Bug#1028997: marked as done (python-glyphsets: (autopkgtest) needs update for Python 3.11)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:55:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028997: fixed in python-glyphsets 0.5.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028997, regarding python-glyphsets: (autopkgtest) needs update for Python 3.11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1027900: parole 4.16.0-2 does not start

2023-01-17 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 15:12 +0300, Сергей Фёдоров wrote: > parole 4.16.0-2 when running in the terminal emulator outputs : > free(): invalid pointer > Emergency stop > > parole 4.16.0-1 is up and running. Yes indeed, so we have an issue with -1 whi

Processed: Re: dask.distributed: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python3-dask (>= 2022.02.0), python-numpy-doc

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #1028691 [src:dask.distributed] dask.distributed: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python3-dask (>= 2022.02.0), python-numpy-doc Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1028691 to the same tags previously set -- 1028691: https://bugs.deb

Bug#1028691: dask.distributed: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python3-dask (>= 2022.02.0), python-numpy-doc

2023-01-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 pending python-numpy-doc has been dropped from the build dependencies in git, but the package FTBFS due to test failures. Those might be fixed in a new upstream release, but that may introduce regressions in its rdeps. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF

Processed: Bug#1028691 marked as pending in dask.distributed

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1028691 [src:dask.distributed] dask.distributed: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python3-dask (>= 2022.02.0), python-numpy-doc Added tag(s) pending. -- 1028691: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028691 Debian Bug Track

Bug#1028691: marked as pending in dask.distributed

2023-01-17 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1028691 in dask.distributed reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/dask.distributed/-/commit/3

Processed: Re: python-dtcwt: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'int'

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1028797 python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 Bug #1028797 [src:python-dtcwt] python-dtcwt: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'int' Marked as fixed in versions python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#1029115: marked as done (linux-apfs-rw: autopkgtest failure on armel, armhf and i386)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:21:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029115: fixed in linux-apfs-rw 0+git20230118+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029115, regarding linux-apfs-rw: autopkgtest failure on armel, armhf and i386 to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Processed: closing 1028821

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1028821 Bug #1028821 [pysurfer] pysurfer ftbfs with numpy 1.24 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1028821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028821 Debian Bug

Bug#1026657: marked as done (latexdraw: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: build] Error 25)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:09:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026657: fixed in latexdraw 3.3.8+ds1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026657, regarding latexdraw: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: build] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#1026688: marked as done (leaflet: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:09:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026688: fixed in leaflet 1.7.1~dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026688, regarding leaflet: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1026699: marked as done (leaflet-markercluster: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:10:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026699: fixed in leaflet-markercluster 1.5.3~dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026699, regarding leaflet-markercluster: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module to be marked as

Bug#1026699: marked as pending in leaflet-markercluster

2023-01-17 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1026699 in leaflet-markercluster reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/leaflet-markercluster/-/commit/4e35

Processed: Bug#1026699 marked as pending in leaflet-markercluster

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1026699 [src:leaflet-markercluster] leaflet-markercluster: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module Added tag(s) pending. -- 1026699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026699 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Bug#1027656: leaflet autoremoval

2023-01-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Yadd (2023-01-18 06:40:14) > On 1/16/23 09:34, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > [replying via bugreport, to have the conversation public] > > > > Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2023-01-16 05:54:07) > >> Do either of you have time to look into fixing #1026688 which will cause > >> autoremoval of

Bug#1027656: leaflet autoremoval

2023-01-17 Thread Yadd
On 1/16/23 09:34, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [replying via bugreport, to have the conversation public] Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2023-01-16 05:54:07) Do either of you have time to look into fixing #1026688 which will cause autoremoval of leaflet and its rdeps? I should be able to take time

Bug#1026688: marked as pending in leaflet

2023-01-17 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1026688 in leaflet reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/leaflet/-/commit/7341a7cf65f0da8b3249ce08e8598d2b

Processed: Bug#1026688 marked as pending in leaflet

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1026688 [src:leaflet] leaflet: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module Added tag(s) pending. -- 1026688: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026688 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: tagging 1029104

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1029104 + ftbfs Bug #1029104 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] FTBFS with fontconfig 2.14.1 (doesn't expect RGB stripes Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1029104: ht

Bug#1028809: marked as done (firefox-esr: FTBFS: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU')

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 04:35:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028809: fixed in firefox-esr 102.7.0esr-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028809, regarding firefox-esr: FTBFS: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1029122: scm: ftbfs on mipsel

2023-01-17 Thread Bo YU
Source: scm Version: 5f2-3 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, The upload[0] cause a regression with build failure on mipsel: ``` ... make checklit make[3]: Entering directory '/<>' ./scmlit -fr4rstest.scm -e'(test-sc4)(test-delay)(gc)' \ -e '(or (null? errs) (quit 1))' < /dev/null remove #defin

Bug#1026669: request-tracker5: FTBFS: can't locate java: No such file or directory

2023-01-17 Thread Ángel
The error here is that ./debian/build-final-ckeditor.sh fails with « can't locate java: No such file or directory » This script is actually calling ckbuilder ( jexec /usr/bin/ckbuilder -- build ... ) However, the package correctly lists ckbuilder as a build-dep, and ckbuilder itself depends on ja

Bug#1029104: marked as done (FTBFS with fontconfig 2.14.1 (doesn't expect RGB stripes)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 02:04:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029104: fixed in libreoffice 1:7.4.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029104, regarding FTBFS with fontconfig 2.14.1 (doesn't expect RGB stripes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1028607: marked as done (FTBFS: FAILED test-correct-notice and test-end-chop in copyright-tests.log due to new year 2023)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 01:53:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028607: fixed in emacs 1:28.2+1-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028607, regarding FTBFS: FAILED test-correct-notice and test-end-chop in copyright-tests.log due to new year 2023 to be marked as done. T

Bug#1029112: Surprise build issue with ibus-libzhuyin

2023-01-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Debian official packages are required to build without downloading external files during their build. (Builddd is in isolated network environment only with access to the Debian package repository. > Tags: ftbfs So if it requires wget file access, it is ftbfs. Don't make build script to do

Bug#1026204: tar FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386, hppa, powerpc and sparc64

2023-01-17 Thread Helge Deller
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:38:38 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote: Here's a slightly different patch to implement basically the same thing Yes, I like this patch better too. Helge

Bug#1029112: marked as done (Surprise build issue with ibus-libzhuyin)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:22:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029112: fixed in ibus-libzhuyin 1.10.2+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029112, regarding Surprise build issue with ibus-libzhuyin to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1028758: marked as done (mozjs78: FTBFS with python3.11 as default: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU')

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 23:46:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028308: fixed in mozjs78 78.15.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028308, regarding mozjs78: FTBFS with python3.11 as default: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU' to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#1028308: marked as done (mozjs78: FTBFS with python 3.11)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 23:46:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028308: fixed in mozjs78 78.15.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028308, regarding mozjs78: FTBFS with python 3.11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1029015: marked as done (qtmir-tests: Depends on NBS package python3-mir-perf-framework)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:48:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029015: fixed in qtmir 0.8.0~git20230115.30c2337-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029015, regarding qtmir-tests: Depends on NBS package python3-mir-perf-framework to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1026585: marked as done (gfxreconstruct: FTBFS: generated_vulkan_enum_to_string.cpp:2006:10: error: ‘VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_VIDEO_PROFILE_KHR’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘VK_STRUCTURE

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:42:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026585: fixed in gfxreconstruct 0.9.16.1+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026585, regarding gfxreconstruct: FTBFS: generated_vulkan_enum_to_string.cpp:2006:10: error: ‘VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_VIDEO_PROFILE

Bug#1029006: marked as done (bpy: couldn't find 'scripts/modules', blender probably won't start)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:35:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029006: fixed in blender 3.4.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029006, regarding bpy: couldn't find 'scripts/modules', blender probably won't start to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#1029006: marked as pending in blender

2023-01-17 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029006 in blender reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/blender/-/commit/5a80283f8096f9214cb4336f

Processed: Bug#1029006 marked as pending in blender

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1029006 [blender-data] bpy: couldn't find 'scripts/modules', blender probably won't start Added tag(s) pending. -- 1029006: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029006 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1028716: marked as done (mozjs102: FTBFS with python3.11 as default: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU')

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:09:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028716: fixed in mozjs102 102.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028716, regarding mozjs102: FTBFS with python3.11 as default: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU' to be marked as done. This means that you c

Processed: Re: Bug#1027760: gortr appears to be unmaintained

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1027760 [src:gortr] gortr appears to be unmaintained Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > affects -1 cfrpki Bug #1027760 [src:gortr] gortr appears to be unmaintained Added indication that 1027760 affects cfrpki -- 1027760: https:/

Bug#1027760: gortr appears to be unmaintained

2023-01-17 Thread Marco d'Itri
Control: severity -1 important Control: affects -1 cfrpki On Jan 03, Marco d'Itri wrote: > gortr has not been updated upstream in over two years and probably most > users at this point have switched to stayrtr for good. But cfrpki build-depends on golang-github-cloudflare-gortr-dev, so let's ig

Processed: Re: Bug#1029046: Wayland session doesn't get back to life post-suspend

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 6.1.6-1 Bug #1029046 [src:linux] Wayland session doesn't get back to life post-suspend The source 'linux' and version '6.1.6-1' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as found in versions linux/6.1.6-1. > found -1 6.1.4-1 Bug #1029046 [src:linux]

Bug#996799: twitterwatch - upload needed

2023-01-17 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:16 PM Malik wrote: > Hello Emmanuel, > > currently upstream-author has no plan to update or release any further > releases for this project [1] > Ok > > > [1] https://gitlab.com/chaica/twitterwatch/-/issues/1 > > kind regards, > Malik > If you leave the package a

Processed: pysurfer was still affected by numpy 1.24

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 pysurfer 0.11.0-3 Bug #1028821 {Done: Étienne Mollier } [mayavi2] mayavi2 missing python3.11 support causes pysurfer ftbfs Bug reassigned from package 'mayavi2' to 'pysurfer'. No longer marked as found in versions mayavi2/4.8.0-1.1. No longer marked as f

Bug#1028821: pysurfer was still affected by numpy 1.24

2023-01-17 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: reassign -1 pysurfer 0.11.0-3 Control: retitle -1 pysurfer ftbfs with numpy 1.24 Control: found -1 0.11.0-3 Control: fixed -1 0.11.0-4 Hi, I'm under the impression I was not well inspired to reassing the present bug to mayavi2, because pysurfer still used to ftbfs after the mayavi2 updat

Bug#1029115: linux-apfs-rw: autopkgtest failure on armel, armhf and i386

2023-01-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:22:41PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: linux-apfs-rw > Version: 0+git20221028+ds-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: fails-always > > Dear maintainer(s), > > You recently added an autopkgtest to your package linux-apfs-rw, grea

Bug#1029115: linux-apfs-rw: autopkgtest failure on armel, armhf and i386

2023-01-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: linux-apfs-rw Version: 0+git20221028+ds-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fails-always Dear maintainer(s), You recently added an autopkgtest to your package linux-apfs-rw, great. However, it fails on armel, armhf and i386. Currently this failure is blocking

Processed: git: CVE-2022-23521 CVE-2022-41903

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1:2.39.0-1 Bug #1029114 [src:git] git: CVE-2022-23521 CVE-2022-41903 Marked as found in versions git/1:2.39.0-1. -- 1029114: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029114 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1029114: git: CVE-2022-23521 CVE-2022-41903

2023-01-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: git Version: 1:2.30.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Control: found -1 1:2.39.0-1 Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for git. CVE-2022-23521[0]: | gitattributes parsing integ

Bug#996799: twitterwatch - upload needed

2023-01-17 Thread Malik
Hello Emmanuel, currently upstream-author has no plan to update or release any further releases for this project [1] [1] https://gitlab.com/chaica/twitterwatch/-/issues/1 kind regards, Malik Am So., 15. Jan. 2023 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Emmanuel Arias < eam...@yaerobi.com>: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan

Bug#1028710: marked as done (jackd2: FTBFS: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rUb')

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:10:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028710: fixed in jackd2 1.9.21~dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028710, regarding jackd2: FTBFS: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rUb' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1029112: Surprise build issue with ibus-libzhuyin

2023-01-17 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Package: src:ibus-libzhuyin Version: 1.10.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hello! ibus-libzhuyin 1.10.2-1 failed to build. This is the relevant part of the buildlog: Making all in model make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/data/model' wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libzhuyin/models/model1

Bug#1028192: libproxy1v5: Gajim 1.6.0-1 crashes in libproxy call

2023-01-17 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:53:59 + Martin wrote: > Control: severity -1 normal > > The problem disappeared magically for all users who reported it before. > I assume, that there is a hidden bug in libproxy, that only appears in > certain circumstances. Downgrading for now. I just got the ne

Bug#1029109: cimg: build dependency gone after tiff transition

2023-01-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: cimg Version: 3.1.6+dfsg-6 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertag: edos-uninstallable Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting issues with your packages. Normally your build dependencies shouldn't be removed from testing without removal all reverse build dependenci

Bug#1028451: 2nd DisplayPort doesn't get video

2023-01-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 17-01-2023 07:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: I will bite the bullet (taking full responsibility for it if necessary, don't blame the other kernel team members) and ask here now the release team: Can we let linux 6.1.4-1 despite the RC bug reported, migrate to testing, so we can move on t

Processed: Bug#1028716 marked as pending in mozjs

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1028716 [src:mozjs102] mozjs102: FTBFS with python3.11 as default: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1028716: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028716 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o

Bug#1029066: diffoscope: FTBFS if no internet is available (using internet connection during build)

2023-01-17 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: found 1029066 230 On 2023-01-17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, your package FTBFS when internet is not available during control file > regeneration phase ... > debian/tests/control.sh > Generating the debian/tests/control file... ... > ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfi

Processed: Bug#1028804 marked as pending in libpdfbox2-java

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1028804 [src:libpdfbox2-java] libpdfbox2-java: FTBFS: No source files for package org.apache.fontbox.afm Added tag(s) pending. -- 1028804: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028804 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Bug#1028804: marked as pending in libpdfbox2-java

2023-01-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1028804 in libpdfbox2-java reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libpdfbox2-java/-/commit/95c2d69090ccf3

Processed: Re: Bug#1029066: diffoscope: FTBFS if no internet is available (using internet connection during build)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found 1029066 230 Bug #1029066 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: FTBFS if no internet is available (using internet connection during build) Marked as found in versions diffoscope/230. -- 1029066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029066 Debian Bug Trac

Bug#1028716: marked as pending in mozjs

2023-01-17 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1028716 in mozjs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/mozjs/-/commit/f51a1f902757c4f10f7c75dfa541fb673

Processed: update

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1027613 [src:onetbb] onetbb: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 ninja test returned exit code 1 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1027613: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#1027613: update

2023-01-17 Thread M. Zhou
Control: severity -1 important I think this FTBFS mostly stems from the toolchain. 1. before the bug is filed, it builds successfully on amd64 2. On the day I recieved this bug report, I reproduced it 3. after some toolchain updates, I cannot reproduce it anymore

Bug#1026988: marked as done (Upcoming test suite regression due to changes in file/libmagic)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:25:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026988: fixed in ruby-ruby-magic-static 0.5.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026988, regarding Upcoming test suite regression due to changes in file/libmagic to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Bug#1029104 marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1029104 [src:libreoffice] FTBFS with fontconfig 2.14.1 (doesn't expect RGB stripes Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1029104 to the same tags previously set -- 1029104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029104 Debian Bug T

Bug#1029104: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029104 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/504

Processed: RC Bug #1027503 forwarded upstream

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1027503 https://github.com/enthought/apptools/issues/325 Bug #1027503 [src:python-apptools] python-apptools: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'pop' Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/enthought/

Processed: Bug#1029104 marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1029104 [src:libreoffice] FTBFS with fontconfig 2.14.1 (doesn't expect RGB stripes Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1029104 to the same tags previously set -- 1029104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029104 Debian Bug T

Bug#1029104: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029104 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/504

Processed: found 1029104 in 1:7.4.4-1

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1029104 1:7.4.4-1 Bug #1029104 [src:libreoffice] FTBFS with fontconfig 2.14.1 (doesn't expect RGB stripes Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:7.4.4-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1

Processed: Bug#1029104 marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1029104 [src:libreoffice] FTBFS with fontconfig 2.14.1 (doesn't expect RGB stripes Added tag(s) pending. -- 1029104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029104 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#1029104: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029104 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/504

Processed (with 1 error): clone

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 1029101 -1 Bug #1029101 [fontconfig-config] please Enable RGB stripes layout for sub-pixel rendering Bug 1029101 cloned as bug 1029104 1026825 was blocked by: 1027837 1029101 1028196 1026825 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s)

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1029101 important Bug #1029101 [fontconfig-config] fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > retitle 1029101 please Enable RGB stripes layout for sub-pixel renderin

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
severity 1029101 important retitle 1029101 please Enable RGB stripes layout for sub-pixel rendering on KDE only thanks [ sorry for "spamming" ] Hi, Am 17.01.23 um 19:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard: it still fails. Probably it ignores it since it's already set in /etc and that already matches? O

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 17.01.23 um 18:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard: I tried to adapt the test to expected values but failed. When I adapt some values stuff even further breaks, and at the 50% test I then had no idea what to do.) LO has already a fc_local.conf: ./instdir/share/fonts/truetype/fc_local.conf

Bug#1029063: reportbug: linux-image-6.0.0-6-amd64 remains unconfigured because of errors

2023-01-17 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 18:12:30 CET Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:56:33 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.0.0-6-amd64 > > > (x86_64) > > > Consult /var/lib/dkms/anbox-binder/1/build/make.log for more > > > information. >

Processed: block 1026825 with 1029101

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1026825 with 1029101 Bug #1026825 [release.debian.org] python3.11 as default 1026825 was blocked by: 1028196 1027837 1026825 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1026825: 1029101 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, addendum: I tried to adapt the test to expected values but failed. When I adapt some values stuff even further breaks, and at the 50% test I then had no idea what to do.) For reference,  this is the test: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/vcl/qa/cppunit/text.cxx?h=libre

Bug#1028669: marked as done (easymock: FTBFS: No source files for package org.easymock)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:19:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028669: fixed in easymock 5.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028669, regarding easymock: FTBFS: No source files for package org.easymock to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1029101: fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: fontconfig-config Version: 2.14.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: causes FTBFS Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=amd64&ver=1%3A7.4.4-1&stamp=1673962775&raw=0: [_RUN_] VclTextTest::testSimpleText ./vcl/qa/cppunit/text.

Bug#1029063: reportbug: linux-image-6.0.0-6-amd64 remains unconfigured because of errors

2023-01-17 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:56:33 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote: > Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.0.0-6-amd64 (x86_64) > Consult /var/lib/dkms/anbox-binder/1/build/make.log for more information. That does not look like a module packaged in Debian ... dkms fails the installatio

Bug#1028717: marked as done (python-gsd: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: python-numpy-doc)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:06:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028717: fixed in python-gsd 2.7.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028717, regarding python-gsd: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: python-numpy-doc to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1028904: pillow: Lost tiff support after binNMU with tiff 4.5.0

2023-01-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:43:23 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: I am uploading a NMU with the attached debdiff to DELAYED/10 to fix this. You can reschedule this to 5 days. From the NMU guidelines: " * Upload fixing only release-critical and important bugs: 5 days " https://www.debian.org/doc/man

Bug#1028669: marked as pending in easymock

2023-01-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1028669 in easymock reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/easymock/-/commit/328c5a157a155bce9dddbbc7198f

Processed: Bug#1028669 marked as pending in easymock

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1028669 [src:easymock] easymock: FTBFS: No source files for package org.easymock Added tag(s) pending. -- 1028669: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028669 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1027230: marked as done (python-dmsh: autopkgtest fail with numpy/1.24.1)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:50:55 +0100 with message-id <5067aa643496524769c6959064a57...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1027230 python-dmsh: autopkgtest fail with numpy/1.24.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1027230, regarding python-dmsh: autopkgtest fail with numpy/1.24.1 to b

Bug#1029080: Info received (Bug#1029080: linux-image-5.10.0-20-amd64: Boot failure "PM: Image not found (code -22)" where power management is NOT used)

2023-01-17 Thread Claire Osborne
Hi, Sorry - can this be closed please. I am going to diplomatically say that a network engineer suffered a failure between mouse and keyboard - who did not appreciate that /etc/fstab is an integral part of the system boot process. My apologies if this has wasted anyone's time. Kind regards

Bug#1029092: Don't update mysql-defaults in Debian testing/Bookworm too early

2023-01-17 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Package: mysql-defaults Version: 1.1.0 Severity: serious Owner: Otto Kekäläinen Don't allow mysql-defaults into testing/Bookworm before MariaDB 1:10.11.1-1 has entered it first. There is no package 'mariadb-server-core' in MariaDB 1:10.6.11-2 and thus the defaults pointer would fail. This severi

Bug#1029080: linux-image-5.10.0-20-amd64: Boot failure "PM: Image not found (code -22)" where power management is NOT used

2023-01-17 Thread Claire Osborne
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:59:51 +0100 Diederik de Haas wrote: > What was the latest 5.10.x kernel which did boot correctly? Reboot- This will (or should) have been the 5.10.0-20 kernel as a post installation reboot due to either new kernel or package dependency trigger indicated in /var/run/reboo

Bug#1028438: otpclient: OTP values are all 000000

2023-01-17 Thread Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
Hi, Thanks for the help guys! libcotp has been upgraded to 1.2.8-1 (see https://bugs.debian.org/1028305). otpclient has been upgraded to 3.1.3-1, we will use libbaseencode version 1.0.15-1 with libcotp 1.2.8-1 while the transition from libcotp 1.2.8-1 to 2.0.0-1 doesn't happen (see https://bugs.

Processed: RC Bug #1026725: Forwarded to upstream fix

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1026725 https://github.com/hynek/structlog/pull/418 Bug #1026725 [src:python-structlog] python-structlog: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.11 3.10" returned exit code 13 Set Bug forwarde

Processed (with 1 error): your mail

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1028716 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1769631 Bug #1028716 [src:mozjs102] mozjs102: FTBFS with python3.11 as default: ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU' Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.

Bug#1028994: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#1028994: mailman3: (autopkgtest) needs update for Python 3.11

2023-01-17 Thread James Addison
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 14:33, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > I intend to do a full sweep on mailman suite in the next week, so don't > worry too much! :) Brilliant - thank you :)

Processed: Re: Bug#1029080: linux-image-5.10.0-20-amd64: Boot failure "PM: Image not found (code -22)" where power management is NOT used

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #1029080 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-20-amd64: Boot failure "PM: Image not found (code -22)" where power management is NOT used Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1029080: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029080 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1029080: linux-image-5.10.0-20-amd64: Boot failure "PM: Image not found (code -22)" where power management is NOT used

2023-01-17 Thread Diederik de Haas
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 14:20:19 CET Claire Osborne wrote: > Booting in recovery mode on 5.10.0.20 also failed > > I have fallen back to the previously installed kernel 5.10.19 - with the > same effect. > > Booting in recovery mode on 5.10.0.19 also fails. What was

Processed: Re: Bug#1029063: reportbug: linux-image-6.0.0-6-amd64 remains unconfigured because of errors

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1029063 dkms Bug #1029063 [src:linux] reportbug: linux-image-6.0.0-6-amd64 remains unconfigured because of errors Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'dkms'. No longer marked as found in versions linux/6.0.12-1. Ignoring request t

Bug#1028994: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#1028994: mailman3: (autopkgtest) needs update for Python 3.11

2023-01-17 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Hi, James Addison wrote on 17/01/2023 at 15:17:43+0100: > Source: mailman3 > Version: 3.3.7-3 > Followup-For: Bug #1028994 > > Dear Maintainer, > > There is hopefully good news relating to this bug: upstream has > discovered the same problem and fixed it after version v3.3.7 - the > fix is inclu

Bug#1028994: mailman3: (autopkgtest) needs update for Python 3.11

2023-01-17 Thread James Addison
Source: mailman3 Version: 3.3.7-3 Followup-For: Bug #1028994 Dear Maintainer, There is hopefully good news relating to this bug: upstream has discovered the same problem and fixed it after version v3.3.7 - the fix is included in v3.3.8 of mailman3. (the fix includes removal of a 'coroutine' de

Processed: tagging 1027354, tagging 1028621, notfound 1028607 in 28.2+1-9, found 1028607 in 1:28.2+1-9 ...

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1027354 - sid bookworm Bug #1027354 [src:ruby-fogbugz] ruby-fogbugz: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: :85:in `require': cannot load such file -- mocha/mini_test (LoadError) Removed tag(s) sid and bookworm. > tags 1028621 - sid bookworm

Bug#1028709: marked as done (objenesis: FTBFS: No source files for package org.objenesis)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:35:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028709: fixed in objenesis 3.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028709, regarding objenesis: FTBFS: No source files for package org.objenesis to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1028636: marked as done (pocl: FTBFS on arm64: ***** The testsuite has failed! *****)

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:35:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028636: fixed in pocl 3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028636, regarding pocl: FTBFS on arm64: * The testsuite has failed! * to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#1029076: uwsgi-plugin-python3: built against non-default libpython3.11 / should always build against the defalt Python in testing

2023-01-17 Thread Dominik George
Package: uwsgi-plugin-python3 Version: 2.0.21-3+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Currently, the uWSGI Python 3 plugin is built against Python 3.11, and depends on libpython3.11.

Processed: Bug#1028709 marked as pending in objenesis

2023-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1028709 [src:objenesis] objenesis: FTBFS: No source files for package org.objenesis Added tag(s) pending. -- 1028709: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028709 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

  1   2   >