Bug#1009580: marked as done (node-inline-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.18%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:33:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009580: fixed in node-inline-source-map 0.6.2~git-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009580, regarding node-inline-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.18%) does not meet global threshold (

Bug#1009565: marked as done (node-module-deps: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (86.71%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:34:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009565: fixed in node-module-deps 6.2.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009565, regarding node-module-deps: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (86.71%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be mark

Bug#1009538: marked as done (node-detective: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (92.15%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:33:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009538: fixed in node-detective 5.2.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009538, regarding node-detective: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (92.15%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked a

Bug#1009513: marked as done (node-object-inspect: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (60.76%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:34:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009513: fixed in node-object-inspect 1.11.0+~cs1.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009513, regarding node-object-inspect: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (60.76%) does not meet global threshold (

Bug#1009507: marked as done (node-deps-sort: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (95.23%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:33:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009507: fixed in node-deps-sort 2.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009507, regarding node-deps-sort: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (95.23%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked a

Processed: Bug#1009565 marked as pending in node-module-deps

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009565 [src:node-module-deps] node-module-deps: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (86.71%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009565: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009565 Debian Bug Trackin

Bug#1009565: marked as pending in node-module-deps

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009565 in node-module-deps reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-module-deps/-/commit/a082d2d74a0c6e

Processed: Bug#1009513 marked as pending in node-object-inspect

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009513 [src:node-object-inspect] node-object-inspect: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (60.76%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009513: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009513 Debian Bug T

Processed: Bug#1009580 marked as pending in node-inline-source-map

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009580 [src:node-inline-source-map] node-inline-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.18%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009580: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009580 Debian

Bug#1009513: marked as pending in node-object-inspect

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009513 in node-object-inspect reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-object-inspect/-/commit/7e55227d

Bug#1009580: marked as pending in node-inline-source-map

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009580 in node-inline-source-map reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-inline-source-map/-/commit/5f

Bug#1009592: marked as done (node-process-nextick-args: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (10%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:19:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009592: fixed in node-process-nextick-args 2.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009592, regarding node-process-nextick-args: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (10%) does not meet global threshold (1

Bug#1009556: marked as done (node-invariant: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (81.25%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:19:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009556: fixed in node-invariant 2.2.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009556, regarding node-invariant: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (81.25%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked a

Bug#1009559: marked as done (node-falafel: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.11%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:19:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009559: fixed in node-falafel 2.2.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009559, regarding node-falafel: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.11%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked as do

Bug#1009544: marked as done (node-combine-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (93.44%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:19:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009544: fixed in node-combine-source-map 0.8.0+ds-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009544, regarding node-combine-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (93.44%) does not meet global threshold

Bug#1009502: marked as done (node-block-stream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.24%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009502: fixed in node-block-stream 0.0.9-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009502, regarding node-block-stream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.24%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be ma

Bug#1009503: marked as done (node-archy: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for branches (95.45%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:18:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009503: fixed in node-archy 1.0.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009503, regarding node-archy: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for branches (95.45%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked as done. T

Bug#1009486: marked as done (node-isarray: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (66.66%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:19:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009486: fixed in node-isarray 2.0.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009486, regarding node-isarray: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (66.66%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked as do

Bug#1009507: marked as pending in node-deps-sort

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009507 in node-deps-sort reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-deps-sort/-/commit/fe57298767ca87b0af

Processed: Bug#1009507 marked as pending in node-deps-sort

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009507 [src:node-deps-sort] node-deps-sort: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (95.23%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009507: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009507 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Processed: Bug#1009538 marked as pending in node-detective

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009538 [src:node-detective] node-detective: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (92.15%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009538 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Bug#1009538: marked as pending in node-detective

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009538 in node-detective reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-detective/-/commit/0dab2546c8846ab97d

Processed: Bug#1009486 marked as pending in node-isarray

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009486 [src:node-isarray] node-isarray: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (66.66%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009486 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1009486: marked as pending in node-isarray

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009486 in node-isarray reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-isarray/-/commit/1b1d59384ac2e11ec57f27

Bug#1009511: marked as pending in node-once

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009511 in node-once reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-once/-/commit/4d52f986ecc7cc8e36a97b2b9781

Processed: Bug#1009511 marked as pending in node-once

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009511 [src:node-once] node-once: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (83.33%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009511 Debian Bug Tracking System Conta

Processed: Bug#1009559 marked as pending in node-falafel

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009559 [src:node-falafel] node-falafel: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.11%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009559: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009559 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1009559: marked as pending in node-falafel

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009559 in node-falafel reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-falafel/-/commit/61681a883eee23f14ae012

Processed: Bug#1009502 marked as pending in node-block-stream

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009502 [src:node-block-stream] node-block-stream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.24%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009502: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009502 Debian Bug Track

Bug#1009502: marked as pending in node-block-stream

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009502 in node-block-stream reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-block-stream/-/commit/56871c27f0d8

Bug#1009544: marked as pending in node-combine-source-map

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009544 in node-combine-source-map reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-combine-source-map/-/commit/

Bug#1009571: marked as done (node-call-limit: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (83.58%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:03:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009571: fixed in node-call-limit 1.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009571, regarding node-call-limit: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (83.58%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked

Processed: Bug#1009544 marked as pending in node-combine-source-map

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009544 [src:node-combine-source-map] node-combine-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (93.44%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009544: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009544 Debi

Bug#1009530: marked as done (node-arrify: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (90.9%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:03:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009530: fixed in node-arrify 2.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009530, regarding node-arrify: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (90.9%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked as done.

Bug#1009545: marked as done (node-jsonstream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (50.89%) does not meet global threshold (100%))

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009545: fixed in node-jsonstream 1.3.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009545, regarding node-jsonstream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (50.89%) does not meet global threshold (100%) to be marked

Bug#1009556: marked as pending in node-invariant

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009556 in node-invariant reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-invariant/-/commit/038e421d8c0e2c8a6b

Processed: Bug#1009556 marked as pending in node-invariant

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009556 [src:node-invariant] node-invariant: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (81.25%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009556: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009556 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Bug#1009592: marked as pending in node-process-nextick-args

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009592 in node-process-nextick-args reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-process-nextick-args/-/com

Processed: Bug#1009592 marked as pending in node-process-nextick-args

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009592 [src:node-process-nextick-args] node-process-nextick-args: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (10%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009592: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009592 Deb

Processed: Bug#1009503 marked as pending in node-archy

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009503 [src:node-archy] node-archy: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for branches (95.45%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009503: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009503 Debian Bug Tracking System Conta

Bug#1009503: marked as pending in node-archy

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009503 in node-archy reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-archy/-/commit/df6d66db38594ced593a4e6002

Processed: Bug#1009530 marked as pending in node-arrify

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009530 [src:node-arrify] node-arrify: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (90.9%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009530: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009530 Debian Bug Tracking System Co

Bug#1009530: marked as pending in node-arrify

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009530 in node-arrify reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-arrify/-/commit/549c9701aa858c86516022fa

Processed: Bug#1009571 marked as pending in node-call-limit

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009571 [src:node-call-limit] node-call-limit: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (83.58%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009571 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1009571: marked as pending in node-call-limit

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009571 in node-call-limit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-call-limit/-/commit/465211ef07ee26d5

Bug#1009545: marked as pending in node-jsonstream

2022-04-18 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009545 in node-jsonstream reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-jsonstream/-/commit/c7a267bdddc7ce1b

Processed: Bug#1009545 marked as pending in node-jsonstream

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009545 [src:node-jsonstream] node-jsonstream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (50.89%) does not meet global threshold (100%) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009545 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1009204: vdirsyncer: diff for NMU version 0.18.0-6.1

2022-04-18 Thread Stefano Rivera
> I've prepared an NMU for vdirsyncer (versioned as 0.18.0-6.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. As a team member, feel free to reschedule this to 0-day. I've merged your git tree. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 4

Bug#1009240: marked as done (esys-particle: autopkgtest regression since rebuild for python3.10 as default)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009240: fixed in esys-particle 2.3.5+dfsg2-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009240, regarding esys-particle: autopkgtest regression since rebuild for python3.10 as default to be marked as done. This me

Bug#981822: marked as done (librust-bytemuck-dev: Depends: librust-bytemuck-derive-1+default-dev but it is not installable)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:19:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981822: fixed in rust-bytemuck 1.9.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #981822, regarding librust-bytemuck-dev: Depends: librust-bytemuck-derive-1+default-dev but it is not installable to be marked as done.

Bug#974117: marked as done (rust-image: FTBFS build-depends on librust-tiff-0.3+default-dev)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:19:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#974117: fixed in rust-image 0.23.14-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #974117, regarding rust-image: FTBFS build-depends on librust-tiff-0.3+default-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#999034: squidtaild: diff for NMU version 2.1a6-6.2

2022-04-18 Thread Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo
Control: tags 999034 + patch Control: tags 999034 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for squidtaild (versioned as 2.1a6-6.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/22. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru squidtaild-2.1a6/debian/changelog squidtaild-2.1a6

Processed: squidtaild: diff for NMU version 2.1a6-6.2

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 999034 + patch Bug #999034 [src:squidtaild] squidtaild: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) patch. > tags 999034 + pending Bug #999034 [src:squidtaild] squidtaild: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch an

Bug#1009769: libhoel1.4: ABI break: h_exec_query_sqlite was dropped

2022-04-18 Thread Nicolas Mora
He Andreas, thanks for the feedback! Le 2022-04-17 à 10 h 42, Andreas Metzler a écrit : Yes, a rebuild will get a binary which works against the new library, however (partial) upgrades from bookworm won't work. BTW, the symbol file seems to be wrong: | h_execute_query_sqlite@Base 1.4.15 the sy

Bug#999095: marked as done (clif: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:18:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999095: fixed in clif 0.93-9.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999095, regarding clif: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#965462: marked as done (clif: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:18:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965462: fixed in clif 0.93-9.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965462, regarding clif: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Processed: xvier: diff for NMU version 1.0-7.7

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 999018 + patch Bug #999018 [src:xvier] xvier: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) patch. > tags 999018 + pending Bug #999018 [src:xvier] xvier: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Add

Processed: info2www: diff for NMU version 1.2.2.9-24.2

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 965595 + patch Bug #965595 [src:info2www] info2www: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm Added tag(s) patch. > tags 965595 + pending Bug #965595 [src:info2www] info2www: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm Added tag(s)

Bug#999018: xvier: diff for NMU version 1.0-7.7

2022-04-18 Thread Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo
Control: tags 999018 + patch Control: tags 999018 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for xvier (versioned as 1.0-7.7) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u xvier-1.0/debian/changelog xvier-1.0/debian/changelog --- xv

Bug#965595: info2www: diff for NMU version 1.2.2.9-24.2

2022-04-18 Thread Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo
Control: tags 965595 + patch Control: tags 965595 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for info2www (versioned as 1.2.2.9-24.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u info2www-1.2.2.9/debian/changelog info2www-1.2.2.9/d

Bug#999015: marked as done (clamassassin: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2022 23:18:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999015: fixed in clamassassin 1.2.4-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999015, regarding clamassassin: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#965468: marked as done (clamassassin: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2022 23:18:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965468: fixed in clamassassin 1.2.4-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965468, regarding clamassassin: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#988716: After the release is before the release

2022-04-18 Thread Geert Stappers
} > Upstream changed paths for the framework manifest files in recent } > releases and did not maintain backward compatibility links resulting } > in 4.3.4 no longer being able to install the frameworks. } } Had a quick look, and it's worse than that. Not just a change in paths, } but an entire ne

Bug#1009054: marked as done (Just crashes)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:52:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009054: fixed in openshot-qt 2.6.1+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009054, regarding Just crashes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#965457: marked as done (choosewm: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965457: fixed in choosewm 0.1.6-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #965457, regarding choosewm: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1009054: marked as pending in openshot-qt

2022-04-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009054 in openshot-qt reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/openshot-qt/-/commit/415288424c643ce0

Processed: Bug#1009054 marked as pending in openshot-qt

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009054 [openshot-qt] Just crashes Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009054: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009054 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#997080: openvdb: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from ./debian/tmp/usr/bin/vdb_view

2022-04-18 Thread Jonathan Rubenstein
This bug is blocking openimageio, which blocks blender. Can this be fixed, is it still not reproducible? Best Regards, Jonathan Rubenstein

Bug#1008818: why is this rpm's fault?

2022-04-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
la...@debian.org dixit: >On my bullseye machine sudo rpm -qa creates the subdirectory in >/root/.rpmdb as root. So IMO this works correct. Not with !env_reset in sudoers, though :( as I wrote in the last mail. bye, //mirabilos -- Gestern Nacht ist mein IRC-Netzwerk explodiert. Ich hatte nicht d

Bug#1009836: python3-pylsp-flake8: give upstream source in the d/copyright file

2022-04-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-pylsp-flake8 Version: 0.4.0-2 Severity: serious The debian/copyright file for this package currently does not state the location of the upstream sources. (Marked "serious" because this is a violation of Policy section 12.5.) I'm happy to fix this myself if you would like me to.

Processed: found 1009415 in 0.5.3+ds-1

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1009415 0.5.3+ds-1 Bug #1009415 [src:gemmi] gemmi: FTBFS with tao-pegtl v3 Marked as found in versions gemmi/0.5.3+ds-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1009415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Processed: src:connectagram: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.3.1-1 Bug #1009833 [src:connectagram] src:connectagram: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x Marked as fixed in versions connectagram/1.3.1-1. Bug #1009833 [src:connectagram] src:connectagram: fails to migr

Bug#1009833: src:connectagram: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x

2022-04-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: connectagram Version: 1.2.11-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.3.1-1 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 day

Processed: src:tanglet: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.6.1.1-1 Bug #1009832 [src:tanglet] src:tanglet: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x Marked as fixed in versions tanglet/1.6.1.1-1. Bug #1009832 [src:tanglet] src:tanglet: fails to migrate to testing for to

Bug#1009832: src:tanglet: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x

2022-04-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: tanglet Version: 1.5.6-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.6.1.1-1 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as

Bug#1009389: confirming and repair attempt

2022-04-18 Thread Geert Stappers
Hi, The FTBFS is reproducable `debuild -uc -us`. Below is a screenshot of my repair attempt. 8<--8<--8<--8<-- stappers@myhost:~/src/lirc $ cd python-pkg/tests/ stappers@myhost:~/src/lirc/python-pkg/tests $ python3 -m unittest discover && rm backend.log E ==

Processed: src:tetzle: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 2.2.0-1 Bug #1009831 [src:tetzle] src:tetzle: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x Marked as fixed in versions tetzle/2.2.0-1. Bug #1009831 [src:tetzle] src:tetzle: fails to migrate to testing for too long:

Bug#1009831: src:tetzle: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build dependency not available on s390x

2022-04-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: tetzle Version: 2.1.6-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.2.0-1 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as ha

Processed: src:uncalled: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build-dependency doesn't migrate

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 2.2+ds1-1 Bug #1009830 [src:uncalled] src:uncalled: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build-dependency doesn't migrate Marked as fixed in versions uncalled/2.2+ds1-1. Bug #1009830 [src:uncalled] src:uncalled: fails to migrate to testing for too

Bug#1009830: src:uncalled: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build-dependency doesn't migrate

2022-04-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: uncalled Version: 2.2+ds-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.2+ds1-1 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days

Processed: Re: Bug#1008189: meson: gnome module incorrectly requires gtk4-update-icon-cache

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1008189 src:ghex Bug #1008189 [src:meson] meson: gnome module incorrectly requires gtk4-update-icon-cache Added indication that 1008189 affects src:ghex > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#1009828: hfst: impossible depends on armel and mipsel

2022-04-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Package: hfst Version: 3.16.0-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org hfst is currently not able to migrate due to dependency issues on armel and mipsel: Issues preventing migration: ∙ ∙ Impossible Depends: hfst -> libfst8/1.6.3-2/armel ∙ ∙ Impossible Depends: hfst -> libfst8/1.6.3

Bug#999620: pktanon: autopkgtest regression on armhf

2022-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 07:46:34PM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi, > > > Do you think we should wait for this to be fixed? As I said before I (just > > > from my practical point of view) would be in favor of just removing the > > > problematic architectures. > > I have no opinion on this. B

Bug#1008818: why is this rpm's fault?

2022-04-18 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 06:32:07PM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:16:18 +0300, Peter Pentchev > > said: > > > > If you run sudo without the "set_home" option, thus making it preserve > > the HOME environment variable, rpm run as root with HOME set to >

Bug#1009359: New security upgrade prevent Chromium from starting

2022-04-18 Thread Andres Salomon
Hm, good question. What I'd start doing is looking at the ~/.cache/chromium and ~/.config/chromium snapshots, making copies, and then trying to run chromium with random stuff deleted. For example, on my system I have ~/.cache/chromium/Profile 1/old_Cache_000 and ~/.cache/chromium/System Profi

Processed: [bts-link] source package lxqt-build-tools

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package lxqt-build-tools > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.or

Bug#999620: pktanon: autopkgtest regression on armhf

2022-04-18 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi, Do you think we should wait for this to be fixed? As I said before I (just from my practical point of view) would be in favor of just removing the problematic architectures. I have no opinion on this. But if you want the package to be releasable, you will need to change it so that it is n

Bug#1009823: halide: FTBFS on arm64

2022-04-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: halide Version: 14.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) halide FTBFS on arm64: 317/569 Test #317: correctness_strided_load ... Passed1.12 sec Start 318: correctness

Bug#1009822: gnss-sdr: autopkgtest regression

2022-04-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: gnss-sdr Version: 0.0.16-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm gnss-sdr's autopkgtest fail with gr-osmosdr 0.2.3-6 autopkgtest [14:10:33]: test testgnsssdr: [--- terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error' what(): rpcmanager: Aggregator not

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:r-bioc-biostrings

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:r-bioc-biostrings > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debi

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:libpdf-builder-perl

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:libpdf-builder-perl > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.de

Bug#1009820: snort: Privilege escalation due to insecure use of logrotate

2022-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Hotwagner
Package: snort Version: 2.9.15.1-5 Severity: critical Tags: security upstream Justification: root security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: sec-advis...@ait.ac.at Dear Maintainer, The path of the logdirectory of snort can be manipulated by user Snort in Debian Bullseye: # ls -ld /var/log/snort/ drwxr-s--- 3

Processed: lower severity

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 981680 important Bug #981680 [src:golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite] golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite FTBFS: test failures Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Bug#981680: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathias Gibbens ) (Bug#981680: fixed in golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite 1.10.1-1)

2022-04-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
Control: severtiy -1 important On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:43:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:21:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >... > > golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite (1.10.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium > >... > >* Add patches

Bug#1008832: freeradius-python3: Module not linked with libpython when built with Python 3.10

2022-04-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 patch On 2022-04-02 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: freeradius-python3 > Version: 3.0.25+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Forwarded: https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/issues/4441 > Package: freeradius-python3 > Version: 3.0.25+dfsg-1+b1 > Depends: freeradius (= 3.0.25+df

Processed: Re: Bug#1008832: freeradius-python3: Module not linked with libpython when built with Python 3.10

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1008832 [freeradius-python3] freeradius-python3: Module not linked with libpython when built with Python 3.10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 1008832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008832 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs

Processed: d52: diff for NMU version 3.4.1-1.2

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 965480 + patch Bug #965480 [src:d52] d52: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm Added tag(s) patch. > tags 965480 + pending Bug #965480 [src:d52] d52: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm Added tag(s) pending. -- 965480

Bug#965480: d52: diff for NMU version 3.4.1-1.2

2022-04-18 Thread guilherme.lnx
Control: tags 965480 + patch Control: tags 965480 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for d52 (versioned as 3.4.1-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u d52-3.4.1/debian/changelog d52-3.4.1/debian/changelog --- d5

Bug#1008818: why is this rpm's fault?

2022-04-18 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:16:18 +0300, Peter Pentchev > said: > If you run sudo without the "set_home" option, thus making it preserve > the HOME environment variable, rpm run as root with HOME set to > /home/something will indeed do the wrong thing. I have no set_home entry

Processed: Re: Bug#997767: open-ath9k-htc-firmware: FTBFS: patching fails

2022-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notforwarded -1 Bug #997767 [src:open-ath9k-htc-firmware] open-ath9k-htc-firmware: FTBFS: patching fails Unset Bug forwarded-to-address > tags -1 - pending Bug #997767 [src:open-ath9k-htc-firmware] open-ath9k-htc-firmware: FTBFS: patching fails Removed tag(s) pendi

  1   2   >