Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2022 06:35:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1009384: fixed in ruby-html-proofer 3.19.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009384,
regarding ruby-html-proofer: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed:
[31mFailure/Error: [0m[32mexpect[0m(output).to
mat
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Lucas,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 4:03 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: nng
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Unfortunately I can't reproduce it. Tried in several ways
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible
Bug #1015098 [src:nng] nng: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #1015098 [src:nng] nng: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity -1 important
Bug #1015098 [src:nng] nng: FTBFS
Package: lvm2-udeb
Version: 2.03.15-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
[ Please keep debian-boot@ cc'd. ]
Hi,
lvm2-udeb is no longer installable, which causes some d-i images to fail
to build:
The following packages have unme
: 0.26.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:fcitx5-zhuyin
Bug #1015171 [libzhuyin13] libzhuyin13: Unaligned access makes fcitx5-zhuyin
FTBFS when building armhf on 64 bit hardware
Added indication that 1015171 affects src:fcitx5-zhuyin
--
1015171: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Package: libzhuyin13
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Forwarded: https://github.com/libpinyin/libpinyin/pull/152
Control: affects -1 src:fcitx5-zhuyin
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=fcitx5-zhuyin&arch=armhf&ver=5.0.8-1&stamp=1657997016&raw=0
...
0% tests passed
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 23:19:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002109: fixed in ruby-slim 4.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002109,
regarding ruby-slim: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.0.0/gems/rake-13.0.3/lib/rake/testtask.rb:130:in `b
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>/doc'
> rm -f {.,../tutorial}/*.{ht
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 22:04:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1009384: fixed in ruby-html-proofer 3.19.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009384,
regarding ruby-html-proofer: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed:
[31mFailure/Error: [0m[32mexpect[0m(output).to
mat
-dagre-d3-renderer
Version: 0.6.4+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 21:34:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1007237: fixed in cryptsetup-nuke-password 4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007237,
regarding cryptsetup-nuke-password: autopkgtest failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Iwayvnc.p -I. -I.. -I../include -I/usr/include/pixma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1015041
Bug #1015041 [gyp] node-opencv: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'six'
Bug #1015051 [gyp] node-re2: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
Bug #1015058 [gyp] node-expat: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module na
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 04:20:18PM -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 13:05 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > The use case below, and any other tools that create files and know to
> > set their permissions appropriately but don't expect unusual
> > ownership
> > by default:
> > > > In p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1015041 1015058
Bug #1015041 [gyp] node-opencv: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'six'
Bug #1015041 [gyp] node-opencv: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'six'
Marked as found in versions gyp/0.1+20220404git9ecf45e
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1015059 [src:node-dagre-d3-renderer] node-dagre-d3-renderer: FTBFS:
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1015059: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015059
Debian Bug Tracking S
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1015059 in node-dagre-d3-renderer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-dagre-d3-renderer/-/commit/87
Source: neatvnc
Version: 0.5.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
Hi,
your recent upload of neatvnc introduced murmurhash which is copyright
"2014 Joseph Werle" but you did not add that to d/copyright:
https://sources.debian.org/src/neatvnc/0.5.1%2B
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1015041 gyp
Bug #1015041 [src:node-opencv] node-opencv: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No
module named 'six'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-opencv' to 'gyp'.
No longer marked as found in versions node-opencv/7.0.0+git20200316.f0a03a4
-pluggy
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
> dh
ng System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-dbusmock
Version: 0.28.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your p
Le 16/07/2022 à 18:50, Steven Robbins a écrit :
Thank you for the suggestion. I was completely unaware of "apt-listbugs".
I have just re-titled and changed the severity of this bug.
Great, it can help other users to avoid the upgrade if they want to.
Due to the large dependencies, it
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #09 [src:ckeditor] ckeditor: CVE-2021-41164 CVE-2021-41165
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
09: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=09
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
those 2 CVEs are tagged as no-dsa (minor issue), then severity can't be
"grave". Fix pushed to unstable (4.19.0+dfsg-1)
Cheers,
Yadd
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 21:54:38 +0200
with message-id <6dcef693-8a59-8558-0604-04d097712...@debian.org>
and subject line FTBFS resolved
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006094,
regarding fonts-roboto-slab: FTBFS: pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The
'unicodedata2>=14.0.0' distrib
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1001999 important
Bug #1001999 [src:snapd] snapd: packaging not up to Debian standards
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1001999: https://bugs.debi
Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/martinpitt/python-dbusmock/pull/139
Ça va Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum [2022-07-16 15:32 +0200]:
> > ==
> > FAIL: test_options (tests.test_notification_daemon.Tes
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 upstream pending
Bug #1015068 [src:python-dbusmock] python-dbusmock: FTBFS: AssertionError:
Regex didn't match: b'[0-9.]+ Notify "fooApp" 0 "warning_icon" "title" "my
text" \\[\\] {"urgency": 1} 27\n' not found in b'1657951521.419
GetServerInformation\n1657
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:49:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013539: fixed in newsboat 2.21-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013539,
regarding newsboat: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
librust-gettext-rs-0.4-dev, librust-gettext-sys-0.19-dev,
librust-pr
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-configurable-http-proxy
Version: 4.5.0+~cs15.1.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:49:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011620: fixed in newsboat 2.21-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011620,
regarding newsboat - needs update for new gettext crates.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 21:30:53 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Already fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #965850,
regarding ttf-bitstream-vera: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in
bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Source: haskell-product-isomorphic
Version: 0.0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-product-isomorphic&suite=sid
...
src/Data/Functor/ProductIsomorphic/TH/Internal.hs:47:10: error:
• The constructor ‘PlainTV’ should have 2 ar
While I did not originally plan to NMU this, the bug has gone well over
a month with no maintainer response, and Fabian Grünbichler said on irc
that he had tested the patched newsboat and it worked for him, so I have
decided to NMU it.
Final debdiff attatched.
diff -Nru newsboat-2.21/debian/ch
Dear APT Development Team,
just as a quick info: this FTBFS bug is most likely already resolved
with the new upload of po4a.
See https://bugs.debian.org/1015087 for a little longer explanation.
I'm not closing this bug, however, because I didn't try to build apt and
therefore cannot be sure
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: isoquery
Version: 3.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to buil
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > cc -Iwayvnc.p -I. -I.. -I../incl
On 16/07/22 at 22:17 +0300, Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 17:04, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > /usr/bin/ld: bobuser.p/bobuser.c.o: in function `main':
> > > ./b 52a78b9866/../test cases/failing build/2 hidden symbol/bobuser.c:4:
> > > undefined ref
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + cinnamon
Bug #1015006 [gir1.2-notify-0.7] gir1.2-notify-0.7: Upgrade to version 0.8.0-1
breaks at least two packages that use Python
Added indication that 1015006 affects cinnamon
--
1015006: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015006
D
Control: affects -1 + cinnamon
This make unable to start also cinnamon-settings
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: rust-cbindgen
Version: 0.23.0-1~deb10u1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: po...@debian.org
On 2022-07-16 15:34, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
>
> cbindgen_0.23.0-1~deb10u1_s390x.deb: has 1 file(s) with a timestamp too far
> in the past:
> usr/share/doc/cbindgen/changelog.gz (Thu Nov 29 21
lua-lpeg is orphaned ... someone has to take care of it first;
I might even adopt it.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995514
I created a Merge Request:
https://salsa.debian.org/lua-team/lua-lpeg/-/merge_requests/1
Le sam. 16 juil. 2022 à 20:09, Alexandre Detiste
a écrit :
>
>
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:31:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1015140: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #860336,
regarding parse error in Request.php
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:32:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1015141: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #882901,
regarding php-numbers-words FTBFS with phpunit 6.4.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:27:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014698: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #941264,
regarding phpunit breaks php-cache-lite autopkgtest: tries to write to
/usr/bin/.phpunit.result.cache
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:27:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014698: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #940275,
regarding FTBFS with recent PHPUnit (8)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:27:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014700: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #882910,
regarding php-http-request2 FTBFS with phpunit 6.4.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:24:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014673: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #988440,
regarding golang-github-seccomp-containers-golang: Keep out of bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:25:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014688: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #976794,
regarding Useless in Debian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:24:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014671: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #949016,
regarding Useless in Debian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:20:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014632: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999133,
regarding sapphire: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:23:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014670: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005383,
regarding Useless in Debian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:21:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014656: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936459,
regarding dvcs-autosync: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:23:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014669: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935639,
regarding Abandoned upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:22:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014668: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935384,
regarding Abandoned upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:22:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014667: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #910813,
regarding doc-linux-fr: FTBFS, latex error "Package inputenc Error: Invalid
UTF-8 byte sequence"
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:22:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014667: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #880786,
regarding doc-linux-fr build depends on removed transitional package lynx-cur
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:22:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014667: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #906953,
regarding doc-linux-fr: French translations of horribly outdated documentation
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:17:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014378: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #997138,
regarding ffdiaporama: FTBFS: engine/_EncodeVideo.cpp:134:46: error: ‘AVStream’
{aka ‘struct AVStream’} has no member named ‘
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:19:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014464: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014462,
regarding libzapojit: unmaintained, only used by gnome-documents
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:17:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014378: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014281,
regarding ffdiaporama: Crashes on start with "malloc(): corrupted top size"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:17:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014381: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004613,
regarding nordlicht: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:18:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014384: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013422,
regarding libgroove FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:14:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014144: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #980023,
regarding petri-foo: FTBFS with GCC 10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:14:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014063: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965563,
regarding gnome-phone-manager: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in
bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:12:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013813: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013813,
regarding RM: uwsgi-plugin-luajit [ppc64el] -- RoQA; luajit2 segfaults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:12:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013811,
regarding RM: snort [ppc64el] -- RoQA; luajit2 segfaults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:11:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013808: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013808,
regarding RM: aegisub [ppc64el] -- RoQA; luajit2 segfaults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:08:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013450: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004809,
regarding deepin-voice-recorder: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
---
Source: node-browserslist
Version: 4.21.1+~cs6.1.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-configurable-http-proxy
Version: 4.5.0+~cs15.1.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:07:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010319: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008526,
regarding gnome-documents: deprecated and unmaintained upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:07:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010319: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005549,
regarding gnome-documents: FTBFS: ../data/meson.build:58:2: ERROR: Function
does not take positional arguments.
to be marked
Hi,
I imported and packaged corsix-th 0.66.
This fix this one build time bug but not the run-time one.
>Welcome to CorsixTH v0.66!
>
>An error has occurred in CorsixTH:
>/usr/share/games/corsix-th/Lua/strict.lua:66: module 'lpeg' not found:
>no field package.preload['lpeg']
>no f
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1015118 [src:node-configurable-http-proxy] node-configurable-http-proxy:
FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit
code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1015118: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1015118 in node-configurable-http-proxy reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-configurable-http-prox
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 17:49:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014952: fixed in gnunet-gtk 0.16.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014952,
regarding libgnunetgtk3: missing Breaks+Replaces: gnunet-gtk (<< 0.16.0-4)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
: cataclysm-dda
Version: 0.F-3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -Wdate-t
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 17:34:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013985: fixed in golang-github-evanw-esbuild 0.14.43-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013985,
regarding FTBFS: attempt to build with Go module
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1013985 [src:golang-github-evanw-esbuild] FTBFS: attempt to build with Go
module
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1013985: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013985
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1013985 in golang-github-evanw-esbuild reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-evanw
Control: retitle -1 gtk4 memorytexture test-case regresses with Mesa 22.1
Control: reassign -1 src:gtk4,src:mesa
Control: found -1 gtk4/4.6.6+ds-1
Control: found -1 mesa/22.1.3-1
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 15:49:25 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package fa
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 gtk4 memorytexture test-case regresses with Mesa 22.1
Bug #1015039 [src:gtk4] gtk4: FTBFS, build-time test failure:
testsuite/gdk/memorytexture.c:389: 0x55441155 != 0x
Changed Bug title to 'gtk4 memorytexture test-case regresses with Mesa 22.1'
f
On Friday, July 15, 2022 6:27:51 P.M. CDT you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This bug is rather anoying as I'm using digikam to manage my video.
I agree it is annoying. I feel the same pain.
Given the hard-transition of ffmpeg [1], it is not possible to build with video
in unstable today. Digikam was
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1004769 serious
Bug #1004769 [src:digikam] Video support missing (FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1004769: https://bugs.debia
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 17:04, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > /usr/bin/ld: bobuser.p/bobuser.c.o: in function `main':
> > ./b 52a78b9866/../test cases/failing build/2 hidden symbol/bobuser.c:4:
> > undefined reference to `hidden_function'
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 FTBFS: attempt to build with Go module
Bug #1013985 [src:golang-github-evanw-esbuild] golang-github-evanw-esbuild:
ftbfs in experimental
Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS: attempt to build with Go module' from
'golang-github-evanw-esbuild: ftbfs in experimenta
Control: retitle -1 FTBFS: attempt to build with Go module
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 9:30 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
> Source: golang-github-evanw-esbuild
> Version: 0.14.43-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Happened
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 15:49:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999527: fixed in joblib 1.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999527,
regarding joblib: FTBFS with numpy 1.21 (in experimental): dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9
.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
: php-guzzlehttp-psr7
Version: 2.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Error in bootst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source php-http-interop-http-factory-tests
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'php-http-interop-http-factory-tests'
Limit currently set to 'source':'php-http-interop-http-factory-tests'
> tags 1015091 + pending
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream pending
Bug #1015067 [src:python-shapely] python-shapely: FTBFS: AttributeError: can't
set attribute '_is_empty'
Added tag(s) upstream and pending.
--
1015067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Control: tags -1 upstream pending
On 7/16/22 15:32, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
=== FAILURES ===
__ OperationsTestCase.test_parallel_offset_linestring __
self =
def test_parallel_offset_linestring(self):
Thanks Lucas, I'll look at it tonight.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, 22:04 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote:
> Source: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic
> Version: 1.24
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1015039 gtk4: FTBFS, build-time test failure:
> testsuite/gdk/memorytexture.c:389: 0x55441155 != 0x
Bug #1015039 [src:gtk4] gtk4: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:264:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Changed Bug title to 'gtk4: F
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1015091 php-http-interop-http-factory-tests
Bug #1015091 [src:php-guzzlehttp-psr7] php-guzzlehttp-psr7: FTBFS: E: Build
killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
Bug reassigned from package 'src:php-guzzlehttp-psr7' to
'ph
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1015088 + upstream
Bug #1015088 [src:golang-1.18] icingadb: FTBFS: ../pkg/com/bulker.go:30:16:
internal compiler error: assertion failed
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 1015088 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/53916
Bug #1015088 [src:g
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1015088 src:golang-1.18
Bug #1015088 [src:icingadb] icingadb: FTBFS: ../pkg/com/bulker.go:30:16:
internal compiler error: assertion failed
Bug reassigned from package 'src:icingadb' to 'src:golang-1.18'.
No longer marked as found in vers
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
