Processed: Re: Bug#1061902: consolekit2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1061902 [src:consolekit2] consolekit2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 1061902: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061902 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Bug#1061902: consolekit2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-05-29 Thread Mark Hindley
Control: severity -1 normal On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:58:34AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:09:59PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > > Michael and Steve, > > > > I would appreciate some help here. > > Bump to reset autoremove timer. Still no response. Downgrading severity

Bug#1072073: python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py

2024-05-29 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Hi Laszlo, I am reaching out to you regarding a file conflict between the nanopb package and the python3-proto-plus package. The conflict involves the file /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py, which is present in both packages. Module name "proto" is part of python3-proto-plus. Rena

Processed: fixed 1059168 in 20.13.1+dfsg-2

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1059168 20.13.1+dfsg-2 Bug #1059168 {Done: Jérémy Lal } [nodejs] flaky autopkgtest Marked as fixed in versions nodejs/20.13.1+dfsg-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1059168: https://bugs.deb

Bug#1072201: rtags: autopkgtest failure due to missing depends on emacs

2024-05-29 Thread Xiyue Deng
Package: rtags Version: 2.38-10 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, rtags is now failing autopkgtest due to missing dependency on emacs. See the autopkgtest regression test from flycheck[1]. It used to work because it pulls in emacs through the dependency of flycheck. The recent upload of flyche

Processed: Re: python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1072073 kd8...@gmail.com Bug #1072073 {Done: Yogeswaran Umasankar } [python3-proto-plus,nanopb] python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bu

Bug#1072073: python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py

2024-05-29 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Hi, I will reachout to the nanopb maintainer. Thank you!

Bug#1072073: marked as done (python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 05:34:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072073: fixed in python-proto-plus 1.23.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072073, regarding python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py to be ma

Processed: found 1072120 in 1:6.0.25+dfsg-1

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1072120 1:6.0.25+dfsg-1 Bug #1072120 [src:zabbix] zabbix: CVE-2024-22120 Marked as found in versions zabbix/1:6.0.25+dfsg-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072120: https://bugs.debian.org/c

Processed: fixed 1072120 in 1:6.0.29+dfsg-1

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1072120 1:6.0.29+dfsg-1 Bug #1072120 [src:zabbix] zabbix: CVE-2024-22120 Marked as fixed in versions zabbix/1:6.0.29+dfsg-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072120: https://bugs.debian.org/c

Processed: Re: python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 python3-proto-plus,nanopb Bug #1072073 [python3-proto-plus] python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py Bug reassigned from package 'python3-proto-plus' to 'python3-proto-plus,nanopb'. No longer

Bug#1072073: python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py

2024-05-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: reassign -1 python3-proto-plus,nanopb Control: affects -1 = On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 08:40:03PM -0400, Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote: > For now, I am planning to declare nanopb in Conflicts for > 'python3-proto-plus' binary. Let me know if it might not be advisable. Doing so violates Debian

Bug#1060772: [Python-modules-team] Bug#1060772: python3-jupyterlab: Using node-corepack downloads yarnpkg from Internet

2024-05-29 Thread Yadd
Hi, depending on the use of "jupyterlab build": - when used manually, may prefer to launch yarnpkg - when used under Debian build/test, may prefer to use pkgjs-install-minimal So proposition: - drop the patch 0003-Use-system-provided-yarn.js.patch - build a custom yarn.js that calls yarnp

Bug#1072073: python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py

2024-05-29 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Hi, Thank you for noticing. Looks like proto module in nanopb is very specific to nanopb. For now, I am planning to declare nanopb in Conflicts for 'python3-proto-plus' binary. Let me know if it might not be advisable. Cheers!

Bug#1060538: marked as done (madfuload: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 02:03:57 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1060538: madfuload: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev has caused the Debian Bug report #1060538, regarding madfuload: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev to be marked as done. This means t

Processed: reassign 1071313 to src:libguestfs, affects 1071313, found 1071313 in libguestfs/1:1.52.0-5 ...

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1071313 src:libguestfs Bug #1071313 {Done: Hilko Bengen } [src:guestfs-tools] guestfs-tools: FTBFS: guestfsd: error: minix: /dev/sda1: mkfs: failed to execute mkfs.minix: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'src:guestf

Bug#1072185: marked as done (farpd: Missing licenses)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 23:34:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072185: fixed in farpd 0.2-11.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072185, regarding farpd: Missing licenses to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: tagging 1072183

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1072183 + ftbfs Bug #1072183 [src:fenics-dolfinx] fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0 Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072183: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#1072185: farpd: Missing licenses

2024-05-29 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this and other issues. The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru farpd-0.2/debian/changelog farpd-0.2/debian/changelog --- farpd-0.2/debian/changelog 2023-09-05 20:05:19.0 + +++ farpd-0.2/debian/changelog 2024-05-29 22:34:32.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +farpd

Bug#1072185: farpd: Missing licenses

2024-05-29 Thread Bastian Germann
Source: farpd Version: 0.2-11 Severity: serious The package includes more licenses than those that are listed in d/copyright. A BSD-2-clause is in tree.h. BSD-4-clause-UC (copyright amendment allows dropping the advertisement clause) is in daemon.c and err.h.

Processed: severity

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1040069 serious Bug #1040069 [src:flask-appbuilder] flask-appbuilder: please stop depending on python-marshmallow-enum Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-05-29 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: fenics-dolfinx Version: 1:0.8.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, upgrading to nanobind 2.0 made your package FTBFS. I am sorry that I did not check this before uploading to unstable, that is on me. I have seen that Frances

Bug#1069909: marked as done (dcraw: FTBFS due to conflicting memmem prototype)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 21:19:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069909: fixed in dcraw 9.28-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069909, regarding dcraw: FTBFS due to conflicting memmem prototype to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1071737: marked as done (r-cran-data.table: autopkgtest regression on armhf)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 21:05:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1071737: fixed in r-cran-data.table 1.15.4+dfsg-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071737, regarding r-cran-data.table: autopkgtest regression on armhf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1005961: nq,fq: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fq', which is also in package nq 0.3.1-4

2024-05-29 Thread Bastian Germann
I suggest fq renames the binary because it was introduced over 4 years later and has only been in one release so far.

Processed: notfixed

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 1005961 fq/0.0.5-1 Bug #1005961 [nq,fq] nq,fq: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fq', which is also in package nq 0.3.1-4 No longer marked as fixed in versions fq/0.0.5-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#1072012: libxml-libxml-perl: new upstream release 2.0210, addressing test failures with libxml2 >= 2.11

2024-05-29 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 02:16:47PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:16 AM gregor herrmann wrote: > > Warning: program compiled against libxml 212 using older 209 > > > > and this comes from libxml: > > > > https://sources.debian.org/src/libxml2/2.12.7+dfsg-2/parserInternals.c/?h

Processed: Re: fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #1063754 [src:linux] fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 1063754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063754 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1063754: fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop

2024-05-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi Bud, Please understand that when I aksed you to carry out a specific test, I had a good reason for doing exactly that. The tests that you have carried out so far, while useful, don't provide the same information. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to d

Processed: severity of 1071926 is serious

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1071926 serious Bug #1071926 [gnome-shell-extension-appindicator] gnome-shell-extension-appindicator fails to install - dependency issue Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#1072102: marked as done (samba-ad-dc: ineffective replaces due to /usr-move (DEP17))

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 17:52:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072102: fixed in samba 2:4.20.1+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072102, regarding samba-ad-dc: ineffective replaces due to /usr-move (DEP17) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1072110: glslang breaks shaderc autopkgtest: undefined reference: ABI breakage?? -- not the case

2024-05-29 Thread Philippe SWARTVAGHER
Hello, Well, this issue is "normal". Currently, shaderc 2023.2-1 is in testing. This version suffers from an "undefined symbol" bug (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070983). This bug is fixed in version 2023.8-1 which is now in unstable. However, this version never migrated to

Bug#1072156: marked as done (libkf6purpose-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libkf5purpose-bin (<< 6))

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 17:50:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072156: fixed in kf6-purpose 6.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072156, regarding libkf6purpose-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libkf5purpose-bin (<< 6) to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Processed: tags

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bookworm is not affected > tags 1072134 + trixie sid Bug #1072134 {Done: Rafael Laboissière } [src:octave-financial] octave-financial: FTBFS: error: parse error near line 64 of file /<>/debian/octave-financial/usr/share/octave/packages/financ

Processed: tagging 1025589, tagging 1072134, tagging 966288, tagging 1072138, tagging 1072135, tagging 1039898 ...

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1025589 - sid trixie Bug #1025589 [wicd-gtk] wicd-gtk: recommends transitional policykit-1 package Removed tag(s) trixie and sid. > tags 1072134 + sid trixie Bug #1072134 {Done: Rafael Laboissière } [src:octave-financial] octave-financial: F

Bug#1060701: marked as done (golang-github-go-git-go-git: CVE-2023-49568 CVE-2023-49569)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 17:20:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1060701: fixed in golang-github-go-git-go-git 5.11.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1060701, regarding golang-github-go-git-go-git: CVE-2023-49568 CVE-2023-49569 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1070256: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Alec Leamas ) (Bug#1070256: fixed in libcxx-serial 1.2.1-6)

2024-05-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:15:45PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: >... > I can see the build log, but have problems reproducing the problem. In > short, I do > > $ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nobench nocheck parallel=2 > $ dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env -us -uc -B -rfakeroot > > which configures and bu

Bug#1072175: texlive-lang-japanese: missing Breaks+Replaces: texlive-binaries (<< 2024)

2024-05-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: texlive-lang-japanese Version: 2024.20240401-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts fileconflict Control: affects -1 + texlive-full Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'stable'. It installed fine in 'stable', then

Processed: texlive-lang-japanese: missing Breaks+Replaces: texlive-binaries (<< 2024)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + texlive-full Bug #1072175 [texlive-lang-japanese] texlive-lang-japanese: missing Breaks+Replaces: texlive-binaries (<< 2024) Added indication that 1072175 affects texlive-full -- 1072175: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072175 Debia

Bug#1069909: dcraw: diff for NMU version 9.28-5.1

2024-05-29 Thread Eriberto Mota
> Dear Eriberto, > > thank you for preparing of the upload. I think it > is completelly ready to be published thanks to you. > > Best regards, > FH > -- > PS. Sorry I am late, the end semester is hectic. Hi Filip, Thanks for your reply. I just uploaded the NMU revision. I wish you a good end

Bug#1071264: marked as done (autopkgtest fails with networkx 3.2.1)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 15:21:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1071264: fixed in seirsplus 1.0.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071264, regarding autopkgtest fails with networkx 3.2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#1070256: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Alec Leamas ) (Bug#1070256: fixed in libcxx-serial 1.2.1-6)

2024-05-29 Thread Alec Leamas
On Thu, 23 May 2024 21:19:14 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: Control: reopen -1 On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 07:09:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >... > Changes: > libcxx-serial (1.2.1-6) trixie; urgency=medium > . >* Avoid crash when running with nocheck profile. Closes: #1070256 >...

Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 error): ftpmasters: please decide on sunrpc in dietlibc

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1067946 by 1072165 Bug #1067946 [src:dietlibc] dietlibc: Includes non-free Sun RPC 1067946 was not blocked by any bugs. 1067946 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1067946: 1072165 > block 1069365 by 1072165 Bug #1069365 [src

Bug#1072167: grub-pc-dbg: newly-added symbol file "..." does not provide any symbols

2024-05-29 Thread lucas
Package: grub-pc-dbg Version: 2.12-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I am following the recommended procedure to debug GRUB from the GRUB Developers Manual, ch. 7 Debugging, section i386. [1] gdb refuses to start, because it cannot load the symbols from

Bug#1072166: python-zombie-imp: Missing build dependency

2024-05-29 Thread Antoine Le Gonidec
Source: python-zombie-imp Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The python-zombie-imp source requires the "setuptools" Python module, but python3-setuptools is not included in its build dependencies. This has been noticed when

Bug#1041096: marked as done (raspi-firmware: kernel removal can render raspi unbootable)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 13:41:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1041096: fixed in raspi-firmware 1.20240424+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1041096, regarding raspi-firmware: kernel removal can render raspi unbootable to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1072163: libxmlrpc-core-c3-dev: Missing dependency on libxmlrpc-util-dev

2024-05-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: libxmlrpc-core-c3-dev Version: 1.59.03-2 Severity: serious Hi! After the recent package split, the .pc file does not work anymore, as there's a missing dependency on the libxmlrpc-util-dev package, which the .pc file depends on. On a pristine system after installing only the libxmlrpc-co

Bug#1072012: marked as pending in libxml2

2024-05-29 Thread Aron Xu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1072012 in libxml2 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/xml-sgml-team/libxml2/-/commit/f0f2fc3a207aed66e651b0d75e

Processed: Bug#1072012 marked as pending in libxml2

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1072012 [src:libxml-libxml-perl] libxml-libxml-perl: FTBFS with libxml2 >= 2.11 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1072012: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072012 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1072159: rust-pango-sys FTBFS with nocheck build profile: cp: cannot stat '/usr/share/gir-1.0/Pango-1.0.gir': No such file or directory

2024-05-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: rust-pango-sys Version: 0.19.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs trixie sid rust-pango-sys fails to build from source when enabling the nocheck build profile. A build ends with: |dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=cargo | debian cargo wrapper: options, profiles, parallel, lto: ['nocheck'

Bug#1071794: marked as done (dcmstack: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'TestDcmstackCli' object has no attribute 'out_dir')

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 12:48:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1071794: fixed in dcmstack 0.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071794, regarding dcmstack: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'TestDcmstackCli' object has no attribute 'out_dir' to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Bug#1071794 marked as pending in dcmstack

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1071794 [src:dcmstack] dcmstack: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'TestDcmstackCli' object has no attribute 'out_dir' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1071794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071794 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bug

Bug#1071794: marked as pending in dcmstack

2024-05-29 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1071794 in dcmstack reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dcmstack/-/commit/56bf9b28ad17a47dc41ce588479f7

Bug#1072158: manpages-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: glibc-doc (<< 2.37-16)

2024-05-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: manpages-dev Version: 6.8-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts fileconflict Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'stable'. It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwri

Bug#1072073: python3-proto-plus has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py

2024-05-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1072073 This looks like some kind of namespace violation in nanopb. nanopb ships /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nanopb/* /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/__init__.py /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/proto/_utils.py /usr/lib/python3/dist-p

Bug#1071728: marked as done (vzlogger: FTBFS: failing tests)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 12:04:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1071728: fixed in vzlogger 0.8.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071728, regarding vzlogger: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#1072156: libkf6purpose-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libkf5purpose-bin (<< 6)

2024-05-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libkf6purpose-bin Version: 6.0.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts fileconflict Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'sid' to 'experimental'. It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails

Bug#1067303: trash-cli in Debian: test problems again

2024-05-29 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Hi Boyuan (and Andrea) On Tue May 28, 2024 at 8:08 PM BST, Boyuan Yang wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2024 14:04:40 +0200 Andrea Francia > wrote: > > Hi Jonathan and Lucas, > >   I solved the problem in the new release (0.24.5.26). That's great news! I' dli > Can you take a look and prepare a new rel

Bug#1072153: marked as done (python3-tornado: unable to instantiate an empty AsyncTestCase)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 11:05:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072153: fixed in python-tornado 6.4.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072153, regarding python3-tornado: unable to instantiate an empty AsyncTestCase to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Bug#1072153 marked as pending in python-tornado

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1072153 [python3-tornado] python3-tornado: unable to instantiate an empty AsyncTestCase Added tag(s) pending. -- 1072153: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072153 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr

Bug#1072153: marked as pending in python-tornado

2024-05-29 Thread Timo Röhling
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1072153 in python-tornado reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-tornado/-/commit/fed42

Processed: python3-tornado: unable to instantiate an empty AsyncTestCase

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:python-tenacity src:terminado Bug #1072153 [python3-tornado] python3-tornado: unable to instantiate an empty AsyncTestCase Added indication that 1072153 affects src:python-tenacity and src:terminado -- 1072153: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#1068186: marked as done (mozc: FTBFS with abseil 20230802: ../../base/init_mozc.cc:90:29: error: ‘absl::debian5::flags_internal::ArgvListAction’ has not been declared)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 10:35:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068186: fixed in mozc 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068186, regarding mozc: FTBFS with abseil 20230802: ../../base/init_mozc.cc:90:29: error: ‘absl::debian5::flags_internal::ArgvLi

Bug#1071560: marked as done (undeclared runtime library depencencies)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 10:35:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1071560: fixed in gpu-burn 0+git20240115+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071560, regarding undeclared runtime library depencencies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1072153: python3-tornado: unable to instantiate an empty AsyncTestCase

2024-05-29 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: python3-tornado Version: 6.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest-8 Control: affects -1 src:python-tenacity src:terminado -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, unittest.TestCase has a feature where it allows i

Bug#1071306: marked as done (ess: FTBFS: dh_elpa_test failed)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 10:04:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1071306: fixed in ess 24.01.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1071306, regarding ess: FTBFS: dh_elpa_test failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#1072134: marked as done (octave-financial: FTBFS: error: parse error near line 64 of file /<>/debian/octave-financial/usr/share/octave/packages/financial-0.5.3/bolling.m)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 May 2024 09:50:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072134: fixed in octave-financial 0.5.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072134, regarding octave-financial: FTBFS: error: parse error near line 64 of file /<>/debian/octave-financial/usr/share/octave/pac

Bug#1072134: marked as pending in octave-financial

2024-05-29 Thread Rafael Laboissière
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1072134 in octave-financial reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-financial/-/commit/600ea7

Processed: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1071448: marked as done (dipy: FTBFS on 32 bit archs with ArrayMemoryError)

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1071448 {Done: Michael R. Crusoe } [src:dipy] dipy: FTBFS on 32 bit archs with ArrayMemoryError 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened

Processed: Bug#1072134 marked as pending in octave-financial

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1072134 [src:octave-financial] octave-financial: FTBFS: error: parse error near line 64 of file /<>/debian/octave-financial/usr/share/octave/packages/financial-0.5.3/bolling.m Added tag(s) pending. -- 1072134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

Bug#1071448: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1071448: marked as done (dipy: FTBFS on 32 bit archs with ArrayMemoryError)

2024-05-29 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 On Wed, 22 May 2024 at 15:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > dipy (1.9.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Team upload. >* Skip the test_check_img_shapes on 32-bit systems. Closes: #1071448 Please also skip this test in the autopkgtest. Regards Graham

Bug#1072085: closing 1072085

2024-05-29 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
close 1072085 thanks This is fixed with sbuild 0.85.9. Cheers Jochen

Processed: closing 1072085

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1072085 Bug #1072085 [src:supervisor] FTBFS: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/dev/stdout' Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1072085: https://bugs.debian.org/

Bug#1068186: mozc: FTBFS with abseil 20230802: ../../base/init_mozc.cc:90:29: error: ‘absl::debian5::flags_internal::ArgvListAction’ has not been declared

2024-05-29 Thread Xiyue Deng
Hi, I have tested the patches from Hayashi-san to be working. It would be great to have this applied to fix mozc (which has since been removed from testing due to this bug.) As an attempt to help, I took the liberty to incorporate Hayashi-san's patches and provided the compiled packages on mento

Bug#1070014: libwibble: FTBFS on arm{64,el}: (7/36) Fs: ../wibble/sys/fs.test.h: 72: assertion `i.ischr()' failed;

2024-05-29 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi, * Sebastian Ramacher [2024-04-28 17:11]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libwibble&arch=arm64&ver=1.1-3%2Bb1&stamp=1714230781&raw=0 make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/debian/build' cd /<>/debian/build/wibble && sh -c "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/<>/debian/build/wibble /<>/debian/build

Bug#1072012: libxml-libxml-perl: new upstream release 2.0210, addressing test failures with libxml2 >= 2.11

2024-05-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:16:47 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > > They all seem to fail with: > > Warning: program compiled against libxml 212 using older 209 > > > > and this comes from libxml: > > > > if ((myversion / 100) < (version / 100)) { > > xmlGenericError(xmlGenericErrorContext, > >