Thanks for the remainder, I will have a look this week-end,
Jerome
On 19/12/2018 05:32, John Stamp wrote:
> On 05/22/18 08:52 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/05/18 23:52, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> Hi Jerome,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:05:26PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT w
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #890117 [src:bedtools] bedtools FTBFS on big endian: Tools failing:
bamtobed bamtofastq coverage genomecov groupby intersect jaccard map merge
multicov negativecontrol
Added tag(s) help.
> tags -1 upstream
Bug #890117 [src:bedtools] bedtools FTBFS
Control: tags -1 help
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2/issues/676
--
http://fam-tille.de
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #890116 [src:bedtools] bedtools FTBFS on 32bit: Tools failing: coverage
intersect negativecontrol reldist shuffle split
Added tag(s) help.
> tags -1 upstream
Bug #890116 [src:bedtools] bedtools FTBFS on 32bit: Tools failing: coverage
intersect ne
Control: tags -1 help
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2/issues/675
--
http://fam-tille.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 671644 important
Bug #671644 [sympa] Password changed due to session/cookie problem
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
671644: https://bugs.debian.
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:19:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916737: fixed in bcron 0.11-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #916737,
regarding bcron: fails to install: installed bcron package post-installation
script subprocess returned error exit status 1
to be marked
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2018 06:08:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916802: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #915690,
regarding kvpm - Depends on deprecated liblvm2app
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2018 06:08:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916802: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #915996,
regarding kvpm FTBFS with glibc 2.28
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:04:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#868413: fixed in gbonds 2.0.3-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #868413,
regarding gbonds: Please drop the (build-)dependency against gnome-vfs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:04:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#885638: fixed in gbonds 2.0.3-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #885638,
regarding gbonds: Please drop Build-Depends on rarian-compat
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 886853 1:10.3.11-1~exp2
Bug #886853 [mariadb-plugin-rocksdb] mariadb-plugin-rocksdb: use sst_dump from
rocksdb-tools
Marked as found in versions mariadb-10.3/1:10.3.11-1~exp2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Followup-For: Bug #863675
And another conflict:
Preparing to unpack .../libmariadb-dev_1%3a10.3.11-1~exp2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libmariadb-dev:amd64 (1:10.3.11-1~exp2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libmariadb-dev_1%3a10.3.11-1~exp2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
tr
Followup-For: Bug #863675
Control: found -1 1:10.3.11-1~exp2
Preparing to unpack .../libmariadb-dev_1%3a10.3.11-1~exp2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libmariadb-dev:amd64 (1:10.3.11-1~exp2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libmariadb-dev_1%3a10.3.11-1~exp2_amd64.deb (--un
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1:10.3.11-1~exp2
Bug #863675 [src:mariadb-10.3] libmariadbd-dev: fails to upgrade from 'sid' -
trying to overwrite /usr/bin/mysql_config
Marked as found in versions mariadb-10.3/1:10.3.11-1~exp2.
--
863675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Package: libmeep12
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to
On 05/22/18 08:52 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> On 22/05/18 23:52, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Hi Jerome,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:05:26PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >> Dear Sebastian, thanks for your warning.
> >>
> >> The amount of change might be too heavy for me.
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:19:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916767: fixed in python-dmidecode 3.12.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #916767,
regarding python-dmidecode-data: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-dmidecode (<<
3.12.2-5)
to be marked as done.
This means t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #914112 [src:galera-3] galera-3 FTBFS: error: no matching function for call
to 'asio::ssl::context::context(asio::io_service&,
asio::ssl::context_base::method)'
Added tag(s) patch.
--
914112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/rules: Use bundled asio, since system asio is too new (> 1.10.8).
* debian/control: Remove build-dependency of libasio-dev (for now).
Thanks for considering the patch.
Logan
>> We had volatile, which, redefined properly, could help. I am trying
>to draft such a definition.
>
>Did you get a chance to work on it?
I do have this on my todo list for around Christmas.
People who know me that I deliberately leave out the year, but my intentions
are 2018 ;).
-nik
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package libelogind-dev-doc
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'libelogind-dev-doc'
Limit currently set to 'package':'libelogind-dev-doc'
> tags 916768 + pending
Bug #916768 [libelogind-dev-doc] libelogind-dev-doc: m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 913044 fixed-upstream
Bug #913044 [src:hy] hy fails its tests with Python3.7
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
913044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Package: libelogind-dev-doc
Tags: pending
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:21:47PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libelogind-dev-doc
> Version: 239.3-3+debian1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your
Hi,
I've tried to create a backtrace for further investigation. This was done by
setting a breakpoint at function client_set_pause() where the bug must occur.
Then I've started the game an tried to reproduce the bug (the unwanted pause).
After I've got into the bug I must kill the lbreakout2 pr
On Wednesday, 19 December 2018 9:17:51 AM AEDT Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Did you mean: in an unstable-like “volatile” repo?
Yes perhaps more like "unstable".
I'm saying that IMHO we should have only one common/shared "PPA" for "stable"
users. I do not want many personal/individual archives.
> Ba
Hi Joachim,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:57:15PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Would not be hard to fix, but is there a chance that upstream could just
> release a version that works with a current compiler?
I'm afraid upstream is not very active but would be happy about a patch.
Kind regards
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> trust - a something we can only have in backports-like "volatile" repo.
Did you mean: in an unstable-like “volatile” repo?
Backports have a defined mission, which has nothing to do
with the “volatile” proposal. What you were referring to,
integration-
On Wednesday, 19 December 2018 2:11:43 AM AEDT Holger Levsen wrote:
> instead of volatile we need PPAs.
I think concept of "volatile" is better, stronger.
PPA allows people to ship whatever they want without cooperating in policy
compliant (official) repo. This is the Debian way where many people
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + fixed-upstream
Bug #916114 [src:xawtv] xawtv FTBFS with glibc 2.28
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
--
916114: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916114
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:29:10 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: xawtv
> Version: 3.104-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/xawtv.html
> ...
> ./common/get_media_devices.c:522: undefined refer
Hi,
Would not be hard to fix, but is there a chance that upstream could just
release a version that works with a current compiler?
Cheers, Joachim
Am 18. Dezember 2018 22:36:26 MEZ schrieb Andreas Tille :
>Control: tags -1 help
>
>Hi,
>
>unfortunately I have no idea how to fix this.
>
>Kind r
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #916800 [phybin] phybin: FTBFS with newer GHC
Added tag(s) help.
--
916800: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916800
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
unfortunately I have no idea how to fix this.
Kind regards, Andreas.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:32:22PM +0200, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> Package: phybin
> Version: 0.3-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:26:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916559: fixed in owfs 3.2p3+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #916559,
regarding python3-ow{,net}: fails to install: SyntaxError in File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ow/__init__.py", line 346
to be m
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:21:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915390: fixed in clazy 1.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #915390,
regarding clazy: Segmentation fault compiling any file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 916782 harfbuzz fails to build on big endian
Bug #916782 [src:harfbuzz] harfbuzz: fails to build on s390x and mips
Changed Bug title to 'harfbuzz fails to build on big endian' from 'harfbuzz:
fails to build on s390x and mips'.
> thanks
St
I have a new version of the gbonds package prepared and sent to my
sponsor for upload.
The vast majority of the credit for this upload goes to Yavor Doganov
who submitted a series of patches to modernize the gbonds code, porting
it to GTK+ 3, GIO, and GSettings and restoring printing support! This
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:39:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#911898: fixed in firefox-esr 60.4.0esr-1~deb9u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #911898,
regarding firefox-esr: SIGSEGV on startup on ppc64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Am 18.12.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> But overall I think this, plus the history of the ocaml program's
> name, does demonstrate that the ocaml program's claim to the overall
> software name `dune', and the command name `dune' is incredibly weak.
>
> I just checked and `odune' seems to be
Meanwhile the package built successfully on ubuntu disco armhf, see
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysbench/1.0.15+ds-1/+build/15588300
pgpipBoYMe2h4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 900912 openjdk-11: Accessibility does not get loaded
Bug #900912 [openjdk-11] openjdk-10: Accessibility does not get loaded
Changed Bug title to 'openjdk-11: Accessibility does not get loaded' from
'openjdk-10: Accessibility does not get
On 2018-12-17 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Metzler (2018-12-17 19:37:05)
[msmtp / GnuTLS 3.6 breaks]
>> FWIW I have had successful connections against exim4 (gnutls 3.5 and
>> 3.6). Which host are you trying to connect to?
> Sorry for exaggerating!
Not at all.
> The hosts I experi
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:49:07 +0200
with message-id <20181218184907.dtc6lcenygtrx...@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#914435: haskell-finite-field: Missing build-dependency
on singletons
has caused the Debian Bug report #914435,
regarding haskell-finite-field: Missing build-depen
On 2018-12-18 18:13, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:33 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
>> Package: znc-backlog
>> Version: 0.20170713-1
>> Severity: serious
>>
>
> Hmm, not sure this is warranted.
It's currently uninstallable in sid.
Instead of requesting a binNMU (and doi
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.18.25
Bug #916799 [dpkg] dpkg: update-alternatives does not properly deregister
obsolete slaves if the link group is currently broken
Marked as found in versions dpkg/1.18.25.
--
916799: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916799
Debian Bu
Package: phybin
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear maintainer,
phybin FTBFS with newer versions of GHC (>= 8.4) with the following error:
[1 of 9] Compiling Bio.Phylogeny.PhyBin.CoreTypes (
Bio/Phylogeny/P
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.2
Severity: serious
Control: found -1 1.18.25
Hi,
there is a problem with update-alternatives not properly deregistering
obsolete slaves:
==
#!/bin/sh
update-alternatives --version
update-alternatives --remove-all foobar
set -x
touch /foo /foo.1
touch /bar /
Even firefox was renamed twice.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Conflict over /usr/bin/dune"):
> https://www.google.com/search?q=dune+software
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_(software)
> https://www.google.com/search?q=%2Fusr%2Fbin%2Fdune
>
> Under the circumstances it seems obvious that, at the very least, the
> ocaml build t
On 12/18/18 8:41 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:38:39PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> But if that is not possible, volatile as a separate archive is also fine.
>
> instead of volatile we need PPAs.
I think a redefined volatile is the best option for sharing work. But
PPA
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:12 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:38:39PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > But if that is not possible, volatile as a separate archive is also fine.
>
> instead of volatile we need PPAs.
Shortly before the Stretch release, when I was scrambling to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source linux
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux'
Limit currently set to 'source':'linux'
> tags 916774 + pending
Bug #916774 [linux-perf-4.19] linux-perf metapackage fails to upgrade due to
file conflict
Resending because
1. mailing @packages.d.o rather than @packages.qa.d.o
2. fixed one of the google urls which I broke while
removing tracking crap
Stéphane Glondu writes ("Conflict over /usr/bin/dune"):
> The "dune" package (of which I am the maintainer) is a popular build
> system for OC
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:33 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: znc-backlog
> Version: 0.20170713-1
> Severity: serious
>
Hmm, not sure this is warranted.
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> do you really need a dependency on the exact binary version of z
Stéphane Glondu writes ("Conflict over /usr/bin/dune"):
> The "dune" package (of which I am the maintainer) is a popular build
> system for OCaml projects. It is pretty recent, has strong upstream
> support, and more and more projects are switching to it, which is a
> reason to have it in Debian.
>
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 21:24 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: linux-perf-4.19
> Version: 4.19.9-1
> Severity: serious
>
> I had the linux-perf metapackage fail to upgrade due to a file conflict
> between linux-perf-4.18 & linux-perf-4.19:
[...]
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /var/cache/apt/a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 909922 8.4.4+dfsg1-1
Bug #909922 [ghc-doc] ghc-doc: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8):
/usr/share/doc/ghc-doc/html/libraries/{haddock-bundle.min.js,quick-jump.css}
Marked as found in versions ghc/8.4.4+dfsg1-1.
> found 905532 0.1
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:38:39PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> But if that is not possible, volatile as a separate archive is also fine.
instead of volatile we need PPAs.
--
cheers,
Holger
---
On 2018, ഡിസംബർ 18 7:14:14 PM IST, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> And yes, I'm with Alexander, the volatile maintenance can't be dumped
>on the backports team. It's a different workflow anyway.
My proposal for backports is to have only the dependencies of packages in
volatile that fall in the curren
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:42:55AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Source: harfbuzz
> Version: 2.2.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> harfbuzz fails to build on the release architectures s390x and mips.
> The new version fails to build on several non-release architectures
> too.
>
> https://b
Source: harfbuzz
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
harfbuzz fails to build on the release architectures s390x and mips.
The new version fails to build on several non-release architectures
too.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=harfbuzz
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Package: slack-desktop
Version: 3.3.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to run slack I recive a segmentation fault.
It seems to be related to libnode. I ran valgrind slack and get:
==14607== Process terminating with default action o
Package: src:cylc
Version: 7.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in buster with dpkg-buildpackage -A but it failed:
[...]
dh binary-indep --with python2
dh_testroot
Thanks Niko,
it seems that you where right regarding libmariadbclient18 ...
downgrading libmariadbclient18 fixed the issue :-)
dpkg -i libmariadbclient18_10.1.26-0+deb9u1_amd64.deb
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 06:44:32PM +0100, h.thien wrote:
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.2
Hey,
* Pirate Praveen [2018-12-18 09:34:46 CET]:
> On 12/3/18 8:11 PM, Dominik George wrote:
> >> well, Debian is using gitlab!!! so this sentence has no sense. The
> >> problem here
> >> is that is a complex software that depends of a lot of pieces and it's
> >> not
> >> easy/possible to fit
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:49:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#912121: fixed in bsd-finger 0.17-15.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #912121,
regarding bsd-finger misses the generator for configure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#912120: fixed in biff 1:0.17.pre2412-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #912120,
regarding biff misses the generator for configure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:49:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#873085: fixed in bsd-finger 0.17-15.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #873085,
regarding bsd-finger does not trap errors from ./configure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Package: activemq
Version: 5.15.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m53.7s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/sh
Package: linux-perf-4.19
Version: 4.19.9-1
Severity: serious
I had the linux-perf metapackage fail to upgrade due to a file conflict
between linux-perf-4.18 & linux-perf-4.19:
$ sudo apt install -t unstable linux-perf
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state inf
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:04:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915335: fixed in checkstyle 8.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #915335,
regarding checkstyle FTBFS: head() in
com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.xpath.AbstractNode cannot implement head() in
net.sf.saxon.om
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #916699 [minissdpd] Run minissdpd debconf question insufficiently detailed
for an advanced user to answer it
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
916699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916699
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Package: pkg-config
Version: 0.29-4+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: missing dependency
# i686-linux-gnu-pkg-config --libs libssl
Package libssl was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libssl.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
N
Package: libelogind-dev-doc
Version: 239.3-3+debian1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to ov
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org).
> usertags 916673 piuparts
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> found 891612 6.5.1-3
Bug #891612 [thumbor] thumbor: uninstallabl
Package: python-dmidecode-data
Version: 3.12.2-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwr
Package: libucto3
Version: 0.14-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
http
Package: znc-backlog
Version: 0.20170713-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
do you really need a dependency on the exact binary version of znc
available at the build time of znc-backlog? I.e., every time znc
gets uploaded *or binNMUed*, a binNMU of znc-bac
On 2018-12-18 10:57, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
>> I've also observed this behavior (i.e. lost files in some package, e.g.
>> eldav) in stretch, so it's probably apel there, too.
>
> I think apel 10.8+0.20120427-16 in stretch is fine, because the
> `emacs` flavor is skipped in the emacsen-install sc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org).
> usertags 914733 piuparts
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> found 914733 5.8.0+dfsg-1
Bug #914733 {Done: Dmitry Smirnov } [c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 916576 + sid buster
Bug #916576 [src:pbdagcon] pbdagcon: FTBFS pbdata/Types.h: No such file or
directory
Added tag(s) sid and buster.
> found 857954 2:1.02.153-1
Bug #857954 [libdevmapper-dev] libdevmapper-dev: broken symlink:
/usr/lib//lib
Control: reassign -1 libaether-ant-tasks-java
Control: affects -1 src:scala
Control: severity -1 important
This is actually an issue with libaether-ant-tasks-java, the classpath
of aether-ant-tasks.jar is missing slf4j-api.jar. This issue was
probably triggered by the update of Maven to the versio
Package: deepin-icon-theme
Version: 15.12.67-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libaether-ant-tasks-java
Bug #915509 [src:scala] scala ftbfs: The repository system could not be
initialized
Bug reassigned from package 'src:scala' to 'libaether-ant-tasks-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions scala/2.11.12-4.
Ignoring request to
Control: notfound -1 10.8+0.20120427-16
Control: found -1 10.8+0.20120427-17
On December 17, 2018 at 11:22PM +0100, anbe (at debian.org) wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #911610
> Control: found -1 10.8+0.20120427-16
>
> I've also observed this behavior (i.e. lost files in some package, e.g.
> eldav) in
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 10.8+0.20120427-16
Bug #911610 {Done: Tatsuya Kinoshita } [apel] eldav: files
missing after upgrade from stretch:
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/eldav/{,vc-}eldav.el
Bug #911612 {Done: Tatsuya Kinoshita } [apel] tdiary-mode:
files missing after upgrade fro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 914524 https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=4625
Bug #914524 [sogo] sogo: SSL problem(?) causes 'An error occurred during object
publishing' in webmail
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=4625'.
> thanks
Stoppi
I have forwarded this upstream, here:
https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=4625
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
signature.as
Hi,
It has been brought to my attention that both packages "whitedune" and
"dune" provide the binary "/usr/bin/dune" (#916468).
The situation falls directly under section 10.1 of the Policy:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-binaries
> Two different packages must not inst
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:04:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916706: fixed in python-cobra 0.14.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #916706,
regarding python-cobra FTBFS with python-pip 18.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Le 14/12/2018 à 09:17, Chris Lamb a écrit :
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
>> Vincent Danjean wrote:
>>
>>> However, the git does not seem to have been moved to salsa.
>>
>> I fixed a number of CVEs recently and I would love to push my changes
>> to suitable branches. Can the PEAR maintainers please migr
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> [adding -devel to cc]
>
> On 12/3/18 8:11 PM, Dominik George wrote:
> >> well, Debian is using gitlab!!! so this sentence has no sense. The
> >> problem here
> >> is that is a complex software that depends of a lot of pieces and it's
> >> not
> >> easy
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:41:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#906371: fixed in jmodeltest 2.1.10+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #906371,
regarding jmodeltest: FTBFS in buster/sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
[adding -devel to cc]
On 12/3/18 8:11 PM, Dominik George wrote:
>> well, Debian is using gitlab!!! so this sentence has no sense. The
>> problem here
>> is that is a complex software that depends of a lot of pieces and it's
>> not
>> easy/possible to fit the definition. So, maybe we should create
95 matches
Mail list logo
