Package: release-notes
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Recent transition from .dbk to .po for the ca language leaves some
untracked .dbk files in the source directory and causes git checkout of
jessie and stretch to fail
On 2019-06-15 Ross Boylan wrote:
> I've been following this bug because it came up as an issue for a
> security upgrade to libgnutls-openssl27 in buster. I'm still seeing
> 3.6.7-3 as the upgrade target.
Hello Ross,
I do not know whether this bug applies to packages using GnuTLS via the
openssl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 811887 2.5.15-1.1
Bug #811887 [src:duma] duma: FTBFS with GCC 6: declaration of ... has a
different exception specifier
Marked as found in versions duma/2.5.15-1.1.
> tags 930577 + sid buster
Bug #930577 [coinor-libipopt-dev] coinor-libipop
Control: severity -1 important
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 11:50:54 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2017-08-12 11:32, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> > Running it in foreground is a debconf low priority user choice. It does
>
> Even better. I can preseed this in piuparts.
Which worked fine for me, t
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #867020 {Done: sa...@debian.org (Davide G. M. Salvetti)} [auctex] auctex:
fails to remove: auctex/remove: Removing parsed (La)TeX macros for
emacs25...rm: cannot remove '/var/lib/auctex/emacs25': Directory not empty
Severity set to 'import
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 930577 https://github.com/robotology/idyntree/issues/456
Bug #930577 [coinor-libipopt-dev] coinor-libipopt-dev: uses uninitialized
memory with MUMPS >= 5.1.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/robotology/idyntree/issu
Package: coinor-libipopt-dev
Version: 3.11.9-2.1+b2
Severity: serious
Justification: causes memory leaks
IPOPT causes memory leaks due to use of not initialized memory with
MUMPS >= 5.1.0.
The problem affects idyntree, see
https://github.com/robotology/idyntree/issues/456
The latest version of i
I've been following this bug because it came up as an issue for a
security upgrade to libgnutls-openssl27 in buster. I'm still seeing
3.6.7-3 as the upgrade target.
Will an openssl27 variant be coming? Or perhaps this problem never
applied to -openssl27 and apt-listbugs just got over-eager? I c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package libtrapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'libtrapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure'
Limit currently set to 'package':'libtrapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure'
> affects
Source: jetty9
Followup-For: Bug #924005
Hi,
I noticed that I also have this problem and managed to solve it by patching the
libtrapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure package with a commit [1] from a
branch that was recently merged into the upstream
trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure repo. In
Package: freecad
Version: 0.18~pre1+dfsg1-5
Severity: grave
I try to start the FreeCAD after I install, but it is not be started, and I get
the message "freecad: symbol lookup error:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenGL.so.0: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Current".
My computer is Thinkpad P1.
Bes
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:38:57PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 22:13:22 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the update isn't going to be as simple for
> > Jessie/Stretch. The functionality relied upon for check_secure() to
> > work correctly relies on a number
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 930559
Bug #930561 [node-schema-utils] Update node-schema-utils to 1.0
930561 was not blocked by any bugs.
930561 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 930561: 930559
> block 930560 by -1
Bug #930560 [node-cache-loader] Update node-cache-loa
Your message dated Sat, 15 Jun 2019 09:06:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#930531: fixed in grub2 2.04~rc1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #930531,
regarding grub2-common: grub-install --force-extra-removable does not work
properly with Secure Boot
to be marked as done.
This mean
Hi Reinhard,
On 13-06-2019 14:19, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On 6/13/19 3:15 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> To be clear, I'm *not* offering tpu.
>
> I've uploaded an NMU to testing-proposed-updates. Debdiff attached.
I'm surprised. Was my last sentence not clear, i.e. should I not have
used the abbre
15 matches
Mail list logo
