Bug#784612: [anki] Qt4's WebKit removal

2016-06-09 Thread Richard Möhn
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 03:01:06 +0200 Andreas Bombe wrote: […] > Right, until there's a Qt5 port, little can be done. I have actually […] This is not a good solution for everyone, but I'm now running Anki inside a Debian Jessie Docker container. See here for how to do it: http://cloj.de/AnkiDocker/

Processed: tagging 826901

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 826901 + pending Bug #826901 [xrdp] xrdp: use dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 826901: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#821676: graphviz: Disable PHP bindings

2016-06-09 Thread GCS
Hi Ondřej, On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > could you please apply attached patch that disable PHP bindings. It > doesn't look like swig is going to be updated any time soon and graphviz > is one of the last packages preventing src:php5 removal from testing. I had a false ho

Bug#821617: Bumping severity of PHP 7.0 transition bugs to serious

2016-06-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Jeremy, the lintian hasn't been updated yet, so please ignore the warnings about php-cli and go ahead and upload the package if it works for you. Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure,

Bug#821676: graphviz: Disable PHP bindings

2016-06-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
Control: tags -1 +patch Hi Laszlo, could you please apply attached patch that disable PHP bindings. It doesn't look like swig is going to be updated any time soon and graphviz is one of the last packages preventing src:php5 removal from testing. If you don't have a time, I am prepared to do an N

Processed: graphviz: Disable PHP bindings

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +patch Bug #821676 [src:graphviz] src:graphviz: PHP 7.0 Transition Added tag(s) patch. -- 821676: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821676 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#826896: xul-ext-noscript: incompatible with firefox-esr in jessie

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed 826896 2.9.0.11-1 Bug #826896 [xul-ext-noscript] xul-ext-noscript: incompatible with firefox-esr in jessie Marked as fixed in versions mozilla-noscript/2.9.0.11-1. -- 826896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826896 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#826896: xul-ext-noscript: incompatible with firefox-esr in jessie

2016-06-09 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: fixed 826896 2.9.0.11-1 On 2016-06-09, David Prévot wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> Apparently, the xul-ext-noscript package in jessie is incompatible >> with the new firefox-esr security update just released. > > Thank you for your report.

Bug#821617: Bumping severity of PHP 7.0 transition bugs to serious

2016-06-09 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
Haven't reached out to confirm with upstream but as the website states "Swift Mailer integrates into any web app written in PHP 5, ..." I'm not exactly certain PHP 7 is a concern. I have attempted to build latest version 5.4.2 under Sid following the suggestions in the ticket and the package doesn'

Bug#814316: marked as done (New Flash player is available -- fixes a security issue)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:28:31 + with message-id <20160610042831.gk3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #814316, regarding New Flash player is available -- fixes a security issue to be mar

Bug#820993: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: Downloads vulnerable flash player, not current version)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Downloads vulnerable flash player, not curre

Bug#826369: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: Cannot update Flash Player to version available on upstream site (latest version))

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Cannot update Flash Player to version availa

Bug#824367: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: installation fails with "ERROR: failed to get upstream version")

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: installation fails with "ERROR: failed to ge

Bug#826618: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree does not update to flash version 11.2.202.621)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree does not update to flash version 11.2.202.621

Bug#820975: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: Update to 11.2.202.616 silently does nothing (ERROR 404: Not Found))

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Update to 11.2.202.616 silently does nothing

Bug#826777: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: latest security release missing from hash)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: latest security release missing from hash to

Bug#820583: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: should notify when an update is not yet available, not just reinstall current version)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: should notify when an update is not yet ava

Bug#826301: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:26:25 + with message-id <20160610042625.gj3...@master.debian.org> and subject line flashplugin-nonfree: newer Adobe Flash Player available has caused the Debian Bug report #820583, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails t

Bug#826864: epubcheck doesn't run anymore

2016-06-09 Thread Markus Koschany
On 09.06.2016 19:20, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > Thank you for the bug report. Unfortunately I'm away from keyboard until > Monday. > I see you found this bug in Debian stable release, can you also > reproduce this with Debian testing/unstable (if you have a possibility > to try of cours

Bug#826301: flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version

2016-06-09 Thread Marc J. Driftmeyer
Good. Glad we did. The thing has been outdated and crapping on every web site across the Internet. It takes 5 minutes to build a new hash and update the package being pulled. It only took nearly 2 weeks of it to get your attention. Don't fret none. In a year or so all sites will have flash rem

Bug#826301: flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version

2016-06-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/10/2016 05:06 AM, jerojasro wrote: > Regardless of whether what you say is correct or not (it's not, but let's Yes, it is. Go to the actual URL of this bug report and check what it says at the top: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826301 "Merged with 820583, 820975, 8209

Bug#826301: flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version

2016-06-09 Thread jerojasro
Dear John Paul Adrian, Regardless of whether what you say is correct or not (it's not, but let's not lose ourselves nitpicking), you are being needlessly rude/patronizing to other people; what might be obvious to you is not necessarily so to us bug reporters. Please leave that attitude outside De

Bug#814316: Fetch flashplugin-nonfree archive from Macromedia directly?

2016-06-09 Thread Elliott Mitchell
The problem for flashplugin-nonfree is verifying the tarball that is downloaded. Adobe isn't making this easy since they don't provide any form of conventional signature (PGP). Thus Bart Martens had been doing the rather unenviable job of having to approve Flash Player somehow. The approach had

Bug#825268: marked as done (zfsutils,zutils: error when trying to install together)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:22:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#825268: fixed in zfsutils 10.3~svn296373-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #825268, regarding zfsutils,zutils: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#826904: php-zeroc-ice: fails to upgrade from 'jessie': php-zeroc-ice.postinst: phpenmod: not found

2016-06-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: php-zeroc-ice Version: 3.6.2-stretch+git1+6f49504-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'jessie'. It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails. >From the atta

Bug#787351: marked as done ([RC][cc-by-nc-sa] Please clarify license of a few svg files)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:37:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#787351: fixed in freetuxtv 0.6.8~dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #787351, regarding [RC][cc-by-nc-sa] Please clarify license of a few svg files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#826896: xul-ext-noscript: incompatible with firefox-esr in jessie

2016-06-09 Thread David Prévot
Hi Vagrant, On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Package: xul-ext-noscript > Version: 2.6.9.3-1 > Apparently, the xul-ext-noscript package in jessie is incompatible > with the new firefox-esr security update just released. Thank you for your report. > I presume t

Processed: limit source to mozilla-noscript, tagging 826896

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source mozilla-noscript Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'mozilla-noscript' Limit currently set to 'source':'mozilla-noscript' > tags 826896 + pending Bug #826896 [xul-ext-noscript] xul-ext-noscript: incompat

Bug#826903: biomaj: installation with skipping mysql database configuration breaks package manager

2016-06-09 Thread Matthias Ernst
Package: biomaj Version: 1.2.3-7 Severity: critical Tags: d-i Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, I installed a fresh debian testing using net installer. I have used advanced graphical setup. I selected DebianScience. When asked to configure MySQL database connection for BioMA

Bug#826901: xrdp: use dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile

2016-06-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: xrdp Version: 0.9.0~20160601+git703fedd-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not properly handle the obsolete conffile /etc/pam.d/sesman Please use dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile to prope

Bug#826701: marked as done (gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:40:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826701: fixed in gnuplot 5.0.3+dfsg3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #826701, regarding gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3 to be marke

Bug#826896: xul-ext-noscript: incompatible with firefox-esr in jessie

2016-06-09 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: xul-ext-noscript Version: 2.6.9.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Apparently, the xul-ext-noscript package in jessie is incompatible with the new firefox-esr security update just released. This pretty much defeats the purpose of this extension in jessie. I pres

Bug#818037: marked as done (vorbis-tools: vcut always(?) segfaults)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:17:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818037: fixed in vorbis-tools 1.4.0-6+deb8u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818037, regarding vorbis-tools: vcut always(?) segfaults to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#824160: marked as done (p7zip: CVE-2016-2334 CVE-2016-2335)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:17:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824160: fixed in p7zip 9.20.1~dfsg.1-4.1+deb8u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #824160, regarding p7zip: CVE-2016-2334 CVE-2016-2335 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#826301: flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version

2016-06-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Jesus Christ, people! There are actually seven duplicates of the *SAME* bug report? Do you people even bother these days to check for existing bug reports or do you just file a new bug right away and always assume you're the first one? Seriously, how hard is it to open your browser and point it

Bug#821811: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#821811: samba: badlock patch breaks trust relationship

2016-06-09 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:40 +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > El 23/05/16 a las 22:28, Andrew Bartlett escribió: > > > > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:47 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > > > > > On 2016-04-29 08:55:43, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Samba maintainers, > > > >

Bug#826892: slpvm: FTBFS:

2016-06-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: slpvm Version: 0.1.5-12.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, slpvm fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

Processed: forcibly merging 826301 820993

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 826301 820993 Bug #826301 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version Bug #820583 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: should notify when an update is not yet

Bug#826887: ggcov: FTBFS: Total: 2/20 tests passed

2016-06-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: ggcov Version: 0.9-10 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, ggcov fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..] g++

Processed: forcibly merging 826301 826777

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 826301 826777 Bug #826301 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version Bug #820583 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: should notify when an update is not yet

Processed: forcibly merging 826301 820975 820583 824367

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 826301 820975 820583 824367 Bug #826301 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: update-flashplugin-nonfree --install fails to download updated version Bug #826369 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: Cannot update Flash Playe

Bug#826365: marked as done (patch to build libgnat* as target instead of host libraries breaks native builds)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
sanitizer (x32 debug symbols) Closes: 826365 Changes: gcc-6 (6.1.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update to SVN 20160609 (r237267, 6.1.1) from the gcc-6-branch. - Fix PR target/71389 (x86), PR tree-optimization/71259, PR target/70830 (ARM), PR target/67310 (x86), PR c++/71442,

Bug#826885: fastqtl,fastqtl-doc: both packages ship /usr/share/man/man1/fastQTL.1.gz

2016-06-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: fastqtl,fastqtl-doc Version: 2.184+dfsg-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation. See p

Bug#826884: snapd: /usr/bin/snap already used by the snap package

2016-06-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: snapd Version: 2.0.5+1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: affects -1 snap Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation.

Processed: snapd: /usr/bin/snap already used by the snap package

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 snap Bug #826884 [snapd] snapd: /usr/bin/snap already used by the snap package Added indication that 826884 affects snap -- 826884: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Bug#824965: diodon: Update to new upstream version 1.5.0

2016-06-09 Thread Oliver Sauder
Severity: important Reverting severity to important as it has been marked by mistake (Diodon doesn't use Qt). Also a package updating to 1.5.0 is available https://mentors.debian.net/package/diodon Looking for a sponsor. Regards, Oliver

Processed: [bts-link] source package gnome-builder

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnome-builder > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.de

Processed: [bts-link] source package yubioath-desktop

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package yubioath-desktop > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth

Bug#826864: epubcheck doesn't run anymore

2016-06-09 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hi Joseph, Thank you for the bug report. Unfortunately I'm away from keyboard until Monday. I see you found this bug in Debian stable release, can you also reproduce this with Debian testing/unstable (if you have a possibility to try of course)? @debian-java the package is team maintained, if any

Bug#823583: marked as done (gfs2-utils: FTBFS: libgfs2 unit tests [..] FAILED (libgfs2.at:4))

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 16:51:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#823583: fixed in gfs2-utils 3.1.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823583, regarding gfs2-utils: FTBFS: libgfs2 unit tests [..] FAILED (libgfs2.at:4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#825411: marked as done (cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 16:49:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#825411: fixed in cdbs 0.4.138 has caused the Debian Bug report #825411, regarding cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#826355: marked as done (apitrace: wrong Built-Using, causing dak rejection)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 16:49:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826355: fixed in apitrace 7.1+git20160531.2d78bef0+repack-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #826355, regarding apitrace: wrong Built-Using, causing dak rejection to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#825109: marked as done (cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 16:49:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#825109: fixed in cdbs 0.4.138 has caused the Debian Bug report #825109, regarding cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#825370: marked as done (cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 16:49:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#825370: fixed in cdbs 0.4.138 has caused the Debian Bug report #825370, regarding cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#826865: kmail: KMail 16.04 needs to have a newer akonadi-server

2016-06-09 Thread Diederik de Haas
Package: kmail Version: 4:16.04.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I, and others, have had a failed attempt at upgrading to KMail 16.04 which resulted in a situation where none of the mail accounts/folder were shown and 'something' was busy all the time, but you had no c

Bug#826864: epubcheck doesn't run anymore

2016-06-09 Thread Joseph Nahmias
Package: epubcheck Version: 4.0.0~alpha11-1 Severity: grave File: /usr/share/java/epubcheck-4.0.0-alpha11.jar Looks like something broke in a recent update and epubcheck stopped working. Here's what I'm seeing: joe@skippy:~$ /usr/share/java/epubcheck-4.0.0-alpha11.jar /usr/share/java/epubcheck-

Bug#826355: apitrace: wrong Built-Using, causing dak rejection

2016-06-09 Thread Hector Oron
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 11:09:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Source: apitrace > Version: 7.1+git20160531.2d78bef0+repack-1 > Severity: serious > > The binary package apitrace-tracers uses the Built-Using filed with a > binary package in instead of the source one. This causes dak to not find >

Processed: tagging 826355

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 826355 + patch Bug #826355 [src:apitrace] apitrace: wrong Built-Using, causing dak rejection Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 826355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#826855: android-platform-build: FTBFS: pandoc: Command not found

2016-06-09 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: android-platform-build Version: 1:6.0.1+r16-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Builds of android-platform-build in minimal environments geared for building only its architecture-dependent binary package have been failing:

Processed (with 2 errors): FTBFS: mv: cannot stat './config.guess': No such file or directory

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 825370 cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files Bug #825370 [cdbs] unicap: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat './config.guess': No such file or directory Changed Bug title to 'cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files' from 'unicap: F

Processed: severity 826803 important

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 826803 important Bug #826803 [fuel-web] Insecure use of password Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 826803: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#823586: marked as done (libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl: FTBFS: got: 'acme.com. 0 IN MX 10 mailhost.acme.com.' expected: 'acme.com. IN MX 10 mailhost.acme.com.')

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2016 12:23:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#823586: fixed in libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl 1.24-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #823586, regarding libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl: FTBFS: got: 'acme.com. 0 IN MX 10 mailhost.acme.com.' expected: 'acme.co

Bug#825291: otrs2: fails to upgrade from 'jessie': DBUpdate-to-5.pl: DBD::Pg::db do failed: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"

2016-06-09 Thread Patrick Matthäi
tag #825291 + moreinfo severity #825291 important tag #825291 + unreproduceable thanks Hi, I can not reproduce your bug report, see attached logs. Am 27.05.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > On 2016-05-27 15:12, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> could you also test if it fails on your system if y

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#825291: otrs2: fails to upgrade from 'jessie': DBUpdate-to-5.pl: DBD::Pg::db do failed: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag #825291 + moreinfo Bug #825291 [otrs2] otrs2: fails to upgrade from 'jessie': DBUpdate-to-5.pl: DBD::Pg::db do failed: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8" Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #825291 to the same tags previously

Processed: tagging 826834

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 826834 + help Bug #826834 [src:lnav] lnav: FTBFS: failing tests Added tag(s) help. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 826834: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826834 Debian Bug Tr

Bug#823215: building kmymoney on Debian unstable

2016-06-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hello! I built KMyMoney myself on Debian unstable/sid latest Plasma/KF5/KDEPIM packages using kdesrc-build Actually it was quite easy with a working kdesrc-build setup: - I also installed quite some devel packages cmake requested - For online banking - I installed aqbanking devel packages

Processed: found 826800 in 3.5.1-6.4, found 826800 in 3.6.2-stretch+git1+6f49504-2 ...

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 826800 3.5.1-6.4 Bug #826800 [ice35-translators,zeroc-ice-compilers] zeroc-ice-compilers and ice35-translators: error when trying to install together There is no source info for the package 'zeroc-ice-compilers' at version '3.5.1-6.4' with

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl package

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 823586 + pending Bug #823586 [src:libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl] libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl: FTBFS: got: 'acme.com. 0 IN MX 10 mailhost.acme.com.' expected: 'acme.com. IN MX 10 mailhost.acme.com.' Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping p

Bug#823586: Pending fixes for bugs in the libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl package

2016-06-09 Thread pkg-perl-maintainers
tag 823586 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl package are closed in revision 5f91d75f0e4ba5c9abf40f5ce727a358a1fffedd in branch 'master' by Christoph Martin The full diff can be seen at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libnet-dns-zonefile-fast-perl.gi

Bug#826842: gammaray: FTBFS on i386 and mips: tests fail/timeout

2016-06-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: gammaray Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, gammaray FTBFS on mips (tests timeout) and i386 (tests fail): https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gammaray&arch=mips&ver=2.4.0-1&stamp=1460020494 https

Bug#826839: kde-l10n: not installable along kde-workspace-data

2016-06-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: kde-l10n Version: 4:4.14.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, upgrading a non-minimal stretch kde installation fails because kde-workspace-data has Breaks+Replaces: kde-l10n-XX (< 4:4.14.0-4~) but kde-l10n-XX is only available at version 4:4.14.0-3. Andreas

Processed: Re: Bug#826701: gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 Bug #826701 {Done: Anton Gladky } [gnuplot-data] gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3 Marked as found in versions gnuplot/5.0.3+dfsg3-2; no longer marked as fixed in versi

Bug#826701: gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3

2016-06-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
Control: found -1 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 Control: found -1 5.0.3+dfsg3-3 It's still broken: Unpacking gnuplot-data (5.0.3+dfsg3-3) over (4.6.6-3) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/gnuplot-data_5.0.3+dfsg3-3_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/gnu

Bug#826834: lnav: FTBFS: failing tests

2016-06-09 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: lnav Version: 0.7.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS I'm filling a new bug for this, despite #783141, since lnav 0.7.0-3 builded fine in part, but now starts failing. Attached is the log. Help in investigating the build failures for lnav is welcome. Regards, Salvatore lnav_0.7.

Bug#826832: pjproject: FTBFS: devlibs error: There is no package matching [libavcodec-dev] and noone provides it, please report bug to d-shlibs maintainer

2016-06-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: pjproject Version: 2.4.5~dfsg-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, pjproject fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

Bug#826831: arc-gui-clients: FTBFS: arcproxy-utils-functions.cpp:678:15: error: 'AuthN' was not declared in this scope

2016-06-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: arc-gui-clients Version: 0.4.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, arc-gui-clients fails to build from source in unstable/

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-09 Thread Eric Beuque
2016-06-09 9:51 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtsen : > [Eric Beuque] > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for your modifications. > > > > i'm starting to cleanup the stream database. I already remove a hundred > of > > invalid stream, to get the most working stream as possible but since > there > > is more than 4000

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-09 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Eric Beuque] > Hi, > > Thanks for your modifications. > > i'm starting to cleanup the stream database. I already remove a hundred of > invalid stream, to get the most working stream as possible but since there > is more than 4000 streams it will takes some times to review all. Yeah. With such am

Bug#818461: marked as done (missing dependencies on ruby modules)

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2016 09:46:27 +0200 with message-id <20160609074627.GA28405@esfahan> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #818461, regarding missing dependencies on ruby modules to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processed: notfixed 818462 in ruby-rails-assets-favico.js/0.3.9~dfsg-4

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 818462 ruby-rails-assets-favico.js/0.3.9~dfsg-4 Bug #818462 {Done: Cédric Boutillier } [src:ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs] missing dependencies on ruby modules No longer marked as fixed in versions ruby-rails-assets-favico.js/0.3.9~dfsg-

Processed: fixed 818461 in ruby-rails-assets-favico.js/0.3.9~dfsg-4

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 818461 ruby-rails-assets-favico.js/0.3.9~dfsg-4 Bug #818461 [src:ruby-rails-assets-favico.js] missing dependencies on ruby modules Marked as fixed in versions ruby-rails-assets-favico.js/0.3.9~dfsg-4. > thanks Stopping processing here. Ple

Processed (with 2 errors): FTBFS: mv: cannot stat './config.guess': No such file or directory

2016-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 825109 cdbs: regression with backing up autotools files Bug #825109 [cdbs] libmarpa-r2-perl: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat './libmarpa_dist/config.guess': No such file or directory Changed Bug title to 'cdbs: regression with backing up autotools

Bug#826803: Insecure use of password

2016-06-09 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Package: fuel-web Version: 9.0+dfsg1-3 Severity: grave Tags: security Dear Maintainer, while investigating the use of PGPASSFILE I found the following code in package fuel-web, file nailgun/tools/env_functions.sh on line 119: echo "*:*:*:${DB_ROOT}:${DB_ROOTPW}" > ${DB_ROOTPGPASS} http://source

Bug#826365: patch to build libgnat* as target instead of host libraries breaks native builds

2016-06-09 Thread Yunqiang Su
> 在 2016年6月7日,23:45,YunQiang Su 写道: > > In ada-gnattools-cross.diff, there are 3 lines, like this: > > +# We will use the just-built compiler to compile and link everything. > +GCC=../gcc/xgcc -B../gcc/ > +GXX=../gcc/xg++ -B../gcc/ > > adding -no-pie option for GCC and GXX will make gcc-6 buil

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-09 Thread Eric Beuque
Hi, Thanks for your modifications. i'm starting to cleanup the stream database. I already remove a hundred of invalid stream, to get the most working stream as possible but since there is more than 4000 streams it will takes some times to review all. 2016-06-09 7:28 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtse

Bug#826801: zeroc-icebox and zeroc-ice-utils: error when trying to install together

2016-06-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: zeroc-ice-utils,zeroc-icebox Version: zeroc-ice-utils/3.6.2-stretch+git1+6f49504-2 Version: zeroc-icebox/3.6.2-stretch+git1+6f49504-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2016-06-09 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installatio