Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:49:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067916: fixed in capnproto 1.0.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067916,
regarding FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1069073 [src:lua-mode] lua-mode: FTBFS: failing tests
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1069073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
I have committed a fix to the team repo (together with other tweaks) and
prepared a package on mentors. See Bug#1069078[1] for the RFS request.
Please help sponsoring. TIA!
--
Xiyue Deng
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1069078
Sebastian Ramacher, le lun. 15 avril 2024 05:41:48 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 2024-04-14 14:19:18 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > El 14/4/24 a las 13:25, Sylvestre Ledru escribió:
> > > I am sorry but I am not sure to see how it is actionable.
> > >
> > > Without a test case, i don't think there is much
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:49:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067319: fixed in gap-polymaking 0.8.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067319,
regarding gap-polymaking: FTBFS: Can't load
'/usr/lib/polymake/perlx/5.38.2/x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi/auto/Polymake/Ext/E
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:10:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069032: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067621,
regarding FTBFS on 32-bit time64 architectures: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘gzopen64’
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:03:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069021: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999077,
regarding msp430-libc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:03:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069021: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965732,
regarding msp430-libc: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:04:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069021: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965541,
regarding gcc-msp430: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 23:34:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1062032: fixed in c-ares 1.27.0-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062032,
regarding c-ares: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:35:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068072: fixed in lcmaps-plugins-basic 1.7.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068072,
regarding Hardcoded dependency on liblcmaps0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Timo,
On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 09:21:43 +0100 Timo =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hling?=
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 20:28:53 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > > /usr/include/thrust/detail/type_traits.h:736:1: error: expected
> > > type-specifier before ‘template’
>
> This bug is caused by a #ifdef casca
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:50:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068417: fixed in trafficserver 9.2.4+ds-0+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068417,
regarding trafficserver: CVE-2024-31309: HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frames can be
utilized for DoS attacks
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:47:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068770: fixed in linux 6.1.85-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068770,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability
in kernel n_gsm driver
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:47:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065320: fixed in linux 6.1.85-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065320,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: 6.1.0-18 kernel enters ACPI Error loop
during boot & requires power cycle
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:38:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068663: fixed in zzuf 0.15-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068663,
regarding zzuf: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /tmp/ccnMZahz.s:1620: Error: symbol
`open64' is already defined
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:36:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066610: fixed in gnomad2 2.9.6-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066610,
regarding gnomad2: FTBFS: jukebox.c:1979:13: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘set_tag_for_file’; did you mean ‘set_tag_for_m
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Timo Lindfors wrote:
I would very much like to have some sort of workaround to start moving some
I noticed that if I use
cmd = [
"virt-install",
"--connect", "qemu+ssh://ansi...@hypervisor.example.com/system",
"--name", "linditest",
"--cloud-init",
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:36:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch pending
>
> Lucas Nussbaum (2024-03-13):
> > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
> > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
> > https://wiki.debian.or
Hi,
I would very much like to have some sort of workaround to start moving
some systems from proprietary clouds to libvirt. I don't quite understand
how cloud-init works, does the workaround suggested in the first message
basically require me to rebuild the image? If that is the case then mayb
Package: src:lua-mode
Version: 20210802-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with elpa
Package: src:totalopenstation
Version: 0.5.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: st
Followup-For: Bug #1065797
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/02-implicit-declarations.patch: Fix an improper mac
Package: whitedune
Followup-For: Bug #1067618
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/implicit-declarations.patch: Add missing inc
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1067618 [src:whitedune] FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function
'yyerror'; did you mean 'yyerrok'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1067618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067618
Debian Bu
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1065797 [src:st] st: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: res.c:115:12: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘_getshort’; did you mean ‘__putshort’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1065797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1066247 [src:uhub] uhub: FTBFS: adcclient.c:178:33: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘ADC_client_connect_internal’; did you mean
‘ADC_client_connect’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1066247: https://bugs.d
Package: uhub
Followup-For: Bug #1066247
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/implicit-declarations.patch: Add missing function
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1066484 [src:tcpxtract] tcpxtract: FTBFS: confy.c:494:16: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1066484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066484
Debian Bu
Package: tcpxtract
Followup-For: Bug #1066484
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/70_fix-implicit-declarations.patch: Add miss
Package: squeak-plugins-scratch
Followup-For: Bug #1065944
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/add-missing-include.patch: Add
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1065944 [src:squeak-plugins-scratch] squeak-plugins-scratch: FTBFS on
arm{el,hf}: WeDoLinux.c:175:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘close’;
did you mean ‘pclose’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1065944:
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:19:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023971: fixed in pantalaimon 0.10.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023971,
regarding pantalaimon: Missing dependency on python3-pydbus
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Source: pantalaimon
Version: 0.10.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
pantalaimon FTBFS in sid (but could be built successfully in bookworm):
dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=pybuild
I: pybuild base:311: cd /build/pantalaimon-0.10.5/.pybuild/cpython3_3.11/bu
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + util-linux
Bug #1069064 [util-linux-extra] util-linux-extra: insufficient Replaces for
util-linux due to /usr-move
Added indication that 1069064 affects util-linux
--
1069064: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069064
Debian Bug Tracki
Package: util-linux-extra
Version: 2.40-6
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p1
Control: affects -1 + util-linux
Hi Chris,
I think I mentioned this on IRC already and you intended to revert, but
nothing happened, so lets turn this into a bug for tracking purposes at
least.
found 1069059 239-1
found 1069059 287-1
tags 1069059 + bullseye bookworm
thanks
El 15/4/24 a las 19:28, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió:
The update for cockpit in DSA 5655-1 had problems with the
test-sshbridge test, causing FTBFS:
For completeness: this was already happening in bullseye and boo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1069059 239-1
Bug #1069059 [src:cockpit] cockpit update from DSA-5655-1 without binary builds
(build failures)
Marked as found in versions cockpit/239-1.
> found 1069059 287-1
Bug #1069059 [src:cockpit] cockpit update from DSA-5655-1 withou
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:23:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068688: fixed in tpm2-initramfs-tool 0.2.2-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068688,
regarding tpm2-initramfs-tool dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386
architectures.
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:20:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068217: fixed in atomes 1.1.14-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068217,
regarding atomes, dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:50:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066970: fixed in esnacc 1.8.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066970,
regarding FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function 'InitNibbleMem'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:29:57 +0200
with message-id <18f89cf6-16e4-9739-0711-f193711a6...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: due to #1058653
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058545,
regarding esnacc: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:13: binary] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This mean
Source: cockpit
Version: 287.1-0+deb12u1
Severity: serious
Justification: missing binary builds, FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org, a...@debian.org, car...@debian.org
Hi
The update for cockpit in DSA 5655-1 had problems with the
test-sshbridge test, causing FTBFS:
>From the tail of th
Source: chr
Version: 0.1.77-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: c...@istoph.de
Dear Debian chr package maintainer,
Your package builds-depends on library package libqt5concurrent5,
which does not exist in Debian Sid after Debian 64-bit time_t transition
since the library package was renamed.
In al
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:19:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066307: fixed in euslisp 9.29+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066307,
regarding jskeus: FTBFS: jpegmemcd.c:29:3: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘jpeg_memio_dest’; did you mean ‘jpeg_mem_des
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:19:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066307: fixed in euslisp 9.29+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066307,
regarding euslisp: FTBFS: jpegmemcd.c:29:3: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘jpeg_memio_dest’; did you mean ‘jpeg_mem_de
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:50:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068120: fixed in mergerfs 2.33.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068120,
regarding mergerfs: builds binary packages with hardcoded dependencies on
pre-t64 libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that
Source: r-cran-spatstat.model
Version: 3.2-8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
Sometime around 2023-12-01, r-cran-spatstat.model's autopkgtest
regressed in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant
part of the log below.
Regards
G
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:33:14AM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
>Source: shim
>Followup-For: Bug #1061519
>Control: tags -1 + patch
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>Please find a MR here
>https://salsa.debian.org/efi-team/shim/-/merge_requests/13
ACK. Thanks for trying to help, but the merge isn't the ha
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.57-2
Followup-For: Bug #1068412
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Security Updates in unstable are not propagated to stable
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:52:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067088: fixed in zfs-linux 2.2.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067088,
regarding zfs-linux: missing B-D: libtirpc-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:51:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067318: fixed in python-pint 0.23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067318,
regarding python-pint: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest
-i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit c
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:51:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067229: fixed in python-pint 0.23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067229,
regarding metpy: autopkgtest regression with NumPy 1.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:51:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067278: fixed in proxycheck 0.49a-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067278,
regarding proxycheck: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13:
override_dh_auto_clean] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1054749
Bug #1054749 [src:ruby-pry-byebug] ruby-android-key-attestation: FTBFS: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.1" failed: Failure/Error: require "pry-byebug"
Bug #1054737 [src:ruby-pry-byebug] ruby-pry-byebug: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.1" failed:
:86
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:32:29 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: prime-phylo: FTBFS: gb.tab.c:1096:16: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066653,
regarding prime-phylo: FTBFS: gb.tab.c:1
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1061519 [src:shim] shim: CVE-2023-40546 CVE-2023-40547 CVE-2023-40548
CVE-2023-40549 CVE-2023-40550 CVE-2023-40551
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1061519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Source: shim
Followup-For: Bug #1061519
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear Maintainer,
Please find a MR here
https://salsa.debian.org/efi-team/shim/-/merge_requests/13
Bastien
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Source: subread
Version: 2.0.6+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
subread fails to build from source on 32bit architectures: A
non-parallel build contains:
| i686-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
-ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
-Werror=forma
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066271: fixed in libdigidoc 3.10.5-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066271,
regarding libdigidoc: FTBFS: DigiDocVerify.c:939:11: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘ddocGetDNPartFromString’
[-Werror
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065774: fixed in libdigidoc 3.10.5-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065774,
regarding libdigidoc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}:
/<>/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c:327:19: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘ddo
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:20:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066489: fixed in p0f 3.09b-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066489,
regarding p0f: FTBFS: .build-609357.c:2:34: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘printf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:04:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066246: fixed in lcm 1.3.1+repack1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066246,
regarding lcm: FTBFS: emit_cpp.c:306:19: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘_exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1065270 by 1064762
Bug #1065270 [paraview] Unable to open VTK file with appended data that were
fine with previous versions (invalid token in vtkXMLDataParser)
1065270 was not blocked by any bugs.
1065270 was not blocking any bugs.
Added bl
Package: python3-notebook
X-Debbugs-Cc: chol...@gmail.com
Version: 6.4.12-2.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When launching `jupyter notebook`, the following stack-trace is produced:
Begin stack-trace
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-pa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1068657 0.3-1
Bug #1068657 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [src:pkcs11-provider]
pkcs11-provider FTBFS with openssl 3.2.1-3
No longer marked as found in versions pkcs11-provider/0.3-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066489 [src:p0f] p0f: FTBFS: .build-609357.c:2:34: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘printf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066489: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066489
Debian Bug
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066489 in p0f reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/p0f/-/commit/83df5c38d86652c0f4b7501a682ba7
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1067264 7.0.3+git20221109.ee13eb9+dfsg-2
Bug #1067264 [node-node-sass] select2.js: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:7:
override_dh_auto_build] Error 3
Bug #1067265 [node-node-sass] node-grunt-sass: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/bin/sh -ex
On 2024-04-15 10:25:48 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 14/04/2024 13.31, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Sorry for my lack of answer.
> >
> > LLVM 14 was already deprecated when this bug has been filed. I don't
> > think we should spend much time on this issue.
>
> Has this issue been fixed in new
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:49:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066368: fixed in filter 2.6.3+ds1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066368,
regarding filter: FTBFS: actions.c:255:21: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘wait’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:49:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065969: fixed in ike-scan 1.9.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065969,
regarding ike-scan: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure: error: cannot determine
snprintf format string for long long int
to be marked a
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:39:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066492: fixed in tinydyndns 0.4.2.debian1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066492,
regarding tinydyndns: FTBFS: seek_set.c:7:7: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘lseek’ [-Werror=implicit-function-d
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:39:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066071: fixed in mtdev 1.1.6-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066071,
regarding mtdev: broken shlibs, leading to uninstallable udebs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1066347 src:euslisp
Bug #1066347 [src:euslisp] jskeus: FTBFS: jpegmemcd.c:29:3: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘jpeg_memio_dest’; did you mean ‘jpeg_mem_dest’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Bug #1066307 [src:euslisp]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1066347 src:euslisp
Bug #1066347 [src:jskeus] jskeus: FTBFS: jpegmemcd.c:29:3: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘jpeg_memio_dest’; did you mean ‘jpeg_mem_dest’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Bug reassigned from package
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1065969 [src:ike-scan] ike-scan: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure: error:
cannot determine snprintf format string for long long int
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1065969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065969
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1065969 in ike-scan reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/ike-scan/-/commit/175d75e70040c11bc202
On 14/04/2024 13.31, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Sorry for my lack of answer.
LLVM 14 was already deprecated when this bug has been filed. I don't
think we should spend much time on this issue.
Has this issue been fixed in newer releases, yet? I usually only file
these bugs for the oldest version
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2024-03-12):
> Your NMU broke this package's shlibs.
>
> Before:
>
> libmtdev 1 libmtdev1
> udeb: libmtdev 1 libmtdev1-udeb
>
> After:
>
> libmtdev 1 libmtdev1t64
>
> At the moment, at least the following package is broken:
>
> The following packages hav
Hi.
I tried to follow this up a bit. Looking at the upstream expat bugs [1] [2]
it might very well be that vtk9 was relying in internals of expat's xml
processing and their assumptions broke when moving to 2.6.0.
Hence this probably is an incompatibility on vtk9's side rather than a bug in
exp
Package: rtags
Version: 2.38-9
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hello maintainer, I fixed a FTBFS on armhf due to time64_t. The regex was causing
"=64" to be stripped from _FILE_OFFSET_BITS, causing cmake to fail to build
test code.
With this regex the example test code of clang fails in cmake, c
82 matches
Mail list logo
