Hi,
>Good finding, but I miss the words "on powerpc" ;) .
true, obviously only powerpc (partch.debian.org) was tested :)
>That file is not extremely big and the change is not incredibly large.>We
>should be able to nail this down for the FTBFS. Still, the issue may
>be outside this file as mult
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:33:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831121: fixed in shark 3.1.1+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831121,
regarding shark: FTBFS with GCC 6: HDF5Tests.cpp:39:56: error: ambiguous
overload for 'operator=' (operand types are 'std::vector' a
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:33:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#820701: fixed in shark 3.1.1+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #820701,
regarding shark: FTBFS on various architectures - testsuite failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:19:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#802608: fixed in knetwalk 4:16.08.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #802608,
regarding knetwalk: missing depend qml-module-org-kde-games-core
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Control: reassign -1 graphviz
Control: merge -1 827806
Hi Santiago,
On 2016-08-18 00:21, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "pyevolve_ex19_gp.py", line 85, in
> main_run()
> File "pyevolve_ex19_gp.py", line 82, in main_run
> graph.write_jpeg('tree.png',
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 graphviz
Bug #834674 [src:pyevolve] pyevolve: FTBFS in testing (Format: "jpeg" not
recognized)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:pyevolve' to 'graphviz'.
No longer marked as found in versions pyevolve/0.6~rc1+svn398+dfsg-9.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 8:50:33 PM AEST Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release),
> the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that
> require similar fixes.
1.13.0 still FTBFS on i386 for another reason:
https://githu
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:48:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835290: fixed in protobuf 3.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #835290,
regarding protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference to
`google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_*')
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:48:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835290: fixed in protobuf 3.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #835290,
regarding protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to
`google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, lon
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:48:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835358: fixed in protobuf 3.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #835358,
regarding libprotobuf-java: artifactid should be protobuf-java not
protobuf-parent
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
tag 835290 pending
--
We believe that the bug #835290 you reported has been fixed in the Git
repository. You can see the commit message below and/or inspect the
commit contents at:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-protobuf/pkg-protobuf.git/diff/?id=6df9f07
(This message was generated auto
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 835290 pending
Bug #835290 [src:protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to
`google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)'
Bug #835302 [src:protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 834107 metview
Bug #834107 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [libgrib-api-dev] magics++:
FTBFS (No rule to make target '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenjp2.so', needed
by 'lib/libMagPlus.so.3.0.0')
Added indication that 834107 affects metview
> than
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 831961 + pending
Bug #831961 [src:proftpd-dfsg] proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A:
make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
tags 831961 + pending
thanks
Hello Santiago Vila, and everyone else,
I have committed to proftpd-pkg git repository,
I will upload to mentos once the other diff has completed.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> tags 831961 + patch
> thanks
>
> The following patch s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 830471 4.6.7-1
Bug #830471 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:metview] metview: FTBFS:
TeDefines.h:208:11: error: '::isnan' has not been declared
Marked as fixed in versions metview/4.6.7-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 834107 libgrib-api-dev
Bug #834107 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [src:magics++]
magics++: FTBFS (No rule to make target
'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenjp2.so', needed by 'lib/libMagPlus.so.3.0.0')
Bug reassigned from package 'src:magic
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 830471 4.6.7-1
Bug #830471 [src:metview] metview: FTBFS: TeDefines.h:208:11: error: '::isnan'
has not been declared
No longer marked as found in versions metview/4.6.7-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Source: blitz++
Version: 1:0.10+ds-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blitz++
Failure on i386, armel, armhf:
../../config/test-driver: line 107: 16150 Aborted "$@" >
$log_file 2>&1
FAIL: matmult
Failures on arm64, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x:
FAIL:
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:19:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831136: fixed in calculix-cgx 2.11+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831136,
regarding calculix-cgx: FTBFS with GCC 6: stl_algobase.h:243:56: error: macro
"min" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
to b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 835290 https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2002
Bug #835290 [src:protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to
`google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)'
Bug #835302 [src:protobuf] p
2016-08-23 23:33 GMT+02:00 Thomas Pierson :
After installing gstreamer1.0-alsa and manually selecting ALSA output
(it just showed ALSA, I couldn't select the specific card).
out.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
I tried with all 4 files, it doesn't play any of them without plugins-bad.
2016-08-23 23:33 GMT+02:00 Thomas Pierson :
> On 23/08/2016 22:33, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>> I tried playing 2 files
>> Ogg data, Vorbis audio, stereo, 44100 Hz, ~0 bps, created by:
>> Xiphophorus libVorbis I (1.0 RC3)
>> I
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 23:15:47 +0200
with message-id <20160824211546.6clvnxa72ozrg...@breakpoint.cc>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#778747: openssl: RFC 7465 says RC4
is broken, never to be used
has caused the Debian Bug report #778747,
regarding openssl: RFC 7465 says
Hi!
First, please understand that so far, no ABI breakage between
FFmpeg 3.0 and FFmpeg 3.1 was found, only the usage of
non-public api (that we decided to work-around for 3.1.1).
Am I correct that no backtrace was provided for this issue?
But even with a backtrace, I fear a bisect may be neces
Source: dsyslog
Severity: serious
Dear maintainers,
XTaran was in contact with upstream asking about the status and the response
was that it
is no longer developed [1].
Therefore the question if it should be removed from Debian, especially as it
will need patches to fix #624025, which is open s
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:50:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835280: fixed in libabw 0.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #835280,
regarding libabw: FTBFS: libabw-0.1.so: undefined reference to
`boost::system::system_category()'
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:33:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811972: fixed in khtml 5.25.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #811972,
regarding khtml: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:33:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831145: fixed in kjsembed 5.25.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831145,
regarding kjsembed: FTBFS with GCC 6: dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier
errors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:45:59PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The way it fails may be related to Bug #730515.
I confirm that this was related and this very reason is fixed in SVN.
There is also a new upstream version.
Unfortunately there are 4 remaining failures. For a test I was just
"h
Hi Gianfranco,
On 24-08-16 14:38, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Interesting findings:
> fpcmkcfg-2.6.4 is *not* failing in neither Jessie, nor Sid.
Good finding, but I miss the words "on powerpc" ;) .
> for this, I copied the file from 2.6.4 over the one from 3.0.0, and I did a
> rebuild.
>
>
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:03:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#806383: fixed in python-igraph 0.7.1.post6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #806383,
regarding python-igraph: FTBFS on *i386: testMultilevel AssertionError
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#833121: fixed in darkradiant 2.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #833121,
regarding darkradiant: seffaults when python scripting enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
The actual error message for the eclipse-cdt FTBFS was snipped from the
log in the bug report, it is:
[javac] 67. ERROR in
/tmp/eclipse-cdt-8.6.0/debian/.eclipse-build/org.eclipse.cdt.core/model/org/eclipse/cdt/core/settings/model/util/PatternNameMap.java
(at line 90)
[javac] privat
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:21:14PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> > I've been strugling to rebuild webkit2gtk backport. I tried with
> > 2 environement, one using Jessie and sbuild, and one using a
> > virtualbox machine without s
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:53:56PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Version 1.6.2-2 depends on
> > >
> > > libgnutls30 (>=3.5.0)
> > > libnotmuch4 (>=0.21~rc1)
> > >
> > > These should be correct.
> >
> > yes, this was my fault, I've already asked a binNMU for amd64, the other
> > arch
> > sho
Markus Koschany wrote:
> whenever you see something with "protobuf" in the logs, it's most
> certainly related to #835358. :)
Really helpful; thank you for this :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
> > Version 1.6.2-2 depends on
> >
> > libgnutls30 (>=3.5.0)
> > libnotmuch4 (>=0.21~rc1)
> >
> > These should be correct.
>
> yes, this was my fault, I've already asked a binNMU for amd64, the other arch
> should be fine.
>
> See bugs.debian.org/835324 for more details.
Hi.
Just to point out
Source: rkt
Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
rkt FTBFS on several architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt
The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release),
the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that
require simi
Package: ruby-appraisal
Followup-For: Bug #830060
Dear Maintainer,
I've built ruby-appraisal 0.5.1-2 directly from git. and the I cannot
reproduce this issue.
$ ruby -e 'gem "appraisal"'
$ dpkg -l | grep ruby-appraisal
ii ruby-appraisal 0.5.1-2 all
Find out
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:00:30 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: bookkeeper
> Version: 4.2.4-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Dear M
Package: libprotobuf-java
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
the recent upload of libprotobuf-java 3.0.0 breaks its
reverse-dependencies [1].
This was caused by changing the artifactid in java/pom.xml from
protobuf-java to protobuf-parent or in other words java/pom.xml
represents the parent p
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:21:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#749365: fixed in lucene2 2.9.4+ds1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #749365,
regarding lucene2: FTBFS too much often
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811977: fixed in kjs 5.25.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #811977,
regarding kjs: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Source: libitext-java
Version: 2.1.7-11
Severity: serious
libitext-java is uninstallable in sid at the moment. This is causing
other build failures (e.g. for jasperreports). I'm not totally sure why
the package won't migrate to testing because only libitext-java-gcj has
been dropped with the last
tag 835341 +pending
thanks
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:48:00PM +, Viktor Jägersküpper wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.6.2-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the latest version of mutt has somehow got wrong dependencies (from an
> older version I guess) and so is not installabl
Hi Graham,
it looks like the eigen-upstream has a patch already,
but AFAIK it does not solve all problems.
I discussed it with Philipp already and I will apply the
patch as far as it will be ready.
Yes, bug can be reassigned.
Regards
Anton
2016-08-24 18:01 GMT+02:00 Graham Inggs :
> Hi
>
> A
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 835341 +pending
Bug #835341 [mutt] mutt 1.6.2-3 has wrong dependencies
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
835341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835341
Debi
Hi
At least ceres-solver and opensurgsim FTBFS with eigen3 3.3~beta2-1.
They both build fine with 3.3~beta1-2.
Should these bugs be moved to eigen3?
Regards
Graham
Thanks for looking into this, Petter.
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2016-08-24 11:05:16)
> I had a look at the current failure, and discovered that there are two
> issues blocking the build. One is the changed output format from
> licensecheck, where a trailing period now show up in the copyrigh
Package: gnupg
Version: 2.1.14-5
Severity: serious
For at least #782904 and possibly other packages proper
Breaks/Conflicts are required for all packages where old versions
(especially the versions in stable) were broken to ensure that these
packages get upgraded to fixed versions when the gnupg p
Package: mutt
Version: 1.6.2-3
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
the latest version of mutt has somehow got wrong dependencies (from an
older version I guess) and so is not installable in unstable or testing.
# apt-get install mutt
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 832438 833783
Bug #832438 {Done: gregor herrmann } [cdbs] cdbs: pass -I.
through to Makefile.PL and Build.PL
Bug #832438 {Done: gregor herrmann } [cdbs] cdbs: pass -I.
through to Makefile.PL and Build.PL
Marked as fixed in versions cd
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I've been strugling to rebuild webkit2gtk backport. I tried with
> 2 environement, one using Jessie and sbuild, and one using a
> virtualbox machine without sbuild. Both times, I had the below
> output:
>
> collect2: error: ld ret
Package: src:influxdb
Version: 0.13.0+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package on stretch with dpkg-buildpackage -A and
sbuild and it failed with an error like this:
--
go generate -v -ldflags=-X main
With the aforementioned patch in place, opensurgsim builds successfully
with eigen3 3.3~beta1-2.
Unfortunately, it fails to build with eigen3 3.3~beta2-1 currently in
testing with the following message (hopefully the relevant bits):
[ 99%] Building CXX object
SurgSim/Physics/UnitTests/CMakeFi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 834180 +patch
Bug #834180 [src:bristol] bristol: FTBFS: audioEngineJack.c:42:26: fatal error:
alsa/iatomic.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
834
tags 834180 +patch
thanks
A fix for the bristol FTBFS is attached.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pe
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:03:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835105: fixed in erfa 1.2.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #835105,
regarding erfa: FTBFS [i386]: Test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #826300 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:fpc] fpc: fp-compiler
not installable on powerpc since glibc 2.23
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopen
On 08/24/16 14:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2016-08-24 14:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:28:23 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have
multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be
useful in othe
control: reopen -1
ok, after digging into the issue I did:
create a jessie-backport chroot for building
create a sid chroot for testing fpcmkcfg- binaries
(it crashes just by running the tool with no parameters).
Interesting findings:
fpcmkcfg-2.6.4 is *not* failing in neither Jessie, nor Sid.
So
On 2016-08-24 14:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:28:23 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > [I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have
> > multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be
> > useful in other packages.]
>
> protobuf has
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:28:23 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have
multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be
useful in other packages.]
protobuf has taken the atomicops code from V8, we should fix the
architecture
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 835170 by 835290
Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf
835170 was blocked by: 835302 835266
835170 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 835170: 835290
> merge 835302 835290
Bug #835302 [src:protobuf] protobuf:
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831874: fixed in mediawiki 1:1.27.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831874,
regarding mediawiki: fails to install: mediawiki.postinst: php5enmod: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831227: fixed in mediawiki 1:1.27.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831227,
regarding mediawiki: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite
/var/lib/mediawiki/extensions/Cite
to be marked as done
Processing control commands:
> block 835170 by -1
Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf
835170 was blocked by: 835266
835170 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 835170: 835302
--
835170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835170
835302: http://bugs.d
Package: binutils-multiarch
Version: 2.27-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
having binutils and binutils-multiarch installed and upgrading from testing
(2.26.1-1) to unstable (2.27-6) makes at least `strings` and `ar` go away.
This happened to me on my main system when I u
Source: protobuf
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch upstream
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 835170 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
protobuf 3.0.0 FTBFS on s390x because it lacks support for this
architecture:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX
Control: tags -1 + patch
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> My problem is that Debian::LicenseReconcile::App::suggest_stanzas isn't a
> subroutine,
> it is a boolean variable. I have no idea how to convince the coverage test
> that
> it isn't supposed to have any coverage. Or perhaps I completly misunder
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #832840 [src:license-reconcile] license-reconcile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
Added tag(s) patch.
--
832840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832840
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 20:23:13 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: snmp-mibs-downloader
> Version: 1.1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> a test with piuparts revealed that your package uses files from
> /usr/share/doc in its maintainer scripts
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:54:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835283: fixed in snap 2013-11-29-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #835283,
regarding snap: FTBFS: exonpairs.c:86:7: error: this 'if' clause does not
guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
to be marked as
"László Böszörményi (GCS)" writes:
> Please use the following: dget -x
> http://www.barcikacomp.hu/gcs/ovirt-guest-agent_1.0.10.2.dfsg-2+deb8u1.dsc
Thank you. I checked it and:
- It works for me with sysvinit.
- With systemd, there is the same permission problem as in unstable with
/var/log
tag 806383 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #806383 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=python-modules/packages/python-igraph.git;a=commitdiff;h=6265548
---
commit 62655487f43dd2e
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 806383 pending
Bug #806383 [src:python-igraph] python-igraph: FTBFS on *i386: testMultilevel
AssertionError
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
806383: http://bugs.debian.org
Package: src:pcl
Version: 1.8.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
pcl 1.8 fails to build on armel and armhf (OpenGLES?)
cd /«BUILDDIR»/pcl-1.8.0+dfsg1/build/apps/in_hand_scanner && /usr/bin/c++
-DEIGEN_USE_NEW_STDVECTOR -DEIGEN_YES_I_KNOW_SPARSE_MODULE_IS_NOT_STABLE_YET
-DQT_CONCURRENT_
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:22:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#834188: fixed in qsapecng 2.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #834188,
regarding qsapecng: FTBFS: type_traits/detail/has_binary_operator.hp:50: Parse
error at "BOOST_JOIN"
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:22:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#834769: fixed in python-oslo.config 1:3.15.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #834769,
regarding python-oslo.config: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named setuptools
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:19:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#828658: fixed in django-stronghold 0.2.7+debian-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #828658,
regarding FTBFS under Django 1.10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 02:19:30 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > I also recommend switching to dh, but in the meantime, the attached
> > patch should work.
>
> Unfortunately that patch does not work.
Strange. While it's true that I completely forgot a
Source: protobuf
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch upstream
[I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have
multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be
useful in other packages.]
Dear Maintainer,
The new version of protobuf fails to build on
While I agree that it would be useful to have an active maintainer of the
package,
I hope it will not block this useful tool to stay in Debian as long as it is
working.
I had a look at the current failure, and discovered that there are two issues
blocking
the build. One is the changed output fo
On 08/23/2016 10:01 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Please don't leave the package in this horrible, broken state!
>
>
> You need to package an older version to replace this if you can't
> get it to work. Granted, Sid is 'unstable', but that does NOT mean
> that it's the same as 'completely broken
Processing control commands:
> tag 835094 pending
Bug #835094 [src:apt] APT fails to install packages which conflict with an
installed package when APT::Get::Purge=true is used
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #835094 to the same tags previously set
--
835094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Control: tag 835094 pending
Hello,
Bug #835094 in apt reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/diff/?id=084562e
(this message was generated automatically
Source: webkit2gtk
Version: 2.12.3-1~bpo8+1
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've been strugling to rebuild webkit2gtk backport. I tried with 2 environement,
one using Jessie and sbuild, and one using a virtualbox machine without sbuild.
Both times, I had the below output:
collect2: error: ld returned 1 ex
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package gajim
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'gajim'
Limit currently set to 'package':'gajim'
> severity 834399 normal
Bug #834399 [gajim] Gajim GnuPG improvements
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Source: snap
Version: 2013-11-29-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
snap fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Source: urdfdom
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
urdfdom fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Source: projectl
Version: 1.001.dfsg1-8
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
projectl fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
Source: libabw
Version: 0.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
libabw fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Source: tiledarray
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
tiledarray fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
Source: rocs
Version: 4:16.04.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
rocs fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
95 matches
Mail list logo
