Bug#978261: marked as done (swiglpk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 07:49:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#978261: fixed in swiglpk 4.65.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #978261, regarding swiglpk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 to be marke

Bug#978261: swiglpk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:43:00PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream > > ... > Attached are the relevant parts from the upstream fix. Thanks. Uploaded. > After that, it is worth trying whether this fixed python-cobra. Python-cobra builds nicely now. Unfortunate

Bug#982155: Found the regression

Hi Thomas, Apparently Luca Boccassi has merged that, and a new release live-boot 1:20210208 was released by Raphaël Hertzog: https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/l/live-boot/live-boot_20210208_changelog Steven On 2021/2/8 下午 06:53, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi Steven, Thanks

Bug#981231: marked as done (gdisk: autopkgtest regression)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 06:04:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981231: fixed in gdisk 1.0.6-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #981231, regarding gdisk: autopkgtest regression to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#982273: marked as done (libbsd0-udeb: depends on libmd0)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 05:48:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982273: fixed in libbsd 0.11.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #982273, regarding libbsd0-udeb: depends on libmd0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: Re: Bug#981804: yubioath-desktop: fails to read yubikey

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 981804 -1 Bug #981804 [yubioath-desktop] yubioath-desktop: fails to read yubikey Bug 981804 cloned as bug 982348 > reassign -1 yubikey-manager Bug #982348 [yubioath-desktop] yubioath-desktop: fails to read yubikey Bug reassigned from package

Bug#981804: yubioath-desktop: fails to read yubikey

clone 981804 -1 reassign -1 yubikey-manager retitle -1 breaks unrelated software and is alpha version severity -1 serious thanks Hi nicoo, that looks now really bad considering that - you packaged an alpha version of yubikey-manager - the alpha version transitioned to testing - yubioauth-desktop

Bug#982323: marked as done (pcp-export-pcp2{graphite,influxdb}: missing Breaks+Replaces: pcp (<< 5.2.5))

Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:03:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982323: fixed in pcp 5.2.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #982323, regarding pcp-export-pcp2{graphite,influxdb}: missing Breaks+Replaces: pcp (<< 5.2.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#982047: marked as done (wordwarvi: invalid Uploaders field: missing comma between Ricardo Mones & Joseph Nahmias)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 02:23:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982047: fixed in wordwarvi 1.0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #982047, regarding wordwarvi: invalid Uploaders field: missing comma between Ricardo Mones & Joseph Nahmias to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: Bug#982334: Acknowledgement (iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10)

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + iptables-netflow-dkms dkms Bug #982334 [dahdi-dkms] iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10 Added indication that 982334 affects iptables-netflow-dkms and dkms -- 982334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982334 Deb

Bug#982334: Acknowledgement (iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10)

Control: affects -1 + iptables-netflow-dkms dkms Hi Andreas, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Control: reassign -1 dahdi-dkms 1:2.11.1.0.20170917~dfsg-7 > > Installing dahdi-dkms seems to break building other dkms kernel modules. Nice find! I was about to argue that it works for me: # find /lib/modu

Bug#982047: wordwarvi

Hi Ricardo, Sorry, been afk for a few days... On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 12:48:45PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > control: tags -1 confirmed > > Hi Joe, > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote: > > > > Indeed, fortuitous timing! He just tagged and closed your issue.Yes, >

Processed: tagging 969072

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 969072 - pending Bug #969072 {Done: Colin Watson } [man-db] man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 969072: https

Processed: found 732408 in 1.3+nmu1, user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 981762, affects 980846 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 732408 1.3+nmu1 Bug #732408 [pv-grub-menu] pv-grub-menu: fails to install in chroot on tmpfs: post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Marked as found in versions pv-grub-menu/1.3+nmu1. > user debian...@lists.debian.org Setting

Bug#969072: dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:56:27AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > I was wondering if there is a way to make it clear that the seccomp filter > has actually blocked something, perhaps by showing a warning. That would > make it easier to debug something like this in the future. Maybe that should > be

Processed: tagging 955858, severity of 955858 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 955858 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug #955858 [gparted] gparted: does not start, 'unable to init server', tmp.mount does not exist Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. > severity 955858 important Bug #955858 [gparted] gparted: does not s

Processed: Re: Bug#969072: dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch pending Bug #969072 {Done: Colin Watson } [man-db] man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc Added tag(s) patch and pending. -- 969072: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969072 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#969072: dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists

Control: tags -1 patch pending Hi Colin, On 2/8/21 11:56 PM, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 07:17:57PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On abel in a armel chroot the issue is reproduced by running:   man -Thtml

Processed: Re: Bug#982334: Acknowledgement (iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10)

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 dahdi-dkms 1:2.11.1.0.20170917~dfsg-7 Bug #982334 [iptables-netflow-dkms] iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10 Bug reassigned from package 'iptables-netflow-dkms' to 'dahdi-dkms'. No longer marked as found in versions iptables-netf

Bug#982334: Acknowledgement (iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10)

Control: reassign -1 dahdi-dkms 1:2.11.1.0.20170917~dfsg-7 Installing dahdi-dkms seems to break building other dkms kernel modules. Andreas

Bug#969072: marked as done (man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:50:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#969072: fixed in man-db 2.9.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #969072, regarding man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#982334: iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10

Package: iptables-netflow-dkms Version: 2.5.1-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to build a kernel module for Linux 5.10: DKMS make.log for ipt-netflow-2.5.1 for kernel 5.10.0-3-amd64 (x86_64) Tue F

Bug#982332: dahdi-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10

Package: dahdi-dkms Version: 1:2.11.1.0.20170917~dfsg-7 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to build a kernel module for Linux 5.10: DKMS make.log for dahdi-DEB_VERSION for kernel 5.

Bug#969072: dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 07:17:57PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >On abel in a armel chroot the issue is reproduced by running: > >  man -Thtml > >even on an empty man page. > > > >Right now you can try: > > > >$

Bug#950761: RFS: ipmitool/1.8.18-11 [RC] -- utility for IPMI control with kernel driver or LAN interface (daemon)

Hi Jorg, I've applied the upstream patches to the current codebase of Ipmitool in Unstable. Please find the attched debdiff. The only place where I had to rework things a little bit was CVE-2020-5208_4-channel-Fix-buffer-overflow.patch where the constant MAX_CIPHER_SUITE_DATA_LEN was not present

Bug#982323: [pcp] Bug#982323: pcp-export-pcp2{graphite,influxdb}: missing Breaks+Replaces: pcp (<< 5.2.5)

Hi Andreas, On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:55 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > [...] > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'testing'. > It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declari

Bug#963392: marked as done (r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS: error: (converted from warning) TBB library not found.)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:35:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963392: fixed in r-cran-rstanarm 2.21.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #963392, regarding r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS: error: (converted from warning) TBB library not found. to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#957382: marked as done (jackeq: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:39:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982218: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #957382, regarding jackeq: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#967196: marked as done (plotdrop: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:37:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982110: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #967196, regarding plotdrop: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#932533: marked as done (gtkperf: Uses manual dh sequence operations that are going to be removed)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #932533, regarding gtkperf: Uses manual dh sequence operations that are going to be removed to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#979641: marked as done (src:kboot-utils: invalid maintainer address)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981795: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979641, regarding src:kboot-utils: invalid maintainer address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#978519: marked as done (openjdk-8: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-9))

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #978519, regarding openjdk-8: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-9) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#929650: marked as done (openjdk-8 is staying in unstable)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #929650, regarding openjdk-8 is staying in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#982059: manpages-de,psmisc: File conflict between psmisc and manpages-de: '/usr/share/man/de/man1/fuser.1.gz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, The first problem I can see is you haven't pushed the git tags. Salsa doesn't know about the 4.9.1 update[1] git push --tags should do it So it fails to build for me here $ gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder gbp:info: Building with (cowbuilder) f

Bug#979222: marked as done (src:geronimo-ejb-3.0-spec: invalid maintainer address)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981497: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979222, regarding src:geronimo-ejb-3.0-spec: invalid maintainer address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#966739: marked as done (gettext-lint: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981214: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #943098, regarding gettext-lint: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#943098: marked as done (gettext-lint: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981214: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #943098, regarding gettext-lint: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#978254: marked as done (pyaff4: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:30:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981108: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #978254, regarding pyaff4: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 to be

Bug#975787: marked as done (golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify: Frequent FTBFS due to flaky test)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:30:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980966: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #975787, regarding golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify: Frequent FTBFS due to flaky test to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#979174: marked as done (node-express-generator: Incompatible with current node-commander and node-mkdirp)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:29:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980805: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979174, regarding node-express-generator: Incompatible with current node-commander and node-mkdirp to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#980685: marked as done (seqan: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j4 test ARGS\+=-j4 returned exit code 2)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:29:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980798: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #980685, regarding seqan: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j4 test ARGS\+=-j4 returned exit code 2 to be ma

Bug#980096: marked as done (Remove this package from Debian)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:27:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980343: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #980096, regarding Remove this package from Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#979415: marked as done (dkimproxy: file conflict with libmsdw-smtp-perl)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:28:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980718: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979415, regarding dkimproxy: file conflict with libmsdw-smtp-perl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#971296: marked as done (rekall: Switch to python3-pycryptodome)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:27:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980059: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #971296, regarding rekall: Switch to python3-pycryptodome to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#966772: marked as done (pycmail: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:28:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980492: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #945727, regarding pycmail: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#945727: marked as done (pycmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:28:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980492: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #945727, regarding pycmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#943133: marked as done (ntlmaps: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:28:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980519: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #943133, regarding ntlmaps: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#934903: marked as done (Please switch to Python 3 or remove the package from Sid/Bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:28:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980492: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #934903, regarding Please switch to Python 3 or remove the package from Sid/Bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#979381: marked as done (Useless in Debian)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:25:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979832: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979381, regarding Useless in Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#981678: marked as done (node-babel-preset-env: Depends: node-babel-plugin-syntax-trailing-function-commas (>= 6.22.0) but it is not installable)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:22:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979457: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #981678, regarding node-babel-preset-env: Depends: node-babel-plugin-syntax-trailing-function-commas (>= 6.22.0) but it is not install

Bug#979156: marked as done (Useless in Debian)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:24:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979829: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979156, regarding Useless in Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#979334: marked as done (Useless in Debian)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:23:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979667: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979334, regarding Useless in Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#979219: marked as done (src:moblin-cursor-theme: invalid maintainer address)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:21:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979449: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979219, regarding src:moblin-cursor-theme: invalid maintainer address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#972127: marked as done (golang-gosqlite-dev: Please remove support for long-unmaintained sqlite 2)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:20:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979390: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #972127, regarding golang-gosqlite-dev: Please remove support for long-unmaintained sqlite 2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#965110: marked as done (oca-core: autopkgtests fails with newer python-werkzeug)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:22:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979556: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965110, regarding oca-core: autopkgtests fails with newer python-werkzeug to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#939506: marked as done (unanimity ftbfs in unstable)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:20:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979253: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #939506, regarding unanimity ftbfs in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#966798: marked as done (unanimity: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:20:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979253: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #938751, regarding unanimity: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#938751: marked as done (unanimity: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:20:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979253: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #938751, regarding unanimity: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#907761: marked as done (etcd-fs: FTBFS in buster/sid (cannot use file (type *etcdFile) as type nodefs.File in return argument))

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:23:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #907761, regarding etcd-fs: FTBFS in buster/sid (cannot use file (type *etcdFile) as type nodefs.File in return argument) to be marked

Bug#981524: marked as done (mrd6 - do not ship with bullseye?)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:19:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#970261: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #981524, regarding mrd6 - do not ship with bullseye? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processed: retitle 969072 to man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 969072 man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc Bug #969072 [man-db] dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists Changed Bug title to 'man: secco

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#969072: dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 969072 man-db Bug #969072 [groff] dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists Bug reassigned from package 'groff' to 'man-db'. No longer marked as found in versions

Processed: gnokii: diff for NMU version 0.6.30+dfsg-1.3

Processing control commands: > tags 978371 + patch Bug #978371 [src:gnokii] gnokii: FTBFS: configure.in:74: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_LANGINFO_CODESET (caused by gettext 0.19 -> 0.21?) Added tag(s) patch. > tags 978371 + pending Bug #978371 [src:gnokii] gnokii: FTBFS: configure.in:74: e

Bug#978371: gnokii: diff for NMU version 0.6.30+dfsg-1.3

Control: tags 978371 + patch Control: tags 978371 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gnokii (versioned as 0.6.30+dfsg-1.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru gnokii-0.6.30+dfsg/debian/changelog gnokii-0.6.30+df

Processed: Re: Bug#978261: swiglpk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch fixed-upstream Bug #978261 [src:swiglpk] swiglpk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) patch and fixed-upstream. -- 978261: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#982059: manpages-de,psmisc: File conflict between psmisc and manpages-de: '/usr/share/man/de/man1/fuser.1.gz

Hello Craig, I updated the packge but now this gdb-thingy (sorry) is on strike and I have now idea why: helge@samd:/tmp/debian-manpages-l10n$ LC=ALL=C gbp buildpackage gbp:info: Performing the build dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui -i -I dpkg-buildpackage: Information: Quellpaket manpages-l10n … d

Bug#978261: swiglpk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 10:45:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: swiglpk > Version: 4.65.0-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye >... > >

Bug#982059: manpages-de,psmisc: File conflict between psmisc and manpages-de: '/usr/share/man/de/man1/fuser.1.gz

Hello Craig, On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:54:54AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 05:16, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Craig Small wrote: > > > I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from > > > psmisc and manpage

Bug#982320: marked as done (elektroid: overly generic header name: /usr/include/utils.h)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:33:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982320: fixed in elektroid 1.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #982320, regarding elektroid: overly generic header name: /usr/include/utils.h to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#955663: marked as done (pangox-compat: FTBFS: pangox.c:282:13: error: ‘PangoFontClass’ {aka ‘struct _PangoFontClass’} has no member named ‘find_shaper’)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:34:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#955663: fixed in pangox-compat 0.0.2-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #955663, regarding pangox-compat: FTBFS: pangox.c:282:13: error: ‘PangoFontClass’ {aka ‘struct _PangoFontClass’} has no member named ‘f

Processed: tagging 978257

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 978257 - fixed-upstream Bug #978257 [src:pynwb] pynwb: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Processed: autobahn-cpp: diff for NMU version 17.5.1+git7cc5d37-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 978201 + patch Bug #978201 [src:autobahn-cpp] autobahn-cpp: FTBFS: wamp_websocketpp_websocket_transport.ipp:55:113: error: ‘::_1’ has not been declared Added tag(s) patch. > tags 978201 + pending Bug #978201 [src:autobahn-cpp] autobahn-cpp: FTBFS: wamp_websoc

Bug#978201: autobahn-cpp: diff for NMU version 17.5.1+git7cc5d37-2.1

Control: tags 978201 + patch Control: tags 978201 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for autobahn-cpp (versioned as 17.5.1+git7cc5d37-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru autobahn-cpp-17.5.1+git7cc5d37/debian/cha

Processed: (Build-) depends on pangox-compat which FTBFS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # 955663: pangox-compat: FTBFS: error: ‘PangoFontClass’ {aka ‘struct > # _PangoFontClass’} has no member named ‘find_shaper’ > # > # There's a patch, but we'll want to remove it after the release of > # bullseye > severity 947649 serious Bug #947

Bug#982323: pcp-export-pcp2{graphite,influxdb}: missing Breaks+Replaces: pcp (<< 5.2.5)

Package: pcp-export-pcp2graphite,pcp-export-pcp2influxdb Version: 5.2.5-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails b

Bug#982059: manpages-de,psmisc: File conflict between psmisc and manpages-de: '/usr/share/man/de/man1/fuser.1.gz

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 05:16, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Craig Small wrote: > > I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from > > psmisc and manpages-de there. > > > > Breaks: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1), psmisc (<< 23.4-2) > > Repla

Bug#982321: libcdparanoia-dev: overly generic header name: /usr/include/utils.h

Package: libcdparanoia-dev Version: 3.10.2+debian-13 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package uses a very generic header file name that now clashes with other packages: /usr/include/utils.h A

Bug#982320: elektroid: overly generic header name: /usr/include/utils.h

Package: elektroid Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package uses a very generic header file name that now clashes with other packages: /usr/include/utils.h Andreas

Processed: raise severity

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #979491 {Done: Andreas Henriksson } [python3-stdeb] xmlrpclib.Fault: Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 979491: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Bug#982316: Errors in config file from package yubikey-ksm (apache.conf)

Package: yubikey-ksm Version: 1.15-6 Severity: Grave Hello, There are 2 bad lines in /etc/yubico/ksm/apache.conf for this packet available for Debian Stretch : 1- you have to replace by at line 10; 2- you have to replace by at the last line. Without these modifications : - Apache2 will c

Bug#982281: marked as done (gets source package name wrong)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 18:35:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#982281: fixed in reportbug 7.10.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #982281, regarding gets source package name wrong to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#952016: marked as done (ruby-graffiti: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed.)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 18:35:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#952016: fixed in ruby-graffiti 2.3.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #952016, regarding ruby-graffiti: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#969072: dahdi-tools FTBFS on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc: pre-grohtml: fatal error: cannot create temporary file: File exists

reassign -1 man-db retite -1 man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc Hi, On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >Hi, >On abel in a armel chroot the issue is reproduced by running: >  man -Thtml >even on an empty man page. > >Right

Bug#982059: manpages-de,psmisc: File conflict between psmisc and manpages-de: '/usr/share/man/de/man1/fuser.1.gz

Hello Craig, On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Craig Small wrote: > I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from > psmisc and manpages-de there. > > Breaks: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1), psmisc (<< 23.4-2) > Replaces: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1) This is correct, it als

Bug#982273: libbsd0-udeb: depends on libmd0

Cyril Brulebois, le lun. 08 févr. 2021 16:16:17 +0100, a ecrit: > Guillem Jover (2021-02-08): > > I've uploaded it now, once it hits NEW I'll poke ftp-masters. The git > > and source+binary packages at: > > > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#977611: apt-cacher-ng: Daily cron job frequently hangs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 977611 3.6-1 Bug #977611 [apt-cacher-ng] apt-cacher-ng: Daily cron job frequently hangs Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #977611 to the same values previously set > forcemerge 977611 980923 Bug #977611 [apt-cacher-ng] apt-

Processed: Re: [apt-cacher-ng] bad exit code (=0) instead (<>0) if Check permissions of /var/log/apt-cacher-ng

Processing control commands: > severity 973883 normal Bug #973883 [apt-cacher-ng] [apt-cacher-ng] bad exit code (=0) instead (<>0) if Check permissions of /var/log/apt-cacher-ng Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' -- 973883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973883 Debian Bug

Bug#973883: [apt-cacher-ng] bad exit code (=0) instead (<>0) if Check permissions of /var/log/apt-cacher-ng

Control: severity 973883 normal Hallo, * Jean-Marc LACROIX [Fri, Nov 06 2020, 03:46:53PM]: > Package: apt-cacher-ng > Version: 3.2.1-1 > Severity: grave > > Dear maintainers, > > It seems there is one bad exit code issue (=0) when trying to start démon if > internal check is bad. (/etc/init.d/apt-

Bug#982281: marked as pending in reportbug

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #982281 in reportbug reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/reportbug-team/reportbug/-/commit/abc8f6cface18081a44da7

Processed: Bug#982281 marked as pending in reportbug

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #982281 [reportbug] gets source package name wrong Added tag(s) pending. -- 982281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982281 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#980923: acngtools eats all the CPU and doesn’t finish daily cron with merged pdiffs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 980923 3.6-1 Bug #980923 [apt-cacher-ng] acngtools eats all the CPU and doesn’t finish daily cron with merged pdiffs Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #980923 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:libsass-python

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:libsass-python > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.

Bug#980923: acngtools eats all the CPU and doesn’t finish daily cron with merged pdiffs

notfound 980923 3.6-1 thanks Hallo, * Eduard Bloch [Sun, Jan 31 2021, 11:30:07PM]: > > > Interesting. Please throw gcore at it and send me a copy of that dump > > > > Uploaded at , thanks > > for looking into it. > > Ok, thank you. I think I can

Bug#976354: git - tests fail with dash

Hi Bastian, On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:14:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: git > Version: 1:2.29.2-1 > Severity: serious > > Some of the tests fail with dash, which is the default /bin/sh in > Debian. Why did you file this bug as serious? As noted in #972457, the build seems to succee

Processed: Re: FTBFS - not ok 3 - progress display breaks long lines #1

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #972457 [git] FTBFS - not ok 3 - progress display breaks long lines #1 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible Bug #972457 [git] FTBFS - not ok 3 - progress display breaks long lines #1 Removed tag(s) m

Bug#972457: FTBFS - not ok 3 - progress display breaks long lines #1

Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible Hi Bastian, On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:12:14AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > I tried a rebuild of git 1:2.28.0-1, 1:2.29.2-1 and 1:2.30.0-1 in an > > unsta

Bug#981870: marked as done (FTBFS: Doesn't build against ruby-nokogiri 1.11.1)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:19:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981870: fixed in ruby-azure-storage-common 2.0.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #981870, regarding FTBFS: Doesn't build against ruby-nokogiri 1.11.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#965181: fix available

A fix has been pushed to the Salsa repository and is awaiting for review & upload. Cheers! -- Aloïs Micard (creekorful) GPG: DA4A A436 9BFA E299 67CD E85B F733 E871 0859 FCD2

Processed: assign myself bugs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 965181 ! Bug #965181 [src:goval-dictionary] goval-dictionary: B-D on removed golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go-v3-dev Owner recorded as Aloïs Micard . > tag 965181 pending Bug #965181 [src:goval-dictionary] goval-dictionary: B-D on removed go

Bug#982281: reportbug gets source package name wrong

Hi, (Disclaimer: I am not a pythonista, but a libapt c++ dev) (Disclaimer 2: Changed to cloned bugreport 982281 as its the one against reportbug, even if the request message didn't end up there so as not to derail the udeb thread further. Subject changed accordingly.) On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at

  1   2   >