding lintian: Argument "v0.902.0" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at
/usr/share/lintian/lib/Lintian/Check/Debian/Upstream/Metad
You could request architecture-specific removal of trickle since it
has no reverse dependencies.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 12:49:29AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:46:00 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > On 17-07-2024 11:20 p.m., gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > So I guess I'd just wait (the new libxml-libxslt-perl version also
> > > has no groundbreaking changes); but I migh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1082747 src:cod-tools
Bug #1082747 [cod-tools] cod-tools: FTBFS on riscv64, with disorderfs or with
make --shuffle
Bug reassigned from package 'cod-tools' to 'src:cod-tools'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1082747 to th
control: clone -1 -2
control: severity -2 important
control: reassign -1 cod-tools
control: retitle -1 cod-tools: FTBFS on riscv64, with disorderfs or with make
--shuffle
control: notforwarded -1
control: tag -1 -fixed-upstream
Hi,
On 2024-09-29 16:49, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Well, just to clari
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1082747 [make-dfsg] make-dfsg: directory cache not invalidated after
invoking command
Bug 1082747 cloned as bug 1083000
> severity -2 important
Bug #1083000 [make-dfsg] make-dfsg: directory cache not invalidated after
invoking command
Severity set
Package: src:postgresql-filedump
Version: 16.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh
Package: src:dpaste
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with autoreconf
Package: src:pg-hint-plan-16
Version: 1.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with p
Package: src:postgresql-16-age
Version: 1.5.0~rc0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --
Package: src:ros-bond-core
Version: 1.8.6-10
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_upd
Package: src:python-eventlet
Version: 0.36.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
make: pyversions:
Package: src:repmgr
Version: 5.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
pg_buildext checkcontrol
--- debian/control
Package: src:pgaudit-16
Version: 16.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_clean
Package: src:node-http-server
Version: 14.1.1+~cs3.14.34-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bi
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:50:02 + Stefano Rivera
wrote:
FWIW: I think these bugs were all caused by setuptools v72 dropping
support for the "test" command, so dh-python has fallen back to
distutils / other test plugins.
If you're trying to figure out how to fix the bug, look at the
implementat
Package: curl
Version: 8.10.1-1~bpo12+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: enrico.barbaro...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you d
Source: chatty
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: armhf
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
chatty was recently rebuilt for the libspelling transition but it
fails to build on armhf.
Some major changes that have happened in the past mo
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:49:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1081734: fixed in jupyterhub 5.0.0+ds1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081734,
regarding jupyterhub: Cannot start: missing alembic.ini
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi
I noticed the enum and the functions associated with the enum are
unused. You could just simply patch them out.
There are more errors after that though.
--
Quoting Andreas Tille:
H again,
Am Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 07:17:41AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Am Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:46:17PM +010
Well, just to clarify. I said:
Since make 4.4.1 includes the above commit (at least that's what the NEWS file
says),
I still think there is *also* a Makefile bug somewhere, unless I'm missing
anything.
Actually, that was already known, since the changelog contains this:
* debian/rules: ad
El 29/9/24 a las 16:16, Aurelien Jarno escribió:
This is definitely a cache issue in make, the following upstream commit
fixes the issue:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/?id=9e2fa24649b870d79e2582f46e851fb34daa4762
Ok, but I tried building with make 4.4.1 using --shuffle opti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1082747 - help
Bug #1082747 [make-dfsg] make-dfsg: directory cache not invalidated after
invoking command
Removed tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1082747: https://bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1082747
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/?id=9e2fa24649b870d79e2582f46e851fb34daa4762
Bug #1082747 [make-dfsg] make-dfsg: directory cache not invalidated after
invoking command
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1082747 + patch fixed-upstream
Bug #1082747 [make-dfsg] make-dfsg: directory cache not invalidated after
invoking command
Added tag(s) patch and fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
control: reassign -1 make-dfsg
control: retitle -1 make-dfsg: directory cache not invalidated after invoking
command
control: affects -1 cod-tools
On 2024-09-29 16:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-09-29 02:10, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:25:10 +0200 Aurelien J
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 make-dfsg
Bug #1082747 [src:cod-tools] cod-tools: FTBFS (only) on riscv64
Bug reassigned from package 'src:cod-tools' to 'make-dfsg'.
No longer marked as found in versions cod-tools/3.10.0+dfsg-1.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1082747
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1079950
Bug #1079950 {Done: Mo Zhou } [src:chafa] chafa: Fails to
build on some architectures with glibc 2.40
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to
Hi,
On 2024-09-29 02:10, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:25:10 +0200 Aurelien Jarno
> wrote:
>
> > TIL disorderfs. I have also been able to reproduce it with disorderfs.
> > In addition knowing the root of the issue, I have been able to
> > reproduce the issue on a riscv64 ma
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:20:45 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1082728: openssh: Passive SSH Key Compromise via
Lattices (RSA host keys)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082728,
regarding openssh: Passive SSH Key Compromise via Lattices (RSA host keys)
to be marked
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed ftbfs
Bug #1082979 [src:libgnupg-interface-perl] libgnupg-interface-perl: testsuite
error against gnupg 2.2.44
Added tag(s) confirmed and ftbfs.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1082979 [src:libgnupg-interface-perl] libgnupg-interface-perl: testsuite
e
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1082956 [apt] apt: autoremove --purge changed behavior; immediately
removes packages
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
1082956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs
Control: severity -1 normal
(I hope at the end its understandable why I downgrade the severity)
Hi,
Am Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 10:11:24PM GMT, schrieb Andres Salomon:
> Here's the log from my terminal:
[…]
> dilinger@debian:~$ sudo apt autoremove --purge libgtk-3-common
> Building dependency tree..
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078900: fixed in node-y-websocket 1.4.5-4+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078900,
regarding node-y-websocket: FTBFS: error TS2307: Cannot find module
'undici-types' or its corresponding type declar
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078897: fixed in node-tap 16.3.2+ds1+~cs50.8.16-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078897,
regarding node-tap: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a
module
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1081049: fixed in amanda 1:3.5.1-11+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081049,
regarding amanda: Another fix for the CVE-2022-37704 fix
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078898: fixed in node-y-protocols 1.0.5-6+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078898,
regarding node-y-protocols: FTBFS: error TS2307: Cannot find module
'undici-types' or its corresponding type declar
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078899: fixed in node-ytdl-core
4.11.2+dfsg+~cs4.10.8-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078899,
regarding node-ytdl-core: FTBFS: error TS2769: No overload matches this call.
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078896: fixed in node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills
0.2.1+dfsg+~0.11.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078896,
regarding node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills: FTBFS: error TS2792: Cannot find
module
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072599: fixed in node-globby 13.1.3+~cs16.25.40-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072599,
regarding node-globby: FTBFS: Property 'parentPath' is missing in type
'DirentFromStats' but required in ty
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078890: fixed in node-mdn-browser-compat-data
5.2.20+~3.33.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078890,
regarding node-mdn-browser-compat-data: FTBFS: TypeError
[ERR_UNKNOWN_FILE_EXTENSION]: Unknow
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068415: fixed in nghttp2 1.52.0-1+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068415,
regarding nghttp2: CVE-2024-28182: Reading unbounded number of HTTP/2
CONTINUATION frames to cause excessive CPU usage
to b
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078885: fixed in node-es-module-lexer 1.1.0+dfsg-2+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078885,
regarding node-es-module-lexer: FTBFS: error TS2792: Cannot find module
'undici-types'. Did you mean to se
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:04:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1018315: fixed in binwalk 2.4.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018315,
regarding binwalk: build-depends on python3-nose or uses it for autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Package: src:ros-interactive-markers
Version: 1.12.0-9
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:ros-dynamic-reconfigure
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:opam
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with ocaml
deb
Package: src:node-kew
Version: 0.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_au
Package: src:golang-golang-x-tools
Version: 1:0.23.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bin
Package: src:delve
Version: 1.23.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem=gol
Package: src:curlpp
Version: 0.8.1-5.3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with autoreco
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1018315 + pending
Bug #1018315 [src:binwalk] binwalk: build-depends on python3-nose or uses it
for autopkgtest
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1018315: https://bugs.debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # only significant on armel and we are removing gjs from armel, see #1080521
> severity 108 important
Bug #108 [src:mozjs128] mozjs128: SharedArrayBuffer feature unavailable on
armel
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Sto
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2024 08:33:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082694: fixed in plastex 3.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082694,
regarding plastex: FTBFS: assert 'a.b' == 'X#'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 1070573 2.10.0-1
Bug #1070573 {Done: James Valleroy }
[src:php-mock-phpunit] php-mock-phpunit: FTBFS with phpunit 11: PHP Fatal
error: Trait "PHPUnit\Framework\TestListenerDefaultImplementation" not found
in /<>/compatibility/BaseTest
On Thu, 26 Sept 2024 at 03:48, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25-09-2024 12:05, Craig Small wrote:
> > grep -E '^([[:space:]]+[[:digit:]]+){18}$' "${stdoutF}" >/dev/null
>
> I thought the problem was that the result didn't start with
> ^[[:space:]], but with ^[[:digit:]],
>
Ah yes, because
82 matches
Mail list logo
