Hi,
I cannot reproduce this error. Seems to be that in sid does
not fail.
--
cheers,
Emmanuel Arias
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ eam...@debian.org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1
⠈⠳⣄
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: rust-ahash
Version: 0.8.8-2
Severity: serious
rust-ahash is unable to migrate to Testing because its autopkgtests are failing:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-ahash
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Package: vtun
Version: 3.0.4-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: lucaslopez5...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
I copied the example server file /usr/share/doc/vtun/examples/vtund-server.conf
into
/etc/vtund.conf and enabled server mode in /etc/default/vtun. Whe
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2024 22:49:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064565: fixed in chromaprint 1.5.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064565,
regarding chromaprint: FTBFS on armel and armhf: double free or corruption
(!prev)
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 23:16:44 +0100 "Xavier G."
wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I confirm this issue.
> I experienced it with an AMD R7 240 graphics card[1] on a regular Debian
> Sid host running kernel 6.6.15.
> Booting with the previous kernel (6.6.13) did not change the situation
> but I confirm
On 01/02/2024 00:36, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 1/31/24 06:06, Pádraig Brady wrote:
To my mind the most protective option takes precedence.
That's not how POSIX works with mv -i and mv -f. The last flag wins. I
assume this is so that people can have aliases or shell scripts that
make -i the default
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - pending
Bug #1063004 [src:synfig] synfig: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1063004 to the same tags previously set
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1063004 [src:synfig] synfig: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Seve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1062879 serious
Bug #1062879 [src:safeclib] safeclib: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1062879: https://bugs
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:06:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1058363: fixed in pydoctor 23.9.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058363,
regarding pydoctor: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i
python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:34:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063640: fixed in mutter 45.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063640,
regarding adwaita-icon-theme: cursor theme not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Processing control commands:
> close -1 4.09c-1
Bug #1064590 [src:aflplusplus] src:aflplusplus: fails to migrate to testing for
too long: Build-Depends not available on mips64el
Marked as fixed in versions aflplusplus/4.09c-1.
Bug #1064590 [src:aflplusplus] src:aflplusplus: fails to migrate to te
Source: aflplusplus
Version: 4.08c-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.09c-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:46:14 +
with message-id <20240224144614.ga3076...@tack.einval.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1036828: debian-cd: wrong firmware archives built and
published for D-I releases?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036828,
regarding debian-cd: wrong firmware ar
Hi,
I just compiled the package without any issue.
A case of eigenbug where you compile three times and it only fails one?
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:55:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056813: fixed in macs 3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056813,
regarding macs: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Followup-For: Bug #1036828
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:01:31 +, I wrote:
> Should this bug be closed? (the logic to skip the experimental/sid firmware
> image build during non-testing builds is in place for both bookworm and
> trixie)
Nope, it looks like I've misund
Followup-For: Bug #1036828
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org
Hi Cyril,
Should this bug be closed? (the logic to skip the experimental/sid firmware
image build during non-testing builds is in place for both bookworm and trixie)
Regards,
James
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1009067 normal
Bug #1009067 [squid-deb-proxy-client] DeprecationWarning: The asyncore module
is deprecated and will be removed in Python 3.12.
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1009067 grave
Bug #1009067 [squid-deb-proxy-client] DeprecationWarning: The asyncore module
is deprecated and will be removed in Python 3.12.
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1064553 + sid trixie
Bug #1064553 [src:libgdiplus] libgdiplus: build-error on current sid (all
warnings being treated as errors)
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1064555 + sid trixie
Bug #1064555 [src:faketime] faketime: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures: Test
Suites summary: 3 succeeded, 1 failed
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1064556 + sid trixie
Bug #1064556 [src:hepmc3] hepmc3: FTBFS on i386: 86
Source: chromaprint
Version: 1.5.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
cd /<>/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/tests && ./all_tests
[==] Running 94 tests from 25 test suites.
[--] Glo
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + rust-mozilla-gdb rust-mozilla-lldb rust-web-clippy rust-web-gdb
> rust-web-lldb rustfmt-web
Bug #1064564 [rustup] rustup has an undeclared file conflict
Added indication that 1064564 affects rust-mozilla-gdb, rust-mozilla-lldb,
rust-web-clippy, rust-we
Package: libstd-rust-1.70
Version: 1.70.0+dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libstd-rust-web-1.70
libstd-rust-1.70 has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an
unpack error from dpkg.
The files
* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libstd-rust-web-1.70
Bug #1064563 [libstd-rust-1.70] libstd-rust-1.70 has an undeclared file conflict
Added indication that 1064563 affects libstd-rust-web-1.70
--
1064563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064563
Debian Bug Tracking S
Package: rustup
Version: 1.26.0-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + rust-mozilla-gdb rust-mozilla-lldb rust-web-clippy
rust-web-gdb rust-web-lldb rustfmt-web
rustup has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack
error fr
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libstd-rust-mozilla-dev-windows rust-mozilla-gdb
> rust-mozilla-lldb rust-mozilla-src
Bug #1064562
[rust-web-gdb,libstd-rust-web-dev-windows,rust-web-src,rust-web-lldb] 4
packages from rustc-web have an undeclared file conflict
Added indication that 1
Package: rust-web-gdb,libstd-rust-web-dev-windows,rust-web-src,rust-web-lldb
Version: 1.70.0+dfsg1-7~deb12u1
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libstd-rust-mozilla-dev-windows rust-mozilla-gdb
rust-mozilla-lldb rust-mozill
Source: dune-grid
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dune-grid&arch=i386&ver=2.9.0-2%2Bb1&stamp=1704501448&raw=0
14/66 Test
Source: ucommon
Version: 7.0.1-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ucommon&arch=armhf&ver=7.0.1-0.1%2Bb1&stamp=1707541460&raw=0
dpkg-gensy
Source: pmdk
Version: 1.13.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pmdk&arch=ppc64el&ver=1.13.1-1.1%2Bb1&stamp=1708597682&raw=0
obj_basic_in
Source: node-leveldown
Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=node-leveldown&arch=mips64el&ver=5.6.0%2Bdfsg-4%2Bb1&stamp=170
Source: lodepng
Version: 0.0~git20220618.b4ed2cd-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lodepng&arch=i386&ver=0.0%7Egit20220618.b4ed2cd-3%2Bb1&s
Source: hepmc3
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hepmc3&arch=i386&ver=3.1.2-2%2Bb1&stamp=1707514176&raw=0
test 5
Star
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1060104 [src:dcmtk] dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for
offset (4100)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1060104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060104
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Source: faketime
Version: 0.9.10-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=faketime&arch=armel&ver=0.9.10-2.1%2Bb1&stamp=1704500126&raw=0
gcc -c
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2024 08:41:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061984: fixed in boinc 7.24.1+dfsg-2exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061984,
regarding libboinc-app7t64 and libboinc7t64 have an undeclared file conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
37 matches
Mail list logo