Bug#935142: FTBFS arch all

close 935142 thanks I could trace it down to sqlite3 3.29.0-2 (downgrading to 3.29.0-1 makes it build again). will check further and then report to sqlite3 i guess.. sorry for the noise :/ Regards, Daniel

Bug#935142: marked as done (FTBFS arch all)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:48:48 +0900 with message-id <20190820064848.lmrmuk2fflwft...@glandium.org> and subject line Re: Bug#935142: FTBFS arch all has caused the Debian Bug report #935142, regarding FTBFS arch all to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#933210: marked as done (rdkit: BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in bullseye)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:49:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#933210: fixed in rdkit 201903.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #933210, regarding rdkit: BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in bullseye to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#935142: FTBFS arch all

Package: firefox Version: 68.0.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, starting with 68.0.1-1, firefox stopped to build on arch all as can be seen on the buildd logs. It would be nice to get that fixed to get translations back. Regards, Daniel

Bug#934600: gffread in cufflinks seems to be the same codebase but older

Hi Alexandre, it looks as if the gffread code in cufflinks would be the same code base but the code in gffread source seems to be more recent. What do you think? Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Debian testing autoremoval watch - Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:39:04 +

Bug#874826: marked as done ([baloo] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:13:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935024: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874826, regarding [baloo] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#820748: marked as done (uniconvertor: ImportError: No module named sk1libs.utils.fs)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:10:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935129: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #820748, regarding uniconvertor: ImportError: No module named sk1libs.utils.fs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#886802: marked as done (python-uniconvertor: cannot be installed)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:10:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935129: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #866472, regarding python-uniconvertor: cannot be installed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#854884: marked as done (baloo: is this obsoleted by src:baloo-kf5?)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:13:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935024: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #854884, regarding baloo: is this obsoleted by src:baloo-kf5? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#892292: marked as done (xpyb FTBFS with xcb-proto 1.13-1)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:11:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935131: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #892292, regarding xpyb FTBFS with xcb-proto 1.13-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#866472: marked as done (python-uniconvertor: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with python3-pil or python-pil))

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:10:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935129: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #866472, regarding python-uniconvertor: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with python3-pil or python-pil) to be marked as don

Bug#874811: marked as done ([amarok] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935022: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874811, regarding [amarok] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#925814: marked as done (qtscriptgenerator: ftbfs with GCC-9)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:05:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919250: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #925814, regarding qtscriptgenerator: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#875181: marked as done ([smokegen] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:06:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935074: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875181, regarding [smokegen] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#875018: marked as done ([lfhex] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:07:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935119: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875018, regarding [lfhex] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#875155: marked as done ([qtscriptgenerator] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:05:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919250: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875155, regarding [qtscriptgenerator] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#784615: marked as done ([ninja-ide] Qt4's WebKit removal)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:06:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935102: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #784615, regarding [ninja-ide] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#784518: marked as done ([qtscriptgenerator] Qt4's WebKit removal)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:05:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919250: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #784518, regarding [qtscriptgenerator] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#784448: marked as done ([amarok] Qt4's WebKit removal)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935022: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #784448, regarding [amarok] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#874978: marked as done ([krecipes] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:56:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935023: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874978, regarding [krecipes] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#874947: marked as done ([kdepim4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:57:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935024: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874947, regarding [kdepim4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#873382: marked as done (adlint only supports ancient gcc not available in debian)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:58:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935026: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #873382, regarding adlint only supports ancient gcc not available in debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#784486: marked as done ([krecipes] Qt4's WebKit removal)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:56:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935023: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #784486, regarding [krecipes] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#784480: marked as done ([kdepim4] Qt4's WebKit removal)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:57:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935024: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #784480, regarding [kdepim4] Qt4's WebKit removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#925647: marked as done (casync: ftbfs with GCC-9)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:34:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925647: fixed in casync 2+20190213-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #925647, regarding casync: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#874952: marked as done ([keurocalc] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:34:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#874952: fixed in keurocalc 1.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #874952, regarding [keurocalc] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#899307: marked as done (ruby-sequel-pg: All SELECT ::Dataset methods fails with FrozenError)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:11:46 -0700 with message-id and subject line Closing as not reproducible currently has caused the Debian Bug report #899307, regarding ruby-sequel-pg: All SELECT ::Dataset methods fails with FrozenError to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processed: Bug#874857: [dssi] Future Qt4 removal from Buster - patch available

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #874857 [src:dssi] [dssi] Future Qt4 removal from Buster Added tag(s) patch. -- 874857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874857 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#874857: [dssi] Future Qt4 removal from Buster - patch available

Control: tags -1 + patch A patch to disable the generation of the Qt4 example plugins is at https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/dssi/merge_requests/1 plus some general packaging updates at https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/dssi/merge_requests/2 (I will merge and u

Bug#933822: virtualenvwrapper depends on cruft package python-stevedore

Control: tags + pending Fix applied, changelog finalised, and it appears an upload is pending. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/virtualenvwrapper/blob/a4fb07eb2768d9b25f96946c4bb0ac74f4b7690d/debian/changelog signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processed: tagging 933822

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 933822 + pending Bug #933822 [virtualenvwrapper] virtualenvwrapper depends on cruft package python-stevedore Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 933822: https://bugs.debian.

Processed: Re: Bug#932015: wireguard-dkms: Wireguard dkms module build fails with gcc-8 on arm for 4.19.0-5-armmp-lpae kernel

Processing control commands: > tags 932015 + moreinfo Bug #932015 [wireguard-dkms] wireguard-dkms: Wireguard dkms module build fails with gcc-8 on arm for 4.19.0-5-armmp-lpae kernel Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 932015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932015 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Bug#932015: wireguard-dkms: Wireguard dkms module build fails with gcc-8 on arm for 4.19.0-5-armmp-lpae kernel

Control: tags 932015 + moreinfo Hi Martin-- On Sun 2019-07-14 02:26:05 +0200, Martin Hoefling wrote: > Package: wireguard-dkms > Version: 0.0.20190702-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > Dear Maintainer, > >*

Bug#935115: bash: [regression] passing variable assignments to functions broken in POSIX mode, violating POSIX

Hi Chet, >There is a problem with bash-5.0 when the variable is declared local in >the interposed function, and I need to fix that, but that's not a posix ah, okay, I didn’t test what removing the “local” would do. Debian is a special beast: it requires of a /bin/sh to behave like a POSIX shell

Processed: Bug#875242 marked as pending in yabause

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #875242 [src:yabause] [yabause] Future Qt4 removal from Buster Added tag(s) pending. -- 875242: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875242 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#875242: marked as pending in yabause

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #875242 in yabause reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/yabause/commit/b32dcaec9873e5a49b36ea8d69abda11

Bug#935079: marked as done (gnome-photos: unbuildable in testing due to missing B-D)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:54:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935079: fixed in gnome-photos 3.30.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #935079, regarding gnome-photos: unbuildable in testing due to missing B-D to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#935079: marked as done (gnome-photos: unbuildable in testing due to missing B-D)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 21:24:06 +0100 with message-id <20190819202406.ga3...@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#935079: gnome-photos: unbuildable in testing due to missing B-D has caused the Debian Bug report #935079, regarding gnome-photos: unbuildable in testing d

Bug#935079: marked as pending in gnome-photos

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #935079 in gnome-photos reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-photos/commit/abaa508412c48657b32c7f

Processed: Bug#935079 marked as pending in gnome-photos

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #935079 [src:gnome-photos] gnome-photos: unbuildable in testing due to missing B-D Added tag(s) pending. -- 935079: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935079 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#935115: bash: [regression] passing variable assignments to functions broken in POSIX mode, violating POSIX

On 8/19/19 11:47 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: bash > Version: 5.0-4 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > The expected output is: > > dbc_mysql_createdb: _dbc_nodb(1)= # initially not set / empty > dbc_mysql_exec_command: _dbc_nodb=yes # MUST be visible

Processed: tagging 935079

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # does not affect stable > tags 935079 + bullseye sid Bug #935079 [src:gnome-photos] gnome-photos: unbuildable in testing due to missing B-D Added tag(s) bullseye and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Processed: fixed 932983 in 2016.8-3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 932983 2016.8-3 Bug #932983 [src:django-restricted-resource] Please remove python2 support from your package The source 'django-restricted-resource' and version '2016.8-3' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versi

Processed: fixed 935016 in debhelper/12.5.2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 935016 debhelper/12.5.2 Bug #935016 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [debhelper] pkg-js-tools: An unannounced change in "debhelper" breaks pkg-js-tools Marked as fixed in versions debhelper/12.5.2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:ruby-nokogiri

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:ruby-nokogiri > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.o

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:kubernetes

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:kubernetes > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Bug#934915: marked as done (node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:49:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934915: fixed in node-es6-promise 4.2.8-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #934915, regarding node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#934905: libaqbanking35: libaqbanking not ready for PSD2, will not work after 14 September 2019

Hi Christian, I understand your bug report and confirm it to be an issue. Unfortunately I don't have much capacity at the moment to work on an updated package in a timely manner. But I do appreciate and support any volunteer's help. Best regards, Micha

Processed: Add tag

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 875165 patch Bug #875165 [src:qwt] [qwt] Future Qt4 removal from Buster Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 875165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875165 Debi

Bug#875074: marked as pending in openpref

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #875074 in openpref reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/openpref/commit/f0c9d2559513bdd76c730416364a77

Processed: Bug#875074 marked as pending in openpref

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #875074 [src:openpref] [openpref] Future Qt4 removal from Buster Added tag(s) pending. -- 875074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875074 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#934483: virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae

On Sun, 11 Aug 2019, Christian Marillat wrote: > But bevare fixind the include file path (drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.h) doesn't > work at all the virtualbox doesn't start. I fixed the path, the build went through. I rebooted my VM and it worked. What exactly was the failure that you had? Did you have

Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Unit 193 wrote: > Ah right. Though while looking through several of my recent sent items, it > seems it preserved those fields as expected. I am using alpine 2.21. Please try this, from the original submission: If I take a message, reply to it, then go to the Subject l

Bug#934483: virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae

On 19 août 2019 17:18, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Darsey Litzenberger wrote: >> I haven't gotten around to testing, but it looks like maybe all that needs >> to be done is to disable building some of these modules after a certain >> kernel version. > > At least I can co

Processed: affects buster

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 935115 5.0-4 Bug #935115 [bash] bash: [regression] passing variable assignments to functions broken in POSIX mode, violating POSIX Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #935115 to the same values previously set > notfound 935115

Bug#935115: passing variable assignments to functions (was Re: Bug#935115: bash: [regression] passing variable assignments to functions broken in POSIX mode, violating POSIX)

Dixi quod… >┌──┬┬──┬┬──┐ >│ shell \ what │ inside visible │ exported │ afterwards visible │ exported │ >├──┼┼──┼┼──┤ >│ ksh93│ ✔ as required │ ✗ (ok) │ ✗ no, p

Bug#932614: basemap: pyproj upstream going to drop Python 2 support

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:47 AM Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > On 8/19/19 5:27 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > So, what do you want me to do? drop the python 2 package for basemap? > > Yes. > > > i cant do that, it has reverse dependencies (just like pyproj) > > basemap is the only remaining rdep fo

Bug#935115: bash: [regression] passing variable assignments to functions broken in POSIX mode, violating POSIX

Package: bash Version: 5.0-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Found this gem in #934027: tglase@tglase:~ $ cat testscript dbc_mysql_createdb(){ local ret l_dbname _dbc_nodb echo "dbc_mysql_createdb: _dbc_nodb(1)=$_dbc_nodb" _dbc_nodb="yes" dbc_m

Bug#932614: basemap: pyproj upstream going to drop Python 2 support

On 8/19/19 5:27 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > So, what do you want me to do? drop the python 2 package for basemap? Yes. > i cant do that, it has reverse dependencies (just like pyproj) basemap is the only remaining rdep for python-pyproj, as it also for python-shp & python-netcdf4. pyspread is the

Bug#925700:

I think this can be worked around by adding -Werror=stringop-truncation to CXXFLAGS -- Michael R. Crusoe

Bug#932614: basemap: pyproj upstream going to drop Python 2 support

So, what do you want me to do? drop the python 2 package for basemap? i cant do that, it has reverse dependencies (just like pyproj) Are you saying that you're willing to break pyproj reverse dependencies without giving them a chance to clear their rdeps first? not really a nice idea On Mon, Aug

Bug#934915: node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore

On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 19 8:27:04 PM IST, Julien Puydt wrote: >Hi, > >Le 19/08/2019 à 15:23, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 19 6:26:14 PM IST, Julien Puydt > wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Le 16/08/2019 à 18:49, Pirate Praveen a écrit : Try removing target 'web' option. (On phone now).

Bug#934483: virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae

Hi, On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Darsey Litzenberger wrote: > I haven't gotten around to testing, but it looks like maybe all that needs > to be done is to disable building some of these modules after a certain > kernel version. At least I can confirm that if you disable "vboxvideo" from the dkms configu

Bug#933077: Clear solution?

Hi, would the following do the trick: diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index a8c564aa0..54ad7ab6f 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +node-typescript (3.5.3-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Move tslib to /usr/share (Closes: #933077). + + -- Jul

Processed: Re: basemap: pyproj upstream going to drop Python 2 support

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #932614 [src:basemap] basemap: pyproj upstream going to drop Python 2 support Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 932614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932614 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debia

Bug#934915: node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore

Hey, On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 8:27 PM Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi, > > Le 19/08/2019 à 15:23, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 19 6:26:14 PM IST, Julien Puydt < > julien.pu...@laposte.net> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Le 16/08/2019 à 18:49, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > >>> Try removing targ

Bug#934340: Please remove the dependency on obus and camlp4

Why have you (I assume) removed 0install and obus from the repository? A camlp4 release for 4.08 came out on Aug 7th: https://github.com/ocaml/camlp4/releases/tag/4.08%2B1 And even if not, surely waiting for the NEW queue to clear so that obus can be upgraded is better than removing working packa

Bug#934915: node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore

Hi, Le 19/08/2019 à 15:23, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 19 6:26:14 PM IST, Julien Puydt > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Le 16/08/2019 à 18:49, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >>> Try removing target 'web' option. (On phone now). >> >> I removed that line: no better. > > I think we will have to a

Bug#934915: marked as pending in node-es6-promise

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #934915 in node-es6-promise reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-es6-promise/commit/c07ec55a09ac008cb

Processed: Bug#934915 marked as pending in node-es6-promise

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #934915 [node-es6-promise] node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore Added tag(s) pending. -- 934915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934915 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#935109: hwinfo: FTBFS on x32: mdt.c:20:10: fatal error: x86emu.h: No such file or directory

tags 935109 + patch thanks On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > I’m working on a patch. The following debdiff allows the build to succeed: diff -Nru hwinfo-21.67/debian/changelog hwinfo-21.67/debian/changelog --- hwinfo-21.67/debian/changelog 2019-07-28 10:13:51.0 +0200

Processed: Re: Bug#935109: hwinfo: FTBFS on x32: mdt.c:20:10: fatal error: x86emu.h: No such file or directory

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 935109 + patch Bug #935109 [src:hwinfo] hwinfo: FTBFS on x32: mdt.c:20:10: fatal error: x86emu.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 935109: https:/

Bug#934370: r-cran-fs: autopkgtest regression

I am not sure, but the tests you are quoting in the email are coming from the reprex package, not fs. The test that is failing for fs on debian's machines is ``` > library(testthat) > library(fs) > > test_check("fs") -- 1. Error: dir_tree() works (@test-tree.R#4)

Bug#935109: hwinfo: FTBFS on x32: mdt.c:20:10: fatal error: x86emu.h: No such file or directory

Source: hwinfo Version: 21.67-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) […] cc -c -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -I/<>/src/hd -O2

Bug#934915: node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore

On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 19 6:26:14 PM IST, Julien Puydt wrote: >Hi, > >Le 16/08/2019 à 18:49, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> Try removing target 'web' option. (On phone now). > >I removed that line: no better. I think we will have to add target: 'node' >And since then, a commit even broke the build ;

Bug#925848: marked as done (vacation: ftbfs with GCC-9)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:39:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925848: fixed in vacation 3.3.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #925848, regarding vacation: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#934915: node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore

Hi, Le 16/08/2019 à 18:49, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Try removing target 'web' option. (On phone now). I removed that line: no better. And since then, a commit even broke the build ; I complained to the author, but don't try anything before it's cleaned up... JP

Bug#875138: Can we remove qsapecng?

Hi Simone! El lun., 19 ago. 2019 07:29, Simone Rossetto escribió: > Hello Lisandro > > Il dom 18 ago 2019, 19:52 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer < > perezme...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> Would it be ok for you if I proceed to remove >> this package from Debian? In this way we can prevent qw

Bug#926699: libc6-{i386,x32}: installing, removing, reinstalling in a --merged-usr system results in unmerged /lib{32,x32}

Aurelien Jarno writes: > control: retitle 926699 libc6 foreign/biarch: installing, removing, > reinstalling in a --merged-usr system results in unmerged /lib{32,x32} > control: affects 926699 libc6 > > Hi, > > I have been asked privately to work constructively on a solution, > otherwise my bad b

Bug#925652: marked as done (chktex: ftbfs with GCC-9)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:05:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925652: fixed in chktex 1.7.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #925652, regarding chktex: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#935096: install-keymap(8) binary not included although package description tells so

Package: console-common Version: 0.7.90 Severity: grave Tags: patch The "Cleanup d/rules using dh" in the latest version of this package accidently causes intall-keymap and several other files (e.g. getkmapchoice.pl) to be left out of the binary package. The fact, that the console-common package s

Bug#875075: Kido renamed to dart - waiting in new queue (Was: [openscenegraph] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Hi, I also checked kido. Thanks to Jose Luis Rivero who prepared the renamed version dart in Git[1] I now uploaded this to new with Build-Depends changed to libopenscenegraph-3.4-dev. Since I explained in my last mail that there is no point in waiting for opensurgsim there is no reason to wait a

Bug#875026: marked as done ([libquazip] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:22:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#875026: fixed in libquazip 0.7.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #875026, regarding [libquazip] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: retitle 934992 to boot-smoke autopkgtest fails if polkitd is not D-Bus activated

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 934992 boot-smoke autopkgtest fails if polkitd is not D-Bus activated Bug #934992 [systemd] network-manager breaks systemd autopkgtest Changed Bug title to 'boot-smoke autopkgtest fails if polkitd is not D-Bus activated' from 'network-man

Bug#935092: Serious issues with inetsim in Debian 10

Package: inetsim Version: 1.2.7+dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Debian source and binary packages for INetSim have been provided with the official inetsim.org APT repository for 10+ years, see . Earlier versions of our .deb packages did not comply with the Debian

Bug#935089: FTBFS: error: no dependency information found for /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libeckit.so.0d

Source: metview Version: 5.6.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, During a rebuild on amd64 metview FTBFS with: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libeckit.so.0d (used by debian/metview/

Bug#935088: libgif7: ABI break in 5.2 - GifQuantizeBuffer

Package: libgif7 Version: 5.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/giflib/bugs/142/ Hello, the new libgif removes multiple symbols from its public API (and ABI)[1]. One of the removals (GifQuantizeBuffer) causes breakage in exactimage, mplayer-gui,

Processed: libgif7: ABI break in 5.2 - GifQuantizeBuffer

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/giflib/bugs/142/ Bug #935088 [libgif7] libgif7: ABI break in 5.2 - GifQuantizeBuffer Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/giflib/bugs/142/'. -- 935088: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=93

Bug#934710: marked as done (systemtap: autopkgtest fails when there are two versions of linux-latest available)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:44:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934710: fixed in systemtap 4.1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #934710, regarding systemtap: autopkgtest fails when there are two versions of linux-latest available to be marked as done. This means that yo

Processed: severity of 932712 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 932712 important Bug #932712 [command-not-found] command-not-found: crashes due to missing database, update-command-not-found does not help Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#875075: [openscenegraph] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On 18/8/19 9:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:47:59 +0200 "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" wrote: >> This package will be removed after rdeps migrate to openscenegraph-3.4 or a >> later version (which does support Qt5), or rdeps are removed, or if nothing >> else, when the

Bug#935086: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS with GCC-9: use of undeclared identifier '__builtin_is_constant_evaluated'

Source: insighttoolkit4 Version: 4.12.2-dfsg1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Insighttoolkit4 FTBFS with: In file included from /<>/BUILD/Wrapping/itkFixedArray.cxx:1: In file included from /<>/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkCommand.h

Bug#935037: marked as done (nginx: CVE-2019-9511 CVE-2019-9513 CVE-2019-9516)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:10:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935037: fixed in nginx 1.14.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #935037, regarding nginx: CVE-2019-9511 CVE-2019-9513 CVE-2019-9516 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#875075: [openscenegraph] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

Hi, as member of the opensurgsim maintainer team I confirm that there is no point in waiting for this package. If all fails it probably should be removed. Kind regards, Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Processed: Re: Bug#926699: libc6-{i386,x32}: installing, removing, reinstalling in a --merged-usr system results in unmerged /lib{32,x32}

Processing control commands: > retitle 926699 libc6 foreign/biarch: installing, removing, reinstalling in a > --merged-usr system results in unmerged /lib{32,x32} Bug #926699 [debootstrap,usrmerge] libc6-{i386,x32}: installing, removing, reinstalling in a --merged-usr system results in unmerged

Bug#926699: libc6-{i386,x32}: installing, removing, reinstalling in a --merged-usr system results in unmerged /lib{32,x32}

control: retitle 926699 libc6 foreign/biarch: installing, removing, reinstalling in a --merged-usr system results in unmerged /lib{32,x32} control: affects 926699 libc6 Hi, I have been asked privately to work constructively on a solution, otherwise my bad behaviour will likely lead to a decision

Bug#934167: Additional Information

Hello, I have done this steps to fix the issue: apt-get install php-pear php-dev libpcre3-dev pecl install oauth The interessting think ist, thats installed pecl.php.net/oauth-2.0.3. So 2.0.4 seems not nessesary. Regards

Bug#875138: Can we remove qsapecng?

Hello Lisandro Il dom 18 ago 2019, 19:52 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer < perezme...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Would it be ok for you if I proceed to remove > this package from Debian? In this way we can prevent qwt from being > removed from testing. > Yes please, remove it from Debian. I've

Processed: Re: Bug#934370: r-cran-fs: autopkgtest regression

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 Jim Hester Bug #934370 [src:r-cran-fs] r-cran-fs: autopkgtest regression Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Jim Hester '. -- 934370: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934370 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p

Bug#934370: r-cran-fs: autopkgtest regression

Control: forwarded -1 Jim Hester Hi Jim, as you can read below there is an issue with the test suite of fs version 1.3.1. Do you have any hint whether we might do something wrong in calling the tests via: for testfile in *.R; do LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 R --no-save < $testfile done or something e

  1   2   >