Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:19:24 +0000
with message-id <e1nghcu-0006qt...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1009486: fixed in node-isarray 2.0.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009486,
regarding node-isarray: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (66.66%) does not 
meet global threshold (100%)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1009486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009486
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-isarray
Version: 2.0.5-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
>  debian/rules build
> dh build
>    dh_update_autotools_config
>    dh_autoreconf
>    dh_auto_configure --buildsystem=nodejs
>    dh_auto_build --buildsystem=nodejs
> No build command found, searching known files
>    dh_auto_test --buildsystem=nodejs
>       mkdir -p node_modules
>       ln -s ../. node_modules/isarray
>       /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test
> + tap -R spec
> 
> test.js
> 
>   ✓ should be truthy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be truthy
> 
>   ✓ should be truthy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be falsy
> 
>   ✓ should be truthy
> 
>   28 passing (729.08ms)
> ERROR: Coverage for lines (66.66%) does not meet global threshold (100%)
> ERROR: Coverage for functions (0%) does not meet global threshold (100%)
> ERROR: Coverage for branches (50%) does not meet global threshold (100%)
> ERROR: Coverage for statements (66.66%) does not meet global threshold (100%)
> ----------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
> File      | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
> ----------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
> All files |   66.66 |       50 |       0 |   66.66 |                   
>  index.js |   66.66 |       50 |       0 |   66.66 | 4                 
> ----------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
> dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/04/12/node-isarray_2.0.5-3_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220412;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220412&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-isarray
Source-Version: 2.0.5-4
Done: Yadd <y...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node-isarray, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1009...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yadd <y...@debian.org> (supplier of updated node-isarray package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:08:21 +0200
Source: node-isarray
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 
<pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Yadd <y...@debian.org>
Closes: 1009486
Changes:
 node-isarray (2.0.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Add "Rules-Requires-Root: no"
   * Fix test for tap >= 15 (--no-cov) (Closes: #1009486)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 04979121890eb31a815f19b1bcc90b53d87a340a 2061 node-isarray_2.0.5-4.dsc
 c7f683f1fa414b2a543e97198561e9a0b028f8fe 2888 
node-isarray_2.0.5-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 96beaa31f27bad0aa755cc4b6425947d85f817c0b8f97be4da0dbe7067677b58 2061 
node-isarray_2.0.5-4.dsc
 f8e73d10bf47341f32f25f1c66a4250999b48e4eef1422c1b896c3f4227d978f 2888 
node-isarray_2.0.5-4.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 0da42991a1decce28f10ef43bb7bdf99 2061 javascript optional 
node-isarray_2.0.5-4.dsc
 a31a684b0c810b6b2bef9b2e875c3524 2888 javascript optional 
node-isarray_2.0.5-4.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEAN/li4tVV3nRAF7J9tdMp8mZ7ukFAmJeUhkACgkQ9tdMp8mZ
7ulEkg//cCkraef+F79vrP2RmOo5LRLjJcomcq4NON5PaRma9CiNzEftVkNf4pDZ
BDlM0vEta8GTExsfNmj+m5CbUQB9u9mk+dd23jEb15mSxVmDQuZ9WCbgPM2L5oaw
sBrgqxtqHDGPFRdQrUUWltG5dd2wp6jSD4z6GNPHLUZ0+5qo6pU0ycFdovZyCPMi
1xhJIgQFMeDYmPJ0LZLfKZvsUoyzn4yHYp6n/8IaPcM+4Vklh9liEbabAWqqxrG3
M/XaYyph/NnhH02XG69DOJ7BLZnj5ld/IDDiISS7dwErCWEPQcSiK/9VIQ/kVRzk
Z0+w2O10Gs/JlPLdutMzchGZKrPfqu8v6S1OX0kJAJwn3vUrdoZN6iCJTVXWj5Pm
ADAHbQ9bYtdt4M9Sh4rgOcEnrfRG4jaR7XfyxNoVMJo/Oyx9xn/96bCPvBHCcNL3
sVY3aGvNqPWZ1irRpMW6YgTz3RvKEeEedsKfi2kFdC3vtkj1XIxlijb4GTzZ04RH
IGu37Acbcu+Noem9HV+2t8y/7TsKJpLZyc7Kurz3MXcBaVFvgCWUhjf/2V7qovAs
qC9k3nrQv75C2q/g05JhgGbtjJQDjeGl/BdtLJ5/CcZP7sEReKYC4WTGQ8pqnjkK
ATA8NngOIywcCdQDY0qAuA+dYFmRec3jbmDu+DZbKdfBYp36L+g=
=2AcM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to