Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1031447 in ffmpeg reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/ffmpeg/-/commit/ad1140437d349749abfaec45eb
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1031447 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [src:ffmpeg]
ffmpeg: FTBFS: src/libavutil/hwcontext_vulkan.c:363:7: error:
‘VK_EXT_VIDEO_DECODE_H264_EXTENSION_NAME’ undeclared here (not in a function);
did you mean ‘VK_EXT_VIDEO_ENCODE_H264_EXTENSION_NAME’
System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ffmpeg
Version: 7:5.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Package: libjs-bootstrap5
Version: 5.2.3+dfsg-7
Followup-For: Bug #1030697
Control: found -1 5.2.3+dfsg-7
Still can't install the package with libjs-bootstrap4 installed:
Preparing to unpack .../libjs-bootstrap5_5.2.3+dfsg-7_all.deb ...
Unpacking libjs-bootstrap5 (5.2.3+dfsg-7) ...
dpkg: erro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1031486 ckeditor prettify.js jquery-i18n-properties dojo
> datatables-extensions
Bug #1031486 [closure-compiler] ckeditor: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:24:
debian/builddir/core/ckeditor_base.min.js] Error 254
Bug #1031452 [closure-c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1031432 closure-compiler
Bug #1031432 [src:mediaelement] mediaelement: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno
2] No such file or directory: '../build/mediaelement.min.js'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:mediaelement' to 'closure-compiler'.
No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1031486 closure-compiler
Bug #1031486 [src:ckeditor] ckeditor: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:24:
debian/builddir/core/ckeditor_base.min.js] Error 254
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ckeditor' to 'closure-compiler'.
No longer marked
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 closure-compiler
Bug #1031474 [src:datatables-extensions] datatables-extensions: FTBFS: make[1]:
*** [debian/rules:10: override_dh_install] Error 254
Bug reassigned from package 'src:datatables-extensions' to 'closure-compiler'.
No longer marked as found
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 closure-compiler
Bug #1031470 [src:jquery-i18n-properties] jquery-i18n-properties: FTBFS:
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:15: override_dh_auto_build] Error 254
Bug reassigned from package 'src:jquery-i18n-properties' to 'closure-compiler'.
No longer marked as
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 closure-compiler
Bug #1031458 [src:dojo] dojo: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:48:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Bug reassigned from package 'src:dojo' to 'closure-compiler'.
No longer marked as found in versions dojo/1.17.2+dfsg1-2.
Ignoring request
Source: ckeditor
Version: 4.19.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 closure-compiler
Bug #1031452 [src:prettify.js] prettify.js: FTBFS:
java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find bundle for base name
com.google.javascript.rhino.head.resources.Messages, locale en
Bug reassigned from package 'src:prettify.js' to 'clos
Source: devscripts
Version: 2.23.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Control: reassign -1 closure-compiler
On 2/17/23 10:49, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find bundle for base name
com.google.javascript.rhino.head.resources.Messages, locale en
at
java.base/java.util.ResourceBundle.throwMissingResourceException(ResourceB
Source: augur
Version: 20.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: python-confluent-kafka
Version: 1.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-oslo.concurrency
Version: 5.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: soundmanager2
Version: 2.97a.20150601+dfsg2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-oslo.db
Version: 12.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libreflectasm-java
Version: 1.11.9+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-eye
Version: 0.7-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/r
Source: nrepl-clojure
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Clojure 1.1
Source: datatables-extensions
Version: 0.0+git20150910.28fd64e+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ruby-celluloid-io
Version: 0.16.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Fail
Source: conda-package-streaming
Version: 0.7.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-omniauth-facebook
Version: 4.0.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: freebayes
Version: 1.3.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: jquery-i18n-properties
Version: 1.2.7+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: guestfs-tools
Version: 1.48.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: botch
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: ruby-rubydns
Version: 1.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/r
Source: eclipse-collections
Version: 11.0.0.M3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: snippy
Version: 4.6.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: grml2usb
Version: 0.19.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: libmemcached-libmemcached-perl
Version: 1.001801+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: python-schema-salad
Version: 8.4.20230201194352-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golang-github-prometheus-exporter-toolkit
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: enlighten
Version: 1.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: django-axes
Version: 5.39.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pcb-rnd
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: dojo
Version: 1.17.2+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruby-redis
Version: 4.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby
Source: r-cran-shiny
Version: 1.7.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: charliecloud
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sane-frontends
Version: 1.0.14-16
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: r-cran-pander
Version: 0.6.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 03:05:06PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>...
> Each time you change the defaults in a way that could be
> backward-incompatible, you could capture those new defaults in a
> permanently-fixed label of, say, 20230616, which is the defaults on that
> date. Probably in the defaul
Source: prettify.js
Version: 2015.12.04+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: poliastro
Version: 0.17.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gearmand
Version: 1.1.19.1+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: python-scrapy
Version: 2.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: fwupd
Version: 1.8.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /
Source: ffmpeg
Version: 7:5.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -I. -I
Source: python-zstandard
Version: 0.19.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lomiri-ui-toolkit
Version: 1.3.5000+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: camv-rnd
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: poetry
Version: 1.3.2+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: qca2
Version: 2.3.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: gnustep-base
Version: 1.28.1+really1.28.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-github-api
Version: 0.19.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: open-vm-tools
Version: 2:12.1.5-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-sh-elf
Version: 4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Enter
Source: diffoscope
Version: 235
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: pandas
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ubuntu-dev-tools
Version: 0.192
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-inotify
Version: 0.2.10-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: conda-package-handling
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Version: 20220917+rebuild1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: mediaelement
Version: 2.15.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1030869 important
Bug #1030869 {Done: Markus Koschany } [tomcat10] tomcat10:
Catalina won't deploy applications missing class
jakarta.websocket.DeploymentException
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing he
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 05:24:04PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>...
> and that moving forward, we make it the image building tools
> problem if they want to support this highly dubious practice of using
> Debian N+X's mkfs to build images for Debian N.
>...
That's what they already have to do for
Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:20:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1031271: fixed in glib2.0 2.75.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031271,
regarding glib2.0 [experimental]: 2.75.3 FTBFS on big-endian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
"Theodore Ts'o" writes:
> As a long-term solution, one could image changing the various image
> creation tools to do something like "mfks.ext4 -T grub2_dumbdown
> /dev/XXX", and then have something like the following in
> /etc/mke2fs.conf:
> [fs_types]
> grub2_dumbdown = {
> features
Hi,
Thanks for the patch!
This has been fixed in Debian testing and sid. However, stable is still
affected. I believe it would make sense to port the patch to stable and
allocate a CVE for this.
Regards,
Gabriel
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/1176
Bug #1031414 [src:pocl,src:libgpuarray] libgpuarray: i386 test fail with new
pocl
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/1176'.
--
1031414: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/1176
@elbrus: Why does britney try to migrate clinfo together with pocl?
IMO clinfo should be able to migrate on its own without causing new
regressions in testing. It does not have any (transitive) dependency on
pocl.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:45:23AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm probably understating the difficulty of making this change in
> practice inside image building software as it's currently constructed.
>
> My concern about changing mkfs options is that I worry that this would be
> a const
On 2023-02-16 11:44:25 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> Adrian> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> >> Am Donnerstag, dem 16.02.2023 um 18:37 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> >> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:05:41AM +0100,
Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:35:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1030767: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030767,
regarding imagemagick: CVE-2022-44267 CVE-2022-44268
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:pocl,src:libgpuarray
Bug #1031414 [src:clinfo, src:libgpuarray] clinfo breaks libgpuarray
autopkgtest on i386: numerical deltas
Bug reassigned from package 'src:clinfo, src:libgpuarray' to
'src:pocl,src:libgpuarray'.
No longer marked as found in ver
Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:49:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1031395: fixed in tzdata 2022g-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031395,
regarding tzdata 2022g-3 removes /etc/timezone while other packages depend on
it, breaking these packages
to be marked as done.
This
Control: reassign -1 src:pocl,src:libgpuarray
Control: found -1 pocl/3.1-3
Control: found -1 libgpuarray/0.7.6-13
Control: retitle -1 libgpuarray: i386 test fail with new pocl
The trigger is probably pocl, not clinfo. I don't yet know whether the
bug is in pocl or libgpuarray.
Package: python3-zstandard
Followup-For: Bug #1031293
X-Debbugs-Cc: b...@debian.org, gregory.sz...@gmail.com
Hi Adrian, Gregory,
Reading the comment above the version check, it seems to indicate that Gregory
isn't particularly enthusiastic to provide support for environments where
there's a misma
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1031395 in tzdata reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/tzdata/-/commit/0a5dcdee0e45c5eb9276112925b3e5c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1031395 [tzdata] tzdata 2022g-3 removes /etc/timezone while other packages
depend on it, breaking these packages
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1031395: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1030939 [e2fsprogs] e2fsprogs: generates filesystems that grub-install
doesn't recognize
Bug 1030939 cloned as bug 1031415
> reassign -2 fai 6.0
Bug #1031415 [e2fsprogs] e2fsprogs: generates filesystems that grub-install
doesn't recognize
Bug reass
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 fai 6.0
Control: clone -1 -3
Control: reassign -3 grml-debootstrap 0.102
On 2023-02-15 21:04:36 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 vmdb2 0.26-2
>
> On 2023-02-14 01:01:38 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Hi Stev
On 2023-02-16 07:54:52 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>
> Sebastian> To better understand the impact of this change, I was
> Sebastian> wondering which tools / image builders in the archive
> Sebastian> would be affected by this change. I'
On 2023-02-16 12:24:01 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> * Sebastian Ramacher [Thu Feb 16, 2023 at 09:09:08AM +0100]:
> > On 2023-02-15 13:17:38 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > > But for example you're not leaving a lot of time for asking programs
> > > like vmdb2 or fai-diskimage to adjust how they
Source: clinfo, libgpuarray
Control: found -1 clinfo/3.0.23.01.25-1
Control: found -1 libgpuarray/0.7.6-13
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of clinfo the autopkgtest of libgpuarray fails i
Processing control commands:
> found -1 clinfo/3.0.23.01.25-1
Bug #1031414 [src:clinfo, src:libgpuarray] clinfo breaks libgpuarray
autopkgtest on i386: numerical deltas
Marked as found in versions clinfo/3.0.23.01.25-1.
> found -1 libgpuarray/0.7.6-13
Bug #1031414 [src:clinfo, src:libgpuarray] cl
The issue is a failing test in test/run_tests.bash:
head fish1.png > ${tmpdir}/fake.png
"$pdiff" --verbose fish1.png ${tmpdir}/fake.png 2>&1 | grep -q 'Failed to
load'
rm -f ${tmpdir}/fake.png
Here it's making sure that we are able to detect a corrupt .png file,
and to throw an error. The
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:05:41AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>...
> Instead, turning on this feature should be postponed for the next release
> cycle
> where a proper transition can be done.
>...
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:02:11PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>...
> You completely miss the poi
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 document log rotation on non-default inits
Am 16.02.23 um 15:41 schrieb Matthew Vernon:
Package: rsyslog
Version: 8.2212.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
When removing the systemv init scripts from rsyslog (which can be
managed by orphan-sysvinit-scri
Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:42:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1031394: fixed in snappy 1.1.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031394,
regarding Please re-enable RTTI support in Sid/Bookworm, needed by at least Ceph
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #1031399 [rsyslog] rsyslog: Log rotation broken on non-systemd systems
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
> retitle -1 document log rotation on non-default inits
Bug #1031399 [rsyslog] rsyslog: Log rotation broken on non-systemd system
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
Adrian> Below is my attempt to give an overview of the situation,
Adrian> feel free to amend/correct if anything is missing or wrong.
I believe your summary is correct and includes the issues I am aware of.
I believe I am following things enough tha
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:45:20PM +0100, David Kunz wrote:
> > The current version of icingaweb2-module-pdfexport depends on chromium.
> All versions are like thes.
icingaweb2-module-pdfexport 0.9.1-2 did not have such a dependency.
> > icingaweb2 is a web service. Depending on a graphical bro
Replying off list, because I don't think it matters much for the RT
discussion.
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Yes, I'm probably understating the difficulty of making this
Russ> change in practice inside image building software as it's
Russ> currently constructed.
R
Disclaimer:
Like everyone else except Sebastian who commented in this bug so far,
I am not a member of the release team.
Below is my attempt to give an overview of the situation,
feel free to amend/correct if anything is missing or wrong.
1. Image creation tools need special cases for older dist
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo