-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package: ruby-redis-namespce
version: 1.4.1-2
severity: serious
log from pbuilder run with rspec 3, for 1.4.1-2
┌───
───┐
│ Run tests for ruby2.1 from debian/ruby-tests.rake
Your message dated Sun, 02 Aug 2015 06:03:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794320: fixed in exim4 4.86-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #794320,
regarding main option "prdr_enable" unknown
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hi,
I just learned that there is a name space conflicts with the new package
ea-utils and amule-utils-gui. I know that we are working according to a
first comes first served basis and thus ea-utils would be responsible to
rename this file. However, I would like to ask you anyway whether there
is
Your message dated Sat, 01 Aug 2015 21:34:19 -0700
with message-id <87h9oie2b8.fsf...@vostro.rath.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#792685: Unable to upgrade from wheezy to jessie
has caused the Debian Bug report #792685,
regarding Unable to upgrade from wheezy to jessie
to be marked as done.
This
I totally empathise with Ian's frustration. I myself spent eight hours
trying to circumvent this 'bug', to put it mildly. I tried to follow a
half-dozen contradictory, inaccurate and incomplete walkthroughs with
no success, so I'm giving up and starting from scratch.
The walkthrough at
http://wiki
control: tags -1 +pending
I've just uploaded a new package to mentors that should fix the issue
with the unsafe metadata backup.
If this works for you too, I think this is suitable for
stable-updates. I'm not sure what the procedure is to get a package in
there, so please let me know if I can do
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +pending
Bug #792685 [s3ql] Unable to upgrade from wheezy to jessie
Added tag(s) pending.
--
792685: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792685
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
Alright, I figured this one out.
First, the reason you're having an s3ql_metadata_bak_0 object right
after the upgrade is that the upgrade itself backups up the metadata
*after* having added the _pre21 suffix to the existing backups.
Secondly (and contrary to what I said before), this should
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 794344 with 794352 794353 794354 794355
Bug #794344 [release.debian.org] transition: python-sqlalchemy
794344 was not blocked by any bugs.
794344 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 794344: 794352, 794353, 794355, and 794354
Package: python-neutron-lbaas
Version: 2015.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
A simple rebuild and upload of the package would be sufficient to pick up
the newer python-sqlalchemy depends, but it FTBFS when I tried to rebuild it.
https://release.debian.org/transitions/
Package: python-sahara
Version: 2015.1.0-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
A simple rebuild and upload of the package should be sufficient to pick up
the newer python-sqlalchemy depends.
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/sqlalchemy.html
I'd be glad to do it if y
Package: python-rally
Version: 0.0.3-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
A simple rebuild and upload of the package would be sufficient to pick up
the newer python-sqlalchemy depends, but it FTBFS when I tried to rebuild it.
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/sqlalc
Source: python-trove
Version: 2015.1.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
A simple rebuild and upload of the package should be sufficient to pick up
the newer python-sqlalchemy depends.
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/sqlalchemy.html
I'd be glad to do it if you
On Jul 30 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'll try and reproduce this in the next day or so and give you access to
> a failing example.
No need, I just managed to reproduce it locally with a filesystem
freshly created in wheezy. I'll look into it.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred.
Hi,
I uploaded an updated package to mentors for easier testing (and also
for someone to sponsor the upload if we've sorted out all problems, I'm
not a DD):
https://mentors.debian.net/package/s3ql
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_2.11.1+dfsg-3.dsc
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG e
Your message dated Sun, 02 Aug 2015 01:04:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#792157: fixed in flask-sqlalchemy 1.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #792157,
regarding flask-sqlalchemy: Not installable: Depends: python-sqlalchemy (<
0.10) but 1.0.6+ds1-1 is in sid
to be marked as done
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 792157 + pending
Bug #792157 [flask-sqlalchemy] flask-sqlalchemy: Not installable: Depends:
python-sqlalchemy (< 0.10) but 1.0.6+ds1-1 is in sid
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
On Monday 20 July 2015 13:33:04, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> We want to backport that to jessie, don't we? I mean a minimal fix.
Yes, we do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: severity -1 normal
On 08/02/2015 01:33 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> 2015-08-01 22:36 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose :
>> reopen 791165
>> severity 791165 serious
>> tags 791165 + confirmed
>> retitle 791165 libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the
>> default
>>
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #791165 [src:libsdl-sge] libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC
5 is the default
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
791165: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
2015-08-01 22:36 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose :
> reopen 791165
> severity 791165 serious
> tags 791165 + confirmed
> retitle 791165 libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the
> default
> thanks
>
> this is exactly what you should *not* do:
>
> libsdl-sge (030809dfsg-5) unstable; urge
Your message dated Sat, 01 Aug 2015 23:05:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#789914: fixed in apache2 2.4.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #789914,
regarding apache2: fails to install: ERROR: Module mpm_event is enabled -
cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled fi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #791072 [src:icu] icu: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the
default
Added tag(s) pending.
--
791072: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791072
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Matthias,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
You missed attaching the patch, but I think you mean the one I do attach.
> this is exactly what should *not* be done. A simple rebuild changing the
> symbols
> without rena
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 791165
Bug #791165 {Done: m...@debian.org (Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo)}
[src:libsdl-sge] libsdl-sge: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the
default
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
al
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #791072 [src:icu] icu: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the
default
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #791072 [src:icu] icu: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the
default
Added tag(s)
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #794045 [hashdeep] hashdeep: fails to upgrade from md5deep/experimental
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
794045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'md5deep' in 'experimental' to hashdeep in sid.
While this is a problem, experimental packages are not widely used and I
don't think this justif
On 2015-08-01 20:47:19, Christian Garbs wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 01:02:15PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for gbsplay (versioned as 0.0.91-1.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it lon
On 01.08.2015 21:34, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. I'll see how I can handle this in piuparts
> properly. You don't have any debconf question I could preseed to
> configure this?
No. One more option is maybe you could get rid of the daptup hook using dpkg
path filtering (d
Your message dated Sat, 01 Aug 2015 19:04:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794329: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.144
has caused the Debian Bug report #794329,
regarding gdc-multilib: uninstallable in sid: Depends: gdc (>= 4:5.2.1-2), but
sid has gdc (5.2.1-2)
to be marked as done.
This me
* Elimar Riesebieter [2015-08-01 20:54 +0200]:
> Pick up the chance to upgrade to 5.17.
Should be 3.17.
Elimar
--
Numeric stability is probably not all that
important when you're guessing;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Package: gnote
Version: 3.16.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to the transition to gcc-5 gnote needs a rebuild against
libgcc1. Otherwise it would be removed or substituded by tomboy
which blows up installations with mono stuff. Pick up the chance to
upgrade to 5.17.
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 01:02:15PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for gbsplay (versioned as 0.0.91-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Hello Sebastian,
thanks for the NMU!
We've done a new
Thanks for the explanation. I'll see how I can handle this in piuparts
properly. You don't have any debconf question I could preseed to
configure this?
The output limit was introduced primarily to catch packages outputting
continuously while being caught in a loop.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 794320 - moreinfo
Bug #794320 [exim4-config] main option "prdr_enable" unknown
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
794320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
> It should, that's the default path embedded in the libs. The en variable
> might be used to override it.
As I said, doing
unset QT_PLUGIN_PATH
and then running anything qt4 does not work either.
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
s
Hi,
Quoting Stephan Sürken (2015-08-01 10:55:52)
> Ok, switching to autoreconf (with b-d on ui-auto) is an option I will
> consider.
>
> Could you ponder a bit more why you think this is a policy violation? It
> seems a bit harsh considering how autotools work, and everything can be
> rebuild wit
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Package: exim4-config
> > Version: 4.86-1
> > Severity: serious
>
> > After updating an old testing system I get this:
>
> > Setting up exim4-config (4.86-1) ...
> > 2015-08-01 15:04:52 Exim configuration error in line 140 of
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 794320 + moreinfo
Bug #794320 [exim4-config] main option "prdr_enable" unknown
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
794320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + amule-utils-gui
Bug #794334 [ea-utils] ea-utils: /usr/bin/alc already used by amule-utils-gui
Added indication that 794334 affects amule-utils-gui
--
794334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Package: ea-utils
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: affects -1 + amule-utils-gui
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
Package: cpl-plugin-naco-calib
Version: 4.4.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the sever
On Saturday 01 August 2015 09:22:30 Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
[snip]
> > The Debian qt4-x11 build looks for plugins in /usr/lib//qt4/plugins.
> > That's why it loads the breeze style even when the path is not explicitly
> > listed in QT_PLUGIN_PATH.
>
> I don't think it does load it without the env-v
Package: sssd-common
Version: 1.12.5-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + sssd
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package deletes an
(obsolete) conffile owned another package.
The chosen approach is wrong since it does not updat
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + sssd
Bug #794332 [sssd-common] sssd-common: deletes conffile owned by sssd:
/etc/logrotate.d/sssd
Added indication that 794332 affects sssd
--
794332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794332
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
Package: gdc-multilib
Version: 4:5.2.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is not
installable in sid:
gdc-multilib/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: gdc (>= 4:5.2.1-2)
gdc-multilib/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: g
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Not sure if that is happening here. But fixing [2] and making sure
> pvscan is run via /bin/systemd-run look like should be done in any
> case.
>
> Michael
>
>
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Package: xmail
Severity: serious
The last upstream release in was 2010, that's also when the last
maintainer upload occured. It has longstanding RC bugs and already
missed jessie. popcon is marginal and we have many good mail servers
in Debian as alternatives.
If anyone disgrees with the removal,
Processing control commands:
> tags 777862 + pending
Bug #777862 [src:gbsplay] gbsplay: ftbfs with GCC-5
Added tag(s) pending.
--
777862: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777862
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Control: tags 777862 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gbsplay (versioned as 0.0.91-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
diff -u gbsplay-0.0.91/debian/changelog gbsplay-0.0.91/debian/changelog
Control: severity -1 important
ael [2015-08-01 7:11 +0100]:
> Back to the i386 machine, the target in this report: when I tried to
> apt-get upgrade in case the bug had been fixed, it hung on systemd
> because udev could not be upgraded. The udev refusal to upgrade came
> with a message from dpk
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #794264 [systemd] systemd: System will no longer boot
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
794264: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794264
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
On 2015-08-01 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Package: exim4-config
> Version: 4.86-1
> Severity: serious
> After updating an old testing system I get this:
> Setting up exim4-config (4.86-1) ...
> 2015-08-01 15:04:52 Exim configuration error in line 140 of
> /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated.tmp:
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.86-1
Severity: serious
After updating an old testing system I get this:
Setting up exim4-config (4.86-1) ...
2015-08-01 15:04:52 Exim configuration error in line 140 of
/var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated.tmp:
main option "prdr_enable" unknown
Invalid new config
# lsof -n | wc -l
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system /run/user/1000/gvfs
Output information may be incomplete.
92842
# lsof -n | tr -s ' ' | cut -f2 -d' ' | uniq -c | sort -n | tail -10
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system /run/user/1000/gvfs
Package: gdm3
Version: 3.14.1-7
Severity: serious
This occurred on a jessie system using the default GNOME 3 desktop.
My laptop screen had been locked for a while. I typed the password and
nothing happened. After a few seconds, the screen went blank again.
Looking at journalctl I observed:
g
Hi Johannes!
On Di, 2015-07-28 at 17:31 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Source: ui-gxmlcpp
> Version: 1.4.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
(...)
> the source package for ui-gxmlcpp includes a ./configure and
> ../aclocal.m4 without including their source. If ./configure and
Your message dated Sat, 01 Aug 2015 10:10:14 +0200
with message-id <55bc7ee6.2000...@debian.org>
and subject line now fixed in gcc-5 5.2.1-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #778112,
regarding schroot: ftbfs with GCC-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Package: dahdi
Version: 1:2.10.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
After installing debain testing weekly build (from 2015-07-27) and installing
DAHDI modules:
sudo apt-get install module-assistant
sudo mo
Your message dated Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:48:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#776292: fixed in ffrenzy 1.0.2~svn20150731-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #776292,
regarding ffrenzy: FTBFS with -Werror
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Hello,
> Could you check with "ldd /usr/bin/qweborf".
> That'll shows which Qt library is used.
It's python. It uses pyqt4.
I am attaching the ldd output for subsurface, which is a C++ thing that uses
Qt4.
> The Debian qt4-x11 build looks for plugins in /usr/lib//qt4/plugins.
> That's why it loa
Package: python-ironic
Version: 2015.1.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
All this package needs is an upload to rebuild it with the current sqlalchemy.
This is blocking sqlalchemy transition to testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.o
63 matches
Mail list logo
