Hello!
Thanks!
Bullseye is meant to ship with 10.5 and 10.3 should be removed once
10.5 has been in Debian testing for a while (currently still in Debian
unstable due to debci false positive).
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:09:57PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
> Given that there's been no upstream reaction for almost a year, let's
> remove?
Agreed, Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #972749 [xen-tools] xen-tools: bullseye: /updates -> -security
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
972749: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Pabs,
Paul Wise wrote:
> With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are
> provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bullseye/updates.
Indeed, thanks for making me aware that this needs also to change at
that point.
> The above hook sc
Hi Jim,
Re:
> The patches that I posted above are from that aur page. Unfortunately, I do
> not
know how to test them.
>From my limited knowledge and digging into some package files, the
>nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms package would need to be rebuilt to include
>the .patch file from AUR and
Package: xen-tools
Version: 4.8-1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/share/xen-tools/debian.d/20-setup-apt
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bullseye-security
With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are
provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bullseye/updat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-de...@lists.debian.org (was p...@debian.org).
> usertags 931519 + buster-security
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: buster-security.
> severity 931519 serious
Bug #931519 [wajig
cross-posting to:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966273
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510368
stbuehler wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966273
> Is there any reason to keep FAM around any longer in your opinion,
> given upstream is
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.80.0
Severity: serious
File: /usr/share/sbuild/create-chroot
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bullseye-security
With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are
provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bullseye/updates.
The abov
Source: mariadb-10.3
Version: 1:10.3.24-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 1:10.3.23-0+deb10u1
Control: fixed -1 1:10.3.25-0+deb10u1
Hi,
This is to track CVE-2020-15180. The issue is
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1:10.3.23-0+deb10u1
Bug #972746 [src:mariadb-10.3] mariadb-10.3: CVE-2020-15180
Marked as found in versions mariadb-10.3/1:10.3.23-0+deb10u1.
> fixed -1 1:10.3.25-0+deb10u1
Bug #972746 [src:mariadb-10.3] mariadb-10.3: CVE-2020-15180
Marked as fixed in versio
Package: openstack-tempest-ci
Version: 0.30
Severity: serious
File: /usr/sbin/build-openstack-debian-image
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bullseye-security
With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are
provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bullseye
Package: openstack-debian-images
Version: 1.47
Severity: serious
File: /usr/sbin/build-openstack-debian-image
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bullseye-security
With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are
provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bulls
Source: python-latexcodec
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.9
Dear Maintainer,
I think an upstream update will fix this.
Cheers,
mwh
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bull
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 972722 https://github.com/heynemann/pyvows/issues/136
Bug #972722 [src:pyvows] pyvows: ftbfs with python 3.9
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/heynemann/pyvows/issues/136'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Source: python-asttokens
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.9
Dear Maintainer,
Like so:
= test session starts ==
platform
Source: python-httpretty
Version: 0.9.5-7
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Dear Maintainer,
Now that python 3.9 is a supported version, the tests fail with:
==
ERROR: fakesock.sock
Source: pyvows
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.9
Dear Maintainer,
Now that python 3.9 is a supported version in unstable the build fails
in the following slightly alarming way:
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970611: fixed in barrier 2.3.3+dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #970611,
regarding src:barrier: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on
mips*el
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Source: rocr-runtime
Version: 3.3.0-1~exp1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
rocr-runtime cannot be built automatically because it lacks a
build-dependency on cmake:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rocr-runtime&suite=experimental
Andreas
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:28:53 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: barrier
> Version: 2.3.2+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers pack
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:33:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948706: fixed in greylistd 0.9.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #948706,
regarding greylistd: python3 version fails to start - conversion from python2
very broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 970878 ghostscript/9.53.1~dfsg-2
Bug #970878 [src:ghostscript] ghostscript breaks doc-rfc autopkgtest:
segmentation fault
Marked as found in versions ghostscript/9.53.1~dfsg-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 970878 src:ghostscript
Bug #970878 [src:ghostscript, src:doc-rfc] ghostscript breaks doc-rfc
autopkgtest: segmentation fault
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ghostscript, src:doc-rfc' to 'src:ghostscript'.
No longer marked as found in ve
On 2020-10-10 13:34:16, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> tried to have a look at this one, found the segfault [1],
> and can point to the place where the pointer gets overwritten [2].
> Unfortunately Valgrind or ASAN gave me not more details.
Thanks for this information. To me, this
Processing control commands:
> tags 957200 + patch
Bug #957200 [src:fdutils] fdutils: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 957200 + pending
Bug #957200 [src:fdutils] fdutils: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957200
Debia
Control: tags 957200 + patch
Control: tags 957200 + pending
--
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fdutils (versioned as 5.5-20060227-8.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru fdutils-5.5-20060227/debian/changelog
fdu
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #972703 [gnome-boxes] gnome-boxes does not start, undefined symbol
libusb_set_option
Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
972703: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972703
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 19:14:54 +0100, David Miguel Susano Pinto wrote:
> gnome-boxes does not start. Trying from command line, issues this error:
>
> $ gnome-boxes
> gnome-boxes: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libusbredirhos
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:49:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971918: fixed in pydantic 1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #971918,
regarding pydantic ftbfs with python3-defaults (python3.9) from experimental
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:48:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970810: fixed in dh-virtualenv 1.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #970810,
regarding python3-venv is gone
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hi Sven,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 09:44:14AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: getmail6
> Version: 6.7-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Your package ships /usr/bin/getmail and various other files owned by the
> getmail package, here is a complete list:
>
> A Conflicts with getmail would solve that,
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:46:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972653: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936146,
regarding archivemail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:45:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972320: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957543,
regarding mkl-dnn: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:46:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972653: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936146,
regarding archivemail: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Package: gnome-boxes
Version: 3.30.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
gnome-boxes does not start. Trying from command line, issues this error:
$ gnome-boxes
gnome-boxes: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libusbredirhost.so.1: unde
Package: ruby-bundler
Version: 2.2.0~rc.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
8<8<8<-
$ cat Gemfile
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'ffi'
$ bundle --local
Could not find gem 'ffi' in any of the gem sources listed
Source: nanoc
Version: 4.11.14-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nanoc&arch=all&ver=4.11.14-3&stamp=1602601516&raw=0
...
Failures:
1) Nanoc::Live::Commands::Live watches
Failure/Error: sleep_until { File.file?('output/lol.html') }
Runtime
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:48:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957436: fixed in libfm-qt 0.14.1-12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957436,
regarding libfm-qt: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:48:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970782: fixed in ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails
3.3.4+dfsg+REALLY.3.3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #970782,
regarding ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails: 3.3.4 version is broken, downgrade to
3.3.3
to be marked
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 961968 -1 -2 -3
Bug #961968 [phpunit-code-unit] Useless in Bullseye
Bug 961968 cloned as bugs 972697-972699
> reassign -1 phpunit-cli-parser
Bug #972697 [phpunit-code-unit] Useless in Bullseye
Bug reassigned from package 'phpunit-code-unit'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 970782 3.3.4+dfsg+really3.3.3-1
Bug #970782 [node-bootstrap-switch] ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails: 3.3.4 version
is broken, downgrade to 3.3.3
Marked as fixed in versions node-bootstrap-switch/3.3.4+dfsg+really3.3.3-1.
>
End of message, stopp
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:43:10 +0530
with message-id <1603386790.356...@onenetbeyond.org>
and subject line fixed in last upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #970782,
regarding ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails: 3.3.4 version is broken, downgrade to
3.3.3
to be marked as done.
This mea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 966472 biobambam2/2.0.173+ds-1
Bug #966472 {Done: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89tienne_Mollier?=
} [src:bcbio] bcbio: B-D biobambam2 not available
in testing
No longer marked as fixed in versions biobambam2/2.0.173+ds-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:49:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957960: fixed in wraplinux 1.7-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #957960,
regarding wraplinux: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:49:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955727: fixed in fotoxx 20.08-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #955727,
regarding fotoxx: dcraw is required, but it is not yet a dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 906835 1.5.188+dfsg-1
Bug #906835 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [src:pdf.js]
xul-ext-pdf.js no longer works with firefox-esr 60
Marked as found in versions pdf.js/1.5.188+dfsg-1 and reopened.
> fixed 906835 2.6.347+dfsg-1
Bug #906835 [src:pdf.js]
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#895851: fixed in gkrellweather 2.0.8-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #895851,
regarding sh: 1: /usr/local/share/gkrellm/GrabWeather: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 972682 + ftbfs
Bug #972682 [src:breezy] breezy fails tests (already with Python 3.8, not yet
tested with 3.9)
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
972682: https://bugs.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 938777 + fixed-upstream
Bug #938777 [src:vim-ultisnips] vim-ultisnips: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
938777: https://bugs.debian.
Hi,
The patch from arch maintainer fixes the issue
See:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/packages/python-jinja-time/trunk/python-jinja-time-0.2.0-arrow_shift.patch
Best.
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 18:11:35 -0700 Steve Langasek <
steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Source
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-bootstrap-switch
Bug #970782 [ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails] ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails: 3.3.4
version is broken, downgrade to 3.3.3
Bug reassigned from package 'ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails' to
'node-bootstrap-switch'.
No longer marked as found in v
Control: reassign -1 node-bootstrap-switch
Control: affects -1 ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:48:00 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Package: ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails
Reassigning to node-bootstrap-switch, we need to upload 3.3.4+really3.3.3 as
this bug is not fixed in newer
Package: src:breezy
Version: 3.1.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.9
breezy fails tests (already with Python 3.8, not yet tested with 3.9)
[...]
==
ERROR: breezy.git.t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 906835 src:pdf.js
Bug #906835 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [xul-ext-pdf.js]
xul-ext-pdf.js no longer works with firefox-esr 60
Bug reassigned from package 'xul-ext-pdf.js' to 'src:pdf.js'.
No longer marked as found in versions pdf.js/1.5.188+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 906835 2.6.347+dfsg-1
Bug #906835 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [xul-ext-pdf.js]
xul-ext-pdf.js no longer works with firefox-esr 60
There is no source info for the package 'xul-ext-pdf.js' at version
'2.6.347+dfsg-1' with architecture ''
Unable
Doing a NMU to skip that test for a first build with Python 3.9, so that we can
build and test more packages for Python 3.9.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 972665 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR97528
Bug #972665 [gcc-10] ICE building firefox-esr/firefox in unstable on armhf
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gcc.gnu.org/PR97528'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:37 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 6 octobre 2020 12:32 +03, Jyrki Pulliainen:
>
> > Now, python3.8-venv contains the ensurepip module. But to me it is very
> > unclear if python3.8-venv is going to disappear? It also makes depending
> on
> > these packages generally a l
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:12:14AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/22/20 9:57 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> The code in question hasn't changed in a long time, so the same code
> >> effectively built fine with older versions of gcc. The last successful
> >> builds of firefox-esr and firefox were
❦ 6 octobre 2020 12:32 +03, Jyrki Pulliainen:
> Now, python3.8-venv contains the ensurepip module. But to me it is very
> unclear if python3.8-venv is going to disappear? It also makes depending on
> these packages generally a lot more brittle: I'd rather depend on
> python3-venv than python3.8-
Source: link-grammar
Version: 5.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.8.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: Masayuki Hatta
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out
On 10/22/20 9:57 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> The code in question hasn't changed in a long time, so the same code
>> effectively built fine with older versions of gcc. The last successful
>> builds of firefox-esr and firefox were using gcc-10_10.2.0-9.
>>
>> I see in the gcc-10 changelog there is "On
Processing control commands:
> close -1 5.8.0-1
Bug #972670 [src:link-grammar] src:link-grammar: fails to migrate to testing
for too long: FTBFS on arm64 and armhf autopkgtest regression
Marked as fixed in versions link-grammar/5.8.0-1.
Bug #972670 [src:link-grammar] src:link-grammar: fails to mi
Processing control commands:
> close -1 2.6.0-1
Bug #972669 [src:tarantool] src:tarantool: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: FTBFS on armhf and arm64
Marked as fixed in versions tarantool/2.6.0-1.
Bug #972669 [src:tarantool] src:tarantool: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: FTBFS
Source: tarantool
Version: 1.9.1.26.g63eb81e3c-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.6.0-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 915582 firefox.js should set media.gmp-manager.updateEnabled instead
> of media.gmp-gmpopenh264.enabled
Bug #915582 [firefox] Installs non-free binaries from cisco and google again
Changed Bug title to 'firefox.js should set media.gmp-man
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:42:25 +0200
with message-id <20201022084225.GA1643470@jcristau-z4>
and subject line Re: Bug#871947: [firefox] Firefox 55 regression for vCenter
WebClient 6.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #871947,
regarding [firefox] Firefox 55 regression for vCenter WebCl
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:37:43 +0200
with message-id <20201022083743.GA1643321@jcristau-z4>
and subject line Re: Bug#931334: firefox: leaks sensitive information between
private windows
has caused the Debian Bug report #931334,
regarding firefox: leaks sensitive information between p
Your message dated Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:33:52 +0200
with message-id <20201022083352.GA1643192@jcristau-z4>
and subject line Re: Bug#909286: firefox: "The bookmarks and history system
will not be functional" message always
has caused the Debian Bug report #909286,
regarding firefox: "The bookmarks a
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 03:25:32PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 58.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> I used FF58b4, it works fine.
> Then I upgraded it to FF58b14, it crashed from time to time.
>
> Today I upgraded FF to 58.0, it crashes each 1 minute (see backtrace)
> (
Hey,
> Sandro removed it (again) in 5.74.0-1 :-/ I'll fix it soon.
sorry for that, I looked via git log and havn't seen your patch, sorry for
that.
> Sandro: when planning to remove dependencies from a -dev file, please
> rebuild the reverse dependencies to check everything still works
> (curre
And _of course_ I forgot to attach the file.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:50:58PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: gcc-10
> Version: 10.2.0-15
> Severity: serious
>
> See the full buildd log in
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firefox-esr&arch=armhf&ver=78.4.0esr-2&stamp=160326
Package: gcc-10
Version: 10.2.0-15
Severity: serious
See the full buildd log in
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firefox-esr&arch=armhf&ver=78.4.0esr-2&stamp=1603260510&raw=0
The preprocessed source that fails is attached as intrapred_neon.i.gz.
This is reproducible on armhf with:
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libtss2-esys0 3.0.0-1
Bug #972659 [release.debian.org] nmu: tpm2-abrmd
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'libtss2-esys0'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #972659 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alte
Source: jsunit
Version: 0.1.6-2
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 0.2.2-1
thunderbird in stable has a Breaks: jsunit (<< 0.2.2-1~)
The version of jsunit in stable should be updated to continue
to work with the newer thunderbird and firefox versions.
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 0.2.2-1
Bug #972663 [src:jsunit] jsunit needs updating in stable
Marked as fixed in versions jsunit/0.2.2-1.
--
972663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
77 matches
Mail list logo
