Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:49:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061376: fixed in pam-python 1.1.0~git20220701.1d4e111-0.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061376,
regarding pam-python ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi Lucas,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 02:39:49PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Source: ola
> Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch pending sid trixie
> Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: time-t
>
> NOTICE: these changes m
control: found -1 1.6.40-3
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 11:05:46 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
control: affects -1 1.6.40-3
G.
On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 23:12:06 + Steve Langasek wrote:
> Source: libpng1.6
> Version: 1.6.42-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch pending
> Justification: library ABI sk
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.6.40-3
Bug #1062570 [src:libpng1.6] libpng1.6: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Marked as found in versions libpng1.6/1.6.40-3.
--
1062570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062570
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:23:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063275: fixed in r-bioc-rhtslib 2.4.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063275,
regarding r-bioc-rhtslib: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
On 2/7/24 06:31, ellie timoney wrote:
Hi Xavier,
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, at 9:59 AM, ellie timoney wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, at 3:53 PM, Yadd wrote:
yes there are other errors because some .h require unavailable .h like
config.h
Ooh interesting, I'll have a look
I'm still working on this, b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1062817 important
Bug #1062817 [firmware-amd-graphics] firmware-amd-graphics: Invalid UVD handle
causes the graphics driver to crash
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 03:39:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1058286: fixed in ncrack 0.7+debian-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058286,
regarding ncrack: FTBFS: configure: error: *** zlib too old - check config.log
***
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:42:33 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:34:07AM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > Providing two APIs makes me quite uneasy due to having core components
> > that would behave differently from the rest of the distribution. It
> > sounds like somethin
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 02:36:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061750: fixed in python-cliapp 1.20180812.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061750,
regarding python-cliapp ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1061853 [src:ttconv] ttconv fails its autopkg tests with Python 3.12
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1061853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061853
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:05:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061736: fixed in aubio 0.4.9-4.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061736,
regarding aubio ftbfs with Python 3.12 as the default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 22:08:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060173: fixed in ruby-hiredis 0.6.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060173,
regarding ruby-hiredis FTBFS with hiredis 1.2.0-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Wed, 7 Feb 2024 01:04:23 +0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1058315: python3-nose: from nose.tools import
assert_equals, assert_raises FAILS
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058315,
regarding python-sure: FTBFS: ERROR: Failure: ImportError (cannot import name
'as
Jeremy, please have a look, thanks
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:39 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Source: python-cryptography
> Version: 41.0.7-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid trixie
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: edos-uninstallable
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> Dose [1] is reporting a bui
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1060173 [src:ruby-hiredis] ruby-hiredis FTBFS with hiredis 1.2.0-6
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1060173: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1060173 in ruby-hiredis reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-hiredis/-/commit/0323cc291be809200464
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.27.2~ds4-1
Bug #1063366 [src:syncthing] src:syncthing: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: new Build-Depends not migrating
Marked as fixed in versions syncthing/1.27.2~ds4-1.
Bug #1063366 [src:syncthing] src:syncthing: fails to migrate to testing fo
Source: syncthing
Version: 1.19.2~ds1-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.27.2~ds4-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: python-cryptography
Version: 41.0.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't b
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:linux
Bug #1063363 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: autopkgtest
needs update for new version of linux
Added indication that 1063363 affects src:linux
--
1063363: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063363
Debian
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
Version: 525.147.05-5
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of nvidia-graph
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:linux
Bug #1063364 [src:nvidia-cuda-samples] nvidia-cuda-samples: autopkgtest needs
update for new version of linux
Added indication that 1063364 affects src:linux
--
1063364: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063364
Debian Bug Trac
Source: nvidia-cuda-samples
Version: 12.1~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of nvidia-cuda-sampl
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:linux
Bug #1063362 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla] nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla:
autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux
Added indication that 1063362 affects src:linux
--
1063362: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla
Version: 525.147.05-5
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of
nvidi
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:linux
Bug #1063361 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470]
nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: autopkgtest needs update for new version of
linux
Added indication that 1063361 affects src:linux
--
1063361: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470
Version: 470.223.02-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of
n
Source: gdb-mingw-w64
Version: 13
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64
Hi,
arm64 now has an architecture-specific flag among the default build
flags: -mbranch
Whilst I am not an expert on this transition or the abi-compliance-checker, a
quick look at the logs[1] suggests this is a tool configuration issue and
src:consolekit2 may not require t64 migration.
Can you clarify?
Thanks
Mark
[1]
https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-03T09:18:00/
Michael,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:24:19AM +, mwhud...@debian.org wrote:
> Source: consolekit2
> Version: 1.2.6-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch pending
> Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: time-t
This patch appears to be broken and
On 2024-02-05 Niels Möller wrote:
> Graham Inggs writes:
>> we have identified nettle as a source package shipping runtime
>> libraries whose ABI either is affected by the change in size of
>> time_t, or could not be analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and
>> therefore to be on the safe side we
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 17:08:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1062802: fixed in pam 1.5.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062802,
regarding libpam0t64: file loss during upgrade due to /usr-move DEP17
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 15:35:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1062356: fixed in adios2 2.9.2+dfsg1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062356,
regarding adios2: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): times out on big host
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:34:07AM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote:
> Providing two APIs makes me quite uneasy due to having core components
> that would behave differently from the rest of the distribution. It
> sounds like something that will come back to bite for a long time.
Can you elaborate?
Keep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1058317 with 1063345
Bug #1058317 [src:celery] celery: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13
1058317 was not blocked by any bugs.
1058317 was not blocking any bugs.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:07:38PM +0100, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> thanks for the heads-up!
> The same debdiff should apply to the version in unstable (4.12.1).
> We'll make sure to NMU the version from unstable.
>
> Waiting for libgap.so.9 would also be an option, if timing works out.
Fortunately
Your message dated Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:52:03 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re-opening was wrong!
has caused the Debian Bug report #1044055,
regarding mirtop: test failure with pandas 2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1044055 {Done: Nilesh Patra } [src:mirtop] mirtop: test
failure with pandas 2.0
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked
Control: reopen -1
The issue is not closed by latest upload
--
http://fam-tille.de
Source: adios2
Followup-For: Bug #1062356
The flakey test is adios2-mpi-examples. debian/tests is building and
running them manually, and running on only 3 processors (mpirun -n 3)
So the problem can't be overload of the machine.
I'll just skip insituGlobalArraysReaderNxN_mpi.
For reference, ups
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # More affected packages discovered for meson bug
> affects 1060838 + src:libdex src:parlatype
Bug #1060838 [meson] meson: should use the host gobject-introspection-1.0.pc
for looking up g-ir-scanner
Added indication that 1060838 affects src:libd
Hi Bastian
On 2024-02-06 12:34:32 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Please use the latest experimental QA upload for the 64-bit time_t transition
> instead of uploading your NMU.
> The other planned transition is documented in #1061645.
> All library package names are SO-bumped, whic
Source: adios2
Followup-For: Bug #1062356
Can't be quite as simple as just the host machine.
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adios2/41403641/log.gz
completed in 9 minutes,
while
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adios2/41496866/log.gz
failed with time
Hi Lucas,
Please use the latest experimental QA upload for the 64-bit time_t transition
instead of uploading your NMU.
The other planned transition is documented in #1061645.
All library package names are SO-bumped, which should be enough to fulfill your
intended change.
This is a cross-posting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 1060933 Nick Morrott
Bug #1060933 {Done: Nick Morrott } [src:valinor] valinor:
FTBFS: AssertionError: 1 != 0
Owner recorded as Nick Morrott .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1060933: https:
Output from gdb (first try with doomsday-dbgsym, doomsday-common-dbgsym,
libsdl2-2.0-0-dbgsym) can be found in attachment.
Tell me to install more debug packages.
ylb
doomsday_gdb_output.txt.7z
Description: application/7z-compressed
Steve Langasek writes ("Bug#1061866: adns: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition"):
> Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to update
> strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name. Please find
> attached a fixed patch.
Hi. Thanks for this project.
I
Package: cardpeek
Version: 0.8.4-pacstall2
Severity: grave
Tags: newcomer
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: xdav...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Installed
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 at 10:20:46 +0100, Yves Le Berre wrote:
> I am not familiarized with building debian debug packages.
> do doomsday and libsdl2 packages need to be rebuilt or do they exist
> somewhere ?
Their detached debug symbols should already be provided in Debian, so you
don't need to rebu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1062484 - pending
Bug #1062484 [src:libnma] libnma: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Removed tag(s) pending.
> tags 1063053 - pending
Bug #1063053 [src:volume-key] volume-key: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Removed tag(s) pending.
Hi Helmut,
Thanks for identifying and raising this issue.
After Graham mentioned this to me, I also looked at the reports and came
to the same conclusion: the change is actually LFS due to ino_t in
matchpathcon_filespec_add().
Providing two APIs makes me quite uneasy due to having core components
Hi!
The proposed change is incomplete, and the build failed on some
architectures.
You need to update debian/rules due to the changes package names:
Line 31 must change from
N = -Nlibxrdec1
to
N = -Nlibxrdec1t64
Regards,
Mattias (package maintainer)
signature.asc
Description: Thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1063261 -pending
Bug #1063261 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [src:xdp-tools]
xdp-tools: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Removed tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1063261:
Re: Steve Langasek
> If you as maintainer want to close this bug report (indicating that no
> transition is required) or un-tag it 'pending' (indicating that a transition
> may be required but the patch is not ready to upload), and accept any
> fallout if it turns out this is incorrect, that will m
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:42:49AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I'm attaching a patch for your convenience. I consider that libiw30 is
> not as central as other packages and hence propose employing Conflicts
> here. Conflicts allow removing the protective diversion in trixie's
> postinst rather th
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libselinux1
Bug #1063328 [libselinux1t64] libselinux1t64: /usr-move caused file loss (DEP17)
Added indication that 1063328 affects libselinux1
--
1063328: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063328
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Package: libselinux1t64
Version: 3.5-2.1~exp1
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: vor...@debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I was looking into performing an upgrade test of libselinux1 with
piuparts and that didn't go well. I spare you the piuparts stuff and go
into crafting a minimal reprod
Package: libselinux1t64
Version: 3.5-2.1~exp1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p1
Control: affects -1 + libselinux1
X-Debbugs-Cc: vor...@debian.org
Hi,
The time64 bump for libselinux1 also causes a /usr-move file loss. Since
it is essential, we cannot use Conf
Sorry, your answer on Sun, 4 Feb 2024 12:31:35 + was marked 'spam'
by my provider,
so i didn't notice it until now.
Here are some informations about my environment :
System:
Host: jupiter Kernel: 6.6.13-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: Xfce v: 4.18.1 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux trixie/
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 09:25:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061531: fixed in sugar 0.121-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061531,
regarding sugar: Stop using webkit2gtk 4.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Control:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 1051425 ukui-session-manager 3.22.0.2-1
Bug #1051425 [src:ukwm] ukwm: undeclared dependency on libqt5-ukui-style1
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ukwm' to 'ukui-session-manage
Control:
reassign 1051425 ukui-session-manager 3.22.0.2-1
Hi,
The bug was present in ukui-session-manager version 3.22.0.2-1 but has been
resolved in the recently uploaded version 4.0.0.0-1.
thanks.
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:50:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063322: fixed in mapcache 1.14.0-3~exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063322,
regarding libmapcache-dev has an undeclared file conflict on
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmapcache.so
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1053865 + patch pending
Bug #1053865 [src:prody] prody: incompatible with python3-biopython > 1.79
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1053865: https://bugs.debian.
65 matches
Mail list logo
