Bug#966865: marked as done (kalign: FTBFS: ld: esl_stopwatch.o:./src/tldevel.h:567: multiple definition of `logsum_lookup'; tldevel.o:./src/tldevel.h:567: first defined here)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966865: fixed in kalign 1:3.2.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #966865, regarding kalign: FTBFS: ld: esl_stopwatch.o:./src/tldevel.h:567: multiple definition of `logsum_lookup'; tldevel.o:./src/tldevel.h:5

Bug#964915: marked as done (raspi-firmware: upgrading kernel or firmware causes system to become unbootable on pi 4 (ROOTPART hardcoded to /dev/mmcblk0p2 instead of /dev/mmcblk1p2))

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:20:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#964915: fixed in raspi-firmware 1.20200601-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #964915, regarding raspi-firmware: upgrading kernel or firmware causes system to become unbootable on pi 4 (ROOTPART hardcoded to /

Bug#967152: marked as done (java-gnome: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:20:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967152: fixed in java-gnome 4.1.3-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #967152, regarding java-gnome: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processed: Bug#967152 marked as pending in java-gnome

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #967152 [src:java-gnome] java-gnome: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 967152: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#967152: marked as pending in java-gnome

2020-08-04 Thread Tony Mancill
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #967152 in java-gnome reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-gnome/-/commit/24fac5d88b09adee036aa0408

Bug#967023: marked as pending in beets

2020-08-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #967023 in beets reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/beets/-/commit/048d128d527740857350

Processed: Bug#967023 marked as pending in beets

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #967023 [src:beets] beets: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) pending. -- 967023: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967023 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#966814: marked as done (cb2bib: frequent parallel FTBFS)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 04:33:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966814: fixed in cb2bib 2.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966814, regarding cb2bib: frequent parallel FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#957141: marked as done (dns2tcp: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 03:48:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957141: fixed in dns2tcp 0.5.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #957141, regarding dns2tcp: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: block 957223 with 967157 967861

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # I cannot upload the FTBFS fix until libglade uses Python 3 or is migrated > away from > block 957223 with 967157 967861 Bug #957223 [src:foxtrotgps] foxtrotgps: ftbfs with GCC-10 957223 was not blocked by any bugs. 957223 was not blocking any b

Bug#967036: marked as done (pycparser: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 02:34:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967036: fixed in pycparser 2.20-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #967036, regarding pycparser: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#967130: marked as done (foxtrotgps: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 09:35:31 +0800 with message-id <82d811c2da71ad054818afb88cd0402fc9b3ea14.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#967130: foxtrotgps: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye has caused the Debian Bug report #967130, regarding foxtrotgps: Unversioned Python

Bug#967034: marked as done (passenger: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2020 01:33:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967034: fixed in ply 3.11-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #967034, regarding passenger: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#967919: kernel panic at boot

2020-08-04 Thread u34
Package: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64 Version: 4.19.132-1 Severity: critical Causes a kernel panic at boot. I have only managed to capture The bottom lines of the panic message. A screen shot is at https://imgur.com/a/ETtMtT2 . Both linux-image-4.19.0-9-amd64 4.19.118-2+deb10u1 and linux-image-4.

Bug#966172: possible fix

2020-08-04 Thread McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)
I'm wondering if the error gcc is throwing is really a valid error. These mismatches are coming because an INGEGER*8 is being passed via %VAL() so this is actually passing by value (instead of the usual fortran pass-by-reference). For the first error at line 248, - PIXMAP is initialised by a GRG

Bug#967912: texlive-luatex: file conflict with old texlive-latex-extra package

2020-08-04 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Sven, > | Entpacken von texlive-luatex (2020.20200804-1) über (2020.20200629-1) ... > | dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-78owrZ/04-texlive-luatex_2020.20200804-1_all.deb > (--unpack): > | Versuch, »/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/cloze/cloze.lua« zu > ü

Bug#957959: wmxres: diff for NMU version 1.2-10.2

2020-08-04 Thread Torrance, Douglas
On 8/2/20 1:24 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Control: tags 957959 + patch > Control: tags 957959 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for wmxres (versioned as 1.2-10.2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > should cancel it. > > Added Doug Torrance

Bug#967032: marked as done (nodejs: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:33:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967032: fixed in nodejs 12.18.3~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #967032, regarding nodejs: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#967916: Depends on geda-gaf

2020-08-04 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: easyspice Severity: serious geda-gaf is scheduled for removal (#965098) and easyspice depends on it. Cheers, Moritz

Bug#967915: Depends on geda-gaf

2020-08-04 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: gspiceui Severity: serious geda-gaf is scheduled for removal (#965098) and gspiceui depends on it. Quoting Bdale in the RM bug above: It looks like the last gspiceui upstream release was in late 2018, and the only reason it depends on geda-gaf is that it wants to use gnetlist to impor

Bug#966575: How to fix LLVM/LUKS installs?

2020-08-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:08:44PM -0400, Todd Howe wrote: > ls /media/root/$UUID > apt install grub > grub-install --root-directory=/media/root/$UUID /dev/sda I generally don't recommend this sort of approach. Instead, and simpler: for x in dev proc sys; do mount --rbind "/$x" "/media/roo

Bug#967147: marked as done (isospec: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 21:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967147: fixed in isospec 2.1.2+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #967147, regarding isospec: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: David Ranch > > Do you think you can resolve the gcc 10 issues (-fcommon is the > > default now) and put up a new release we can package? > > Hmmm.. I don't have any systems that run GCC 10 today. Do either of these > packages NOT compile on your desired system? What Debian OS version are >

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread David Ranch
Hello Christoph, I was glancing at the SF.net repo for ax25mail-utils but thought I had seen the last commit in 2018. Sorry for being sloppy there. Ok, good that you see it now. Do you think you can resolve the gcc 10 issues (-fcommon is the default now) and put up a new release we can p

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Florent Le Coz
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:57:04 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:biboumi > Version: 8.3-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-10 > > Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it > was filed for. If a fix in

Bug#966575: How to fix LLVM/LUKS installs?

2020-08-04 Thread Todd Howe
tl;dr I hit this error while trying to reinstall grub: grub-probe: error: can't mount encrypted volume '/dev/sda5': no such partition Hello, we've seen fixes suggested for non-encrypted installs which involve either reinstalling grub or running dpkg-configure grub-pc from chroot. How do we go abo

Bug#966885: spring: FTBFS: SHA512.cpp:25:3: error: ‘snprintf’ was not declared in this scope

2020-08-04 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: spring Version: 104.0+dfsg-6 Followup-For: Bug #966885 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu groovy ubuntu-patch Hi Markus, Attached is a patch for this issue which I have uploaded to Ubuntu, to unblock the icu67 transition. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek

Bug#967078: marked as done (scilab,scilab-cli: both ship /usr/share/applications/scilab-cli.desktop)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 20:49:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967078: fixed in scilab 6.1.0+dfsg1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #967078, regarding scilab,scilab-cli: both ship /usr/share/applications/scilab-cli.desktop to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Christoph Berg
> The last commit for ax25mail-utils was back in late December 2019 and April > 11th 2020 for Linpac so I wouldn't call these as "very much dead upstream". Hi David, thanks for the feedback! I was glancing at the SF.net repo for ax25mail-utils but thought I had seen the last commit in 2018. Sorr

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread David Ranch
Hello Chris, I am the current gatekeeper for this package written by a previous developer with significant help from others. Have you reviewed the current GIT "develop" branch: https://sourceforge.net/p/ax25mail/ax25mail-utils/ci/develop/tree/ same can be said for the Linpac package: h

Bug#953098: xscreensaver: Crashes with XIO: fatal IO error

2020-08-04 Thread Tormod Volden
I was running xscreensaver continuously for a couple of months but could not reproduce. If nobody else can reproduce and you cannot provide more information I must at least lower the severity of this bug report. Regards, Tormod On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:29 PM Tormod Volden wrote: > > Jens, the

Bug#957698: pommed: diff for NMU version 1.39~dfsg-5.1

2020-08-04 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags 957698 + patch Control: tags 957698 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pommed (versioned as 1.39~dfsg-5.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru pommed-1.39~dfsg/debian/changelog pommed-1.39~dfs

Processed: pommed: diff for NMU version 1.39~dfsg-5.1

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 957698 + patch Bug #957698 [src:pommed] pommed: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 957698 + pending Bug #957698 [src:pommed] pommed: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957698 Debian Bu

Bug#966979: marked as done (mapproxy: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error: debian/mapproxy-doc/usr/share/doc/mapproxy/html/search.html does not load searchindex.js)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:19:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966979: fixed in sphinx 2.4.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #966979, regarding mapproxy: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error: debian/mapproxy-doc/usr/share/doc/mapproxy/html/search.html does not load searchindex.

Bug#967157: libglade2: diff for NMU version 1:2.6.4-2.1

2020-08-04 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:24:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and > uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437. Except not, because I forgot to update my key in the keyring and it’s expired. Ho hum... Regards, Step

Processed: Bug#966979 marked as pending in sphinx

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966979 [src:sphinx] mapproxy: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error: debian/mapproxy-doc/usr/share/doc/mapproxy/html/search.html does not load searchindex.js Added tag(s) pending. -- 966979: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966979 Debian

Bug#966979: marked as pending in sphinx

2020-08-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #966979 in sphinx reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/sphinx/-/commit/5a9036658584e49d2949b5b

Bug#957645: oroborus: diff for NMU version 2.0.20+nmu1

2020-08-04 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags 957645 + patch Control: tags 957645 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for oroborus (versioned as 2.0.20+nmu1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru oroborus-2.0.20/debian/changelog oroborus-2.0.20+

Processed: oroborus: diff for NMU version 2.0.20+nmu1

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 957645 + patch Bug #957645 [src:oroborus] oroborus: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 957645 + pending Bug #957645 [src:oroborus] oroborus: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957645: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957645 D

Processed: tagging 957313

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 957313 + fixed-upstream Bug #957313 [src:grsync] grsync: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 957313: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Processed: Bug#966763 marked as pending in mod-wsgi

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966763 [src:mod-wsgi] mod-wsgi: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye Bug #967043 [src:mod-wsgi] mod-wsgi: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 966763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#966763: marked as pending in mod-wsgi

2020-08-04 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #966763 in mod-wsgi reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/mod-wsgi/-/commit/c1a257201d0e622aa2e

Bug#967223: marked as done (thunderbird: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 18:36:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967223: fixed in thunderbird 1:68.11.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #967223, regarding thunderbird: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#967912: texlive-luatex: file conflict with old texlive-latex-extra package

2020-08-04 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: texlive-luatex Version: 2020.20200804-1 Severity: serious There was a hiccup installing your package (sorry for the German): , | Entpacken von texlive-luatex (2020.20200804-1) über (2020.20200629-1) ... | dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-78owrZ/04-texli

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: tags -1 upstream wontfix > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Wall -g > -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -c axgetlist.c > In file included from /usr/include/string.h:495, > from axge

Processed: Re: Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 upstream wontfix Bug #957029 [src:ax25mail-utils] ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) wontfix and upstream. -- 957029: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957029 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957360: insighttoolkit4: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Étienne Mollier
Greeting, On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:45:35 +0200 Étienne Mollier wrote: > Arf, no dice, there might be more changes needed, including > maybe: > * reviewing cmake build dependencies metainformations, as in > the upstream commit documented in a previous entry, which > makes me wonder whether

Bug#967157: libglade2: diff for NMU version 1:2.6.4-2.1

2020-08-04 Thread Stephen Kitt
Package: libglade2 Version: 1:2.6.4-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437. Regards, Stephen diff -Nru libglade2-2.6.4/debian/changelog libglade

Bug#966997: marked as done (python-textile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 18:20:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966997: fixed in python-textile 1:4.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #966997, regarding python-textile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit co

Bug#956973: marked as done (4store: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 18:18:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956973: fixed in 4store 1.1.6+20151109-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #956973, regarding 4store: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#956973: 4store: diff for NMU version 1.1.6+20151109-2.1

2020-08-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Sudip Mukherjee (2020-08-04 20:04:23) > Control: tags 956973 + patch > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for 4store (versioned as 1.1.6+20151109-2.1). The > diff is attached to this message. Great. Thanks! Feel free to release the NMU without delay. - Jonas -- * Jonas S

Processed: 4store: diff for NMU version 1.1.6+20151109-2.1

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 956973 + patch Bug #956973 [src:4store] 4store: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 956973: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956973 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#956973: 4store: diff for NMU version 1.1.6+20151109-2.1

2020-08-04 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags 956973 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for 4store (versioned as 1.1.6+20151109-2.1). The diff is attached to this message. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru 4store-1.1.6+20151109/debian/changelog 4store-1.1.6+20151109/debian/changelog --- 4store-1.1.6+20151109/debian/chang

Processed: Bug#966997 marked as pending in python-textile

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966997 [src:python-textile] python-textile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) pending. -- 966997: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966997 Debia

Bug#966997: marked as pending in python-textile

2020-08-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #966997 in python-textile reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-textile/-/commit/e9401c7

Bug#967212: solfege: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread François Mazen
Hello Matthias, the python2 dependency may be dh-python, but I doubt it actually depends on python2 because there is no dh-python3 package. As indirect dependency, lilypond package depends on python2. Could you please confirm that this bug is only because of lilypond? Thanks, François signa

Bug#967227: marked as done (usermode: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Aug 2020 18:46:42 +0200 with message-id <20200804164642.GA254845@pisco.westfalen.local> and subject line Re: usermode: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye has caused the Debian Bug report #967227, regarding usermode: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be

Processed: slepc

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 966981 https://gitlab.com/slepc/slepc/-/issues/24 Bug #966981 [src:slepc] slepc: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test VERBOSE=1 SLEPC_DIR=/<>/slepc-3.13.3\+dfsg1 PETSC_DIR=/usr/lib/petscdir/petsc3.13/x86_64-linux-gnu-real PETSC_A

Bug#963818: marked as done (numpy breaks python-fabio autopkgtest: fabio.test.codecs.test_brukerimage.TestBrukerLinear fails)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:04:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963818: fixed in python-fabio 0.10.2+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #963818, regarding numpy breaks python-fabio autopkgtest: fabio.test.codecs.test_brukerimage.TestBrukerLinear fails to be marked as

Bug#967088: fflas-ffpack: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-08-04 Thread Torrance, Douglas
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/282 Control: tags -1 pending On 8/4/20 3:11 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: == FFLAS-FFPACK 2.4.3: tests/test-suite.log == # TOTAL: 40 # P

Processed: Re: Bug#967088: fflas-ffpack: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/282 Bug #967088 [src:fflas-ffpack] fflas-ffpack: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/i

Bug#967039: marked as done (spamassassin: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:36:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967039: fixed in spamassassin 3.4.5~pre1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #967039, regarding spamassassin: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: bug 963818 is forwarded to https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/issues/389

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 963818 https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/issues/389 Bug #963818 [src:numpy, src:python-fabio] numpy breaks python-fabio autopkgtest: fabio.test.codecs.test_brukerimage.TestBrukerLinear fails Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gith

Bug#966981: slepc: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error

2020-08-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: slepc Followup-For: Bug #966981 Smells like a gcc-10 porting issue. Strange it wasn't picked up earlier in the gcc-10 testing.

Processed: make blocks petsc

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 964150 by 964541 Bug #964150 [src:petsc] petsc: autopkgtest regression: mpiexec was unable to launch the specified application 964150 was not blocked by any bugs. 964150 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 964150: 964541 > t

Bug#967157: libglade2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 8/4/20 3:47 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 at 12:25:07 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> replacing python with python2, makes libglade2-dev installable again. I'm >> uploading this to DELAYED/3. > > Thanks! I think from the GNOME team's point of view, nobody would object > to yo

Bug#966972: [in-toto-dev] Bug#966972: in-toto: FTBFS: ValueError: SSH supports only 1024 bit DSA keys

2020-08-04 Thread Lukas Puehringer
Thanks for the report! It looks like a recent update to pyca/cryptography v3.0 causes our test code (only) to break. I just filed an issue upstream, because I am not fully sure if the change was made intentionally: https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/5373 If it was, I will update our test

Bug#967157: libglade2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 at 12:25:07 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > replacing python with python2, makes libglade2-dev installable again. I'm > uploading this to DELAYED/3. Thanks! I think from the GNOME team's point of view, nobody would object to you rescheduling this to 0-day. smcv

Bug#966856: marked as done (tao-pegtl: FTBFS: rep_one_min_max.hpp:40:26: error: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘>= 0’ is always true [-Werror=type-limits])

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:34:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966856: fixed in tao-pegtl 2.8.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966856, regarding tao-pegtl: FTBFS: rep_one_min_max.hpp:40:26: error: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘>= 0’ is always true [-Werror=ty

Bug#966849: marked as done (qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS: XPathGrammar.cpp:120:10: fatal error: XPathGrammar.hpp: No such file or directory)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:20:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966849: fixed in qtwebkit-opensource-src 5.212.0~alpha4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #966849, regarding qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS: XPathGrammar.cpp:120:10: fatal error: XPathGrammar.hpp: No such fil

Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 4 August 2020 at 15:06, Matthias Klose wrote: | block 967209 by 967157 | thanks | | sorry, that's due to uninstallability of libglade2-dev. Thanks, that makes sense. (And thanks also to Julien, that was a good idea too but it does come up negative: edd@rob:~/deb/rgtk2(master)$ grep -ri P

Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
block 967209 by 967157 thanks sorry, that's due to uninstallability of libglade2-dev. On 8/4/20 2:49 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > Hi doko and Python folks, > > On 4 August 2020 at 09:29, Matthias Klose wrote: > | Package: src:rgtk2 > | Version: 2.20.36-2 > | Severity: serious > | Tags: sid

Processed: Re: Bug#967151: kconfig-frontends: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 967151 by 967157 Bug #967151 [src:kconfig-frontends] kconfig-frontends: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye 967151 was not blocked by any bugs. 967151 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 967151: 967157 > thanks Stoppi

Processed: update python blocks information

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 967209 by 967157 Bug #967209 [src:rgtk2] rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye 967209 was not blocked by any bugs. 967209 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 967209: 967157 > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#957486: marked as done (likwid: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:05:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957486: fixed in likwid 5.0.1+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #957486, regarding likwid: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi doko and Python folks, On 4 August 2020 at 09:29, Matthias Klose wrote: | Package: src:rgtk2 | Version: 2.20.36-2 | Severity: serious | Tags: sid bullseye | User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org | Usertags: py2unversioned | | Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove | P

Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le mardi 04 août 2020 à 07:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : > Hi doko and Python folks, > > I am lost. > I suggest to check the shebangs. Cheers, JP

Processed: severity of 966370 is important

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 966370 important Bug #966370 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils: 12.1.3 removal of lorder breaks rdeps Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 966370: https://b

Processed: tagging 957936

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 957936 + fixed-upstream Bug #957936 [src:wine] wine: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 957936: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=95

Processed: retitle 967856 to mod-gearman: keep out of testing

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 967856 mod-gearman: keep out of testing Bug #967856 [src:mod-gearman] mod-gearman: keep out of testging Changed Bug title to 'mod-gearman: keep out of testing' from 'mod-gearman: keep out of testging'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: Bug#967151: kconfig-frontends: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 967151 4.11.0.1+dfsg-2 Bug #967151 [src:kconfig-frontends] kconfig-frontends: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye No longer marked as found in versions kconfig-frontends/4.11.0.1+dfsg-2. > severity 967151 important Bug #967151 [sr

Bug#967856: mod-gearman: keep out of testging

2020-08-04 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Source: mod-gearman Version: 1.5.5-1+b9 Severity: serious With mod gearman not being needed for icinga anymore, it might make sense to remove it. Please only close this bug if you are willing to adopt the package. (its being orpahened!) If this does not happen before the release of bullseye, I'l

Bug#966916: marked as done (eckit: FTBFS: sqly.tmp.h:131:14: error: ‘yyscan_t’ was not declared in this scope)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:04:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966916: fixed in eckit 1.11.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966916, regarding eckit: FTBFS: sqly.tmp.h:131:14: error: ‘yyscan_t’ was not declared in this scope to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#966849: marked as pending in qtwebkit-opensource-src

2020-08-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #966849 in qtwebkit-opensource-src reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qt5webkit/-/commit/7f2b1879

Processed: Bug#966849 marked as pending in qtwebkit-opensource-src

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966849 [src:qtwebkit-opensource-src] qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS: XPathGrammar.cpp:120:10: fatal error: XPathGrammar.hpp: No such file or directory Added tag(s) pending. -- 966849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966849 De

Processed: block 967852 with 967854

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 967852 with 967854 Bug #967852 [gimp-plugin-registry] gimp-plugin-registry: keep out of testing 967852 was not blocked by any bugs. 967852 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 967852: 967854 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: found 967154 in kross-interpreters/4:18.08.1-1

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 967154 kross-interpreters/4:18.08.1-1 Bug #967154 [src:kross-interpreters] kross-interpreters: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye Marked as found in versions kross-interpreters/4:18.08.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#967852: gimp-plugin-registry: keep out of testing

2020-08-04 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Package: gimp-plugin-registry Version: 9.20180625+nmu1 Severity: serious Hi, this package should be kept out of testing until it is adopted by somebody who is willing to fix all the plugins to work with current gimp versions, checks if there are new/active upstreams, updates the package and pack

Bug#967171: mdk: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
block 967171 by 967157 thanks On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:28:34AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:mdk > Version: 1.2.10+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2unversioned > > Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian

Bug#957464: libpam-ssh: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks for the report. I am working on it soon. Best, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#967171: mdk: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 967171 by 967157 Bug #967171 [src:mdk] mdk: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye 967171 was not blocked by any bugs. 967171 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 967171: 967157 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#957186: evolver: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-04 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks for the report. I am working on it soon. Cheers, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#966651: marked as done (libgc-dev: missing dependency on libatomic-ops-dev)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:07:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966651: fixed in libgc 1:8.0.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966651, regarding libgc-dev: missing dependency on libatomic-ops-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#963461: marked as done (ocsigenserver: FTBFS: ocamlfind invocation fails)

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:07:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963461: fixed in ocsigenserver 2.16.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #963461, regarding ocsigenserver: FTBFS: ocamlfind invocation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Bug#963461 marked as pending in ocsigenserver

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #963461 [src:ocsigenserver] ocsigenserver: FTBFS: ocamlfind invocation fails Added tag(s) pending. -- 963461: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: fixed 966910 in 4.1-2

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 966910 4.1-2 Bug #966910 [src:polymake] polymake: FTBFS: pool_allocator.h:36:19: error: ‘typedef std::size_t __gnu_cxx::__pool_alloc_base::size_t’ is private within this context Marked as fixed in versions polymake/4.1-2. > thanks Stopping

Bug#963461: marked as pending in ocsigenserver

2020-08-04 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #963461 in ocsigenserver reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocsigenserver/-/commit/92fb9584f064d3f4a9

Bug#967487: libubootenv: Cannot build libubootenv with dpkg-buildpackage

2020-08-04 Thread Gylstorff Quirin
Package: libubootenv-tool Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, I tried to build libubootenv-tool with dpkg-buildpackage and the following error did occur: ``` -- Detecting C compile features - done CMake Error at src/CMake

Bug#936146: archivemail - Python 3 porting

2020-08-04 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:37:36AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: do you have any plan on completing this port? I'm not a user of archivemail but it looks like it should be removed, not salvaged: * no new upstream releases since 2011 (!) * last upload to debian in 2014 * retired from fedora: https://

Processed: Re: libglade2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #967157 [src:libglade2] libglade2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) patch. -- 967157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967157 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

  1   2   3   >